Those question marks appear when someone has more positive points (total unique positive) than negative points (2^unique negatives) like in this case. It can't show it as green because there's a negative but showing only negative would probably be wrong too because of that many positives. Read more here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1066857.0

Having a sub-section for closed threads on every category would probably make sense, but that would be a lot of work for moderators. I'm not sure if it would be worth it. If users followed the guidelines and edited the title with [Closed] and locked the threads it wouldn't be required at all.
Regarding moving scams to that new sub-section I don't think it will ever happen because scams are not moderated. Mods can't (must not) lock or delete a thread if they think it's a scam and they certainly wouldn't be able to move the threads to that new section.

I can't give an opinion on Steam accounts as I don't have experience on that but 70 of your listed domains should be enough to cover the loan plus collateral. Personally the problem I see here is the long term of the loan. 3 months is a long time and some problems could arise. For example if BTC price goes up then the loan could become more than the collateral, also should the collateral need to be sold then the renew date would be too close for several domains after 3 months plus some grace period (if it's asked). There wouldn't be too much time to sell it and renewing 70 domains would be way too much.

I could give this loan if it's possible for you to take it for considerably less time. For example if 30 or 45 days would help you for about 0.15 or 0.2 BTC interest. We can discuss the exact interest and domains in that case.

Verified, archive of the post with the address.

However you should use an older address, and there's always the chance the account was sold. I'm leaving negative trust until you get it back or there's a proof the account was sold instead of hacked.

What domains exactly can you offer as collateral? I can fund the loan if the domain(s) can really be sold easily and immediately for more than BTC1.265 (very few can) and not only it was estimated by a site to be worth that amount. What registrar are your domains on? Will you push them to the lender/escrow's account?

There were 2 big differences in that case: first it wasn't sure it was a scam, there were just strong suspicious; and he stopped promoting it quite soon after a thread was opened and he read people's opinions. So we can't really compare your question with that case.

If you promote a scam and keep promoting it while knowing for sure it is a scam of course you would deserve negative trust and you would get it. Someone who knowingly  helps anyone to scam in any way and gets money to do so is definitely untrustworthy.

If you already know the site is a scam and you promote it anyway then you can be completely sure you will get negative trust.

Verified, the address was posted here.
Because of the amount and the long term I could do this only with your account as collateral, i.e. you wouldn't have access to it until the loan is repaid. Let me know if you'd consider this option. Of course escrow would be OK to hold the account if you prefer.

Then you mean you want free money and you will just take whatever amount you receive and never send anything back in any case? It's quite easy to fake a screenshot that 'proves' you lost the money. Fortunately nobody will send anything.

This is not funny and it looks like a (very poor) scam attempt. If it is a joke then you should lock this thread and move it to Archival, otherwise you could start receiving some negative feedback.

Yes newbies definitely see Staff members as representatives of the forum, even if it's not that way. The word 'Staff' kind of implies that.


Baseless? Stunna can check the IP addresses of the accounts:

And of course Admins should check the IPs here too and take other measures to confirm those are his alts before taking any actions.

Smarter? How does claiming multiple times from multiple accounts show any kind of smartness?
What EAL did (if confirmed, it seems it is) is definitely not trustworthy. I'm not sure if it deserves a trusted negative feedback -probably does- but it's definitely an untrustworthy behavior. I strongly believe staff members should be very trusted because they're somehow seen as representatives of the forum (regardless of whether they're really that or not). Unless EAL does a magnificent work as Staff then I agree he should be demoted. Admins should definitely check this.

Since you created an account just for this and considering PayPal can always be reversed no matter what nobody will (should) deal with you. There's no way to guarantee you won't charge back later, even 6 months after the deal is done. Using escrow or you sending first won't protect the seller. Beware of PayPal and other reversible transfer services

If you want to deal here try a non-reversible payment method. Otherwise try virwox or localbitcoins.

Hi. Unfortunately my experience doesn't include too much from games, I develop more utilities.
The faucet can be completely customized, however that's not included in the free offer. I'd need more information to give details and an estimate of time and cost.
Feel free to PM me.

My assumptions?  Sure I 'assumed' that based on the proofs I posted above.
Honestly I didn't expect you to remove your lies. That would have really surprised me.

There's at least one newbie account with a low post count on default trust. It's shown at the end of the list. I think that's the only one but I'm not completely sure.

It seems everybody scams OP!
Apparently I scammed him 4 times! 10 BTC each! according to the accusations he made in my profile. If only I could find those BTC40.

No, you didn't.

That's not how collateral works. You'd need to transfer them to the lender (or escrow) before receiving your fund in order for them to be considered collateral. If you offer to send them as repayment when you default the loan then there's no protection for the lender, it's just your word.


Only extraordinary domains are considered valid collateral. Most domains (including yours) are worth less than reg. fee.
In order to consider a collateral to be valid it must be possible to easily and quickly sell it for more than the loan amount plus interest. The fact you're having a hard time to sell them for even "10's of dollars" shows that condition is not met.

I will remove my feedback I left in your profile if most people think it's unfair and there isn't the slightest evidence as you have affirmed. I expect you to do the same if people think your feedback is wrong. Here's the proof of the feedback I've left:

Here you were selling a guide that allows people to scam by easily charging back payments: https://archive.is/KKafm
There I asked "Is this guide made to buy BTC or something else and then chargaback (i.e. scam) or to sell BTC or something else and then prevent a chargeback..." and you replied "it contains both versions and it works".
Regarding the part where I say you were lying. You posted this: "I tried my self with a 2nd paypal account and it worked like a charm" in OP and later you said you needed the money to buy the account in order to resell it because you didn't have it yet (unfortunately I can't find an archived version of the second page of the thread).

Here's the thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1009768.0
The guide (which is still online today) includes steps to buy hacked/carded accounts and how to commit fraud with it.

Before you were claiming the feedback you've received is just lies and without the slightest evidence. Now you finally accept at least you were a "scammer, cheater and many other things":

However before trying to suggest you changed you forgot to even remove the guide to commit fraud you shared.

---

OK I see:
I just posted evidence of the feedback I left. I hope you honor your word and remove the feedback you've left in my profile so you can claim you have "never left negative feedback to anyone without proof".

You left this feedback on Quickseller's profile today:
He left the feedback on 2015-04-30, when you were still active with your fraud guides, not today after creating this thread. So you lied here too.

The other feedback you've left are nonsense too. Let's see if you have some decency and remove them.
As I said I will remove mine if most trusted people think they're lies without "the slightest evidence".

As reference here's your feedback as it stands now: https://i.imgur.com/49tWMDV.png

No, OP is selling BTC, not buying it. The problem is he was demanding to be payed first without escrow. That's a common modus operandus of scammers. They give the excuse that PayPal is reversible and therefore there's no risk to send first. Of course that's not true. They usually get the payment in PayPal, withdraw it and never send the BTC. Then repeat with another PayPal account. The buyer may or may not be able to reverse the transaction and the PayPal account may or may not be in control of the scammer by then.
Once he noted no one would deal with him without escrow he invented a deal and fled with lame excuses.

Because unfortunately people trust scams and there's no way to know whether you're one of them. I'm doing my best to stop more scams from happening. Sometimes I do receive negative trust back as revenge, while annoying of course that won't stop me.
All you have to do is offer valid collateral so everyone is safe. You can use a very trusted escrow to keep the collateral so you're not scammed either.