You’re right on about all that which will take years to fix. Unless metanet can make it happen much faster.
I’ve brought up yobit numerous times and warned people that they lock wallets to force you to sell for very long periods. I even said it’s most likely going under. I always warn people if I see it. I warned them against cryotopia, hitbtc and xt and now I’m throwing in Hotbit. I was right about the first 3. Cryptsy fooled me cause it never got hacked I knew for a fact only Vern had the key to cold storage room and they were in the US where there’s recourse and serious prison. Cryptsy was the only exchange that I didn’t see coming. The rest even gox I knew it was an inside job - they’re all inside jobs.
Sadly, It’s a necessary act or this crypto thing won’t work on a large scale. I’ve paid more than my dues for the greater good without a big fuss so cross my name off the Hax0r list. The only fed I have a problem with is Microguy cause he made a written binding contract with us and broke it, thus leaving a fraudulent paper trail. He’s literally a criminal and he’s not above the law. That’s why I’ll keep hounding and hunting him. The rest were smart, can’t prove Jack so you just forget it.
Vlad
Well we can still go necromance with our favorite coins in the meantime. I even signed up for an aol.com email address because u still can. Yesterday I was on IRC mostly freenode. No one around to talk go figure lol. Oh well, one of these days we'll live long enough to see more than just TwitterEggs on/from Namecoin on OpenSea as tokenized ERC-721 of "wrapped" Namecoin NFT... I just don't think THEY want to read blocks correctly on other merge mined chains. We're too easy to let down and make wait - so why would the invisible hand care? In the meantime while MarkM's game slowly comes together in our metaverse moonshot - lets share reading. I feel like pretending it's 2011-2014 and I'm living it right. Seems like a better time. Ethereum can really irk me sometimes. I think it's a boring and overrated software. https://bitcoinmagazine.com/culture/the-emergence-of-bitcoin-through-the-lens-of-austrian-economics |
|
|
|
Problem is mainstream media hack and criminal cases unresolved, civil suits ongoing, exchanges claiming they lost funds but did not steal, network I mean exchange operators being held accountable for lost coins bootstrapping off botnet filled channels with mods that can boot your nodes, fragmented networks, protocol changes leaving out old nodes that CEX may be running, cloud outages, bootstrapping non-Bitcoin networks being flooded, flaws in software (bugs), networks going offline, unplugged servers.... offline data that can come back online and re-org or augment chains.  Pretty much all these things happened, but how many times Vlad, have you talked about Yobit IXC wallets. These walled garden exchanges all have the same chat/trollboxes, RU CN connections, and well, if you can't withdraw the price gets knocked down don't it - IXC on Yobit. Also if you have only a few listings like WEX when it locked withdrawals for BTC and other coins only allowing NMC to be withdrawn, NMC benefitted from people looking to get out - but then where did they sell it? Prob nowhere it would've been a loss. Right? Idk. Too much protocol and single point of failure bootstraps and misunderstood protocol and patching. Likely not hacks, just a story of a metagame that's only reality to the people confused from the outside of the directors lounge (like me) - but you do have the ability to just think for yourself after awhile. Like DNS, these court cases and allegations are unresolved. Maybe even illegal if the Ulbricht sentence was real - but never have I ever seen such a big case not on mainstream media and sadly during that trial I watched those cable news channels. They never reported shit. I only see them in documentaries as if we all knew it was a case. They made it seem like that trial was OJ. Fuck that. I deny its reality. Highly illegal to put away a network admin with hosting in other countries. He was basically a forum admin and it had a marketplace. Big deal. Again, just common law in US courts. Rule based off past rulings. These cases of the Internet and it not being physical meet in person type dealing - the precedent for that isn't set. It's still going to be overturned and that will set the liability precident. Putting valuations of $ on Bitcoins and heck even auctioning them off with your U.S. Marshalls? That's all legally court ordered and in our legal system establishing the court ruled BTC had x $$$ value. That's a good result people overlook. =P |
|
|
|
|
I'm bumping because of the discovery of property titles on NMC and Emblem Vault resizing in these anceint NFT and being wrapped up good to ERC-721 with all data intent over selling these vintage pioneer NFL into' the mainstream before eth, others. They've more fun too! I wish the apps came back. Doge Reboot is doing quite well competition. It's 7 years old fast settlement and Emblem Vault away from being a UTXO, ancient NFT, only to have an ERC-721 "wallet" to protect its wrapped travels. Just in time for dinner Emblem.Vault FTW!
|
|
|
|
I'm updated it works great. Fast Fast Fast. Simple, secure, continuous, merge mined for a decade, and nothing much left for us in UTXO land. One upgrade to 0.9.x - Do we go for Counterparty? It sure is hot. Or maybe we get all over the place - we're the darkhorse of all crypto and I'm seeing NMC IXC making moves on AI grade sights lately. DVC is an unsung here - I'm excited for the Galactic Milieu. MarkM must've got ripped off by Zuck because he's flat out nailed the last 11 year developing the game the right way legally. Excited for crossover  |
|
|
|
I have been in that space since before the advent of Huntercoin, with my endgame being the full-immersion 3-D interface but starting first with what it is that will eventually be illustrated with full 3-D immersive graphics. I aimed at strategic / tactical games rather than "twitch games", that is, I aimed for characters whose accuracy, combat abilities and so on are part of the character rather than part of the player. Part of the reason for that is of course to keep things easier to make "accessibile" to "handicapped" players, but part is also that it seemed (and still seems to me) easier to first figure out what happened then let client interfaces determine how to present what happened to the player than to first draw in 3D something like a bullet traversing a trajectory or a sword swinging through certain parts of 3-D space then from that try to figure out whether anything happened to be in its path and, if so, what the effect would be upon the bullet or sword and upon whatever it intercepted. The latter approach seemed like it would require some kind of Artificial Intelligence and/or Image Recognition for a client interface to try to figure out what happened based on what was depicted in a 3-D image, whereas the former approach lets text mode clients simply say what happened and let graphical interaces depict it however they choose based on the graphical powers and resources available to them. (Tile based 2-D using the most similar tiles, clients equipped with libraries of 3-D models choosing the most appropriate or similar models to deploy and so on.) I also chose to build from free open-source resources, so basically I periodically examine what free open-source games and virtual reality tools are available that support (hopefully massively) multi-user and actually work, and look for ways to incorporate them into the game. As I explain on the Devtome wiki page https://www.devtome.com/galactic_milieu ultimately the economics have to work, at least the part of the economics that pays for hosting and bandwidth, else the whole edifice is unlikely to work or last. So I started from the observation that to many people, at least the kind of people we see a lot on Bitcointalk forums, simply having something to trade is game enough; in fact I expect that a lot of them actually far prefer simply directly trading on an "exchange" to having to first have a character in a place on a planet make its way to a place where things can be traded, possibly being "mugged" on the way to or from the exchange. So I started with currencies. In order that the game need not depend of having "enough" players trading each "pair" to allow "price discovery", I developed the "treasuries" system whereby the galactic currencies each have a "treasury" from which the currency's value per coin or share can be calculated simply by dividing the total value of the "treasury" by the number of coins or shares minted. That also allowed me to adopt various ancient cryptocoins from the dawn of crypto simply by building a "treasury" for each coin I wanted to adopt and dividing the total value of that treasury by the number of coins minted. Those who followed Facebook's idea to create a currency of their own will recall that Facebook proposed much the same idea for their own "stable" currency: it would have a "treasury" of assets behind it. I regarded that as somewhat of a validation of my approach. As you can see from the tables and plots at http://galaxies.mygamesonline.org/digitalisassets.html which show historical value data going back to 2012, this system has been running for quite some time and has seemed reasonably effective. Each currency or asset also has at least one "slush fund" account, if only as a place to keep any of itself that it happens to own, such as ones it never parted with and ones it has bought back. Each asset's value is counted as zero when computing the value of its own treasury, and in any case it is intended that it not be necessary to dig things back out of the treasury in order to buy back the asset or coin, the slush fund should ideally suffice to buy back the whole lot without having to dig into the treasury to do so. The initial worlds were FreeCiv worlds, with the monthly hosting fee to control a nation on such a world being based on the so-called "square miles" that FreeCiv reports the nation as controlling. The intent is that those "square miles" cost enough that a full array of OpenSim "regions" can be hosted to represent all of those "square miles". Since we are still a long way from actually spinning-up immersive 3-D interfaces, those "hosting fees" the nations are paying mostly just accumulate in the treasury of GHC, a Corp known outside the game as General Hosting Corp and inside the game as Galactic Holding Corp. Nations should not mind that they are paying a heck of a lot more than it costs to host a FreeCiv world and some Crossfire RPG maps of selected portions of it (hopefully eventually all cities and any FreeCiv tile that has a FreeCiv unit on it), because they should aim to own a proportion of the shares of GHC commensurate with their proportion of all FreeCiv "square miles" in the multiverse so that almost all the value they pay out as hosting fees accrues into the value of the shares of GHC that they own, until some future time when GHC starts paying out huge sums to host 3-D immersive representations of (viewports into, rabbitholes into) the game. For text mode we use CoffeeMUD, as most early MUD code had restrictive licenses forbidding using it commercially without making some kind of deal with their developer. Limiting bandwidth of the initial interfaces allows a lot more room for player profit than if everything every character did had to be presented in full immersive 3-D at high framerate, so play-to-earn players should appreciate that even if twitch-game advocates have reservations about it or objections to it. It also makes dployment of large numbers of scripted characters more practical. I am not sure whether it is a good thing or a bad thing that Facebook seems to be coming around to some of my ideas.  -MarkM- Yes I have seen FB follow the MarkM curve now for some time in relation to your game.  |
|
|
|
Maybe the high transaction fees problem can be sidestepped by making a clone of Counterparty on a blockchain that uses the same address format as bitcoin so that for each bitcoin address that exact same address works on the other chain; and is merged-mined alongside bitcoin so has a very high difficulty albeit not as high as bitcoin's since not all bitcoin miners do merged mining.
I am thinking of DeVCoin, which admittedly is based on bitcoin code that by now is a little old, but should not be too hard to bring up to date if newfangled features of bitcoin are desired.
Counterparty could even be updated to be able to retain linkage to bitcoin's own blockchain by periodically doing bitcoin-chain counterparty transactions bring the bitcoin chain up to date with various transactions that have happened on the cheaper chain, to pin it all back to bitcoin's level of difficulty/security from time to time.
-MarkM-
THIS. Still needs to happen. Big win for CP users. You can use DVC chain like an EVM L2 Rollup but on Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
WARNING: I am pretty sure the code only supports 1/5ths of a share, trying to make it do 1/10ths would probably require a rebuilding of the actual node core software as well as maybe some modifying of the scripts we use to build the distribution files.
So file custodians be aware the files I just prepared might not actually work, we might have to re-do the file-preparing using 1/5ths of a share as I am pretty darn sure that is the smallest granularity we coded in from the start.
-MarkM-
Thanks for the heads up Mark! This is how we are fixing the issue: 1. Increase shares from 200 to 400 2. Duplicate assigned shares to all receivers (i.e: 1/10ths to 1/5ths) 3. Redistribute remaining 1/5ths to ensure the new receiver file is paying 1/5ths (tricky part) For #3 (and after several tests) I found additional 3/5ths of a share needed to be distributed somewhere, so I did as follows: - Increase Satoshi0x's Marketing duty shares from 1/5th to 2/5ths (well done Dan!) - Increase develCuy's Earning Factotum shares from 1/5th to 3/5ths (dude you're keeping me very busy!) I'll give up (again) some fractions of shares in the future, whenever we need to onboard new people. Changes are ready to deploy. Go go Devcoin! - develCuy The change above should wait till round 123 since current round 122 is already minting under the rules of original receiver_122.csv, the only change is nominal. I changed 1/10ths by 1/6ths to reflect the actual max granularity and surprisingly the sum of all shares when using 1/6ths is 200! Btw, Devcoin blockchain keeps running well, it is just the block explorer that needs the right receiver_122.csv. This is what I get from getinfo ATM: {
"version" : 80700,
"protocolversion" : 70001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 488965,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 4,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 26172217.34253749,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1542223662,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : "",
"round" : 122
}In order to fix your node or wallet, please just shutdown it, delete receiver_122.csv from "receiver" folder and start your node/wallet again. It should start syncing just like my wallet did. NOTE: In case you are running an old Devcoin version, please download the file manually from: https://receiver01.devcoin.org/receiver_122.csvGo go Devcoin! No get it a decentralized coin with a centralized management, changing rules and deciding who gets what ... no good idea is nice but model is not transparent reward has to be based on utility like numbers of views & rating update to a decentralized automatic reward system and maybe you got a chance Obviously, there's a 100% chance all this data and work are going to get upgraded/compatible with the layers that have oracles on it that will give our community the value it has contributed here. Even thise POST costs value. Multiply by 10.5 years and however many more on private nets. |
|
|
|
liberland.org - not too far off. Go lay down some bricks there and make Vlad's Government |
|
|
|
Hope it helps!
I hope for that person's sake their merit ends up being valued monetarily. I didn't even know people on Reddit tokenized karma until months ago so don't believe you'll be finding me trying to rack up the points any time soon. That being sad I don't mind a motivated community member in a place its pretty much impossible to s*itpost for merit |
|
|
|
There doesn't appear to be a 0.01BTC fee condition in the code anymore, because the main.h file that housed it has been completely removed and I haven't found the condition in any other include/source files.
It's definitely gone. Some vodoo magic accounting. There's quite a few places thought where forks "burn" or "destroy" 0.01 units of their coin as well as some places where Bitcoin miners "threw away" their block rewards/fees. Just some magic accounting - I always sort of keep a running accounting book as I study tx. I think it's funny how we're in a similar spot today with "ETH" -- it's 0.01+ for small 10-30 USD/transactions so I don't even bother with it. Like I missed the BTC train, I go for precursors (older codebases than the Bitcoin Core code, or bets on special forks that are long "dormant" but have a good dev community). I feel like "ETH" isn't the only chain that is gonna merge with one of its forks ('Beacon Chain' merge for ETH 2.0). Just a hunch. |
|
|
|
I do not see how it does that. 1 BTC will likely always be smaller than USD/EUR/etc, thus meaning that it can be used for micropayments.
This guy though... (necroed again - this is a great and overlooked threat with satoshi and Gavin both) |
|
|
|
I’m hoping Arizona or Florida fall in the conservative gun toting zone. Then I’ll come back. Maybe.
Florida isn't conservative enough for you? I'll be there soon enough |
|
|
|
need one exchange
Sure. Lets make one |
|
|
|
You taking CS courses or just self learning. You’re sounding like a real dev. Bastardi. :/
A person who lives in the US paying for CS courses is like a guy who has the internet paying for pornography. Unless you go to Berkeley ...but I don't feel like getting full paint buckets thrown on my clothing for walking around campus because some girl from Newport Beach was reborn into a SJW and shuns me for going to class to learn about making the machines more powerful/labels me a corporatist. Then checks her iPhone and Snapchats to everyone how much of a difference they're all making... That's what Berkeley's like right? Sad to say that's most coastal schools right now. They’ll self destruct but probably leave behind lasting damage. The US should split in half. Who’s gonna stop the south and the Midwest? Haha. Try for a vertical split since the horizontal one didn't pan out for the overt slavers lol. Now we're just slaves being mandated by Washington D.C. :/ Vertical won’t work. Too many conservative states would want on and east coast is almost as bad as california. Expect this, a foretelling map from the heaven. No blood spilled this way. I give it an 80% probability of actually coming true. This eclipse BTW was only over North America so I raise that to 90%. Can’t wait to move to a sane moral state. Apocalipsa Not a fan of Illinois? Cairo is a ghost town - never been but YouTubers like to go record their trips to the despair |
|
|
|
I like a good deep dive into stats that don't involve money - just ratings. I respect the commitment this whole topic was a fun read and also shows that people do care about quality community discourse when no $$$ is at stake. If I HAD sMerit you would have got some from me already - be back when I load up again |
|
|
|
You taking CS courses or just self learning. You’re sounding like a real dev. Bastardi. :/
A person who lives in the US paying for CS courses is like a guy who has the internet paying for pornography. Unless you go to Berkeley ...but I don't feel like getting full paint buckets thrown on my clothing for walking around campus because some girl from Newport Beach was reborn into a SJW and shuns me for going to class to learn about making the machines more powerful/labels me a corporatist. Then checks her iPhone and Snapchats to everyone how much of a difference they're all making... That's what Berkeley's like right? Sad to say that's most coastal schools right now. They’ll self destruct but probably leave behind lasting damage. The US should split in half. Who’s gonna stop the south and the Midwest? Haha. Try for a vertical split since the horizontal one didn't pan out for the overt slavers lol. Now we're just slaves being mandated by Washington D.C. :/ |
|
|
|
You taking CS courses or just self learning. You’re sounding like a real dev. Bastardi. :/
A person who lives in the US paying for CS courses is like a guy who has the internet paying for pornography. Unless you go to Berkeley ...but I don't feel like getting full paint buckets thrown on my clothing for walking around campus because some girl from Newport Beach was reborn into a SJW and shuns me for going to class to learn about making the machines more powerful/labels me a corporatist. Then checks her iPhone and Snapchats to everyone how much of a difference they're all making... That's what Berkeley's like right? |
|
|
|
The change above should wait till round 123 since current round 122 is already minting under the rules of original receiver_122.csv, the only change is nominal. I changed 1/10ths by 1/6ths to reflect the actual max granularity and surprisingly the sum of all shares when using 1/6ths is 200! Btw, Devcoin blockchain keeps running well, it is just the block explorer that needs the right receiver_122.csv. This is what I get from getinfo ATM: {
"version" : 80700,
"protocolversion" : 70001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 488965,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 4,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 26172217.34253749,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1542223662,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : "",
"round" : 122
}In order to fix your node or wallet, please just shutdown it, delete receiver_122.csv from "receiver" folder and start your node/wallet again. It should start syncing just like my wallet did. NOTE: In case you are running an old Devcoin version, please download the file manually from: https://receiver01.devcoin.org/receiver_122.csvGo go Devcoin! It worked! My wallet is caught up and I received the new block share reward! 03:43:14

{
"version" : 80700,
"protocolversion" : 70001,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 62783446.60240600,
"blocks" : 488968,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 1,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 23711340.31830925,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1630823224,
"keypoolsize" : 100,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"unlocked_until" : 0,
"errors" : "",
"round" : 122
}
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
