Is this coin bitmonero?
Can this coin be merge mined with fantomcoin? What hashrate do you get with the fantomcoin merge miner?
Bitmonero may be forked soon but until now it is the same. Yes you can merge mine both fantomcoin & Monero BUT you have to use an other miner that is 6 times slower than the one to mine Monero alone. It is not worth it, you'll lose too much hashrate and fantomcoin has no value. your right. I am getting 4 times slowing mining and only mining 2 coins at once. It is not worth it. I tried the merged miner and it didn't even work. Mined fantom just fine but any MRO blocks it found resulted in unspendable coins. This is not FUD, just my experience. If someone were to figure out how to fix the merged miner I would use it. |
|
|
|
What was the command line to upgrade the linux version ?
Easiest thing to do is 1. Securely back up your wallets2. Rename your source+build tree. (I'd say delete but I don't want people deleting their wallets when they ignored #1) 3. rm -r ~/.bitmonero (possibly-poisoned block chain is in here) 4. Follow the directions in the first post to do a fresh git clone and compile. |
|
|
|
This coin sounds pretty cool.
Can someone explain ring signatures to me?
Thanks
Ring signatures mean that when you sign a tranaction to spend an output (coins), no one looking at the block chain can tell whether you signed it or one of the other outputs you choose to mix in with yours. With a mixing factor of 5 or 10 after several transactions there are millions of possible coins all mixed together. You get "anonymity" and mixing without having to use a third party mixer. There are a number of other anonymity features, explained in the first post on this thread and the pages linked from there. |
|
|
|
Hmm looks like an interesting coin... guess most of us missed the boat!  Everyone (except the developers) missed the boat because it was 80% mined before they even released it. A relaunched version with no premine is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.0 The new one has all of the interesting anonymity features and is only about 2% mined. Nevertheless BCN still has its following, and shouldn't necessarily be dismissed. I still mine it. Smooth, please stop posting this shit, I pray. Practically everyone knows your opinion. There are new people showing up all the time. I'm going to respond to their posts as honestly as possible, which is exactly what I did. Note that I didn't say this coin is shit because it was premined. It is what it is. People can make up their own minds. |
|
|
|
Ah, another coordinated get together. The more the merrier.
I'll be impressed if they manage to come up with an account registered before January, but then again they could buy those. Ignore the trollers. Carry on. |
|
|
|
Hmm looks like an interesting coin... guess most of us missed the boat! Everyone (except the developers) missed the boat because it was 80% mined before they even released it. (They claim they "released it" on the deep web, but no one on the deep web nor any deep web search engines has ever seen it. If a tree falls in the forest and no one hears it....) A relaunched version with no premine is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.0 The new one has all of the interesting anonymity features and is only about 2% mined. Nevertheless BCN still has its following, and shouldn't necessarily be dismissed. I still mine it. |
|
|
|
Exchanges supporting cryptonote-based coins is hard. They're used to supporting mostly bitcoin clones (with a few exceptions such as Nxt) that all have the same wallet API and indeed the same API code. These coins do not. They will likely add support eventually if the coins are popular enough, but it won't happen (and hasn't happened) overnight. |
|
|
|
The balances connected to those early blocks would be affected. The removal of checkpointing means the problem has been stopped and reversed. There are plenty of nodes with the clean blockchains and you'll sync from them instead of absorbing any fake blocks.
Just to be clear, resyncing the blockchain now (i.e. after deleting the old one) will be sufficient? Have the fake blocks been removed and the old balances restored? If you have the latest daemon from the official sources (first post on this thread), it will not accept any fake blocks. Do not trust any other sources, whether posted on this thread or otherwise. We don't know who was behind the attack. |
|
|
|
|
AFK for a while guys. Play nice.
|
|
|
|
WTB 0.001000 / 500 / 0.5
Is this in place of any of your other orders or do you still want them all up there? |
|
|
|
WTB 0.001000 / 750 / 0.75
Trade completed. lol, who'd you buy from at that cheap price? I'm guessing you're just driving the price down, because I can't find a seller under 0.0013500. You can just put up a buy order and someone looking to sell immediately may take it. Sell orders aren't your only option. Still, there needs to be some verification - either the seller needs to post in this thread or send a pm to smooth. Otherwise it's just BS trades to manipulate the price. Let me explain how this works. I'm reporting what people tell me. I do my best to report accurately. You are free to disbelieve it, and some skepticism in this regard is probably a very good idea. If I had to guess, I'd assume that not every trade listed up there actually happened, but I don't mean to imply anything about any particular trade, I'm just guessing. Caveat emptor. The trades listed in bold are ones where I acted as escrow, so I can guarantee that coins actually moved and a fee was paid. But even then I can't guarantee that the parties doing that "trading" weren't acting in some collusive manner. If they wanted to pay my 1% to put up a sham trade, I'm in no position to stop them. Again, I don't have any specific knowledge, but I can't guarantee it hasn't happened. Caveat emptor again. |
|
|
|
WTS 10 mil for 3 btc
Is this in place of your existing orders? |
|
|
|
if I have multiple miners how do I search or determine which miner found a block
Ubuntu
I attempted grep "found block" bitemonerod.log but need not see found block anywhere, however I did find a block.
grep " Found block" bitmonerod.log |
|
|
|
Made for your very own OgNasty, We did work out this deal to help out NastyFans, but just out of respect I'm awaiting approval before putting it up on the site. Can be placed on Beer Mugs, Pint Glasses, etc... What y'all think? http://www.pixskull.comCustom Engraved Glassware & Hand Blown Glass[/center] I think that looks amazing. You do beautiful work. |
|
|
|
Will update the chart in 30 minutes... I am finishing my excel sheet wich makes it possible for me to just put in very little data and the 3 charts are updated automatically chart updated, enjoy I made it easier for me, so expect regular updates when trades happened Fantastic work! |
|
|
|
Altcoin history shows that except in the case of premine (Tenebrix), the first implementation stays the largest by a wide margin. We're repeating that here by outpacing Bytecoin (thanks to its 80% mine prior to surfacing). No other CN coin has anywhere near the hashrate or trading volume. Go check diff in Fantom for example or the lack of activity in BCN trading. Tomorrow you can watch this Monero "relaunch" troll coin fail when it goes live.
Fantom will likely catch up in terms of difficulty due to merged mining but will still likely be a shitcoin that miners just dump for a little extra income (like the BTC merged coins). I personally find it a bit irratating that they went ahead and did merged mining even though this coin's community specifically said we didn't want it. I would really like to see the ability to merge mine coins against MRO removed. Let them build their own network. |
|
|
|
Error: refresh failed: daemon is busy. Please try later. Blocks received: 0 Are you as tired of it as I am? I finally found the solution (after losing around three days of mining): Mine from the daemon, even on your local machine! (the one with the wallet). Mining from the daemon is fine but a better solution is to type "save" in the daemon after it syncs. This will make the RPC work (so starting mining from the wallet works, along with the rest of wallet functionality) and will also save the blockchain to disk so you won't have to do all that syncing again. |
|
|
|
Has Bitstamp commented this thing at all? There are multiple ways to fix this... and being quiet makes it worse.
Actually there happens to be a single correct way to fix it. For pretty much the same reason there is one single correct way to count. Their answer is simply magical. Fixing it by applying the fee to the order instead of by transaction is also valid. The way this would be done is to reserve the full fee (based on order quantity) when an order is opened, but then credit back only the unfilled portion of the fee when the order is closed (canceled or filled). Round the first up, round the second down (except in the special case of zero filled). They get the generated rounding breakage they seem to want, but once per order. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
