|
You can look at the top of this thread for one example.
Look asshole, stop with the smear campaign against me. I know that you did the same thing to TF when he gave you negative trust, and you are doing the same thing to me.
There has not been one person to disagree that you scammed TF/CoinChat, although the question remains as to how much. As soon as people start disagreeing with you, the thread simply gets locked.
At the end of the day you are not getting your negative trust removed, you are a scammer, a troll, and a spammer.
|
|
|
|
Services would be most appropriate, or maybe digital goods. I would not recommend using Quickseller as escrow. Services. Although your default trust account would likely get removed pretty quickly.
Also I know you are trying to create a smear campaign against me and it's not working.
Me or OP? or both? Both. Assuming you aren't the same person. |
|
|
|
How would you possibly have additional information then what you had when the OP was published now then what you had when the OP was made?
It seems to me that you are simply trolling.
Why don't you bother to answer the question asshole? If you don't think I can find your main account then you are sorely mistaken. Just because you likely paid the tor tax and are hiding behind tor doesn't mean I can't figure out who you are. Why would I care In fact why do you care so much what my alt is so you can give me negative trust, for what exactly? What is the point of hiding jackass? I know with a good amount of certainty that I already gave your account negative feedback, most likely recently. Probably within the last few weeks. Your account can't get anymore negative feedback from me, at least not more that can do additional damage to it. |
|
|
|
|
I honestly don't agree with Vod's policy on MSDN sellers however I don't think this consistent troll fest against Vod is appropriate.
You really need to look at the bigger picture when trolling Vod.
This is an example of why it is a bad idea to put a lot of effort into calling out scammers. It is a thankless thing to do and all you get is personal attacks and people making up crazy, false accusations against you whose sole point is to get them to stop preventing scammers from being able to scam in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
Services. Although your default trust account would likely get removed pretty quickly.
Also I know you are trying to create a smear campaign against me and it's not working.
|
|
|
|
How would you possibly have additional information then what you had when the OP was published now then what you had when the OP was made?
It seems to me that you are simply trolling.
Why don't you bother to answer the question asshole? If you don't think I can find your main account then you are sorely mistaken. Just because you likely paid the tor tax and are hiding behind tor doesn't mean I can't figure out who you are. |
|
|
|
The case that he dug into a persons posts to give him a negative rating for something he did 2 years prior got already buried with irrelevant posts. Looks like he's gone the opposite way with me. He's added more negative trust (trust spamming?). His new one says that not only does he take a known scammer's word for it that I'm somehow a scammer, but because I called him out for his smear campaign, that also makes me untrustworthy. He says "avoid interacting with me at all". Hey, Quickseller, how is leaving three negative trust ratings on me (between you and your alt) equal to avoiding interaction? Seems like immature trolling to me.
Holy shit! Just looked at your ratings, did that idiot give you negative trust for something you did two years ago? How objective of you Quickseller, it's not like you targeted because you hate him, not at all. He really deserved a negative trust rating 2 years after no one else had complained about what he did. No wonder that you think accts seller is his alt, he necroposted on your scam accusation from 2013 2 years afterwards just to target you from what is seems. Way to abuse his position in default trust. People that have Quickseller in their trust lists should seriously reconsider their choice, his abuse is getting out of hand. It's not that Quickseller is leaving a negative trust for personal reasons but his ratings are mostly based on assumptions and extreme cases which may not be true (although they can be a possibility) and hence one cannot trust his ratings. If he negates an account for scamming there are 50% chances of it being true and 50% untrue. Unless there is a solid evidence or the person attempts scamming, it's not right to make assumptions. The people who trust him may blindly trust his ratings but they need to even read the reasons which is not the case always. I too find many people suspicious here but I can't claim anyone to be a scammer without having any proof. He won't be removed from the trust list for these reasons. Proof is not always publicly provided because providing such evidence would allow scammers to evade detection in the future, however evidence is retained and validated prior to calling someone out as a scammer. I have been wrong in the past and when this happens I do remove such negative feedback, although I tend to gather sufficient evidence to make sure I am correct prior to leaving a negative and as a result I do not often need to remove negatives. |
|
|
|
Quickseller: Did you sell the account in question, and did that account consequently leave you positive feedback?
Im sorry but that is none of your business. You're a lying sack of shit, on default trust, who is not only selling forum accounts, but gaming the trust system. Yeah, it's my business. Post from your main account and I might reconsider. |
|
|
|
Quickseller: Did you sell the account in question, and did that account consequently leave you positive feedback?
Im sorry but that is none of your business. Either way that doesn't matter. He clearly stated that the reason for the positive feedback was that I acted as escrow for a trade which I did do, and which can be corroborated by other sent and received feedback. |
|
|
|
That was not an admission. I also stated that I was not saying the account in question was ever mine.
Sorry as "admit" is the wrong word. You always twist your words and leave the reader in suspense. I felt that you might have worked as an escrow for the account in question and hence owned it for a while. @OP: deluxeCITY does not seem to be an alt of Quickseller as he hasn't capitalized the letter "i" while Quickseller always takes care of his capitalization and grammar.  Anyways, I notice that you have a lot of FANS here on BCT and it's tough for you to handle them now. Yes I have since noticed the account has been sold. Quickseller owned this account until February 2015 when it was sold. The new owner then traded with Quickseller using that account and then left him feedback from it. This is not what I thought had happened when I posted the OP I had assumed Quickseller still owned the account and had left himself positive trust. How would you possibly have additional information then what you had when the OP was published now then what you had when the OP was made? It seems to me that you are simply trolling. |
|
|
|
Obviously you have not done enough waisted research because this account has been under my control for months! Just take a look at recent posts you plonker we have very different styles of writing plus we post in 'totally' different threads. He never ever posts in gambling or any of the threads i do, your research lacks research.
I left him deserved trust because he could have saved me from losing my funds in a trade, i choose a trusted escrow i have dealt with before. One last thing because i won't be posting hear anymore! Why does he care about 'untrusted feedback' LOL! Surly you can see this is back to front and he would give positive to this account lol! Check my feed back untrusted and you will see who i traded with using Qs as escrow.
Case closed newbie.
So you bought the account from Quickseller? Quickseller himself admitted: "The account in question is not mine as of now. " That was not an admission. I also stated that I was not saying the account in question was ever mine. |
|
|
|
|
Why don't you post actual proof. Why don't you post from your "main" account instead of an obviously fake/impersonation account?
I have no way to control what any of my accounts that I have previously sold do. (This is not saying that account ever was mine).
|
|
|
|
How is that a personal attack? I am merely pointing out that the site you are advertising for is by your own definition is "aiding and embedding" a scammer by failing to disclose a scammer's withdrawal addresses.
Make a scam thread. If dogedice receives valid negatives I will leave. "aiding and embedding"? Some joke I am not understanding? It is not scamming. It is doing essentially the same thing I did for them. You are being hypocritical |
|
|
|
|
Lol. You are wrong about my alts.
The account in question is not mine as of now.
I am curious to know how you claim to know one of those accounts are banned.
|
|
|
|
|
How is that a personal attack? I am merely pointing out that the site you are advertising for is by your own definition is "aiding and embedding" a scammer by failing to disclose a scammer's withdrawal addresses.
|
|
|
|
I think a way that these kinds of scams can be prevented in the future is to announce the payment addresses publicly on this thread
Doubt people will bother to check. Addresses are just random to most people. What they really need to check is who they're actually sending money to, but no amount of precautions put in place wont stop some people from getting scammed. The person in question had at least attempted to advertise on the forum before (I don't think he won), so in theory he would have previously seen theymos publicly providing the payment addresses and when this didn't happen when he "won" he should have noticed that something was 'off' |
|
|
|
|
Who exactly are you referring to? If the loans were not from someone who is reputable then it would probably be best to disregard the positive trust reports when deciding if you want to loan to that person (with or without collateral)
|
|
|
|
Quickseller had given negative rating to girlbtc.com which he removed while trying to become escrow. I would like to publicly state that I was asked to give a price on how much it would cost to escrow this signature campaign. I gave the OP a quote and I will follow up by editing this post if/when escrow is funded to pay all participants.
Since you still have one negative red on girlbtc account, so I think they will let you to be the escrow. and its removed now, it was expected already Previously, Quickseller had become escrow of a scam site which allowed them to run a signature campaign. The account already had negative rating from BadBear and they wouldn't have got any participants without Quickseller's help. Do you seriously think that I would sell trust for the $1 in escrow fees that I 'make'? If you cannot honestly think that someone in a first world country would seriously do that then you need to stop bringing up this fact. The dropping of the girlbtc.com negative had nothing to do with I escrowing for them.
BTW, the owner of the site that you are critical of me escrowing the signature campaign for has known addresses with huge amounts of taint with the gambling site you are advertising, had lost over 7 BTC on the site you are advertising (he has posted this just before the forum went down IIRC) and the owner of the site you are advertising had declined to provide withdrawal addresses he had withdrawn to, citing privacy for his customers. So if you are going to be critical of anyone who "helps" moreia, then I would suggest removing your signature and criticizing the owner of the site you are advertising for |
|
|
|
Posts: Insubstantial posting
If this is the case then it would be a very high risk to purchase this account. The risk of a perm ban is high and if this happens then all of your accounts will be banned as well. @Quickseller I see you're very experienced here, what exactly constitutes an "Insubstantial posting" can you give me an example? According to the OP the kind of posts that were made by the account you are selling
An insubstantial post will generally be one that is very short, typically only one or two lines, it will add no content to the conversation and will almost never receive an kind of a response from anyone further down the thread. |
|
|
|
There will always be the chance that an account has been banned multiple times in the past. The best course of action if you wish to buy an account would only to buy from a reputable seller, to specify in the escrow agreement that the post history should meet a certain high criteria (obviously this would entail using escrow) and to put sufficient effort into your posts once you start posting from your account so that it does not matter if the account has been banned in the past (because the future posts would not warrant a new ban)
got it . I really wants to buy sr like accounts from you but your rates are very high so i have to trust some newbies by paying first and thanks god never got scammed . there are no seller i found reputable . You are right, it is very rare to find a reputable account seller. There are some people who want to make it very discouraging for people to sell accounts publicly and as a result they only sell for a short period (and as a result cannot ever become reputable). @Quick you say that your account`s never banned . i will pm you for lower rate`s  I am no longer selling accounts, however if I was then I would be (as I was previously) sell for a higher rate because of the high post quality and the lack of ban history of what I previously sold |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
