You're just going to run your battery down. Mobile devices have got to be terrible for mining.
|
|
|
Tho this IS one angle of attack, it appears that Joey is the worst gambler in history so it might actually earn him a tax credit. Except that, as people pointed out, gambling benefit money seems illegal in itself.
Pizzas & taxis are fun things to send to his house but it would be more amusing if there was something/someone which wouldn't leave so quietly
You can't deduct gambling losses from your personal return if they're more than your winnings. But since Joey doesn't have a job he doesn't have to worry about that anyway.
|
|
|
Yes, thanks for sharing -- I usually do puzzle hunts for free (actually I pay to do them), so it's nice to get paid ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Received another 0.01 ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) thanks
|
|
|
You could have 5 brain wallets, each with 0.01 BTC in them. But I don't know if people would just guess random user names.
|
|
|
Just got 0.01 BTC, thanks ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
It's OK, it was a community effort -- thanks for setting it up!
|
|
|
1QK8w1RZrpKR4K3FuR2W15kNX8B5YRZrWd
I'm glad that jackjack and pirateat40 were both correct, I should have zoomed in more on tomato!
|
|
|
My guesses: 1) genjix 2) jackjack 3) pirateat40 4) ?? nbartlett or njbartlett -- Bartlett is the only city I can find 5) JohnJohnK -- already provided above
Is glasses a hint, or just a reference to his avatar? Now I'm looking for nicolas, glass, or a fruit along the mississippi...
|
|
|
I guess I shouldn't say it's my code -- it's all stolen and cobbled together from the example scripts etotheipi gave.
|
|
|
Ugh, I tried Shakespeare, because it has pear in it, and the address was 18EL... so close ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif)
|
|
|
Yeah, but the picture is from the wikipedia page of Blytheville, AR, which is right on the Mississippi.
|
|
|
I got the same, but that means I'm wrong on one or more of the others ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) I don't understand the Sir Nicolas bit, so it's probably that one. The only fruit named city on the Mississippi with a remotely close username I could find was Bartlett.
|
|
|
Ahhh thanks So now I have 1 (I think), but the brain wallet isn't coming out (compressed or uncompressed), which means I've got another one wrong ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif)
|
|
|
Hmm here is what I have: - Nothing is c3rtain but Death and That. - There are two of them to any question. - Bob of all trades, master of none. (*) - Never listen to those three advisors - The night, Love and... And... Errr... - Two of those are better than one. (*) Money does not do that on trees. 3) Taxes: x 2) Sides: i all, none, or one) Bob? Jack? 3) Everything seems to be about 5 letters, and all I can think of are the three wise men, and Myrhh rhyms with Err.. (grasping here): r 2) Heads: e 1) Grow: g xijreg xibreg << bigrex?
|
|
|
Here's my code for my watching only script to load the blockchain and read a balance for some addresses. Hope this helps. import sys sys.path.append('..') sys.path.append('.')
from armoryengine import * from time import sleep start = RightNow()
TheBDM.setBlocking(True) TheBDM.setOnlineMode(True) print 'Loading blockchain took %0.1f sec' % (RightNow() - start) start = RightNow() topBlock = TheBDM.getTopBlockHeight() print '\n\nCurrent Top Block is:', topBlock TheBDM.getTopBlockHeader().pprint()
cppWallet = Cpp.BtcWallet() cppWallet.addAddress_1_( addrStr_to_hash160("1ArmoryXcfq7TnCSuZa9fQjRYwJ4bkRKfv") )
print cppWallet.getNumAddr(),' addresses in this wallet' print '\n\nRegistering the wallet with the BlockDataManager & loading...' TheBDM.registerWallet(cppWallet) TheBDM.scanBlockchainForTx(cppWallet) print '\n\nTransaction history of this wallet:' ledger = cppWallet.getTxLedger() for le in ledger: le.pprintOneLine() print '\n\n************************************\nBalance of this wallet:', coin2str(cppWallet.getSpendableBalance()) print 'Unspent outputs:' unspentTxOuts = cppWallet.getSpendableTxOutList(topBlock) for utxo in unspentTxOuts: utxoAddr = hash160_to_addrStr(utxo.getRecipientAddr()) print utxoAddr," ",float(utxo.getValue())/100000000.0, " ",utxo.getNumConfirm()
while True: if TheBDM.getBDMState()=='BlockchainReady': prevTopBlock = TheBDM.getTopBlockHeight() newBlks = TheBDM.readBlkFileUpdate() if newBlks>0: print newBlks," new blocks found" latestBlockNum = TheBDM.getTopBlockHeight() topTimestamp = TheBDM.getTopBlockHeader().getTimestamp() TheBDM.scanBlockchainForTx(cppWallet) print '\n\nTransaction history of this wallet:' ledger = cppWallet.getTxLedger() for le in ledger: le.pprintOneLine() print '\n\n************************************\nBalance of this wallet:', coin2str(cppWallet.getSpendableBalance()) print 'Unspent outputs:' unspentTxOuts = cppWallet.getSpendableTxOutList(topBlock) for utxo in unspentTxOuts: utxoAddr = hash160_to_addrStr(utxo.getRecipientAddr()) print utxoAddr," ",float(utxo.getValue())/100000000.0, " ",utxo.getNumConfirm() time.sleep(10)
|
|
|
They say gen2 in october! So since we are not asking for refund, nor for compensation. LETS WAIT! thats the best idea.
They said 9-10 weeks for gen1.
|
|
|
So you don't want any compensation for delays? What if the refund gave you priority of gen2 delivered in october, and your board would support it? I'm speechless of how friendly some people are for getting screwed like this..
Of course I would. I'd love a 50% rebate on the chips I purchased from Avalon.
|
|
|
And what happens to the people that bought parts already and are sitting on non refundable parts? Should they have their chips refunded (most of the people in the group buy) to satisfy a few users in the group buy? Lets be realistic here.
If Avalon is right about gen2 coming out in october. Those past groupbuys should get priority (for example those with refund). Old hardware designs shall support gen 2 chips. Would that then not be best? get refund now, wait for gen 2 when you might actually get some of your investment back. And then they only offer gen 2 based on in stock ordering so we will know that the delivery time will be correct. From what I read the gen2 will be the same size, but different pinout and I'm sure other small differences would need a complete redesign. You can't expect to just drop it in.
|
|
|
What's the point in getting chip refunds when we've already paid for assembly etc? I'd rather have a miner with chips in it than a miner without chips sitting on my desk.
|
|
|
|