I watched my first movie on your website for free, and it was awesome. I’m very interested in blockchain projects that could solve real life problems like we see in the gaming industry. BitMovio seem to be one problem that could solve problems like payments within games. I see bitmovio going mainstream soon.
Am in agreement with your opinion, there's so much that can be done with the BitMovio platform, I was amazed by the features of the platform which includes gaming, video and many more. The most interesting feature is the ability for one to earn simply by watching videos. This would encourage more persons to join the cryptocurrency industry and keep them glued to the platform. By earning, do you mean their tokens or other pioneer ones like bitcoin?, it will be best if they have their own token attached to it because that will be one of the key factors of driving up the value of their token to a much more acceptable height, i must attest that their user interface is quite captivating to say the least but in all, the developmental process is what matters |
|
|
|
Am actually glad that the project gave the users of the platform various options. One could access the platform via the Mobile app which is available for both the android and iOS users. There's also an opportunity to access the platform via the website. I'll advise that purchases should be made via the website to avoid loosing 30% of your fund to mobile app charges.
Yes, most projects tend to go for just android users, in one of my comments on another thread, i stated the fact most brand believe android users are less capable of investing than iOS users, which i don't quite agree because the bulk of investors in most of such seems to come from the android community, their website looks nice though and the gaming industry is a multi-billion dollar one |
|
|
|
We were meant to understand that sec already gave her approval for tokensales. Is this the case here? I'm confuse really
That’s right. Dreamr team says it’s approved by SEC, that’s what got my interest at the First glance. Dreamr tokens, DRMR, would be the first security tokens sold on an exchange. IDCM is lucky to have DRMR bringing in much more volume to the exchange. I guess the approval that was gotten is connected to the project as a company where the token holders are viewed as shareholders. In this case, it should be allowed for United States citizens to become shareholders of the company, but would only be feasible after 12 months of the tokens be launched on a cryptocurrency exchange. Good information. So it means token holders will be enjoy all benefits like shareholder of any company? This is important factor as people have another reason to hold tokens. These is a great strategy to raise the value of the token, what they need to do is ensure that they get as many investors as they can bag. I am still trying to get an idea of how the platform operate I believe that dreamr has been making great moves to get more investors in the STEO. I ones read that several people on cryptocurrency community are talking about the project. It's an agreeable fact that the concept of the project is unique and that must have propelled greater interest in the project. I do hope that the intensity of the interest is equivalent to the number of tokens sold on the STEO. Any reason why they kept a month for STEO for token sale? I saw few keeping IEO for a. Week or two only. Also, usually it goes in phases, with different different type of offers/bonuses. Is it the same case here? Every project is unique and the dreamr team decides on the period or terms of the STEO. I was actually surprised when I got to know that the dreamr tokensales wasn't offering any bonus or incentive to investors on the purchase of their tokens. Bonuses are rampant these days on tokensales and I sincerely don't know what may have necessitated the team from doing like others. You're right, bonuses helps attracts investors, especially the early birds, as these individuals are the core investors that helps new projects come to life, they are actually the risk takers and as such, they should be given some leverage, perhaps the dreamr has some other way that they intend to compensate the early investors, its important |
|
|
|
If by now crypto is not yet mass adopted and famous then somethings are not right. We have been lied to. We were told that 2019 is the year of the blockchain. What happened? What really happened?
Many have adopted the crytpo and few countries even started accepting transaction in Bitcoin. Only issue was many scam project came in last couple of years and people now taking additional steps before accepting anything. IMO it's taking too many years already. We thought it all got corrected during the 2018 bear year. But it's almost the close of the year and nothing positive unfortunately We all know how buoyant the industry was about 2-3 years ago, just as i have been stating, the industry was bastardized by a lot of unscrupulous individuals, many investors were scammed, many accounts were hacked, i can go on and on, so that led to investors not trusting the industry, so the aim should be how to get back investors into the blockchain industry and that will require a lot of convincing Things will become normal soon, as of now SEC is rejecting Bitcoin ETF, however ETF application going through lot of modification and within short time we could see it's getting approved by Sec. In short crytpo is getting adopted slowly but steadily You're right, mass adoption will no doubt come but it will take sometime for things to run smoothly, while its taking this long is the because it has to do with financial product and some are really skeptical of it taking over the conventional monetary system but change is what life its all about, technology is the future and the blockchain industry is part of the future |
|
|
|
If by now crypto is not yet mass adopted and famous then somethings are not right. We have been lied to. We were told that 2019 is the year of the blockchain. What happened? What really happened?
Many have adopted the crytpo and few countries even started accepting transaction in Bitcoin. Only issue was many scam project came in last couple of years and people now taking additional steps before accepting anything. IMO it's taking too many years already. We thought it all got corrected during the 2018 bear year. But it's almost the close of the year and nothing positive unfortunately We all know how buoyant the industry was about 2-3 years ago, just as i have been stating, the industry was bastardized by a lot of unscrupulous individuals, many investors were scammed, many accounts were hacked, i can go on and on, so that led to investors not trusting the industry, so the aim should be how to get back investors into the blockchain industry and that will require a lot of convincing |
|
|
|
If by now crypto is not yet mass adopted and famous then somethings are not right. We have been lied to. We were told that 2019 is the year of the blockchain. What happened? What really happened?
Many have adopted the crytpo and few countries even started accepting transaction in Bitcoin. Only issue was many scam project came in last couple of years and people now taking additional steps before accepting anything. The honest truth is that cryptocurrency is still very far from the mass adoption which was promised. The terrain is even much scary now owing to the increase in hacking of cryptocurrency exchange which has given substantial wealth to a handful of miscreants who stole from the exchange. Yea, there are still so much loopholes to cover that, like i once stated that the terrain is still very much uncharted and both manipulations and unchecked practices is kinda highly rampant, till a set of rules are brought in that will help address some factors like security, we may likely have less number of individuals coming into the picture |
|
|
|
I can’t tell what might have been the issue or how this works, but why the restrictions to US investors in DRMR STEO tokens sales? I guessed since it was a SEC approved, US Investors shouldn’t be restricted from the opportunity.
I think US residents still buy these tokens, it's just not from the on going IEO. It might be dur to exchange not in US or something? I think US residents should contact project and they will let them know the way to buy these tokens. Yes, but there are no options made available to the Americans now by the Dreamr team. I think they aren’t allowed to buy not because of the exchange, but for some other reasons. I think it’s best they wait for Dreamr to get listed and buy. I think one of the major reason why US citizens are not allowed from most projects is the rules that govern them, not like the project made it so, they can always get such after it has been made available on exchanges, its just for the project to be on the safe side and not fall victim to the laws of the stated citizen's country, its really a complicated process I agree with you, most projects prevent the citizens of some countries from participating in their tokensales to avoid the wrath of their government authorities. This explains why in several occasions we find that the citizens of USA, China, etc are prevented from participating in tokensales. Yea and funny enough they have high number of citizens from the specified area participating in the cryptocurrency industry, most top project reviewers are also from the US but they usually add a disclaimer before they start one, how ironic, well i just hope to see a situation where all these will be left behind and total acceptance of all will be done in the industry It would be much beautiful to have total acceptance of all countries in the world to participate in the cryptocurrency space, but we need to get things right before that could be achieved. Due to the prevalence of scam incidence on the space, it's very difficult to trust that everything would go smoothly. You can say that again, like i literally can't wait for such to happen, its usually the norm for people to find it difficult to accept change and the blockchain industry won't be an exception coupled with the fact that most of the projects been issued requires some sort of payment to get accepted in the form of investment, so people are still very much skeptical |
|
|
|
I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here
I agree with you, deepcloud is indeed the one at the loosing end from all indication. I read deepcloud testimony on the issue and the ceo plainly stated that he has been trying to communicate with George, who is the ceo of Bitmax, but to no avail as George has chosen not to reply to his chat. Well, the CEO of deepcloud should take to social platforms just maybe he can get to the bitmax big boy. Deepcloud should have try as much as they could in ensuring fair business I'll suggest that deepcloud should channel their efforts in searching for more partnerships and listing of their tokens in other exchange platform. I just feel there's no point crying over a spilled milk, since the delisting has been made. If they wanted to make amends it should be before the project was delisted. Now that the worst has been done, let them find a way to move on. You have a point but i believe they are doing this just to get back the confidence of the community by clarifying the issue, like i stated earlier,the damage has already been done, so they need to think more of a semi re-branding plan to get things up and running, the way i see it, there is no resolution happening between the 2 brands and like you stated, is best to look into other exchanges |
|
|
|
I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here
I agree with you, deepcloud is indeed the one at the loosing end from all indication. I read deepcloud testimony on the issue and the ceo plainly stated that he has been trying to communicate with George, who is the ceo of Bitmax, but to no avail as George has chosen not to reply to his chat. Well, the CEO of deepcloud should take to social platforms just maybe he can get to the bitmax big boy. Deepcloud should have try as much as they could in ensuring fair business Communication is the key here. There is a lack in communication somewhere. I am not happy that this is happening, there should be a way to curb this and avoid the dramas. There must have been a lot of communication for it to have gotten to this stage, i mean it won't be right for bitmax to just wake up one morning and drop deepcloud out of their exchange, there are rules of engagement and if that doesn't solve the problem, then i wonder what else will, both parties have dropped a lot of information about this |
|
|
|
I was thinking, would there be a use case for Dreamr App Project outside the cryptocurrency/blockchain ecosystem? Would non coiners and people not interested in cryptocurrency find Dreamr App any useful like we do with Facebook and fiverr?
The thing is, so long as you're offering something of value, you stand a chance of becoming known and accepted, though there's still much to be done in the blockchain industry but if we continue to see projects that tends to create sustainable value, then people will come in from the conventional system and gradually accept the blockchain industry, its still a long way to go |
|
|
|
I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here
I agree with you, deepcloud is indeed the one at the loosing end from all indication. I read deepcloud testimony on the issue and the ceo plainly stated that he has been trying to communicate with George, who is the ceo of Bitmax, but to no avail as George has chosen not to reply to his chat. Yea,saw that on medium, so i think bitmax is just trying to stay safe, i mean they must have worked hard to gain such reputation and are not in the mood to step down in order to let go the wrongs of anyone, even though deepcloud was once their client and like the saying goes, customers are king but this is a situation that has to deal with financial products, so its tough |
|
|
|
Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.
What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was? I guess there was a problem with the Deepcloud tokens contract. I’ll expect Deepcloud team to talk about BitMax delisting and resolve the issue with the tokens. Btw, what happens to people with Deepcloud tokens? Is there a different exchange where Deepcloud is listed? I guess they would all move their token to deepcloud wallet pending when the issue is resolved and regarding bitmax delisting the team should ensure they tackle the problem squarely before investors start losing interest on the project In my opinion, investors were already losing interest even before the issue deteriorated into the delisting of their tokens. I only hope that the two teams could settle their differences before from what I've been reading they both have their own side of the story which is not exactly similar. You seem to know more about deepcloud, i don't see the reason why they should issue out false documentation if they mean well for the community, these are things that create bad reputation for the blochchain community, all i want to see is a healthy community to help the industry grow, its nauseating to keep seeing such stories For all I know bad name or negative news is not healthy for any known blockchain platform. It kills both faith and confidence with the system. They should work on a mutual resolution and shake hands. that will never happen based on both of stories have created by bitmax and deep, it looks like both will never try to shake hands for a better solution. It's really sad to know that deep was only listed on the bitmax but it has delisted. Investors are a party who has been getting a huge impact caused by this problem and these investors have lost their money in this case. But in my opinion if both are dishonest platforms. I don't get the last part of your statement, i think they both have something to backup their claims, bitmax is the one offering the services here and i feel they seem to know what's best for their brand, hence the removal of deepcloud, i don't think they would have done that if the case was not a pretty serious one, deepcloud is the one on the loosing end here |
|
|
|
I can’t tell what might have been the issue or how this works, but why the restrictions to US investors in DRMR STEO tokens sales? I guessed since it was a SEC approved, US Investors shouldn’t be restricted from the opportunity.
I think US residents still buy these tokens, it's just not from the on going IEO. It might be dur to exchange not in US or something? I think US residents should contact project and they will let them know the way to buy these tokens. Yes, but there are no options made available to the Americans now by the Dreamr team. I think they aren’t allowed to buy not because of the exchange, but for some other reasons. I think it’s best they wait for Dreamr to get listed and buy. I think one of the major reason why US citizens are not allowed from most projects is the rules that govern them, not like the project made it so, they can always get such after it has been made available on exchanges, its just for the project to be on the safe side and not fall victim to the laws of the stated citizen's country, its really a complicated process I agree with you, most projects prevent the citizens of some countries from participating in their tokensales to avoid the wrath of their government authorities. This explains why in several occasions we find that the citizens of USA, China, etc are prevented from participating in tokensales. Yea and funny enough they have high number of citizens from the specified area participating in the cryptocurrency industry, most top project reviewers are also from the US but they usually add a disclaimer before they start one, how ironic, well i just hope to see a situation where all these will be left behind and total acceptance of all will be done in the industry |
|
|
|
Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.
What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was? I guess there was a problem with the Deepcloud tokens contract. I’ll expect Deepcloud team to talk about BitMax delisting and resolve the issue with the tokens. Btw, what happens to people with Deepcloud tokens? Is there a different exchange where Deepcloud is listed? I guess they would all move their token to deepcloud wallet pending when the issue is resolved and regarding bitmax delisting the team should ensure they tackle the problem squarely before investors start losing interest on the project In my opinion, investors were already losing interest even before the issue deteriorated into the delisting of their tokens. I only hope that the two teams could settle their differences before from what I've been reading they both have their own side of the story which is not exactly similar. You seem to know more about deepcloud, i don't see the reason why they should issue out false documentation if they mean well for the community, these are things that create bad reputation for the blochchain community, all i want to see is a healthy community to help the industry grow, its nauseating to keep seeing such stories For all I know bad name or negative news is not healthy for any known blockchain platform. It kills both faith and confidence with the system. They should work on a mutual resolution and shake hands. You're right but i do not think there will be any resolution because a lot of damage as already been done, investors must have left the scene and even potential investors must have flee from deepcloud, the position that bitmax is making is quite clear and deepcloud really have to sort themselves out immediately or they risk loosing everything |
|
|
|
Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.
What I understood is there was some tokens supply related miscommunication from deepcloud project? Or what exactly the issue was? I guess there was a problem with the Deepcloud tokens contract. I’ll expect Deepcloud team to talk about BitMax delisting and resolve the issue with the tokens. Btw, what happens to people with Deepcloud tokens? Is there a different exchange where Deepcloud is listed? I guess they would all move their token to deepcloud wallet pending when the issue is resolved and regarding bitmax delisting the team should ensure they tackle the problem squarely before investors start losing interest on the project In my opinion, investors were already losing interest even before the issue deteriorated into the delisting of their tokens. I only hope that the two teams could settle their differences before from what I've been reading they both have their own side of the story which is not exactly similar. You seem to know more about deepcloud, i don't see the reason why they should issue out false documentation if they mean well for the community, these are things that create bad reputation for the blochchain community, all i want to see is a healthy community to help the industry grow, its nauseating to keep seeing such stories |
|
|
|
I can’t tell what might have been the issue or how this works, but why the restrictions to US investors in DRMR STEO tokens sales? I guessed since it was a SEC approved, US Investors shouldn’t be restricted from the opportunity.
I think US residents still buy these tokens, it's just not from the on going IEO. It might be dur to exchange not in US or something? I think US residents should contact project and they will let them know the way to buy these tokens. Yes, but there are no options made available to the Americans now by the Dreamr team. I think they aren’t allowed to buy not because of the exchange, but for some other reasons. I think it’s best they wait for Dreamr to get listed and buy. I think one of the major reason why US citizens are not allowed from most projects is the rules that govern them, not like the project made it so, they can always get such after it has been made available on exchanges, its just for the project to be on the safe side and not fall victim to the laws of the stated citizen's country, its really a complicated process |
|
|
|
New update from BitMax posted this morning on the delisting announcement of Deepcloud.ai. Please check for the link in the first post. Directly discuss with team in their telegram channel if you want to know more.
Woh, this partnership between Bitmax and Deepcloud was looking good till few days ago. What happened suddenly? Want to know more, will check at telegram channel. Crazy happenings around the crypto sphere but one thing is certain many investors won't be comfortable with the happenings. A lot of us expected more from Bitmax. They could easily have been the next Binance but well... I still believe they are on track, measures like this needs to be taken in order to ensure trustworthiness and transparency. Shortcomings are usually in business. I believe investors are aware of that. Yea, its things like these that will help strengthen the industry, when you have rules in place to curtail such inadequacies things are bound to change sooner or later, i'm still going through deepcloud statement on medium and their CEO made some points but i believe they have these written on paper or something, i mean both parties, if yes, then they should make it public |
|
|
|
It’s not just going to be the volume of DRMR tokens moved daily on exchanges, this time, DRMR tokens would be rewarding to Dreamr users who hold the tokens. It’s an equity token for a platform with amazing potential to change the way people use social media.
I Am yet to get a full grasp of how dreamr tokens would be beneficial to the holders. I've gotten several insight, promising amazing rewards to the token holders but non has been able to pin point any specific benefit for holding the tokens. I do hope to receive some explanation on the specific benefits of holding the dreamr tokens. Neither did I but I figured that since Dreamr token is a security. It's profit comes from increase token price. I think speculation would be great for Dreamr tokens since it will have sec approval to be one. What's the status on SEC approval. I think for better response it will be good to ask this question at their telegram channel. I think they might already have necessary approvals in place, otherwise it will not possible to actually sell the tokens? Agreed, even though they have been responsive here for a while, telegram is still the fastest way to get response from the team but they should still maintain this section, as its valuable and kind off create a vibrant atmosphere for the brand as a whole, many seem to neglect this avenue not knowing the boost they can get by just answering questions |
|
|
|
Juts going through the blogs shared by both team. Not looking good for investors but I think it's better to stop or delist the token rather than keeping it and playing with investors.
Hope investors can move the token to wallet without any issues
Could you post the link to the article by DeepCloud? I can understand the reason from Bitmax for this delisting but it could also be that they have a legally binding agreement between each other. Let's just hope that this won't end in a legal dispute between both parties. I think the situation is quite deep, though bitmax gave a very strong reason for the delisting of deepcloud as a result of providing false information to investors and the the community, which to me is pretty serious, even though they may have a legal binding but providing also documentation as a means of getting listed is a serious crime that can lead to serious brand damage for deepcloud |
|
|
|
Cryptocurrency is all about transparency and it’s great to see BitMax keeping to being transparent all the time. I think being transparent as an team is healthy for a cryptocurrency exchange community, and that’s just what BitMax is trying to do right here.
That's what matters most, i don't intend looking into any project that lacks transparency, the cryptocurrency industry is been littered with a lot of projects without core values and hence many are scared of investing which is somehow affecting the industry heavily, its when things are done right that we will get to see the blockchain industry rise up to its expectation |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
