That paste has since been deleted. Anyone have copies?

...
i 'll keep this confidential and not enquiry Mr Cartmell yet
Wayne Lee-Archer 2:55 AM
MagicalTux will be travelling to NZ to talk to the recievers regarding Bitcoinica/Intersango
Alberto Armandi 2:55 AM
i'll wait for you to come up with confirmations
2:55 AM
ok good, so might be as well that we can arrange a meeting with Mr Cartmell regarding this
Wayne Lee-Archer 2:55 AM
yes, please wait - like i said i dont wanna screw up anyones legal workings (esp Cartmell's tasty work with bitcoinica)
Alberto Armandi 2:56 AM
he could provide some documentation to him for supporting the legal suite
Wayne Lee-Archer 2:56 AM
...

lol

bulanula got it, so should this dude.

I don't usually like your posts but these lines made me laugh.

What's Bitcoin100? I must have missed that. Got an explanatory link?

Maybe this talks good about Roger. Who, besides making mistakes from time to time, has an extensive history for supporting and developing Bitcoin worldwide. Trolls in this thread all summed up, have done less than 0.001% that Roger made in the benefit of the community.

And blockchain.info service and features are awesome. I support both Roger and blockchain.

Good show. Quick, reasonable and effective countermeasures.

EDIT: As you are now the sole person that has access to the site's full features, please remember to store admin login credentials with a lawyer in case you get hit by a bus.

Their whois entry is 5 days old. http://whois.domaintools.com/cpcelectronics.co.uk

No contact or adress information on the site but the chat, the adress listed on WHOIS is a huge office block, about the best adress in Manchester, so it's likely a mail forwarding service.

Yeah, this looks like a "money re-appropriator"


EDIT: Haha, laughing about the 1 year guarantee. You can't even do that in the EU. That's way too short.

Hmmm. I'd like a definition of "moments". What length of time is a "moment"? If it's further divisible by any amount, could the hashing device have not existed only in that shorter time frame? The length of a moment becomes a moving target which, at it's limit, equals zero. So an  an object simply cannot exist (with respect to the network ) for any appreciable time before it hashes. From the perspective of the network, ASIC hashing devices are simply spontaneously generated.

I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of this, which this thread is too narrow to contain.

Cracked by a Canadian:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/story/2012/12/18/toornto-carrier-pigeon.html

It supposedly says "artillery observer/spotter at K-sector Normandy"

Highly trained, incredibly skilled carrier pigeons (and at least one not operating on all thrusters, thus opting to refuel, causing its demise) delivered messages between allied troops in Europe.

Here's the letter distribution count:

A: 9
B: 3
C: 3
D: 6
E: 4
F: 7
G: 5
H: 8
I: 4
J: 5
K: 10
L: 3
M: 5
N: 9
O: 7
P: 7
Q: 6
R: 8
S: 2
T: 5
U: 1
V: 2
W: 5
X: 4
Y: 3
Z: 4

And the count by frequency:

K: 10

A: 9
N: 9

H: 8
R: 8

F: 7
O: 7
P: 7

D: 6
Q: 6

G: 5
J: 5
M: 5
T: 5
W: 5

E: 4
I: 4
X: 4
Z: 4

B: 3
C: 3
L: 3
Y: 3

S: 2
V: 2

U: 1

Now, it looks pretty simple to solve.

K = Contact
AN = Airborne Network (or Army/Navy)
HR = Human Resource/Relations; Hand Receipt(s); Humanitarian Relief
FOP = Flight Operations Plan
DQ = Data Quest
G = Grid           J = Jammed
MTW = Major Theater of War
EI = End Item               X = Exercise       Z = Zodiac
BCL = Battlefield Coordination Line           Y = Y-Axis (Yankee Time Zone)
SV = Sniper Variant
U = UNCLASSIFIED; Unrestricted

I would not, but the car on the lot in your example has been completely assembled and has all working parts (theorectically) in place and in proper working order.

Men stealing meat from lions.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBpu4DAvwI8

Dear Bitcoin100 community,

once again: Thank you all for supporting us! We got 16 more BTC from your generous donation activities and now achieved the state, perfectly meshing with your group name: We are now BITCOIN100! :-)

Please let me address some special thanks @Phinnaeus Gage, who pushes Bitcoin100 with his untiringly commitment. Also @Rassah, who, in my external perception, stands for the strictly correct accountancy of your initiative. And last but not least @jsmithers, our personal Bitcoin-consultant, who initially established the contact and who is so kind to post the messages of BUND Berlin e.V. to you.

So, have some nice christmas days and good luck for all the ongoing and coming kickstarter-campaigns!

Thorsten Edler
BUND Berlin e.V.

Just honored my pledge by sending 5 BTC to the Bitcoin 100 vanity address, TX ID: 9955afd2b35b52f8de669b6a747442641d58347f0977a8e577f9073642165da4

The volatility of the Bitcoin's value is settling down and an increasing number of online retailers are excepting the currency. New smartphone apps are enabling Bitcoins to be used as easily as cash. From The Economist article:

Tony Gallippi, the boss of Bitpay, which processes Bitcoin payments for retailers, says that his client list has increased from around 100 in March to 1,100 now. These are mostly e-commerce businesses, selling things like domain names and web hosting. But the list also includes a taxi-driver in Chicago and a dentist in Finland. "Credit cards weren't designed for the internet," he says. Bitcoin transactions cost less and cannot be reversed in the way credit-card transactions can be. This is important for firms selling to customers in countries known for credit-card fraud, such as Russia or Belarus.

is there a chance to find out the contact data of the bitcoinplus admin?? Or is this guy 100% anonymous?

There was a CEO that got slammed by the SEC for a Facebook message, I forget which company though.

With all due respect, Phin. I like your humorous side.

But this is something else completely.

I don't know if I can explain.

Sorry, I feel I need to explain this statement a bit better


I don't mean that they are bad or have less worth because they are poor. I don't think someone's current net worth necessarily says much about them. My own net worth only finally went from negative to positive this September. There are plenty of examples of Mr. Douche Moneybags out there, especially from people who simply inherited their money. And there are a TON of examples of poor people busting their asses dawn to dusk to support their families and strive to get to something better. Especially in the much maligned illegal alien community. I admire those people. Specifically those with the drive to move forward, the curiosity to learn, explore, and improve their lives. The types of poor that I don't like, and that I see among a lot of SA's ranks, are the complacent kind of poor, who are poor in money, motivation, curiosity, and culture, and are comfortable where they are. They are the types who live in Small Town, Middle America, working hard, dead-end jobs, living in the middle of nowhere, and have no interest in doing anything more, or traveling outside of their town, because they "have everything they need right here." Or the types that are like that, who also are often complaining about having too little money, crappy families, and not enough to do where they're at, but yet don't bother to do anything about it. All they do is moan, but are too comfortable where they are, and too afraid to attempt to change.
Maybe I'm just biased by the few people in SA I know personally, who do actually live in those poor, uninteresting situations, but considering one of the main points of SA's ridicule is that Bitcoiners are flailing around, trying to be "Randian supermen," whom they make fun of at every opportunity whenever someone tries to throw out wild ideas for starting a business, or invests in mining equipment, while their status quo is to just be a good little 9-to-5, tax-paying, obedient citizen, it makes me think that my bias is warranted.

I'm also now fairly convinced that SA works on their own self-feeding bias. Their whole point is to laugh at other's expense, so the only links that end up on their forums are ones some members track down about someone failing miserably. And sure, we have people like logansryche and others who may not be all right in the head, had a few people who did blow a ton of money on mining equipment at precisely the wrong time because they didn't bother doing their finance homework, and had idiots investing tons of money in things that were obviously too good to be true. If that's all you ever read when on that forum (and it usually is, since that's the point of it), then you would obviously have a pretty bad view of Bitcoin and bitcoiners, while completely missing that a majority here does have good business ideas (or are at least willing to risk and learn from mistakes), did run the math and are making actual profits on mining, and don't invest in stupid scams. Most just stay quiet, some ridicule the same people SA does.
One quote I remember best from one of my teachers - "If you get cut off by people in traffic, you will just assume "bad driver" and carry on. If you are told that Asians are bad drivers, and then you get cut off by people in traffic, you will actually look to see if the person is Asian, and validate your own prejudice that "Asians are indeed bad drivers, or ignore it if they aren't. That's how racism works - it's a self-feeding loop" We're all likely guilty of that at some level.
/rant

To them "power is
not a means; it is an end. And power means the capacity to inflict unlimited pain and suffering to another
human being"[3]. Power, then, for them creates reality, it creates truth. The position which Orwell
attributes here to the power elite can be said to be an extreme form of philosophical idealism, but it is more
to the point to recognize that the concept of truth and reality which exists in 1984 is an extreme form of
pragmatism in which truth becomes subordinated to the Party. An American writer, Alan Harrington, who
in Life in the Crystal Palace [4] gives a subtle and penetrating picture of life in a big American corporation,
has coined an excellent expression for the contemporary concept of truth: "mobile truth." If I work for a big
corporation which claims that its product is better than that of all competitors, the question whether this
claim is justified or not in terms of ascertainable reality becomes irrelevant. What matters is that as long as
I serve this particular corporation, this claim becomes "my" truth, and I decline to examine whether it is an
objectively valid truth. In fact, if I change my job and move over to the corporation which was until now
"my" competitor, I shall accept the new truth, that its product is the best, and subjectively speaking, this
new truth will be as true as the old one. It is one of the most characteristic and destructive developments of
our own society that man, becoming more and more of an instrument, transforms reality more and more
into something relative to his own interests and functions. Truth is proven by the consensus of millions; to
the slogan "how can millions be wrong" is added "and how can a minority of one be right." Orwell shows
quite clearly that in a system in which the concept of truth as an objective judgment concerning reality is
abolished, anyone who is a minority of one must be convinced that he is insane.

Well I guess in that case I ain't gonna tell you what it stands for, fellow forum member. Feel the burn.