WAT?
70% grow in a week called no p&d nowadays?
You f*ucking serious??
You can't expect people to think beyond a 15 minute period in the crypto space. It's simply too taxing.
|
|
|
rather than listening to everyone and programming something that the community want..
Although I don't agree with you on BU matter (I think that we need something better than just increase the block size), you are right on this. Somehow they should be more receptive to what the community wants. What they should've done is stuck to that mythical 2mb + Segwit agreement that wasn't an agreement or whatever it was. Things would be rosier than a rosy thing by now.
|
|
|
When LBC volumes explode in a new country the first thing I normally do is check whether MMM has started up there.
|
|
|
This type of behaviour can't be maintained forever. If you're an overt and flagrant prick then eventually every single person in the space will turn on you. It's only a matter of time.
|
|
|
So can anyone help me understand what's stopping this from happening? In my opinion, I think this is the future of the Bitcoin network and it would be a shame if consensus cannot be reached regarding this topic.
Well, that's the hottest issue of the last few years. It's miners who are the ones who can activate it. Some miners can't be bothered to signal for any change. Some miners are signalling for Segwit. Others are actively trying to block it. Some say that's because Segwit would remove an advantage they have to save power and increase profitability. Others think it's because they don't want a centralised development team to lord over Bitcoin forever. Others think it's a pure power grab so they can turn it into something even more centralised. One thing I am sure of is that it's getting old.
|
|
|
Now if Bitcoin Unlimited were feeling extremely psyops ish they could sneak release a new version of their code named Do Nothing. There might be enough stupid miners to run it.
|
|
|
Has it been confirmed they ve halted withdrawals as well? I ve read only about wire deposits not working.
It was dollar withdrawals that were stopped first, then it became dollar deposits a while after. Crypto's still fine as are CHF and HKD withdrawals. I'm not sure what fiat deposits are possible right now.
|
|
|
Have you used Tether.to to withdraw USD to a bank account? If so when?
I'm pretty sure you can't do that. Here's some reassuring terms from here https://tether.to/legal/"PURCHASE AND REDEMPTION OF TETHERS: The Site is an environment for the purchase and redemption of Tethers. Once you have Tethers, you can trade them, keep them, or use them to pay persons that will accept your Tethers. However, Tethers are not money and are not monetary instruments. They are also not stored value or currency. There is no contractual right or other right or legal claim against us to redeem or exchange your Tethers for money. We do not guarantee any right of redemption or exchange of Tethers by us for money. There is no guarantee against losses when you buy, trade, sell, or redeem Tethers." Would you entrust your money to something with those terms? It is however back to dollar parity. Those terms probably aren't too far off the terms of many other more legit places, but 'more legit' is the key phrase.
|
|
|
does anyone know if bitfinex allows withdrawals in fiat other than USD ( EUR, CHF, etc.) ?
They're doing withdrawals in Swiss Francs and Hong King Dollars. Stuff like EUR and a few others is supposedly in the pipeline.
|
|
|
Okcoin.com (not CN) chucking in USD as well. Perhaps they bank in Taiwan too. I'm not sure.
|
|
|
It would do more than that. All of the various side chain devs could look to litecoin instead of bitcoin. Litecoin could pass over bitcoin in short order if that happened. How would you like LN to go with litecoin instead?
Of course they'll pour in, if only for proof of concept. There must be loads of Bitcoin projects waiting to roll out right now which'll head straight there. If Bitcoin gets left behind then so be it. However a successful LTC Segwit will also hugely increase the desire for the same on BTC. As for a Lightning Network, I'd like to see one in action before deciding it's the greatest thing ever.
|
|
|
even if segwit was the most amazing scaling solution in the world, it wont help litecoin that much right now since litecoin barely has any merchants. it was just a p&d.
I think Litecoiners themselves would be the first to admit they won't have a capacity problem for a very long time, if ever. It would shine a light on them and attract more quality developers though.
|
|
|
I wonder if LTC miners have something similar to asicboost therefore they refusing to activate segwit for it too in order to mine as many coins as they can?
Nah. I think it's pure Bitcoin politics spilling over. If it's demonstrated that Segwit does the job and does some new ones too then Bitmain will have lost an awful lot of face.
|
|
|
I think that the anti-segwit movement is now becoming an increasingly large issue, and having segwit on LTC would have been a good tech demo for everyone. Now that it's blocked, I'm becoming increasingly suspicious of Jihan.
By hook or by crook Segwit will happen on Litecoin now. It's literally one man against everyone else by the looks of things.
|
|
|
So this is all about political agenda. I wonder why they block segwit in Litecoin. It would be best to let Segwit be activated in Litecoin and see the result. I think they are afraid of Segwit since hey knew it is a game changer. This definitely means what is happening in cryptocurrency is not about what is better but rather a political agenda for their own benefits.
The more brazen they are, the more isolated they become, the easier it is for everyone else to cut them adrift and route around them. This won't last forever. It's very slowly coming to a head of sorts.
|
|
|
We cannot actually say when it will come to the end, we dont know what caused the whole suspension of wire transactions ( deposits/withdrawals ).
They haven't really provided one single detail of their hack and that was multiple months ago. If I was running a place as questionable on the surface as Bitfinex I'd make it a priority to communicate properly. That's if they're not crooked bastards of course. And here's an interesting metric - https://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin/address/3D2oetdNuZUqQHPJmcMDDHYoqkyNVsFk9rThat's supposedly Bitfinex's cold wallet. As you can see it's dwindling rapidly.
|
|
|
If your constituency isn't listed, just vote for someone who isn't a tory (or a kipper, as those are basically tories too).
My constituency is hideously Conservative and the last Lib Dem they rolled out looked about 13. I think it's going to be a second opportunity for Brexiters to ram it home no matter what. All politicians from all sides have totally fucked us.
|
|
|
Anyone knows if Hong Kong's companies registry is public as it is in many countries? In Spain and some other European countries anyone can access the annual balance sheet of a company for a measly 10€.
I don't think they have much to do with Hong Kong any more. Their parent company is located in the British Virgin Islands or something.
|
|
|
Don't you think the fact that Finex's 4 Taiwanese banks have frozen transfers (under pressure from Wells Fargo) has something to do with it?
I find it rather odd that this question is still popping up. The reasons are on Bitfinex's site and it's obvious why it is how it is.
|
|
|
Arctic and the Antarctic are the last remaining wild frontiers of our planet. As the population increases, people will try to occupy previously uninhabited regions such as these polar zones. Very soon the competition for resources will shift to the moon and mars.
I dunno about resources, we seem to be doing pretty good on that, but this lack of space thing befuddles me a little. Take a drive around the USA. Most of it is completely empty. The UK has ten times the population density yet I can stroll out my door and not see a sign of human activity for multiple hours. The more developed the world becomes the lower the population growth until eventually it levels off then falls. We'll probably peak within the next 50-100 years and then start working our way down again.
|
|
|
|