Bitcoin Forum
July 02, 2024, 01:13:28 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 [63] 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 ... 193 »
1241  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: unconfirmed transactions very stressed. on: December 12, 2017, 11:59:23 AM
2.6.4 is a very old version of electrum and it is likely setting a fee that is too low for your transaction. Anyway please try these steps to fix your problem:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1916963.msg19015496#msg19015496
1242  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Create Electrum wallet CLI without password on: December 11, 2017, 04:21:46 PM
This is being dealt with on reddit. Please don't create threads on multiple forums.
1243  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Android Electrum Secure? and MPK on: December 11, 2017, 03:31:54 PM
How secure is Android Electrum and Android platform in general?

Depends on what apps you install Smiley

Quote
If a hacker gets your MPK how vulnerable are you?

Eg just using as watch on android.

He'll see all your addresses, transactions and balance. He won't be able to spend your bitcoins though.

1244  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: No seed in Electrum after moving from Multibit HD on: December 11, 2017, 03:11:05 PM
He's telling you to create a new wallet. However you don't really have to do this. You can continue using your current wallet and should you need to restore from seed in the future then use the multibit seed again in the same way you did before. So your seed is your old multibit HD seed.
1245  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Trying to figure out fees on: December 10, 2017, 04:07:31 PM
I've looked through the different threads after a search for "high fee", but I don't seem to get the answer I need.

I have just made a donation (= no haste going through the block chain) of ≈ €20,00 with the "Fee" slider set to the lowest position (= 25 blocks, I believe). Before I'd paid attention to what was going on I had paid ≈ €10,00 in fees. Which is obviously ridiculous. The transaction did go through pretty quick, though, much faster than expected and... needed.

One thread I found here suggests that setting the preferences to "Edit fees manually". Right now I have only "Use dynamic fees" and "Propose Replace-By-Fee = Always." In a case like this one, how can I know what's the right fee to apply while trying to avoid the transaction getting stuck forever (I've had this happen once, it took one whole month before it went through, a real hassle for both sides getting the BTCs back).

Fees change according to demand and supply of space on the blockchain. When you set fees to dynamic that means electrum queries electrum servers for fee estimates and then sets a fee based on what it learns. Therefore the fees electrum sets are based on market conditions and are the best fees for a novice user.

Replace by fee (RBF) is a setting that marks your transaction as replaceable. It is used in case your transaction gets stuck due to low fees (which shouldn't normally happen with dynamic fees). In such a situation it is possible to bump the fee of your transaction by replacing it with a new transaction that pays a higher fee. Marking a transaction as RBF doesn't cost you anything but it does provide you with a safety net in case a transaction gets stuck due to low fees.

Now regarding how fees are calculated you should know that it is the size of the transaction in bytes that matters not the amount transferred. You are paying for space on the blockchain so the more space your transaction takes the more you have to pay. Transactions with lots of inputs and outputs pay more than transactions with fewer inputs and outputs.

So now that I've explained all of the above lets address the question of why you had to pay such a large fee. Edit LOL because fees are just very high right now! What can I say? Bitcoin is expensive to use!

In future you can click on preview on the send tab to see how much in fees you will be paying before you send the money.


What I need to know then is the following:

1. If in this concrete case (€20) the €10 fee is related to 25 blocks, would a fee of, say, €2 be related to 125 blocks?

2. Where is it possible for a commoner to see the time it would take to get through 100, 125, 150 blocks, or whatever?

3. From how many blocks is there a risk of my transaction never getting through?

Sorry if I'm not asking these questions the right way, but again I only want to use BTC as a payment method, taking them out my pocket as I would a Euro bill.

1. IDK depends on market conditions. It does not scale up and down linearly. Besides electrum only offers the 25 block delay. There was talk of expanding that to slower confirmation times. Maybe in the next release.

2. A block happens on average every 10 minutes but it can vary widely. The  protocol tries to ensure a 10 min average time between blocks over every 2 week period.

3. Transactions are atomic so if it doesn't get picked up by a miner and incorporated in a block it'll eventually be forgotten and the funds will show up back in your wallet. This can take weeks though. However if you have RBF enabled you can increase the fee retroactively. That means you can low ball the initial fee and later on bump it higher if it doesn't confirm.

The best thing you can do is to keep an eye on the mempool using sites like the earn.com one and the ones below:

https://tradeblock.com/bitcoin/
https://btc.com/stats/unconfirmed-tx

Do your transactions on days when the mempool is less congested and fees have fallen. That tends to be on weekends although not this weekend obviously Smiley


1246  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Generating multiple receiving addresses on: December 10, 2017, 01:27:52 PM
Use the receive tab:

https://bitcoinelectrum.com/how-to-use-the-electrum-receive-tab/
1247  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Segwit on: December 10, 2017, 01:27:08 PM
Read this. It answers most questions regarding segwit and electrum: https://www.reddit.com/r/Electrum/comments/7dku5r/segwit_wallets_and_electrum/
1248  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Upgrading from 2.6.4 with 2 factor to 3.0.2 on: December 09, 2017, 01:37:07 PM
1. Yes you don't have to do anything other than install the latest version

3. I don't think electron cash supports 2fa wallets. You could try it but I don't think it'll work.

5. Your 2fa addresses are multisig addresses so they have 3 private keys behind them. Any 2 are required to sign spending transactions. Restoring from seed recreates a wallet with 2 private keys. The third one is held by trusted coin. Anyway it's going to be a lot more complicated than simply sweeping the keys in coinomi. I haven't looked into bgold software so I can't guide you on how to do this but I'm sure others here can.

Old 2fa wallets had 25 word seeds. Electrum can still restore from those. It maintains backwards compatibility with all past seed mnemonic formats.










1249  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: ELECTRUM - Why the hell am I losing so much BTC for a send transaction?!?! on: December 09, 2017, 07:47:36 AM
For anyone interested I solved the problem. Because some of the bitcoins were in the "Used" addresses, by default it wouldn't allow me to spend from them, but by selecting all the addresses with any coin in them from the "Addresses" tab and then right clicking and choosing "spend from" I am able to choose the true maximum amount send my entire balance in one go. Thanks for the help, I probably wouldn't have worked it out otherwise!

That doesn't make sense. Electrum keeps track of all your addresses including used ones. Were any of the addresses frozen? Frozen addresses have light blue back ground and you can't spend from them until you unfreeze.
1250  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: ELECTRUM - Why the hell am I losing so much BTC for a send transaction?!?! on: December 08, 2017, 01:20:05 PM
What type of wallet is this? The wallet type should be mentioned in the window title.

Can you click on the preview button and tell us the output amounts listed there?
1251  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: help getting electrum 1,9,8 online to finish wallet key recovery on: December 07, 2017, 02:43:30 PM
You should restore your wallet using the latest version of electrum. That old version will not work anymore.
1252  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum Wallet Not Synchronizing and "Unverified" on: December 06, 2017, 05:57:47 AM
See here: https://bitcoinelectrum.com/frequently-asked-questions/#electrum-is-stuck-at-synchronizing-what-can-i-do-to-fix-this
1253  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Using outdated versions of Electrum on: December 06, 2017, 05:55:17 AM
quote ranochigo :
For several updates, there are changes to the network rules and/or have security updates. It is recommended to upgrade in those cases. If you have to decide, check the changelog[1].

So with all this Segwitx2 stuff going on has there been theese kind of changes that would require the latest version?
Im clueless for checking the changelog.

Thanks for the info :-)

Segwit2x was cancelled. There were improvements made to handle potential hard forks in preparation for segwit2x.

Anyway it's best to keep up with the latest version of electrum. New versions have bug fixes and new features.
1254  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: electrum wallet is not letting me send any bitcoins. on: December 06, 2017, 05:47:36 AM
Is this a 2fa wallet? Does it say 2fa or 2factor authentication in the electrum window title?
1255  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Working way of installing electrum onto Ubuntu live USB? on: December 05, 2017, 01:40:28 AM
I updated my script to support dependency installation on ubuntu. Tested this with Ubuntu 16.0.4.3 live as well as Debian 9.2 live

https://github.com/BitcoinsPakistan/electrum-install

Download and run the install script using sudo

Code:
wget https://github.com/BitcoinsPakistan/electrum-install/raw/master/install
sudo bash install 3.0.2
1256  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Not successful restoring wallet on: December 04, 2017, 03:54:07 AM
AFAIK, you need to get your secret key from TrustedCoin to make a wallet from 2FA to a regular wallet.

This is incorrect. He restored from seed so he doesn't need anything else.

@Yp108 is your restored wallet synced correctly? What color circle do you see in the bottom right?

Also do you see familiar addresses on the addresses tab? Go to view menu > show addresses to display that tab.
1257  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Electrum Wallet seed lost on: December 04, 2017, 01:24:12 AM
On a side note, suppose I lost my Electrum (seed) password, but I could retrive it eventually.

Now, I don't know if someone else could have had access to it, so it must be insecure to keep using that wallet with that seed.

Should I recreate a new one in Electrum and transfer all funds ASAP to this new one?

Yes that sounds like a good precautionary step to take. Here's how you can create a new wallet: https://bitcoinelectrum.com/creating-an-electrum-wallet/
1258  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: Why is not the hash (SHA-256) written to the signature on: December 01, 2017, 07:42:12 PM
A digital signature is a signed hash of the message. In this case the message being the file you downloaded. So the hash is there it's just that the verification of the signature is automated by gpg so you don't see it.

The reason Core does things the way it does them is because they have lots of different files that they want to sign so they generate sha256sums of all of them and then sign that file of checksums. In Electrum's case there aren't many files so it's easier just to sign them directly. The end result is the same. They are both equally secure. So please just verify the signature.

And FYI if you are advocating for unsigned hashes published on the electrum site then you should know that they only serve to give users a false sense of security. Fake electrum sites can also publish unsigned hashes. They are meaningless.
1259  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: None of you are financial experts, it's scary on: November 30, 2017, 08:27:25 PM

I've been following this forum for a few weeks now and I'm honestly shocked as to how little 95% you know about economics or finance in general. 

The Bitcoin community is filled with young, uneducated, and over-excited children "playing" with digital currency/asset as a hobby.  None of you have the slightest clue as to how quickly the entire value of Bitcoin could be brought down to $0 in a matter of days.

Put aside your egos and "to the moon" mirages and think about the following.  How will Bitcoin react if:

1.) The US government starts to regulate it? Or ban it? (GASP!)
2.) Another exchange is found to be a fraud?
3.) A bank or government created it's own cryptocurrency that's legal and trusted?
4.) Bitcoin has trouble scaling and it take days or weeks for transactions to process?
5.) Mining is no long feasible or profitable?

I am hopeful that a cryptocurrency will emerge in the near future.  However, in my opinion, the issues above need to be addressed for any new cryptocurrency to even have a shot.

Save the "oMfG you're a N00B with 1 p0St" bullshit.  I am an active investor in many different markets and industries. I'm hoping to open some of your eyes and bring you back to reality.


1) The US government already regulates fiat <> bitcoin conversions like it does with all transactions involving fiat. For it to attempt to ban bitcoin would be a bit like trying to ban gold. What's the point? There is no need for such heavy handed tactics when the simple regulation of fiat <> btc suffices. So far every indication they've given is that they consider bitcoin to be an innovation not a threat and the regulation of fiat <> btc bridges is sufficient.

Now if despite all of the above they do ban it then the price will obviously suffer. But there are other countries in the world besides the US so it won't be all that bad. It would require concerted global action to truly ban bitcoin and even then it wouldn't be entirely effective because of its decentralized nature.

2) This is guaranteed! In case you haven't noticed exchanges go down like nine pins in the bitcoin world. It's only a short term bump in the road especially since no exchange commands the market share that Gox once did. Bitcoin survived Gox so it can survive any exchange bust now.

3) These already exist! I mean not "crypto currencies" but regulated electronic payment methods. Paypal for example or any myriad other centralized payment systems. But bitcoin is unique because it is decentralized and not controlled by any single entity. It is a common newbie mistake to equate bitcoin with the many different epayment systems out there which is why it's FAQ number one on my site!

4) Yes this would be very bad for bitcoin. A sudden loss of hash rate would be very bad indeed. Maybe they'll hard fork to a lower difficulty to fix it? A hard fork with community support would be fine.

5) Difficulty adjust automatically to network hash rate so if mining is no longer profitable the less efficient miners leave, network hash rate falls, difficulty adjusts downward and mining becomes profitable again.
1260  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: address on: November 30, 2017, 06:09:56 PM
update to the latest version of electrum if you haven't done so already. then do this: https://www.reddit.com/r/Electrum/comments/7g9qfr/bitcoin_sent_to_an_old_address/dqik4gt/?context=3

Do you see your address?
Pages: « 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 [63] 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 ... 193 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!