It looks like it is using some kind of tool that replacing various words with synonyms and occasionally slightly rephrasing certain statements. The two paragraphs are saying almost exactly the same thing and in the same order. It looks like a pretty advanced bot to me. also My spouse and i constrained the number of contacts for you to 50.
LOL |
|
|
|
How do you handle account bans? If someone buys your account and gets banned, then all the accounts get compromised as there is no way to know for sure that the account was really sold.
I have sold accounts in the past where the buyer immediately started making dozens of spammy posts, and was quickly banned. None of my other accounts were affected. I think it is pretty fair to say that BadBear is pretty good at detecting when an account was sold. I had that question following this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=994097.0IMO banning everyone, seller, buyer is the right thing to do as one can never be sure that the account has indeed been sold. You would obviously disagree to this, but not doing this creates a loophole. It shouldn't be too difficult to tell if an account is sold, especially if the posting habits changes substantially. It is also not difficult to tell when an account is sold, especially considering the fact that most people who are going to get banned for signature spam are not going to go out of their way to hide the fact that their account is banned. Edit: the fact that I have a reputation of putting in a lot of effort into what I post likely is going to give me additional credibility when it comes to these decisions. Also if you are curious, yes people have likely tried to get me banned by buying multiple accounts and then immediately started posting large amounts of shit posts in a very short amount of time. I was notified by the person that purchased them that they were banned for 14 days within an hour (they had probably made ~150 one liners in that time) and no none of my other accounts that I own were affected. I honestly don't blame you Quickseller. I know how the people work in the community. If they can't get something their way, they will go out of their way to try and hurt you. (Symatec and FuckIdolplus for examples) I even had someone turn me down for a sale when I mentioned getting you to be the escrow. Wasn't nothing against them, I've had successful transactions with them before, and with you, so I was kinda surprised when they said that they wouldn't use you because of some of the feedback you had. But at least this way you have 1 less item you have to worry about. I'm sure you'll make money other ways. you don't blame quickseller for helping scammers scam? by selling them accounts. Yes he is not doing anything wrong but he is in deed promoting these issues. His end goal as most is to make some coin but at the expense of selling which could be hacked accounts or used as vehicles for scamming. Again I am not saying he knows they might be hacked, stolen what ever you want to call it. But by selling accounts he is part of the problem. Its like this you wouldn't buy a stolen expensive watch on the street (not knowing its stolen of course) why would you buy accounts that could be stolen? Quick seller should be held accountable to some degree. How about making account buying and selling banned. This should reuse the issues I bought an account way back and got screwed for it. I don't use at all. It is too bad that a very small percentage of the accounts I have sold ended up scamming. It is probably well under 6%. The accounts that I have sold were not hacked prior to me selling them as I took the proper precautions to ensure that was not the case prior to me purchasing them. Although I cannot guarantee that the new owners took care of their passwords after they purchased them from me. |
|
|
|
I want to sell my account but for a good price! I'm not really decided but a tempting offer could make me switch! Look at the time spent online! Writing 4/10 reading 9/10 Please PM only serious offer!  You really should be more vague about the stats of the account. With the level of detail you are giving it is possible to figure out the identity of the account. Having the identity of the account known lowers it's value (as you apparently know based on the fact that you created a new account to attempt to sell the one you are selling. |
|
|
|
To be fulfilled by "Quickseller"
Please send to:
12KsutCoHyKXmCdRpYttbUT4HoNBXeAA2E
Hi,
I need a microloan of .05 BTC to be paid back @125% (.0625) in less than 2 weeks from today. Please PM. Thanks!
Sent. Please confirm. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 This is quickseller from bitcointalk today is april 9 2015 The loan to johnniewalker in the amount of .05 btc has been funded via 6f5c1b8cd65af9bb3542418707823b99737725103a3f5c01265c53ae4c0ff8e9 Please repay .065 BTC by April 24 2015 to the following address: 1NDNNhjkdc9X6rhPTDQWyeK977ZDtNxMZs Thank you. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.orgiQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVJzjKAAoJEFMt0pDwvrUWYFYIAKzpulnBrq03F9MoDUa1Tz4u KINYDhSlCUOrt+zvJRWZJWnyC2urVeBmWNHz1A/SZo7cQB0hslIxGV7quRnmP8a2 W6aDM6A8+hJ9cxJDmcplp9YNgQKOU56Tb09zl+Ngu1e6DJpANrAVxAQKk/nud/J1 Lrg64zkoonGDkxituDHRGTGHpm6cSICFpauBqz+Xgh8Ohi81Sxnnwt+kRvoJEzJL DcYWDlZ7o4P/ESkbx1B6LQzNQK+WPbT/kw0gqRfokrf341/O7XmmHD2nLhuOe/Ub l0xgvT9dH4uwM0bex14FGva45OZOFSLb3IrPpMRG04oUP9i94plZURRSXrXFuxU= =do8k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
This is quickseller from bitcointalk today is april 9 2015
The loan to johnniewalker in the amount of .05 btc has been funded via 6f5c1b8cd65af9bb3542418707823b99737725103a3f5c01265c53ae4c0ff8e9
Please repay .065 BTC by April 24 2015 to the following address: 1NDNNhjkdc9X6rhPTDQWyeK977ZDtNxMZs
Thank you.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVJzjKAAoJEFMt0pDwvrUWYFYIAKzpulnBrq03F9MoDUa1Tz4u
KINYDhSlCUOrt+zvJRWZJWnyC2urVeBmWNHz1A/SZo7cQB0hslIxGV7quRnmP8a2
W6aDM6A8+hJ9cxJDmcplp9YNgQKOU56Tb09zl+Ngu1e6DJpANrAVxAQKk/nud/J1
Lrg64zkoonGDkxituDHRGTGHpm6cSICFpauBqz+Xgh8Ohi81Sxnnwt+kRvoJEzJL
DcYWDlZ7o4P/ESkbx1B6LQzNQK+WPbT/kw0gqRfokrf341/O7XmmHD2nLhuOe/Ub
l0xgvT9dH4uwM0bex14FGva45OZOFSLb3IrPpMRG04oUP9i94plZURRSXrXFuxU=
=do8k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
|
|
I assume you mean that the account is not on default trust but rather that one person on default trust gave the account positive trust (and that it has no negative trusts). Am I correct? escrow is cool
I am glad that you are not too cool for escrow lol |
|
|
|
I feel the same way about the physicals I am selling. I had one person buy up all my BTC silver coins the same day I put up my thread, and one other person buy up two of my LTC silver coins. Silver seems to sell very well/quickly. GLWS  - Graded Cryptolater Silver Bitcoin (ICG MS69)
How did you get IGC to grade this coin? I was under the impression that only ANACS graded these kinds of coins. Well I went back to look at the prices a bit and I think I may have underpriced some of my coins a bit but it's no biggie, not going to go back on it after the guy already paid. It wasn't that much of a difference anyway The ICG graded Cryptolator coin I got from Pistachio ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=47306). I believe ANACS and ICG are the two who grade physical crypto coins. I personally never got a chance to get any coins graded myself so perhaps someone else may be able to provide better insight in regards to this. You can check out the thread here, where blazedout got some of the same coins graded by ANACS to see if the two organizations grade differently, for these particular coins at least. Thanks for your kind words It looks like that based on that test that ANACS tends to grade lower, although it was only two coins so the test is not scientifically conclusive but still a rough estimate - it appears that based on what blazed said that ANACS is more reputable anyway. I am in the process of getting a bunch of lealana and Casasscius graded by ANACS and they should come back late this month. Hopefully they will grade pretty well  |
|
|
|
Thanks man, just let me know. Even one of them would be great if possible.
Sorry, the two 5 LTC coins have been sold. I have a feeling that I have somewhat underpriced the silver....... oh well I still got a great deal on them |
|
|
|
Mostly just the Silver Wallets left, one buyer swept up half my collection all at once! Surprised how quickly they went, hopefully I didn't underprice anything too much, I do believe my prices are fair Thanks guys! I feel the same way about the physicals I am selling. I had one person buy up all my BTC silver coins the same day I put up my thread, and one other person buy up two of my LTC silver coins. Silver seems to sell very well/quickly. GLWS - Graded Cryptolater Silver Bitcoin (ICG MS69)
How did you get IGC to grade this coin? I was under the impression that only ANACS graded these kinds of coins. |
|
|
|
Quickseller, do you control 1NPDJ8gmNbZd2QimaQzbFBmGUtCX5djgrC
? yes. I don't think you have very much trading experience on here as I don't think you know what you are talking about. I am also surprised that you are brining this up now in a campaign that you are not even participating in, especially considering that the escrow for your campaign did not sign a message from the escrow address he claimed to control. This makes me believe you are either trolling (most likely) or are spamming your signature. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 I will be providing escrow services for the DaDice signature campaign. I am in possession of 8BTC for the first week, and dadice has stated that he or she will be refilling the address weekly. ndnhc will be managing the campaign and will be maintaining a list of enrollees for payment each Tuesday. Upon verification of the spreadsheet, the enrollees will receive payment to the address provided. No more than 7.4BTC will be released to campaign members weekly. Hero/Legendary/Staff Members: 20*.0015*100 =3 Senior Members: 20*.0013*100 =2.6 Full Members: 20*.0009*100 =1.8 The escrow fee for this signature campaign is 3% Let me know if you have any questions, I'm looking forward to working with each of you. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: Keybase OpenPGP v2.0.8 Comment: https://keybase.io/cryptowsBcBAABCgAGBQJU9jDJAAoJEFkJihs2GslbSNgIAKXyiAKkt61b5f2fFpjXUMbz H1/TyXoeSWsixCZ9qRYZZFYIol4vudaVW647dTCLLaSVfSqzOlCX8nMNPiDBUDLx X5p9hEtIVDBsQgQdJaIoeMeitscZqhUjDpVSvMZE9tAlKU9dByt/sQiRara+sPu5 dDwpqnDL03wI6KhWu0d9fMsbdHdoM2cvOKudjzcJ2bjnRowaTnjdvGyRD5jRtpx7 5azwEFAMKv3C9KS+KU8t/ki1JW/EGTX/VTDAV4baBv8xNwTwd2kXXUUBLzEK6sxz PeTlLSQphXMMarFv8067uSey1byr5+vfYBSFBekzno+hZ1//RNFBjUrfLk4ZF0o= =p0+B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
|
|
|
You guys can say this, and it is what it is. However, the tradition in escrowing for a signature ad campaign is to sign a message from the escrow address to prove that you, the escrow, have received the funds. Signing with PGP just adds PGP authenticity to the post which claims he controls it. But we already can see this from the fact that he posted a message in this forum. I don't understand what signing with PGP is supposed to prove here. However, if he were to sign with the escrow address, that would be proof that the escrow has received the funds.
You don't have to take my word for it, ask bitcoininformation aka MitcheLL or hillariousandco or anyone who's been around these signtaure campaigns for some time. The tradition is to sign from the escrow address so that we know that the escrow is in receipt of the funds.
Like I said to you via PM, signing a message proves nothing. The escrow could easily get a signed message from whoever else controls the private key. If you are not going to take my word for it then there is no reason why you would take my word when I give you a signed message that I say I signed myself. Anyone who somehow thinks that just because an escrow controls a certain address that they will receive payment is just niave. The determining factor of is escrow is going to pay out is their reputation. Note that the escrow is not supposed to be "guranteeing" the payouts with his own money. The escrow is supposed to be in receipt of money from one of the parties and will release it to the other party upon completion of certain terms. Signing from the escrow address shows that the first part of this arrangement has occurred, namely, that the escrow is in receipt of funds from one of the parties.
I don't think you understand the role that escrow plays. If escrow receives funds and they agree that a counterparty will receive a certain amount of funds under certain circumstances then it is his responsibility to make sure that they receive payment if those circumstances are met. Displaying a specific address is to provide transparecy to tell potential participants a maximum total amount that I am willing to payout. I have used escrow in probably close to 50 trades and never once has the escrow provider offered to sign the escrow address nor has any of my trading partners. I have probably completed a good 75 trades without escrow (both are estimates) and my trading partner has never asked me to sign the address I am asking to receive payment to. If I don't actually control the private key to the address I am asking to receive funds to then too bad for me. |
|
|
|
|
My PGP key is in my profile.
I am guaranteeing that the amount in that address will be available to be paid out by participants. In the (unlikely) event that I somehow lose access to funds in that address then I would need to use my own personal funds to pay participants. As long as you (or any participant) trusts me enough to pay them when they meet the conditions to receive payment then proving that I control that address is a moot point. If you do not trust me enough to pay out, then proving that I control that address is even more of a moot point.
|
|
|
|
|
NXT is not a pointless thread. While you may think that it is going to fail over the long run, as long as it is an actual altcoin it is correct for it to remain.
While I am not personally a supporter of POS coins, I have worked with NXT in the past and I would opine that it does have features that will make it attractive for users to use in real world applications (assuming of course that no one ends up successfully attacking as POS is easy to attack.
Regardless, as long as it is an actual altcoin it should remain, and likely even after it fails (assuming it does).
The forum does not make judgements of if something is a scam or is viable over the long term.
You guys in the altcoin section seriously need to take a chill-pill and stop with all the drama.
Edit: it looks like those threads are discussing why they think NXT will fail. The above point that the forum does not determine what is viable still stands. The threads in question are unique topics of discussion; if the people publishing them do not reach a valid conclusion or reach a conclusion based on flawed logic then their reputation will suffer and will not be taken seriously.
Everyone has their right to have their own opinion.
|
|
|
|
Am I eligible for this campaign?
I think you should repay your loan before trying to make money with your signature. |
|
|
|
regardless of what quickseller is saying I could use my bitmedia.io account as collateral. with a pending balance of .4 BTC
This is probably your best bet - to use collateral - until you gain positive trust. Yea I am willing to do that. its just damn this guy gets on my nerves. Im playing with the idea to fill your loan, but what I dont understand is: If you have .4 and can withdraw at any time[1], why not just withdraw? Why pay a premium for something you already have? [1] 4.5 https://bitmedia.io/termshis 0.4BTC is still pending that is why he cant withdraw and use it yet I understand, but that makes it worthless collateral as it cant be "sold" easily. How is it worthless? and it would be btc you would withdraw it to your account nothing to sell.... Yes, sold is the wrong word. Maybe I am a bit slow, but why should I be able to withdraw but you are not? Does this have something to do with time or what else will make the difference between pending and available? Update on my balance today. maintenance is complete.  Its fine you guys dont want to lend .11 BTC its understandable just be more serious about your answers guys ever one on here is so scared about being scammed.. and miss out on real people with real Loan requests. Sorry, but I dont understand why asking questions about the nature of the collateral is considered not serious. If you are looking for someone that just sends you money on a whim, I am certainly not the right person. This person has a history of attempting to get loans with dubious collateral, as well as attempting to get loans of widely varying amounts (likely in an effort to get as much as they can out of a potential loan). I will find specific threads later, but there are several both in lending and long-term loans. I would avoid lending to onewiseguy with or without collateral. |
|
|
|
I was asked to provide escrow services for CryptoSplit. It looks like there are some reports of this being a ponzi, so by providng escrow services I am in no way endorsing them in any way, but am rather attempting to facilitate a safe trade. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 This is quickseller from bitcointalk. Today is April 9 2015 The escrow address for the CryptoSplit signature campaign contest is :1CShWAqgUNLzHWyrvcCCoQFLX9jzsk3QZr This is in reference to the thread located: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1018736.0As long as there are funds in the escrow address to cover payment to all participants then it is safe to submit an entry CryptoSplit will choose a winner no later then 2359 April 13 2015 (forum time) at which time the winner who CryptoSplit chooses will need to post or provide the BB codes of the signature they had previously submitted. Once CryptoSplit confirms receipt of the BB codes then I will send funds in escrow (minus my fee) to the BTC address of the winner’s choice. It is my understanding that the prize will be 0.10 BTC Thank you. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.orgiQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVJqAGAAoJEFMt0pDwvrUWFi0H/Ay5YYCJio4xhe45Gsap/jE3 3+bhWpZSB2eWcpxbYokTSyf97p4mBbnUEJeFeEOrLPp3DNO4m0IsElCXXK2u3UmD 4mwlm1h7P3t1BiQ7mZNHUTOl0B/iSnAbiQHJgjpf7//LvrZ4IFVH41y+r12iz7Kq Hbz6NRuUSrYhV1ghwL5BwpsFhdPnhVN2XcLLOz7Hs4wQhRLjW8xAtftvV3qLRx7C RKantEzdHt3gCB1IoE12sDFvoWsCDeTbJLV1tjiu/M2gcAVKdGkA2iHcA9LIYbIA VHbzSqeta4zUoX7nEmAjO49rp7f1KDSuztrRRS17CpsPtfiWlrTTGe+aHdgiius= =I/7h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
This is quickseller from bitcointalk. Today is April 9 2015
The escrow address for the CryptoSplit signature campaign contest is :1CShWAqgUNLzHWyrvcCCoQFLX9jzsk3QZr
This is in reference to the thread located: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1018736.0
As long as there are funds in the escrow address to cover payment to all participants then it is safe to submit an entry
CryptoSplit will choose a winner no later then 2359 April 13 2015 (forum time) at which time the winner who CryptoSplit chooses will need to post or provide the BB codes of the signature they had previously submitted. Once CryptoSplit confirms receipt of the BB codes then I will send funds in escrow (minus my fee) to the BTC address of the winner’s choice. It is my understanding that the prize will be 0.10 BTC
Thank you.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVJqAGAAoJEFMt0pDwvrUWFi0H/Ay5YYCJio4xhe45Gsap/jE3
3+bhWpZSB2eWcpxbYokTSyf97p4mBbnUEJeFeEOrLPp3DNO4m0IsElCXXK2u3UmD
4mwlm1h7P3t1BiQ7mZNHUTOl0B/iSnAbiQHJgjpf7//LvrZ4IFVH41y+r12iz7Kq
Hbz6NRuUSrYhV1ghwL5BwpsFhdPnhVN2XcLLOz7Hs4wQhRLjW8xAtftvV3qLRx7C
RKantEzdHt3gCB1IoE12sDFvoWsCDeTbJLV1tjiu/M2gcAVKdGkA2iHcA9LIYbIA
VHbzSqeta4zUoX7nEmAjO49rp7f1KDSuztrRRS17CpsPtfiWlrTTGe+aHdgiius=
=I/7h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
|
|
Would really, really like to buy 1 or both of those 5 LTC coins, please let me know if I can, just saw this thread.
I have reached an agreement with someone to sell them, however he has not paid yet. If he ends up not paying by the end of today then I will shoot you a PM to let you know it is available |
|
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 This is quickseller from bitcointalk. The escrow address for the bitcoinpoker.ag signature campaign is : 1NPDJ8gmNbZd2QimaQzbFBmGUtCX5djgrC This is in reference to the thread located: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1018585.0As long as there are funds in the escrow address to cover payment to all participants then it is safe to wear the signature. Thank you. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.orgiQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVJmgLAAoJEFMt0pDwvrUWHecIAKxHQ3404g0I2CUz01MqKyJN yt6vrYF5ssnuUuSIPfpHggxczhTZAIr3abWHidp++QpNQS1/nPYEAmyJUGHRaXXx TaQHNjVSLFltZnG6kPtsO9AnbADv9UhQM3jKVMIGHoUEE1sEpthcaUzdoM9ImpUM g31T4uC2U8OG1sZZi1aMljT3M88YjbJuSOkluf3bYuQSwfJfosE8zliZ7U/fqZhP U6v6kr6+QtEvQz+iqap3v3wIxzbxeK+VKSP7YmrC//DFzbqOtLHri9bb0JIYj9h+ 0TDkAna4iy4FK+gZGxH0h2fshc0aZuJVX43cS2jimb3Nt3Z2H8g+JKtcUObzk4E= =WlZe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
This is quickseller from bitcointalk.
The escrow address for the bitcoinpoker.ag signature campaign is : 1NPDJ8gmNbZd2QimaQzbFBmGUtCX5djgrC
This is in reference to the thread located: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1018585.0
As long as there are funds in the escrow address to cover payment to all participants then it is safe to wear the signature.
Thank you.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJVJmgLAAoJEFMt0pDwvrUWHecIAKxHQ3404g0I2CUz01MqKyJN
yt6vrYF5ssnuUuSIPfpHggxczhTZAIr3abWHidp++QpNQS1/nPYEAmyJUGHRaXXx
TaQHNjVSLFltZnG6kPtsO9AnbADv9UhQM3jKVMIGHoUEE1sEpthcaUzdoM9ImpUM
g31T4uC2U8OG1sZZi1aMljT3M88YjbJuSOkluf3bYuQSwfJfosE8zliZ7U/fqZhP
U6v6kr6+QtEvQz+iqap3v3wIxzbxeK+VKSP7YmrC//DFzbqOtLHri9bb0JIYj9h+
0TDkAna4iy4FK+gZGxH0h2fshc0aZuJVX43cS2jimb3Nt3Z2H8g+JKtcUObzk4E=
=WlZe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
|
|
regardless of what quickseller is saying I could use my bitmedia.io account as collateral. with a pending balance of .4 BTC
I think pending in the key word in that sentence. IIRC, one thing you were lying about is how much exactly your domain makes in revenue so having a pending balance from advertising is more or less worthless ? How was I lying? This is not adsense my friend. Get your damn facts straight. Yes pending as in it will get paid. Again. a domain and a website are totally different things my friend get it straight. I believe you were claiming that your Adsense account was making a lot of money from your faucet, however Adsense does not allow faucet like traffic so any "pending" amounts would ultimately not get paid. I am not familiar with the TOS of bitmedia.io however based on your prior history of lying about the values of things you are offering (and the revenue of things you are offering) as collateral, I think it is safe to say that the revenue from your advertising account will more likely then not, not pan out  |
|
|
|
regardless of what quickseller is saying I could use my bitmedia.io account as collateral. with a pending balance of .4 BTC
I think pending in the key word in that sentence. IIRC, one thing you were lying about is how much exactly your domain makes in revenue so having a pending balance from advertising is more or less worthless |
|
|
|
|
With the exception of two people, none of the people who left you positive feedback are in my trust network so I do not take their trust ratings into consideration.
If you were trying to sell something at a price lower then the amount of a loan that you were trying to get with it as collateral then I don't see any way why anyone would think that you had any intentions of paying back such loan. I think it should be pretty clear that any BTC that is sent to onewiseguy for a loan will never be seen again
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
