Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2024, 05:18:57 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 [599] 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 »
11961  Other / Meta / Re: Get email notification of thread starter posts for a specific forum on: April 30, 2015, 10:42:21 AM
Click here to be notified about new threads created in the Announcements (Altcoins) forum: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=notifyboard;sa=on;board=159.0;

You just need to visit the forum section and click "Notify" in the upper right corner and you'll get notified when new Threads are created in that forum and not when a user replies to posts.

To sort the forum thread click "Last post". https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=159.0;sort=last_post

However, you'll be notified only once via email and until you don't visit that forum section, the second notification won't be sent. I hope this helps  Smiley

I am not sure if MZ said the same thing.
11962  Other / Meta / Re: Referral Section on: April 29, 2015, 06:07:50 PM

I am surprised to see you agreed to this. You already saw BadBear's post in previous thread about referral link.

I missed this quote "If you pay people to register under your ref link it works on games and rounds, also sometimes when people find new promos or giveaways they give their ref link and a non ref link, seems to be allowed aswell." "Still referral spam."

I have seen Sr. members as well who do it and never thought that it wouldn't be allowed as they might not be aware of the rules then.



I don't want to see "Trashcan v3". There certainly won't be any use to it. Owners of spambots will only be the persons who gain from it. People who want to advertise their referral link should choose whether they need a paid sig in their signature or referral link. Their choice.


Most PTC sites have such a section and it may not be useful to the forum but to members it can be. It was my suggestion and one may agree to disagree.
11963  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: Beware of PayPal and other reversible transfer services on: April 29, 2015, 04:38:23 PM
Why is Bank Transfer not safe? It cannot be reversed as once the money is sent to the bank, it cannot be chargedback.
11964  Local / Off-Topic (India) / Re: ICICI bank is very unprofessional on: April 29, 2015, 04:30:26 PM
Why dont you go with Government banks like SBI, Allahabad Bank, Punjab National Bank, Bank of Baroda etc. ? SBI is pretty professional now a days...

I had an account with Bank of Baroda but the interest rates are quite low and the staff as well is very rude.

I have tried the other banks but am considering SBI.
11965  Other / Meta / Re: Referral Section on: April 29, 2015, 04:23:14 PM
I thought of suggesting a section may be like "Advertise Here" which could allow one to post referral links or exchange referrals (it it could be allowed). Now it seems you can add a referral link only in the signature or as marco has stated.

11966  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: need BTC, have PM on: April 29, 2015, 12:59:57 PM
How much can you send via Perfect Money for 0.0645 BTC?
11967  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Post-Partition: India still owes Pakistan a little over Rs5.6b, says State Bank on: April 29, 2015, 10:16:49 AM
Am not supporting either countries as both have been attacked by terrorists and so in that respect, both the countries aren't safe to live in.

You are a quality moron if you think an entire country of 1.2 billion population is unsafe because of a terrorist attack once in a blue moon.

Stop trying to increase your post count with stuff you are ignorant about. Take your tripe elsewhere.

Yes, I am a moron to think that terrorists don't exist like you. FYI, my city has been under the attack as well many times  Angry Once in a blue moon, yeah. My friend who lost her father in the train bomb blast never travels in the train till today as she finds the country very safe.


I was talking about Kashmir (you dint bother to read it). Kashmir is under the continuous attack and if you find it safe, it's your wish not mine. You may find even Iraq and Iran very safe.



I don't care about talking to people like you who just want to insult others so don't quote me.
11968  Other / Archival / Re: I need some C# help on: April 28, 2015, 08:49:55 PM
@jonnybravo0311, you helped me a lot. Thanks

We have 2 hours of informatics weekly. Professor tells us to write some material from the books in our notebooks and when we are done, we are free.

OK, I have done it with numbers.


Can you give me some hint how to do it with text?
 


Use a for loop instead of a do and while loop.:

for (; ; )
         {
            Console.WriteLine("Your name");
         }



1. task
Program which writes my name 10 times.

#include <stdio.h>

main()

{

  int n;
  n=10;
  While (n)

    {
     printf (Your Name);
     n = n-1;
    }

}

LOL! This is a C program and not C#.
11969  Economy / Services / Re: Will pat 5,500 satoshi for a ten second task on: April 28, 2015, 07:29:49 PM
I've sent you a PM.
11970  Other / Meta / Re: people "buying" trust without you noticing? on: April 28, 2015, 06:59:30 PM
I don't see why someone shouldn't leave feedback for loans that they complete. If someone borrows 0.01 BTC and pays back 0.015 BTC, make sure you leave that in your feedback. If someone has proven themselves trustworthy with 0.01 BTC, that doesn't mean they are trustworthy with any larger sums.

500 positive feedback from the most trusted members of the forum for 0.01 BTC each, doesn't make that person trustworthy with 5 BTC, maybe with 0.05.

I don't believe in giving positive trust to any member as it's like giving a person a reputation of always being trusted. I had given a person positive trust earlier when I had completed a trade with him successfully and he turned out to scam someone else. The people who he scammed almost blamed me for giving him a feedback just after one trade and that was a lesson learnt by me that I cannot take the responsibility of even a known person being trustworthy. They try to abuse the trust system then.
11971  Local / Off-Topic (India) / Re: Earthquake hits nepal and north east india, heavy damage in nepal on: April 28, 2015, 06:31:13 PM
It's sad to know about 4400 deaths. May their souls rest in peace.
11972  Local / Off-Topic (India) / ICICI bank is very unprofessional on: April 28, 2015, 06:27:46 PM
I submitted my documents 2 weeks back for opening and account and I have noticed that they have yet not opened my bank  Undecided

They have stopped accepting ration card and electricity bills as address proof as well and hence I submitted my voters ID card but still they dint yet open my account. Two weeks back I got an SMS about my request being processed and still no response from them.


I have other bank accounts as well and it has never taken more than a week. HDFC opened my bank account in 2 days but this bank is just delaying.  Huh


I am planning to close my account as soon as it gets opened I don't want to have any association with such a bank that does not value its customers  Angry
11973  Economy / Services / Re: want to buy votes on: April 28, 2015, 05:57:36 PM
Still looking, i am willing to pay 0.001 per vote, IP preferably from EU/Balkan

If you are interested in buying 1 vote at a time, I can give you one for 0.001 BTC but I have an Indian IP. Let me know if interested.
11974  Other / Archival / Re: Quickseller, trust abuse, innacurate negative ratings, unprofesional escrow... on: April 28, 2015, 05:51:22 PM
If he had removed it, that would explain what he said to me about checking the top of this thread for an example of a time when he removed unwarranted negative trust.  However, it'd be weird that he'd put it back right afterwards....

Why are you leaving positive trust for yourself using your alt account? It seems that https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=117142 is your alt as the signature implies the same.
11975  Other / Archival / Re: Quickseller, trust abuse, innacurate negative ratings, unprofesional escrow... on: April 28, 2015, 05:23:12 PM
I have pissed off a lot of people and cost them a lot of money they were hoping to steal.

You have also pissed off a lot of innocent people and prevented them from contributing to the Bitcoin community because of your false or misleading accusations.
No.

Here we go, in denial again.

I noticed that you had your negative trust removed and then Quickseller added it again today. What happened?
11976  Other / Meta / Re: Selling Bitcointalk Trust - which subforum to use? on: April 28, 2015, 05:19:25 PM
The links are to accusations, not evidence.  Sure, Trust can be abused, but not BespokeServicesLTD Trust.
If selling trust was bad, I'm sure theymos would have made a rule against it.  He didn't, and here is why:

You can't ban selling Trust, there's no way to enforce that.  Trust would still be bought and sold, but newbies wouldn't know about it, so they won't be able to protect themselves.

I'm selling my Bespoke Quality trust in the open, on Bitcointalk, so newbies would know it's done all the time and will be more careful.
Just like selling accounts.
You're not against selling trusted accounts, are you?



You opened a new account so soon: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=507594

I know you are disgusted with the buying and selling accounts but now you're just trolling and now others as well are entertaining your post.
11977  Other / Meta / Re: Selling Bitcointalk Trust - which subforum to use? on: April 28, 2015, 03:47:09 PM
I did not know that honesty can be bought and sold. Why can't you yourself prove that you are honest by posting with your main account? I don't think an alt can be trusted.
11978  Other / Archival / Re: Quickseller, trust abuse, innacurate negative ratings, unprofesional escrow... on: April 28, 2015, 01:58:00 PM
The case that he dug into a persons posts to give him a negative rating for something he did 2 years prior got already buried with irrelevant posts.

Looks like he's gone the opposite way with me.  He's added more negative trust (trust spamming?).  His new one says that not only does he take a known scammer's word for it that I'm somehow a scammer, but because I called him out for his smear campaign, that also makes me untrustworthy.  He says "avoid interacting with me at all".  Hey, Quickseller, how is leaving three negative trust ratings on me (between you and your alt) equal to avoiding interaction?  Seems like immature trolling to me.

Holy shit! Just looked at your ratings, did that idiot give you negative trust for something you did two years ago? How objective of you Quickseller, it's not like you targeted because you hate him, not at all. He really deserved a negative trust rating 2 years after no one else had complained about what he did.

No wonder that you think accts seller is his alt, he necroposted on your scam accusation from 2013 2 years afterwards just to target you from what is seems. Way to abuse his position in default trust.

People that have Quickseller in their trust lists should seriously reconsider their choice, his abuse is getting out of hand.

It's not that Quickseller is leaving a negative trust for personal reasons but his ratings are mostly based on assumptions and extreme cases which may not be true (although they can be a possibility) and hence one cannot trust his ratings. If he negates an account for scamming there are 50% chances of it being true and 50% untrue. Unless there is a solid evidence or the person attempts scamming, it's not right to make assumptions.

The people who trust him may blindly trust his ratings but they need to even read the reasons which is not the case always. I too find many people suspicious here but I can't claim anyone to be a scammer without having any proof.

He won't be removed from the trust list for these reasons.
11979  Other / Meta / Re: Quickseller left himself positive trust using an alt account on: April 28, 2015, 01:15:46 PM

That was not an admission. I also stated that I was not saying the account in question was ever mine.

Sorry as "admit" is the wrong word. You always twist your words and leave the reader in suspense. I felt that you might have worked as an escrow for the account in question and hence owned it for a while.

@OP: deluxeCITY does not seem to be an alt of Quickseller as he hasn't capitalized the letter "i" while Quickseller always takes care of his capitalization and grammar.  Wink

Anyways, I notice that you have a lot of FANS here on BCT and it's tough for you to handle them now.
11980  Other / Meta / Re: Quickseller left himself positive trust using an alt account on: April 28, 2015, 12:59:55 PM
Obviously you have not done enough waisted research because this account has been under my control for months! Just take a look at recent posts you plonker we have very different styles of writing plus we post in 'totally' different threads. He never ever posts in gambling or any of the threads i do, your research lacks research.

I left him deserved trust because he could have saved me from losing my funds in a trade, i choose a trusted escrow i have dealt with before. One last thing because i won't be posting hear anymore! Why does he care about 'untrusted feedback' LOL! Surly you can see this is back to front and he would give positive to this account lol! Check my feed back untrusted and you will see who i traded with using Qs as escrow.

Case closed newbie.

So you bought the account from Quickseller?

Quickseller himself admitted: "The account in question is not mine as of now. "
Pages: « 1 ... 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 [599] 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!