So you can't prove we're on a spinning sphere in a vacuum going around a million mile wide thermonuclear bomb at 66,600 miles per hour yourself? Have you considered suicide instead of linking to unscientific mainstream media propaganda?
|
|
|
^^^ Gravity is bullshit converted into text and printed onto paper, it exists only as words of malice.
|
|
|
^^^ NASA lies about the height of their vehicle assembly building so flat earthers can't use the numbers they provide to prove the earth is not a globe with P900 photos from the highway.
NASA is the source of the "official" atmosphereic refraction tables used by "modern science" and if they claim refraction is causing the building to be lifted up over the curve they'll contradict their own numbers, so they lie about the height.
|
|
|
^^^ The textured surface would grind against you as it turns, not only would you feel it but you're likely to get an Indian burn.
Relative motion, the Earth has been spinning for billions of years. Initially, there was a violent reaction as the star was born, as such if you accelerate to 100 km/hr very quickly you feel the G force, but then feel nothing. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_10iBEFhvcMA train traveling 400-600 KM/hr, and the coin stands vertically upwards stably. The Earth is like the train moving and you are on it. Your lack of science and knowledge is quite outstanding Go back to your flat earth nonsense. "modern science" being completely devoid of the scientific method refuses to acknowledge that Relativity has been falsified by direct measurement. Apparently the "official global narrative" being force fed to the masses takes precedent over the facts. Time-frames of billions of years is unreasonable, there's no proof of these ridiculous spans of time on Earth. The creation story told by "modern science" to support the "official global narrative" is the only reason this fallacy exists. You claim the Earth is rotating, thus it would experience a constant acceleration. What kind of science claims acceleration is the same as a constant velocity? Who's peddling nonsense here asshole? fake edit: Gravity is an unproven theory created by "modern science" to support the "official global narrative" and doesn't adequately explain, the lack of an explosion the shear stress an Earth sized flywheel made of molten lava would create, not to mention how it can allow an 8,000 mile wide flywheel spinning a 1,000 MPH out of a liquid with no container.
|
|
|
^^^ The textured surface would grind against you as it turns, not only would you feel it but you're likely to get an Indian burn.
|
|
|
^^^ How big can we make this thread? Anybody who rides in a car absolutely knows that the earth is not motionless. I mean, jump out at 60mph, and just see how motionless it is. And drive the mountains to see that the earth is not flat. notbatman and his BS. Bullshit you say? You're neglecting the fact that you [globalist] claim we're rotating at 15°/hour and, that angular motion of a constant velocity causes an acceleration with somewhere in the neighborhood of ~14 grams of force being imparted on the average person. A person can't feel 14g of force you say? He wants you [the reader] to drive to the mountains so your ears will pop and you'll be disoriented. Balance is your sixth sense not that Hollywood and sci-fi BS, the 3rd eye is a fucking eye and it's part of your vision motherfuckers! The Earth is motionless. High altitudes can also fuck up your car, it might go into safemode or shutdown completely and you'll have to tow it back to the dealer for a reset and a massive bill, dealerships you know, oh and towing from the top of a mountain, LOL!
Hey BADecker tell us, does refraction make a light source appear higher or lower?
|
|
|
The Earth is flat and motionless. ... [refraction bending up]I love how when viewing a ship vanishing at the horizon suddenly refraction (and perspective) doesn't exist. The flat earther is a retarded idiot for not accepting the ship went up, over and behind a convex dome of water thus proving the globe. [no refraction]How about Eratosthenes experiments with sticks and/or wells and the shadows cast? It's funny that refraction doesn't exist for that experiment and the flat earther is a retarded idiot for not accepting that the shadows prove the globe. [no refraction]What about when somebody posts a video to YouTube they made with their P900 of a lighthouse, the entire lighthouse including the shore being visible when it should be hidden by curvature. The globalist claims refraction lifted the lighthouse up allowing us to see behind the curve of the earth, and claims the flat earther is a retarded idiot for not understanding science. [refraction bending up]So what the fuck, refraction bends up when they need it to then doesn't exist when it's convenient? Mate you should go off yourself quietly instead of promoting this fucking conspiracy.
|
|
|
^^^ Here's a flat earth timeline. 1. I had issues in elementary school with teachers when introduced to the AE projection map on a ferry boat field trip. 2. I had more issues with the same teachers when I pointed out NASA photographs of the Moon landings where composite images the same as in Star Wars and Dune. 3. The teachers worked directly with NASA. 4. I was selected for the first use of PC computers in the school system; Commodore 64. 5. I accidentally froze the computer and it locked a picture of a witch riding a broom I drew on the screen and I got banned from using the computers. 6. I'm guessing God sent people who told me point blank the Earth is flat and how to prove it, but I had succumb to the globe propaganda. It was a combination of gravity, guys like Carl Sagan and the NASA zero-G space shuttle flying movie studio. 7. I never really got over the fake Moon landing photographs, I also got good at identifying hoaxed UFO/flying saucer images. 8. I play a lot of video games. 9. I can see the Mars rover images are stitched together with a computer algorithm from source photographic material that could only come from where lemmings are native. 10. Something's wrong with the big bang theory and how they say the Sun works. 11. If they're faking the Moon and they're faking Mars then they must be faking the Earth and scamming everybody, but how I'm standing here? 12. Holy crap the Earth is flat. 13. Watch stand-up comedy video by an artist who had contracts with NASA, watch video by Eric Dubay, watch video by My perspective. As you can see YouTube came last.
|
|
|
As another Flat Earther put it, you know the one that National Geographic interviewed, and I'm paraphrasing here "we can enter an age of chaos or a golden age".
The true history two, three, four? hundred years ago referenced only as the brief failed Victorian era or they add 10,000 years and call it Atlantis, this is already coming to light. Shitty publishers of shitty history book referenced by shitty multimedia and shitty teachers may control flow of information with an iron grasp but, there's really a lot of old buildings that tell a different story, especially in Russia (Tartan) and the US (Dutch East India Co?). Look back in time and the buildings get better and better, high-tech stuff. (((They've))) been so successful in re-writing history I'm just taking shots in that dark here but the official narrative I can say is 100% bullshit!
What shit architecture we have today BTW!
|
|
|
^^^ They needed a flash bomb big enough to hoax nuclear weapons to photograph it (with a telescope)...
There are currently 6.5 million Flat Earthers in the US. | Source: National Geographic.
|
|
|
I don't think we can talk about flat earth or globe earth because we have never seen the original shape.
Get the concept of "outer space" and the "big bang" universe out of your head, we're in an enclosed system. Gravity and the claim that all matter has a pulling force by virtue of its weight alone, is not only an unproven theory but scientifically unsound and not consistent with physics derived through experiment and observation. There's so much "magic" that gravity has to perform to maintain an 8,000 mile wide spinning sphere covered with liquid and gas in a hard vacuum that the globe is a literal impossibility. We can't see the universe or the original shape as you put it from outside our enclosed system but, we can see the land and the sea [Earth] and it's observably and measurably flat.
|
|
|
^^^ Sure, I'll put than in my bucket list along with the Antarctic expedition...
BTW there's 24 hour light in Antarctica during the summer because it's close to the concave mirror and the light wraps around, there is no 24 hour Sun like there is in the Arctic. The Sun scrolls across the horizon like a 2D video game for some hours then goes out of sight while it travels around.
This same effect is observable in Australia to all-be-it to much lesser extent, you can see the sideways motion of the sunlight just before sunrise and just after sunset there.
Why do you have to go to Antarctica? Just fly high enough and take a picture or use a telescope to observe the dome? I read (((they))) used a giant flash bomb in Antarctica (cover story was the nuke hoax) and got photographs of the dome. fake edit: Hey wikileaks, you should hang out some relevant images from Antarctica for a limited time. The images posted so-far leave much to be desired... bonus video: Antarctica - Sorry We're Closed! Our Hidden Flat Earth -- https://youtu.be/NPbhHpeHTiE (30:05)
|
|
|
"...Almost nothing in SpaceX is original..."
A coat of paint and a little extension and it's ready to go!
|
|
|
^^^ Sure, I'll put than in my bucket list along with the Antarctic expedition...
BTW there's 24 hour light in Antarctica during the summer because it's close to the concave mirror and the light wraps around, there is no 24 hour Sun like there is in the Arctic. The Sun scrolls across the horizon like a 2D video game for some hours then goes out of sight while it travels around.
This same effect is observable in Australia to all-be-it to much lesser extent, you can see the sideways motion of the sunlight just before sunrise and just after sunset there.
|
|
|
^^^ More like petrified wood than deja vu if you ask me. If they gave the Dutch prime minister a piece of wood why would that auction be any less fraudulent?
"(PhysOrg.com) -- The Dutch national Rijksmuseum made an embarrassing announcement last week that one of its most loved possessions, a moon rock, is a fake -- just an old piece of petrified wood that's never been anywhere near the moon.
Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2009-09-moon-fake.html"edit: Does anybody remember that Bitcoin "hand crafted" woodcarving thread?
|
|
|
^^^ I've provided pieces of the dome and that's a whole lot more physical evidence than the big fat goose egg big G (gravity) can produce. Notice the yellow oxide on this piece of clearly manufactured steel alloy. The phenomenon of objects falling or more precisely sinking is an electrical phenomenon similar to electromigration that occurs between, the positive inner surface of the dome (+) and the negative surface of the Earth (-).
|
|
|
^^^ You're going straight to hell, you know that right?
"New users" can start with the Moon landing hoax. It may take a while for the understanding that we're inside a high-tech engineered structure to sink in. Once you start to see the scale of the lies told on every subject under the Sun it will be easier to deal with the bigger conspiracies. Here's a "random" video YouTube to start with: A Brief History of Moon Hoaxes - Why do people still believe in them? -- https://youtu.be/PT3ferYrmgU
|
|
|
In 2019, someone else believes in a flat land? How is this even possible? The cheapest option to check, launch a homemade satellite on a helium balloon with a camera and that's it. This is what the Earth looks like from a balloon.
|
|
|
You idiots have nothing but a big fat lie backed by organized crime. The Earth is a stationary plane covered by a steel dome.
|
|
|
|