on XML file i think there was a non active market, i've also fixed that. But if you have this file and you can send me i will check for you.
|
|
|
This is something that is happening only on your machine. Nobody have the same problem, yesterday i look for something for about 1 hours, and i haven't found any solution. Why don't you use a windows machine ? Wink
Otherwise, i need you to perform these tasks :
- Start 4.8 in a folder without other logs (so you'll be sure that all logs are from 4.8 and from that precise run). - Wait for this problem
A question : did you perform some XLM load file or some action before getting these errors? Or CAT start write error without any reason? This is what i wrote you. No reply from you. Your log have tons of the same error, it's always the same error, like an infinite loop. If you run for 1 hours, log will be X mega, if you run for 2 hours, log will be X*2 Mega. But error is always the same. There's no other customer having the same error, so i need info, but anytime i ask you for something you didn't reply, then you come back some days later posting the same error. Considering the fact that from my point of view, if an error occurs just for only 1 of my customers it's still a problem to consider and manage, i've removed that class that probably gives that error with another piece of code. So from 4.9 version your erros should not happens.
|
|
|
it is a annoyance since ~2 days the same as happened java.lang.InterruptedException at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:936) at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.tryAcquireNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1247) at java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock.tryLock(ReentrantLock.java:442) at CAT.C_Env_Market.A_Managers.a.run(Unknown Source) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:308) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:294) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) java.lang.InterruptedException at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:936) at java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.tryAcquireNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1247) at java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock.tryLock(ReentrantLock.java:442) at CAT.C_Env_Market.A_Managers.a.run(Unknown Source) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:308) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180) at java.util.conc excerpt from CAT_Log_2017-03-06_20_34_04.txt Modified: Mit, Mär 8 2017 19:26:49 3,4 MB (3.434.480 bytes) already reply you about that, no reply from you. You don't read my response, i can't give you support this way.
|
|
|
During next weekend i will try to release 4.9 A lot of improvements on check Api responses and log management And C-CEX it will works again, CAT will use another way to find trades....
|
|
|
Electrum all life (per ora) Ero sostenitore di Multibit, poi dopo un brutto scherzetto finito comunque senza danni (ma con multibit inutilizzabile sul mio portafoglio) l'ho messo per sempre in pensione. Supporto 0, qualitą del software mediocre, funzionalitą ridotte (E spesso poi ti si ritorcono contro)
|
|
|
Nope, cant get it to do this one thing. Ill get back to you sometime because after three hours on this software, on this one issue it becomes incredibly frustrating.
Another question : you're not a CAT customer, so are you using another account? Yes. I am not using my full account to broadcast to the world what I want to do with the software. Its nothing scammy Im doing. I think many people on your thread used alt accounts when asking you questions. yes don't worry it was only a question sometimes people makes questions BUT they don't have a CAT copy
|
|
|
Well there's no need to correct my english error in the text you quote I'm sure you understand the concept, and usually i write faster while i'm thinking. English is not perfect but i'm sure i'm able to write understandable things :-) Question is simple : if you want to buy or sell to another user you can simply use the buy/sell pool. did you see this image in the Tips & Tricks C.A.T. Section?? Using (edit manually) the buy/sell pool you can put some coins in wait status and let CAT use them to create new orders. You can manipulate the buy/sell pool rules to use only some of that coins every lookup. For example, you can put 1 BTC inside pool, but tell cat to create only ping with qty < x (maybe in some markets, with a quantity limit of 100, using 1 BTC you can creat 50-150 Orders). And you can also tell cat to stop ping creation if 10 orders are active. (10 it's only an example, all of these parameters are customizable) Every pool lookup (that occurs every number of normal lookup, by default 5) CAT will get some available coins from the pool, and will create a new PING. If algorithm is static, order will be static at the price you choose, otherwise it will be a Dynamic order. So, i have no problem to remove the Limit price check, and allows you to buy/sell to yourself. BUT if you only want to continously sell/buy to OTHER users, you can use the pool. I think CAT it's not complex, really, but of course, there's needed to understand this schema.
|
|
|
Nope, cant get it to do this one thing. Ill get back to you sometime because after three hours on this software, on this one issue it becomes incredibly frustrating.
Another question : you're not a CAT customer, so are you using another account?
|
|
|
Your final scope is to generate volumes or buy/sell to yourself? If is buy/sell to yourself CAT is not done to perform such action. It's done to make you money not to loose money (and if you buy/sell to yourself you will loose money)
If you need to bought coins at fixed price (not from you) and without continue putting new orders i wrote you in the last message how you can achieve that.
|
|
|
When you say algo are you talking about a ping pong creation? if so, do you mean I need to create two different sets of ping pong creation I don't know how to load an algorithm on top of an already running Ping Pong creation?
Why cant I just instruct it to keep buying X amount of coins at a particular price. Even better would be a randomize feature between set price parameters when buying to make it look natural. Why must I always have to add in both a buy and sell order to do this...
I was talking about 2 different ping-pong algorithm, but looking at the code, the only way to have a full buy/sell to yourself is to remove the check i put when you set static prices. In other words CAT won't allow you to set a static algorithm with same buy/sell price, you will receive a warning message because Cat wants a higher sell price than buy price. Also create 2 static algorith won't work at 100% Why cant I just instruct it to keep buying X amount of coins at a particular price You can do that, set a static algo, put a value into the BUY Pool, and set option : "Never Create ping with QTY > X". So cat start create buy orders, at price X with QTY no higher than X (even if there's more available into the buy/sell pool). Cat will create 1 order every lookup if you don't set other limits like : STOP PING CREATION IF Number of active order is > X (there are also other options to stop ping creation) would be a randomize feature between set price parameters when buying to make it look natural. Why must I always have to add in both a buy and sell order to do this... CAT is not a volume generator, you can try to make this behaviour combining the options provided. You don't have to always add something, CAT is able to run without stop after setting the first trade amount (creating orders or setting a value into the buy/sell pool)
|
|
|
Hi Sampey
to run CAT on a VPS smoothly:
what to choose?
KVM or Virtuozzo 7 where is Java running better with no issues?
(Ubuntu, Centos or Debian)
VNC Remote-Konsole
thx
Well i'm not an expert about that, i don't want to give you some suggestion based on some google search. Java should not get problem related to the operative System, because for any operative system there's a Java Virtual Machine. BUT more than 70% of problems occurs on Linux OS, probably because many times users install Open JDK instead than java official library. The thing that is sure is that you need a Remove Destkop Access, because you need a VPS with "desktop" interface to run a Desktop Application like C.A.T.
|
|
|
Yes
I should be able to create an order which states buy @100 - Sell @100 and keep running for as long as I want?
Don't know what I'm doing wrong
try to run 2 static algorithm on the same market. In algo 1 you sell at X and buy at Y in algo 2 you buy at X and sell at Y This should works, let me know
|
|
|
How the do I get Cat to keep buying my own sell order. I have tried so many times even using on two computers trying to get one bot to sell and the other to keep buying but I get not joy. Can someone help me with this simple task of creating volume without raising the price.?
Have you tried to remove the option "Check to not buy/sell to yourself?"
|
|
|
Are good whereas this function works I don't understand. there is more detail description? whether it is possible to receive on API from the exchange the short-time growth or course falling as a percentage?
the site cryptowat.ch shows this moment. it wouldn't be bad to implement it in a bot.
the section Parameters description interests, there is no exact description.
You can find all the parameters description here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=507103.msg5590896#msg5590896if you need more help pls pm me. CAT won't use third party service like cryptowat.ch
|
|
|
Hi, i'm C.A.T. Dev. You can find info about C.A.T. in the official topic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=507103.0This is the C.A.T. official price list : My Auction is for the C.A.T. CORE. C.A.T. CORE is a lifetime license : Full support via PM and All next release for free. Auction starts from 0.1 BTC (0.2 Official price -50%) Increment bid is 0.01 BTC Buy It Now : 0.18 BTC Auction end : 11 March 2017 8:00 PM (Bitcointalk time) Winning user must add at least 1 API. For the PRICED API i will proportionally calculate the Price according to the % spread between CAT Core Price (0.2 BTC) and Auction Winning Price. Example : if you win the auction for a price 30% lower i will apply a 30% Discount over the Priced API You choose to add.For any question PM Me
|
|
|
Hello! how to set up (Create Ping Orders Only If of % of Market Spread Is>-0.250). there is a possibility of operation only on the negative? pref { - } I couldn't set up.
A negative spread means that market sell price is lower than market buy price. That's impossible.
|
|
|
AT 8:00 PM Today auction will end
|
|
|
Well i think we have a little communication problem : - You write me a problem. - I ask you for some info/ I make you questions. - You don't give me the info i need - You post again some days later
And cycle restart.
I ask you for an XML File you're trying to load, but you didn't send me (i think your first problem is because you're loading a market that is removed from the exchange but it's inside the xml file).
You errors, are not easy to manage : nobody send me the same problems. I'm not able to understand your system configuration. But if you help me with info i ask you, maybe i'll be able to find some problem and in the next 10 days you will have a full working CAT copy.
About latency : cat must wait for server response, when server is slow, Cat is slow (or an error occurs).
I'm writing a new layer of checkings over the current one.
The problem i'm worried abot is your first one.......actually it's not easy to understand what happens : it's not a CAT Code, it's something inside a Java library for parallel processing....
|
|
|
|