Cricket is only the place for the players to perform. We cannot make players in cricket matches because in International team we need good planner, good hard hitters, good pressure handlers, good bowlers like Muhammad Amir when he came in International team. We need good partnership builders and strong mindset players but now our team lack in everything. No single player is available in the team ,we saw their performance in T20 World Cup where they could not chase only 120 runs . Pakistani team should sink in water due to disrespect.But they are living their life happy and we won the World Cup 15 years ago and now we have no strong team . Players have no conversation with each other and that is also big cause of failure.
Basically I think the main reason is the references. Means the selection committee always give the chance to those players who have strong references. Or we can say they give chance who gave money to the selection committee. Means directly or indirectly corruption is interfering. And selection committee is not giving the chance to those who has the natural talents. And one is the most important thing which effect on our national team is match fixing. Many of our players are involved in it. Well if Pakistani team really want to remain in the top teams so PCB should resolve these issues. If Pakistan cricket did not have any kind of problems with the match-fixing, this could certainly be a very different story for Pakistan cricket. So many players have been caught and many cricketer have actually lost their careers because of this. Corruption is obviously everywhere. But for some reason, it is actually very much visible in Pakistan. The reputation of Pakistan is obviously not good at all. But I think things have changed a lot. Right now the players that the Pakistan team has, are obviously of a different mindset. I don't think it is going to be a big problem for Pakistan to actually find really good players who are interested in cricket. Kids who can play really well, should also not be that hard to find in Pakistan. But even though match-fixing is not a thing anymore, corruption is definitely still very prominent. |
|
|
|
Ten Hag is full of luck right now, because in any other year he will be sacked so much early and had no chance of stay in his spot.
But thanksfully for him Manchester United still in the bad moment for so many years, so the management dont want to change again the coach, they tried it before and no one bring any solution to the main problem, so they want now to keep him and give more chance to solidify a project.
Erik Ten Hag is a very tactically gifted coach. He knows how to tactically outclass a team and deliver good results. Yes, he may not have been the best in the league, but he alone can't be blamed for this. He had an injury-depleted squad, and a lot of his main players were out of form, out of luck. He can also be criticized for his decisions in terms of transfer business, but again, that’s entirely not his fault either. ManUtd has been lacking a proper Director of Football in the club, and good scouts too. To maintain at the highest level, you need a fit squad and a lot more luck. Maybe after the inclusion of Zirkzee and De Ligt, ManU would get back on track. |
|
|
|
You are Bangladeshi because I don't like to watch the match of Bangladeshi team because they do not play quality cricket and BCB also not interested to improve the Bangladeshi team. There should be the solution of problems but now that is not possible for Bangladesh to play well in next tournament. Bangladeshi team could play against Zimbabwe, Namibia and Kenya . It could not play against Afghanistan, India and Pakistan also. Now Bangladeshi team is very low than Pakistani team but I am not satisfy the performance of Pakistani team. Pakistani team could improve if PCB take good actions and there should be quality players and ok merit players. But that is impossible for Pakistan to play well in this tournament. Indian team is favorite and Afghanistan is less favorite than India.
Only because of political discrimination no such talented players are able to join the Bangladesh team. Despite the talent of the players, they are being victimized by politics and are able to develop them every time due to which the Bangladesh team is getting weaker day by day. The current chairman of Bangladesh BCB aims to do well in the next World Cup and not in this World Cup. Which can be called a kind of madness. Are you trying to say that Bangladesh doesn't have good players, maybe you are wrong. Look at Shakib Al Hasan, he is an all-rounder who is famous all over the world and perhaps he was the first to hold the record of being the world's number one all-rounder in all three formats of cricket. Bangladesh team's performance is very poor in Test and T20 format as compared to ODI format. You have to admit Bangladesh can challenge any team in ODI format as we have seen them in many matches. Bangladesh definitely has a lot of good players. But the problem is there are a lot of bad politics going on in Bangladesh right now. And that is probably the biggest thing which is affecting Bangladesh cricket so badly. And yes the Bangladesh Cricket Board is also full of politics. You know, the president of the Bangladesh Cricket Board Mr. Papon knows nothing about cricket at all. But for some reason, he is actually the president. Well actually because he is a very close guy to the Prime Minister of Bangladesh. There are a lot of players who are actually good in Bangladesh but they do not get a chance because they do not support the political party that is in power. It is as simple as that. And now even the squad has a lot of favoritism and politics going on. |
|
|
|
As for second best, I'd say it's Ethereum. It's second best as an investment, it has a big community which makes it seem more reliable than many other coins, and it's been around for a long time as a consistent #2 after Bitcoin.
Some people would think that their's no second best to Bitcoin well they might be partially right cause if you check the community behind Bitcoin and how it's price has attained some certain level, you'll see that there's no other Cryptocurrency that comes closer but then I won't leave out Ethereum, ETH might be no where close to BTC but it has value and it's market value is okay as Well and I believe if Bitcoin never existed, ETH would've been the best Cryptocurrency asset for investment. However, I love Bitcoin for it's transpiracy, it's blockchain is the most confidential block explorer used as a search tool for crypto transactions and I consider it the best Cryptocurrency asset that anyone would think of holding for a long term purpose, I picture Bitcoin as the future of money and we'll see how possible it come be in future. If BTC had never existed , ETH would never have appeared because all altcoins were created based on bitcoin , copying ideas from bitcoin and even ETH. I'm not a bitcoin maximalist but I have to admit that bitcoin is the best and only currency we should own long term and for our actual uses. The rest of the market is no different from speculation , so we need to be more careful instead of looking for another coin to put our trust in instead of bitcoin. ETH may not be close to bitcoin but it is really big but that is not enough for me to have long term faith in it . The crypto industry is very new and things are developing very fast and anything can happen so I wouldn't put my hopes on any other project other than bitcoin. |
|
|
|
|
It is true that most people think that the German government is selling bitcoins and almost no one knows exactly who is selling, you have provided an additional interesting information. But this won't change anything in the market and above all the sale of 50kBTC to the market is almost over so it won't matter who sells anymore.
As a bitcoin investor, we should focus on accumulating bitcoins and should take advantage every time someone dumps bitcoins to get better discounts. Don't spend too much time trying to figure out what the cause is and who is selling those bitcoins because it's almost impossible to change anything.
|
|
|
|
I am 20 years old man living in South Korea. I finally accumulated 0.1186448 BTC. Do you think I can make $30000 in this bitcoin cycle?
Wan Congratulations! I am really happy that you have been able to accumulate such an amount of bitcoin. What I will recommend you do is to properly secure your bitcoin. You can make $30,000 in bitcoin, but it all depends on you. If you can hold bitcoin for a long time, then you will be able to achieve that, but if you are holding it for a short period, then you might find it kind of difficult to achieve that, so if you are expecting that amount of money from the bitcoin you just bought, then you will have to hold it for a long time. You should keep in mind that you won’t be selling soon. In the long run, he could achieve his goal easily, but he is expecting that to happen during this bull season and I would say it is very difficult to achieve. Expecting bitcoin to increase 5 times from its current price is asking for too much and is nothing short of an impossible task. Many people are even starting to doubt that bitcoin cannot reach $100k this cycle, let alone expecting bitcoin to reach above $200k is almost too difficult to achieve. But he can achieve this goal sooner by continuing DCA instead of stopping buying and waiting. I believe that if he had had that bitcoin at a very young age, continuing to accumulate it would not have been his problem. @OP, as many others have said, you should keep accumulating bitcoins and you will reach your goal soon instead of waiting and it will take longer. |
|
|
|
Frankly if I were Trump, I won't be happy that I have a competition in Joe Biden. The guy's 81 for Pete's sakes!!
biden is only 4 years older than trump trump is not that young i am sure the usa is not happy that both of its biggest running candidates for president are on the verge of life and death i mean surely there are fitter, smatter, fresher minds out there that are not in the brink of extinction If it's not happy, why let the two oldest people run for president when both parties have many other young and enthusiastic candidates? In addition, the 4-year age difference is not small when it comes to the elderly, because 4 years ago Mr. Biden's situation was not as bad as it is now. If you watch the debate between the two, you will see that Mr. Trump is still much more alert than Mr. Biden even though the two are only 4 years apart as you said. What do I expect, the guy's gonna milk this opportunity for his benefit. Believe me when I say " never trust a politician".
he is going to tell all his “plans” about crypto and tell everyone how good and innovative he finds crypto time can only tell if he will actually push through his plans In fact, both Trump and Biden cannot be trusted because no politician is a good person, all they want is power and they will do anything to achieve their goals. But the question is do we have any other choice? Can we eliminate both of these candidates and propose someone better? Even Mr. Biden, will he really keep his promise if elected? All politicians are equally bad. |
|
|
|
Chelsea getting a huge cash injection is not going to "solve" anything for them. Lets be real, they do not have a bad team anyway, and they got a good manager, that is not the problem and money certainly isn't because they have some awesome players they bought as well, overpaid mostly too.
The issue they have is that they are not a "team", like if anyone thinks that City has the best team in the world, or at least in this league, has no idea about football, they have one of the best, but not better than everyone enough to win it four in a row. Why are they dominating then? Because they are a team, and being a team beats anything else in the world. Chelsea needs to learn to be a team, and if they do that, then sky is the limit for them, they have everything else ready.
Chelsea do have a team, but how effective is that team. They have a lot of young players I think don't have enough experience to pilot the affairs of the London pride and it played out last season. If the management of the club wants to pump in Money to help the manager buy some players he feels will help improve on the teams current performance, I don't see any problems with that. The kind of team you're looking out for Chelsea to get will Definitely take a bit of a time, Chelsea literally overhauled their team for last season and brought in new set of players who for me I still think are learning on the job, give them the next two seasons or even lesser, then you will see the army they will turn out to be. Mikel Arteta had almost similar experience with arsenal, but today the Gunners are one of the most solidify team in the English premier League. Chelsea have everything but a solid mindset in them. The players are good, the wage structure is broken but at least the players are happy. But we have to keep in mind that a club does not fix itself from the ruins in just one or two seasons. I think for them to get back in the Big 6 status, Todd Boehly has to ensure more trust in the manager and the players and let them do their things. If they are given time, things will start going their way more often. The manager that they have right now is great and had a great season with Leicester. He needs to be given enough time, and they will return to who they were 2-3 years back. |
|
|
|
Plans are involved for the growth of the club, Napoli will bounce back to extreme form but it's just a matter of time. Napoli new coach, Antonio Conte will make sufficient usage of his players. He's one of the promising coach that wouldn't settled for lesser scores, will bring on his best. Whereas in the case of Lukaku, he is an important player, he enchanced his ability and will exert more pressure towards the end of the league.
Currently, Napoli can be said to be the most hotly discussed club among the Serie A clubs. This is because the actions taken by Napoli are quite good, namely by bringing in Conte as their new coach, and intending to bring in Lukaku in the summer transfer market this time. However, as we know, Napoli has one obstacle in being able to carry out all its plans well. The problem is that no club has yet bought/contracted Osimhen. Meanwhile, the money from the sale of Osimhen will of course be used to bring in Lukaku and maybe several other players. So if, for example, Napoli fails to sell Osimhen in the transfer market this season, it is very likely that Napoli will fail to bring in Lukaku. So if that happens, Conte will definitely have to make good use of the players Napoli currently has. Because, even though Conte insists on bringing in Lukaku, while Napoli failed to sell Osimhen, I'm sure Napoli management doesn't want to spend any more money to buy Lukaku. Because as far as I know, Napoli's current finances are not as big as other clubs in Serie A. But even so, I also agree that Conte can definitely bring Napoli back to glory, even without Lukaku. Because if you look at his experience as a coach, Conte has always been able to develop the clubs he coaches very well. Likewise at Napoli, Conte will definitely be a very good coach this season. Apart from that, it is also possible that under Conte's tutelage, Osimhen will shine again at Napoli. So basically, I really can't wait to see how Napoli perform under Conte next season. Is Osimhen going to finally stay at Napoli? I thought he wanted to leave and also Napoli wanted to sell him as well. I guess him not leaving is not going to hurt Napoli at all. But it is going to hurt the career of the player. He should have left before the last season started. But I believe it was a mutual decision from the player and also the club to make him stay. But now he should definitely leave. But there are some things that he will have to keep in mind. If he wants to leave to go to PSG, it is probably better for him to not leave and stay at Napoli. At least he will be among the competition and if he manages to stay healthy, He will be able to improve. At PSG, he is not going to improve. If Napoli actually can not sell him, they are definitely not going to go for Lukaku. Because I think bringing Lukaku while Osimhen is in the club, will be like dragging deadweight. |
|
|
|
-.-
They're over spending which is not wise, and the names brought in are not experienced not even good enough, they'll need time, they have to adapt because the Premier League Competition ain't a easy place to be. They should take time to review the failures and wins they had last season at most in the Premier League Competition, then they fill up necessary areas, rather than go make unnecessary moves for players who aren't worth it. My advice to all Chelsea fans would be not to have high expectations ahead of the season, they should lower whatever expectations they have and hope for the best of the best. I'm keen to see how quickly Enzo Maresca would be able to get his first team. I double doubt he'll be able to do that during Pre-season because not all players are currently present. The plans wouldn't go well and he'll definitely place blames on the coach again. He should allow those who knows how to do the job to do their jobs. Getting a concrete goalscorer is all they need this season, they fail to do that and they'll definitely crumble. Chelsea in every transfer window feels like a headless chicken to me. They go on and try to steal deals from other clubs by offering big wages, and longer contracts. Boehly is filthy rich and he thought spending cash on big names would guarantee success, like most other rich owners we saw in footballing history. What Chelsea really needs is a few good scouts, a proper sporting director who would take the hold of the club very firmly. Without proper management, Chelsea will not succeed. Boehly really should allow those who know how to do the job to do their jobs. For transfers, Chelsea needs a proper number nine, a good right-back back, or a wingback. If managed in both positions, they can expect a good season, because in every other position, they have pretty decent depth. |
|
|
|
I am not American and I could really care less what their politics is like or who wins but I am pretty sure the mention of crypto and their plans to "defend" it are just a way to gain support from crypto enthusiasts. politicians love to say almost everything to gain support from the people and when they are finally voted into a seat they love to ignore what they promised.
It cannot be denied that politicians will despite all tricks and are willing to do anything as long as they can increase votes for them, they are really unreliable. But between someone who openly supports crypto and someone who is trying to suppress crypto, who should we support since we don't have a third option? I'm also not an American citizen and someone becoming president wouldn't affect me at all. But if someone is a cryptocurrency investor and also an American citizen, I think they will know who to choose to give that politician a chance as well as give themselves a chance to have a better future. To vote for them, we need to evaluate many different factors, but if we ignore all of those factors and just look at the cryptocurrency aspect, there is no reason not to vote for Mr. Trump. |
|
|
|
What you need to know about breathing is that you need to keep doing it to stay alive. I do not get the purpose of these type of topics that share the most obvious stuff, but if anyone needs to read these and learning these here, then I am sorry but you should wait a bit more before you invest because you are in a situation that is far too newbie about it. Bitcoin has some stuff that people should learn, and even these included, but not here, not on this forum, not on this topic.
There are vastly better stuff, even free educations that explains all the smaller details of bitcoin world, go learn it from there and get good results. We are talking about something that isn't that simple here, like very detailed, unlike this topic.
But if you pay attention you can see that he is new to the forum and maybe also a newbie to the market . His account was only created within the last 10 days . Indeed , this topic makes no sense to those with many years of experience in the market, and is even boring because those things are too basic when talking about bitcoin and no investor does not know. But maybe for newbies , it's something they just discovered and it makes them see how great bitcoin is and they simply want to share it with everyone . This is the oldest bitcoin forum and home to the most veteran investors in the market, and the OP probably doesn't know that. |
|
|
|
BCCI took great step to give rest to big players of team amf they gave chance to youngesters because BCCI can't test youngesters against big team like Australia and England but they can check the capability and stamina of players against small teams like Zimbabwe and Namibia. But Zimbabwe team played well in first T20 and Sikander Raza was a match changer in this match but Indian team did come back and and performed well in second match and won the match by high margin. Two slots are available in Indian Cricket team and two new Youngesters will fill that space and we will see that Indian team will be strong in future because whole country love cricket.
Yes you are right that is the good decision because they are giving chances to new talents. If they are giving rest to big players and giving the chance to new players so BCCI want to select more valuable players for the team because they are good in cricket. I have seen in both Women Cricket and Men Cricket. BCCI is playing a big role in cricket. And both teams are strong. While we can see how Indian Men team won the T20 World Cup and in Women Cricket how Indian team is playing with South Africa Women team. So in both cases they are strong. So if they are giving chance to new talents so this is really good decision. One thing India has is a good supply of young cricketers. And another thing that India does really well is, it doesn’t matter how they spend money or how they waste money and how much nepotism and favoritism they have, they are still bringing in interesting players. And those players are actually world-class. Sometimes they don't even have to make those players world-class. Those players are basically ready to play at the top level of competition from the start. Giving good chances to the new talent are always going to be the best decision that any team's authority can make. Because if you do that, instead of waiting for the day when the players who are already playing will perform well, you would actually get players who can perform well regularly. Basically you will not have to wait for the day when one player is going to perform well after giving chances consistently. And you will even have good replacements ready just like the Indian team has. |
|
|
|
Assuming Xavi is still the coach, Barcelona will still be in second position at the end of each season until the club is strong enough to win Laliga, but currently that a new coach has taken over I don't know ifit will be a problem for Barcelona to finish second in the table next season. Flick is a good coach and I believe he will be supported by the management but it might be difficult for them to win Laliga till they have the players that can outsmart Real Madrid.
Olmo is a good player and very young, if he comes to Barcelona it will be an advantage to them because the team will improve in performance. He can play along with Yamal if he is not sold out and their attack will be strong. However, it will take the coach time to strengthen the team to win trophy but with time he can turn Barcelona into a team that use to be a nightmare to Real Madrid.
I think for next season the results will still be the same for Barcelona to be right under Real Madrid and maybe that will happen for quite a long time. The main problem that causes this is the financial support of each club and as long as this is an unresolved obstacle, Barcelona must face that reality. Even though Barcelona has a coach who is rich in experience like Hansi Flick, in reality it hasn't changed at all, but I hope that at every El Clasico meeting, Barcelona will provide equal resistance, even if possible, they can steal points from that match. Dani Olmo still seems far from Barcelona's reach and therefore it is difficult to convince the player to join at this time.  Hansi Flick, the new coach of Barcelona, even if he is able to bring in good results, I believe it is going to take him quite a lot of time. He is definitely not going to bring incredible results instantly. Barcelona definitely made a mistake by changing the coach. Because now they will have to give him a good amount of money to bring in the players that he wants as well. And for a club which does not have enough money to spend, that is an additional problem that I think they could have easily avoided. But You know Hansi Flick has managed Bayern Munich and the German team before. So I guess he is probably going to be good enough to at least maintain the performance that Barcelona was doing. |
|
|
|
We can say in this series that both teams are equally strong. If you want to judge the strength of West Indies, look at West Indies' Test series against Australia which was held before the T20 World Cup. They beat Australia in that series which was a great moment for them.
Equally strong? What the heck are you talking about? You clearly don't know much about test cricket. England are extremely strong on their home grounds which is why they most probably will comfortably win against the Windies. They are literally one of the best sides in test cricket. I don't see the Windies coming close to winning even a single match against the English in this series. West Indies is probably towards the bottom of the top 10 when it comes to test playing in nations. They cannot play test cricket. There is a reason why one team is not going to be able to succeed in different formats if they have the same squad. If they are playing really well in the T20 format, they will not be able to play well in the test format. If they try to do that, that will make them perform badly in both of the formats. There is a reason why big teams have different squads for different formats of cricket. West Indies is not a very good team when it comes to the test format and compared to them England is far better. I am not expecting West Indies to even win a single match in the test format against England. |
|
|
|
The fourth match in Major League Cricket 2024, between Los Angeles Knight Riders and San Francisco Unicorns is underway at Grand Prairie Stadium in Dallas. Jake Fraser-McGurk is playing for Unicorns, making his debut in MLC today. He will be up against Spencer Johnson, Ali Khan, Andre Russell and Shakib Al Hasan. First match for the Unicorns, while LAKR win their first match against Texas Super Kings three days back. Latest news from the field is that Unicorns won the toss and chose to field.
I think it was a decent target posted by LAKR but the bowling performance from them was absolutely terrible. and by the way, Shakib Al Hasan is not a good bowler anymore. He is giving away runs against literally everyone. And honestly looking at the batting performance of SFU it definitely feels like this was not a bowling track. And the target from LAKR probably should have been a lot more compared to what they had posted. All the bowlers of LAKR were very expensive. In the end, this was a very easy win for San Francisco Unicorn. Matt Short and Allen performed really well and scored very quickly as well to make sure that the San Francisco Unicorns win very easily. |
|
|
|
Unfortunately due to rain we failed to reach the result of this match. Cricket lovers are completely deprived from enjoying this match due to bad weather. Rain interrupted the match after the first innings of the second match. 2 umpire decision match canceled due to rain interruption. But if today's match had not been interrupted by rain, then maybe the South Africa women's team could have done something better against the India women's team in this match as well. Because I think a score of 177 is a fairly reliable score to win a T20 match South Africa Women would have probably won the match if there was no rain interruption. They made 177/6, which is huge in women's cricket. Tazmin Brits and Anneke Bosch treated the Indian bowlers with disdain, unlike the case with ODI and test series. And India finally dropped the out of form Renuka Singh, as Pooja Vastrakar opened the bowling with Sajeevan Sajana. But all of the Indian bowlers were expensive apart from Deepti Sharma. Deepti returned figures of 4-0-20-0. South Africa's women's team set a very good target. And I think there was a good chance for them to actually win the series. But in case of rain interruption nothing can be done. And it is the same for every team. I would actually say that India got away with this one. Because if they lost this match, the series would have been over and they would have lost. But now India is going to have a chance to at least level the series. On the other hand, South Africa will have to win the last match if they want to win the series. There is a possibility, a very big possibility that India will be able to win the last match. But the way the South African women's team has actually performed in the second match, the batting performance was so consistent. If they can perform like that in the last match, maybe they will be able to secure the series win. |
|
|
|
Bayern Munich finally succeeded in bringing in Michael Olise with a transfer fee of 53 million or a total 94 million spent on 5 new players and I'm sure Bayern Munich isn't over yet I mean they are still hunting for other players to complete the squad, Munich still needs several players in the defender position because among the 4 other teams, Bayern Munich is the team that has conceded the most goals, 45 goals of course they can't compete with that bad record.
On the other hand, Leverkusen has so far only spent 33 million on 2 new players midfielder and defender Aleix Garcia is one of them, this player became the most prominent for Girona's achievements and its market value has continued to increase since it was first introduced by Girona then Leverkusen had to pay 18 million to take him. Xabi Alonso definitely has plans for next season by only bringing in players at low prices.
Gnabry, Kingsley Coman, Tels,. Leroy Sane are all winger's for Bayern Munich, what would adding Michael Olise do to this squad? Would it lead to selling a player like Kingsley Coman? He was amongst the names mentioned to be leaving at the end of the season but so far nothing. Michael Olise is a great lad and very creative, moving to Bayern Munich is the best place for him honestly. I hope he makes them proud same way Harry Kane did in his debut season. Bayern Leverkusen are making good moves honestly as they prepare for the new season. They'll be needing all the depth they can get because they are having enough games from the Champions League Competition and down to the Bundesliga League Competition and that of the Cup games. Of course, they had to improve the squad as they were going to face stiff opponents in the upcoming time. so it only makes sense that Alonso is bringing in a lot of that he understands will be very important for his squad. We also have to understand that Leverkusen does not provide a high level of finances to Xabi Alonso as well. so he will have to bring in players very carefully. Even though he was able to bring in huge success with Leverkusen, I do not think he will be able to the level of finances that Bayern Munich has or any of the big competitive clubs that he is going to play against. He will probably have to again work with a club that is probably going to be half as powerful as Bayern Munich. But for some reason, I still believe that Alonso will be able to bring in good results. |
|
|
|
Spain will remain the favorite team when they face France, especially since their level of confidence is getting bigger after successfully getting rid of Germany. The way they played when they beat Germany was very classy, the Spanish squad this time showed something different from before. Even though the core squad contains many young, inexperienced players, their presence actually makes Spain stronger. France will have difficulty facing Spain, I think Germany's defense is stronger than France, the Spanish players will try to open the French defense area to score goals.
I agree with you, Spain is the favorite team to win against France because they have defeated stronger opponents in this tournament. Spain defeated Italy, Croatia, and Germany, they won against these strong teams, and I don't think France will be able to stop them in the next game, however, since the start of this tournament France has only scored three goals, one was a penalty against Poland. France, in my opinion, is a weak team in this tournament since they drew with Poland, a team that every opponent defeated in the group stage, they were just lucky to win the penalty shootout against Portugal. Spain on the other hand has scored 11 goals since the start of this tournament and has not draw any of their games, which is why I am very confident in their game, but if France wins, I believe they will be lucky with how Spain has performed. Why France is unable to perform well despite having such a strong squad is a mystery. France's attack of Mbnappe, Griezmann, Giroud, Dembele, KOla Muani and Thuram are all very talented. Also French midfield players Camavinga, Rabiot, Kante and Tchouameni are all playing for big and renowned clubs in Europe. All are talented and experienced players. France's defense also has players like Kounde, Saliba and Theo. It would not be wrong to say that France is the strongest team in Europe. But the main strength of Spain's squad is the understanding between the players is very good. The players have been able to adapt themselves very well to Coach Fuente's match strategy. Williams and Yamal are also able to perform well. There are many star players in the France squad, but the understanding between the players is not good. Spain team on the other hand is not very experienced but the understanding between the players is very good. |
|
|
|
Zimbabwe beat India in the first T20I really created a miracle in cricket as it was truly an unbelievable miracle that Zimbabwe defeated India, the champions of this year's ICC T20 World Cup, in the very first match after the World Cup. But India leveled the series by beating Zimbabwe by 100 runs in the second match and the next three matches are very likely to be won by India. Both Indian bowlers and batsmen are equally balanced whereas Zimbabwean team's batting and bowling balance is not right. So for now it seems that it will be really difficult for the Zimbabwean batsmen to score runs in front of the Indian bowlers.
Now, the next match between Zimbabwe and India will be played after the break of two days at the same ground. This time, the Zimbabwe’s team also playing with competition as they won the first match. At this time, both teams are in the game but that team who will win the next match will have a lead and have more chances to win the series. In this series, we will see five matches. In the second match, we also have seen a century by the best player of IPL, the one and only Abhishek Sharma and after hitting the century for sure he is the man of the match. @LDL, In the first match between India and Zimbabwe, it was actually a very unexpected result. Actually, Zimbabwe did not give a big target to India by any means. But India failed miserably to reach the target. Zimbabwe had given a target of only 116. And India lost by 13 runs. I can't decide if it was an incredible bowling performance from Zimbabwe or just a terrible batting performance from India. But whatever it is, I can't deny it was definitely a huge win for Zimbabwe. And it’s not like India brought the newest players or the weakest team that they could find. India did have a decent team. I hope Zimbabwe will be able to take some confidence from this match and carry it forward. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
