When did Mbappe play in the centre-forward position? I had a look at like 7 or 8 games just right now and he either plays left wing or half-center forward together with Messi. I can't even remember when he played a centre-forward game, he usually prefers to attack from the left-wing anyway.
Yeah Mbappe never play as center forward, but even though he's play as left wing position, he's good in finishing, that's why center forward position looks better for him. If Kane replace Messi, there's could be an internal problem because both Kane and Mbappe will trying to beat each other which is not good. It would be like France national club where Benzema didn't play when Mbappe is playing. |
|
|
|
After successfully earn two merits by creating this thread , now you want to create a similar thread in order to earn merit, correct?  Twitch has a rule to prohibit their streamers to stream gambling, I don't see any reason why anyone should know the top streamers who're stream gambling. Twitch isn't supporting them, so everyone who support those streamers are definitely don't care about terms of service, maybe this is why most people always complaint about KYC when they want to withdraw. |
|
|
|
One thing with gambling sites is that, once their lack the capacity of developing their original games they tend to rely on a long on other games vendors to supply their games and at most, the revenue is shared between the casino and games providers this has reduced the total revenue of the casino and that is why developing their own original games is better even though it may have immediate cost on the casino also requires some extra hands in terms of games developers.
But all the same, we can expect something huge from Flush, since they have taken this long to come up with that and definitely it will be worth the wait.
There's nothing wrong to rely on other gambling providers because creating own original games has no guarantee there's a lot gamblers interested about that game, it's mean the casino just spend more money than the profit they earn. Most of original games are simple too, it's not really interesting to compared to gambling providers games. If the gambling providers charge a lot revenue and it make the casino can't earn more money, the casino can just add requirement rollover, charge extra withdrawal fee etc. |
|
|
|
You were right in there. Merits are not given to all great posts in the forum, so you can’t tell that those who have not been merited are completely making pointless discussion. Everyone has their own idea or concept on the given thread so I think there’s no right or wrong here. It’s just that some posts were favored by other members so they leave merits for them while some posts may still be good and reasonable but have not gained attention by most of the members.
It doesn't make sense if someone regularly make high quality posts and they not receive any merit, merit sources are everywhere in this forum, other people could just merit them or report it to this thread [self-moderated] Report unmerited good posts to Merit Source. But it's obviously ranking isn't the only one thing to judge someone post quality, a new newbie rank and low number of posts might be a good poster, but if there's a newbie rank with high number of posts e.g. 1000+ and he only receive 10 merits. It's obviously a spammer or shitposter. |
|
|
|
|
It's not really change anything, it just mean you're reply to particular subject, but your post are still stay on the thread where you post.
Mine post is the example because I change the subject when reply in this thread.
AFAIK there's no punishment if you change your subject, but if you wrote someone personal information or death threat in your subject, it would definitely broke the forum rule.
|
|
|
|
Indeed, exchanges do not force us to trust and deposit money in them, it is all about supply and demand. If the OP is just a holder, then he doesn't need to use centralized exchanges, no one forces him to do it, and he doesn't need to constantly talk bad about them either.
Everything is at risk, whether centralized or decentralized, so we need to worry and always have a backup plan. Even if our assets are kept in cold wallets, nothing is 100% guaranteed, so always be on the lookout for anything.
Everything has a risk, but the risk in cold wallet is come from the holder, there's no intervention from outside who's control your coins. Can you trust your money with someone you don't know who's him? if I promise your coins will be safe if you send it to me, would you trust me with all of your hard earned money? Centralized exchange do force every users to trust them, they promise they have a very good security, their exchange is safe, their exchange is better than other etc. |
|
|
|
|
If the casino is regulated and comply all of the rules, the casino can launch an Initial Public Offering where anyone who's interested to invest, has an option to buy the casino's stock. But crypto casino is only has Curacao license, it's really a weak regulation, not to mention many countries are unban and ban crypto whenever they want. This will be a problem if the crypto casino want to launch IPO, this will cause FUD for them.
|
|
|
|
|
In the end, if you think you can beat the casino through lucky based games, you're only dreaming. Before the casino launch the welcome bonus, they have calculated it and make sure most of the gamblers will lose, if they're giving welcome bonus in order to make the gamblers win, they will going to bankrupt ASAP.
It's not about deposit bonus, but wager contest, rakeback, etc something involved in lucky based games aren't ways to beat the house.
|
|
|
|
|
Nope, I wouldn't become aggressive if someone define me as an addicted gambler. I will ask him or them for few questions and reasons why they said I'm an addict, I will going to debate with him or them and if I lose, I will admit if I was an addict.
But the way I control myself of how much I spent for gambling, how long I gamble, and how I view gambling, are far than can be said as an addict which is looks unbelievable if someone say I'm an addict.
|
|
|
|
but I was disappointed that actmyname didn't take the time to check whether what was tagged had changed or not.
You should check the thread before, previously he tagged 460 users but currently there are only 413 users which mean he has at least removed 47 users from the list. It is just a neutral tag, not red tag.
Stop generalizing it's just a neutral tag, if you get tagged with him, I believe your chance to get accepted into signature campaign is lower than other users. Not to mention few campaign managers will kick you immediately after you get tagged. But I still see people have that tag and they have good posts.
I mean, you're not the one who get tagged, they must be aware of the tag and they're trying to get rid off from it, if they don't care, it's their choice. |
|
|
|
Actually this problem is not easy especially since the adoption of Bitcoin has not reached the global level, at that time when we get global adoption this will be a big dilemma and we will need real quick solutions.
Before Bitcoin reached the true global adoption, there's a progress behind that and many people will talk about the high fees in Bitcoin. There's will be a solution about that if there's no change or movement after few months. Previously BRC-20 tokens make the Bitcoin price high for around 1-2 weeks, it's still short. The latest development on Bitcoin chain e.g. taproot seems not make any big change compared to segwit, sooner or later L2 chain would be the easiest solution. |
|
|
|
You create an accusation against other casino when the problem because of yourself for not read the whole terms before make a deposit to get the bonus Just got scammed by Trustdice.win stay away and before than that, you're selling 3 verified Binance accounts and Binance has a terms for one person use one account, do you consider you're legit person? The Binance Account can only be used by the account registrant. Binance reserves the right to suspend, freeze or cancel the use of Binance Accounts by persons other than account registrant. You don't know what behind of the accusation, all you do are only believe of the accuser. |
|
|
|
Helena, The first thing you need to accept is that you don't take things like this too personally.
Although the trust lists are public and everyone can see them, it is still some kind of personal opinion of each member. For some reason, rby felt that your opinion did not match his understanding, so he decided to put you on his distrust list. What is a solid reason for you, does not have to be the same for me or rby, or any member here.
I didn't taking any personal, no hard feelings, I always try to become objective. Example in this case where I leave a neutral feedback because there's no solid evidence even though there are DT members were leave negative feedback. "Personal opinion of each other", I don't think it's correct when you distrust someone because of your disagreement, put on ignore list could be an option. I just presented how JollyGood, with his trust list, explains to all the dissenters why he gave them a tilde.  OP, no one owes you anything. A person can put a tilde sign for any action, maybe rby does not want to trust you without any explanation, especially in public. And this is a better action than leaving reviews, which are sometimes without reason. Just accept the rule that you can't be loved by everyone. JollyGood is an exception because he have contributed a lot, just like other controversial DT members. If he don't want to trust me, it should be in the middle of trust and distrust which is neutral, if he distrust me that's mean he not trust everything I do in this forum. It's true any user can leave any feedback, include exclude someone in their trustlist, create flag etc, but everyone are always stick with this rule LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system Do's and Don'ts- Don't exclude users from your Trust list based on retaliation. It's okay to trust someone's judgement, even when he doesn't trust yours.
|
|
|
|
I distrust him because he give a positive feedback to bbigtart who was previously busted someone wearing double signature. Firstly he didn't give a positive feedback, but the first one is robelneo, I suggest him to change his positive feedback to neutral feedback, but after few posts I realized rby sent a positive feedback to and disagree with my point. But two weeks later someone busted bbigtart was using AI to post, this make robelneo delete his positive feedback and rby change his positive feedback to neutral feedback. I remember someone warned both of us, but we still proceeded to hand the positive feedback to the user for bursting scam  I didn't delete my positive feedback, rather I turned it to neutral while being able to capture the AI writing as a reason to change feedback from positive to neutral. I don't to be hard on my trust list, but I just want to wait for few months to see their progress either they will start to change their habit to leave a positive feedback to a worthy user or not. That's why I not exclude them when they already delete/change their positive feedback before. Now the funny thing rby distrust me, without any solid reason!He didn't reach my PM to talk about the reason I distrust him, so I'd better to open a new thread and explain it here. Did I distrust or trust wrong user? did I leave an inappropriate feedback or flag? did I support or oppose a flag? show me. This is retaliation distrust, can this be said as abuse of trust list? |
|
|
|
If I really want to make money out of anything by lending it out it will not be Bitcoin, I have to use a separate fund to buy Ethereum and stake it or lend it out for some rewards over time, it's true that there is no point holding your coins in your wallet for years when you can make more coins but I just don't like the idea because it's risky.
There's no difference either you use Bitcoin or Ethereum, if you stake your coins, it mean you're taking a risk to lose all of your coins. This mean you're still want to stake your coins, but with small amount of money. if asked to choose to hold or lend my bitcoin, I prefer to hold it, even when the loan has collateral and a few percent interest. why is that? because I don't want the assets that I hold to be in the hands of other people, and when I need them, I can't sell or withdraw them directly.
You're not making any sense. If the borrower give a valid collateral, you don't need to worry because you can sell it if he can't pay back the loan. Usually the collateral is more valuable or expensive than the amount you lend, so you're making a profit. |
|
|
|
I support Cz with reasons that binance has done alot to earn it's communities trust,helping millions of users in the crypto ecosystem,and has more durable marketing strategy whereas the Sec is government driven and wants to control everybody.
Do you think Binance doesn't want to control everybody? why did they force their customers to complete KYC verification when they were not? Even though centralized exchange make people easier to buy Bitcoin and convert to fiat, but if people only know to buy Bitcoin must use a centralized exchange, doesn't know about private key or seed phrase as they only know email and password etc, it will confuse many newbies since they think there's no such be your own bank in Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
|
No one can answer it, because it's full of speculation and conspiracy, we can only make a guess.
No one know what SEC is trying to get in this case and as you know human is really hard to understand.
SEC is just crackdown on Binance, that's.
What anyone should do is move their money to a non custodial wallet and try to learn to use a decentralized exchange or P2P sites to make sure you're invulnerable against of centralization.
|
|
|
|
Both gambling and investing in bitcoins are risky but the difference is that if you lose gambling your funds will be gone immediately and your balance will be zero. But if you invest in Bitcoin, even if the price of Bitcoin goes down, you can hold it for a long time and at some point it will recover your losses and give you a profit. So investing in Bitcoin and gambling are not the same. Investing in bitcoins will save you some money but gambling and losing will not save your money in any way. So if you can stay away from gambling it will be great for you but you can continue to invest in Bitcoin but in this case you must be patient and hold Bitcoin for long time.
Yeah, as long as you still hold and not sell your Bitcoin during dump season, you're not lose, but it's still an unrealized lose. The @OP is promoting gambling site, it's hilarious if he need to stay away from gambling because he need to gamble, exploring and know about it as his campaign need to post in gambling section. If @OP want to stay away from gambling, he need to avoid anything related with gambling in the first place. But it doesn't mean gambling is bad, gambling is good if you have a good self control and money management. |
|
|
|
No Bitcoin exchange pays the fee for us as the fee will be deducted from our total withdrawal.
And if that's the case, your withdrawal amount will decrease but it's okay if you withdraw a large amount of money.
As far as I know, the exchange doesn't take up to 2 days to receive your Bitcoin because that's what I experienced.
For the fees, we can't resist high transaction fees because the exchange has to adjust the transaction fees according to the conditions that occur on the network.
To deal with high fees, you need to be patient and wait until the transaction costs can go down but if you are not willing to wait, you have to pay high fees.
The exchange only adjust the fee when the current condition on the network is increase, if the network is empty and back to normal, they will not reduce their fee. If they will adjust the fee every second with the current condition on the network, no one will complain about the high fee on centralized exchange. The reason why withdrawal on centralized exchange is fast because the fee they charge are more than the cost of high priority fee. |
|
|
|
Its a very good news for Liverpool fans that Mac Allister just signed the contract. The transfer fee is just 35m euro.
It can’t believes that Liverpool signed a world class player only 35m. Liverpool knows the transfer policy very well.
I say it surly that no other teams can make it happens with this transfer fees. Its a big deal for Liverpool. They will sign two more midfielder’s to competitive the PL tittle and back to the champions League in next season.
I think Mac Allister will prove himself so early with the best team in England.
Brighton is stupid to let Mac Allister join Liverpool for only 35M Euros, they should earn more than that. Brighton is bad to negotiate with other team about their player, they need to learn from Atletico Madrid where Atletico Madrid tend to find a loophole to make money from their players. Even Liverpool reject Brighton's offer due to too high, I don't see anything wrong for Mac Allister to keep playing in Brighton, just wait until other team interested to spend big amount of money. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
