Last Payout 13 hours ago
Are you guys aiming at daily payouts now?
My last payout was 11 hours ago. I guess something is wrong not with payouts itself but with exchanges. "Unexchanged" is really high for me. |
|
|
|
Hi UdjinM6,
You able to post your address or PM me your address so i can run a check for you?
Thanks
Hi there! I already switched my miner to another pool about an hour ago and now stats suddenly shows "Estimated amount from confirmed coins ready to payout so far: 0.03337936". So it's back to something more "normal". But just in case you have some history records - here you go http://stats.altcoinplex.com/users/bitcoin/13w3Q6s6vTbfpQo3eZ4cDCwVGDNDgaamnh.htmlHope it'll help you find a problem. EDIT: payout occurred just at the time I posted so it's 0 now |
|
|
|
I'm refreshing stats today and every time I do this I can see "Estimated amount from confirmed coins ready to payout so far" is ridiculously low and keep decreasing (and no payouts made btw) WTH is going on?  If the payout is the same time as yesterday, it'll be in about 90 minutes. I hope it will be ok but stats looks scary Estimated amount from confirmed coins ready to payout so far: 0.00062806
and few minutes later Estimated amount from confirmed coins ready to payout so far: 0.00062768
another few minutes and Estimated amount from confirmed coins ready to payout so far: 0.00062719
and it's not the amount I'd be happy with pointing my 5 mh/s miner to this pool |
|
|
|
I'm refreshing stats today and every time I do this I can see "Estimated amount from confirmed coins ready to payout so far" is ridiculously low and keep decreasing (and no payouts made btw) WTH is going on? |
|
|
|
I'm working on EU and Asia servers to launch and split the load. Current server is overloaded with all the traffic/hashpower it got. Stay tuned!I do wish Terk would take down that announcement that the Rejects issue is resolved. It clearly is not!
I totally forgot it's out there in the first post. Removed. Increased rejects are because of performance problems. New servers around the globe should reduce it. cool! but do you mean they will autobalance or should I manually point my miners to the closest one? |
|
|
|
now: { "blocks" : 226470, "currentblocksize" : 0, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : 913676.75432575, "errors" : "", "generate" : false, "genproclimit" : -1, "hashespersec" : 0, "pooledtx" : 0, "testnet" : false } yes, this one http://bit.usr.sh:2750/chain/Unobtanium and my wallet are at the same block you posted but http://rockchain.info/chain/Unobtanium stuck  |
|
|
|
Holy crap God is mining Litecoin!!! it is 830 MHS now. It must be a bot or ASIC miners or 1000 R9 290X cards. only the user can tell. it's 3+ gh/s now  |
|
|
|
|
hmm... 0.034 for 5 mh/s .... ~0.007 per 1 mh/s
for another 5 mh/s on clever i got 0.053
i'm out
|
|
|
|
Oi, no anger.. just confusion.
I have a steady ping of 80ms to us.clevermining.com, but i'm still seeing 27% reject rate. I like how Clevermining is setup, but that's almost 10x the loss of other pools, some of which have even worse pings to the server from my location.
Could we get an explanation of what's happening? It doesn't seem to just be a network connection issue..
hmm, avg ping for me is 280ms and reject rate is ~7%... it's definitely not a network issue from my point of view something is wrong with your config maybe |
|
|
|
EDIT: Payout on CM is much better than MC for the last week. Was testing the waters and am going to stay  So in the interest of perhaps changing the subject off the reject rates (last couple hundred posts!) I was wondering something about pools in general. The more Hash Power your pool has (for example CM has just gone from 1Gh earlier this week to 6Gh today) does it increase the overall profits for the miners within the pool.
I actually have no idea how the overall effect of having so much more hash power would have on your individual miners as whole...does it even make a difference after a certain point? Maybe someone can edumacate me on this considering this is probably the fastest growing pool right now I just wonder if we should applaud more users/bigger pool/ high hash or rather keep it quiet and hope it doesn't get to big? was wondering about this too. time will show  |
|
|
|
wow! I don't know where it's all heading to but I like to see such activity here (few days ago I really thought this coin is more dead then alive) still believe in COINO and holding every single coin(o) I mined  |
|
|
|
oh, come on guys, why being so rude to each other?  Minerist, there is no 30% rejects already, this issue is fixed now. I posted my hashrate and rejects stats few messages before - take a look. And to everyone who is still worrying about those rejects %% - I posted my profits stats there too, you can see they are really close to numbers you see on the top of the site. |
|
|
|
If you have 10 MH/s and are getting 30% rejects, the system shows you are 7 MH/s. When these rates of BTC per MH/s are being quoted, are they on accepted MH/s or the total MH/s? If it does not include reject %, and say waffle is only 10% rejects, then waffle is the better pool. Can someone explain to me how CleverMining is getting so many rejects considering its hash power has gone up significantly? Its a problem with Terks code it seems. Considering Waffle had 1GH last week and there was amost less than 1% of rejects. I am tired of seeing the phrase its normal, its not.
there is no need to worry about rejects as far as you get high profit: waffel 0.0093 clever 0.011 I'm running 5mh/s on clever and I have this - "Last 24h Profits 0.05380326 BTC" so it's really close to 0.011 per mh/s per day and I'm pretty happy with that Well, I checked again. I have 5.2 mh/s reported by cgminer to be precise. The "system" shows me 5.2 and "Rejected: 0.3 MH/s (5.6%)" for the last hour. Also I get "4.8 MH/s 24-hour Average". As far as I can see on hashrate graph it became a lot more stable now and I expect 24-hour Average to grow a little. But even if it stays as it is I'm fine. |
|
|
|
Can someone explain to me how CleverMining is getting so many rejects considering its hash power has gone up significantly? Its a problem with Terks code it seems. Considering Waffle had 1GH last week and there was amost less than 1% of rejects. I am tired of seeing the phrase its normal, its not.
there is no need to worry about rejects as far as you get high profit: waffel 0.0093 clever 0.011 I'm running 5mh/s on clever and I have this - "Last 24h Profits 0.05380326 BTC" so it's really close to 0.011 per mh/s per day and I'm pretty happy with that EDIT: btw, congrats on 6 gh/s! keep growing! |
|
|
|
Coino removed from CoinMarketCap ? Why ? Due to its price decrease ?
it is still there, but you have to look on the next site... it isn't anymore under the top 100 98th again |
|
|
|
Is there any chance to see the accepted and rejected hash rate for more then last hour ? Last 24hours would be ok or something like last 7 days...
I'm not looking very often on stats and would like see possible reason's of lower payouts then expected.
Much appreciated for great support and superb pool.
+1 I'm not sure it should be №1 in todo list but would be nice to have rejects tab on the same graph as (24h) hashrate. But even until it's done you can take a look at (24h) hashrate tab and I'm sure you can get some ideas about your rejects |
|
|
|
|
web frontend always was a bit slow for me (like 5-10 sec to load) and I just noticed that it became blazing fast! good work!
EDIT: also I have to mention that I'm happy with 24h payouts so far (even with 5-10% rejects) and will keep mining here for more
|
|
|
|
site down |
|
|
|
thanks for an update and congrats on reaching 5 gh/s! not bad, I'll keep mining here for some more time |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
