The next time will be many, many years away, if ever. No crypto will pass muster with them. The market can never be regulated to their satisfaction and there's no issuer answerable.
|
|
|
It is funny on two grounds: 1. "potential for fraudulent or manipulative acts and practices in this market" because that never ever happens on the Wall Street...
But the people who do that are the ones they'll be having a nice dinner with tonight.
|
|
|
They actually quoted somewhat professor bitkorn's comment he sent in about a small group hoarding most bitcoins. They really focused on the manipulation of exchanges, primarily in China and non-USA locations. Stated Bitcoin is still in its very early stages of development (really).
Doing all of this to protect us.
Grrrr....
I think that's a pretty sensible position for them to take at this stage. Unsexy, but true. I wonder how much all this has cost the Winklevii.
|
|
|
"Based on the record before it, the Commission believes that the significant markets for bitcoin are unregulated. Therefore, as the Exchange has not entered into, and would currently be unable to enter into, the type of surveillance-sharing agreement that has been in place with respect to all previously approved commodity-trust ETPs—agreements that help address concerns about the potential for fraudulent or manipulative acts and practices in this market—the Commission does not find the proposed rule change to be consistent with the Exchange Act."
As I suspected, it's because of the wider Bitcoin market. China did their best but it wasn't enough. None of the other applications will get past this either.
|
|
|
Exciting stuff. What are we gonna do for hype now? And I wonder what the other ETF applicants feel about this.
|
|
|
Is there actually going to be a streamed announcement from someone or will it just be a text added to a site somewhere?
Surely they've spent so long up to their eyes in Bitcoin the front page of the SEC site will be entirely taken up by that Ron Paul gif.
|
|
|
Sorry if this has been mentioned but have you seen prof stolfi has put a negative comment to the SEC
Edit. Just seen it on Reddit mega etf thread on bitcoinmarkets page
He can always be depended on to devote at least 18 hours a day to destroying Bitcoin in his uniquely passive butt headed way. I shudder to think what's going to happen to him if it passes. He wants all of us Bitcoin fans to die in a fire.
|
|
|
Going on what they've had to endure from the little shits who live in crypto land with this, I assume future shitcoin ETF applications, and rest assured there'll be loads of them added to their ICO announcements that never actually happen, will be told to fuck off and not come back.
|
|
|
Who is this guy? Why do you post him as a reliable source of info?
He's Marketwatch reporter who specialises in ETFs. That makes him a rather more reliable source of information than me.
|
|
|
Math is hard.....
Yes it is.
|
|
|
How does this ETF work? I thought there are fixed shares backed by fixed coins so there is no pressure on the overall bitcoin market, just a way to own coins via a third party.
That's the idea, but they have the option to buy more coins to back more shares if people want more. I assume that's one of the main reasons why they created Gemini. I remember reading their original application where they went into the details of the exchange options. 'Well, there's Bitstamp in Slovenia, that isn't regulated. There's BTC-e in, um, somewhere, and no one knows who runs it. Err...' There will of course be people selling their shares too. It's quite possible it'll always be a totally self contained market that never needs a Bitcoin market buy.
|
|
|
I thought if that much money comes into the ETF they have to buy more BTC to balance the fund's assets with the underlying commodity
They have shares in 108,000 coins to sell first. That's worth considerably more than $300 million. The day when they have to market buy will come but it could be a long time away yet, especially if the price keeps on rising.
|
|
|
Reading this thread seems to be one of the best ways of finding out what's going on. I noticed a day after someone posts some news here story's about it start appearing on the crypto news websites. It's almost as if their author's read the latest news in this thread, then write an article about it.
In general I find Reddit far, far more news savvy than here. There are often lengthy threads there on subjects that haven't even been mentioned anywhere on here yet. This one bit of news though won't be slipping by. Plus volume is just noise a lot of the time - $300 million coming along to BUY is another story entirely....
Who came up with this figure and who are they? If it's 300 million going into ETFs then that's money that never sees this market. If it's 300 million of professional speculator money looking to join in, professional speculators don't initiate pumps. They prey on them.
|
|
|
does this mean it was denied? I think we're going to find that out from the SEC themselves, not a blob on a website.
|
|
|
is it even possible it hasn't been decided yet? that they still need to take a vote?
So they'd wait three years for a five minute screaming match with the clock ticking? I'd hope they were a little more considered than that.
|
|
|
Who bought at the bottom/sold at the top ? I was far too busy blinking.
|
|
|
So it breached $1337 for a fraction of a millisecond? I understand that's a meaningful figure for the computer orientated.
|
|
|
approval won't mean a huge injection of market cap for bitcoin, it will only encourage further speculation from direct bitcoin investors hoping that capital will seep through into bitcoin eventually.
Who the hell do you think you are with your attention to details and facts? Like almost all good news it goes in the future bank, not the immediate one, but it'll inspire a short term pump because the usual suspects like them. It could be years before they have to buy coins on the market. It is perhaps easy to underestimate the effect of American money unleashed though. We'll see. Ultimately it makes Bitcoin safer and easier to get exposure to but it still does nothing to inspire people who were previously indifferent to actually want to do that.
|
|
|
|