I wonder if burnside would ever put a warning on his own security, of course not. Why don't we post a warnings and then post even more severe earnings now that ASIC miner had plumetted.
Its like the dow Jones posting warnings on its companies.
WARNING: Apple didnt provide their usual pre order #s, trade with caution.
Burnside has shown himself to be a clown just like every other person in the BTC community. Our warning feature is new thats why we havent posted on other securities, but it works so perfectly for Labcoin
Wtf are you talking about? Labcoin is being super fucking shady and they deserve MORE then a warning. So has everyother security including burnsides own, Peta broke its contract where are the warnings? Riiiiight Talking about BTC-TRADING-PT, bids are currently at 0.561 BTC and shares were selling at 1.126 BTC two weeks ago. With all the trading that Labcoin has seen, dividends should be at an all time high. With BTC-TRADING-PT's share price at a low, that seems to be an incredible bargain at the moment. So, for those who think Labcoin is too risky, BTC-TRADING-PT seems like a good alternative to invest in. I'm surprised the FUDsters aren't snapping the shares up. I guess they're just too bust trying to trade Labcoin shares.  look at the ROI boy. probably labcoin has bought so many overpriced shares lately from the cash they took from selling their shares that they now sell to give out dividends n stuff and buy their own shares now that they finally were able to buy/assemble miners... Last page seem to be the real fudsters ... Your comment is not even remotely relevant to anything I just wrote. I'll break down what I said so even an idiot can understand. Lots of Labcoin shares have been bought and sold recently. BTC-TC charges a fee for those trades. The more trades on BTC-TC, the more money BTC-TC makes. BTC-TRADING-PT shares are at an incrdibaly low price. Why aren't FUDsters buying BTC-TRADING-PT shares? Is it because they're too busy trading Labcoin shares and their FUD is designed to guide the prices in the direction they want? Now, how did your comment relate to what I just said? Did you just see the word "FUDSters" and jump in to defend yourself?  |
|
|
|
I wonder if burnside would ever put a warning on his own security, of course not. Why don't we post a warnings and then post even more severe earnings now that ASIC miner had plumetted.
Its like the dow Jones posting warnings on its companies.
WARNING: Apple didnt provide their usual pre order #s, trade with caution.
Burnside has shown himself to be a clown just like every other person in the BTC community. Our warning feature is new thats why we havent posted on other securities, but it works so perfectly for Labcoin
Wtf are you talking about? Labcoin is being super fucking shady and they deserve MORE then a warning. So has everyother security including burnsides own, Peta broke its contract where are the warnings? Riiiiight Talking about BTC-TRADING-PT, bids are currently at 0.561 BTC and shares were selling at 1.126 BTC two weeks ago. With all the trading that Labcoin has seen, dividends should be at an all time high. With BTC-TRADING-PT's share price at a low, that seems to be an incredible bargain at the moment. So, for those who think Labcoin is too risky, BTC-TRADING-PT seems like a good alternative to invest in. I'm surprised the FUDsters aren't snapping the shares up. I guess they're just too bust trying to trade Labcoin shares. |
|
|
|
There are 262 TH/s are ordered/ delivered so far.
Very precise number! Do you have a source for this? Here: 1. 62+200=262TH/s. Earnings and profitability highly depends on the competitors and how the price range the purchasers will accept after two to three months. And please bear in mind that they are perspectives, only bonds could usually give a fixed range of profit predictions.
|
|
|
|
If you invest a large number of BTC to someone and expect he will give you reasonable return after 1 year, what's the most important thing you are expecting from him? The trust right?
No. The return, obviously. |
|
|
|
We will show everyone this operation is very serious within about one month from now.
This is the part that keeps worrying me. Anyone with an attention span greater than a gold fish knows what he's talking about. 50 Th/s coming online in October. Why does that worry you? Because I'm waiting an extra 20 hours for the simplest of updates. That suggests to me that everything may not go according to their schedules. Actually, nothing whatsoever has gone according to their schedule. Things they said would happen in 2 days did not. So I'm skeptical about something that's supposed to happen six weeks from now. They said they would get their chips on the 28th of August and they claimed they did. Why do you think they won't get more chips when they say they will? That shipping schedule is down to TSMC. It's not about the chip arriving date. It's about their ability to deploy the hashing power and how upfront they communicate with the investors. Their ability to deploy will get better with experience and that experience is being gained by dealing with their current problems. Just because they are currently having problems with deployment, doesn't mean those problems will arise every time more hardware is deployed. Solving those problems now should stop them from occurring in the future. |
|
|
|
We will show everyone this operation is very serious within about one month from now.
This is the part that keeps worrying me. Anyone with an attention span greater than a gold fish knows what he's talking about. 50 Th/s coming online in October. Why does that worry you? Because I'm waiting an extra 20 hours for the simplest of updates. That suggests to me that everything may not go according to their schedules. Actually, nothing whatsoever has gone according to their schedule. Things they said would happen in 2 days did not. So I'm skeptical about something that's supposed to happen six weeks from now. They said they would get their chips on the 28th of August and they claimed they did. Why do you think they won't get more chips when they say they will? That shipping schedule is down to TSMC. |
|
|
|
We will show everyone this operation is very serious within about one month from now.
This is the part that keeps worrying me. Anyone with an attention span greater than a gold fish knows what he's talking about. 50 Th/s coming online in October. Why does that worry you? |
|
|
|
There really is no reason to hold off on giving proof of mining and an address, this means that they are delaying the release probably in the hopes of actually solving a block. My bet is that they are mining somewhere(probably a significant amount) less than 2TH and have yet to find a block, so the release of their address now will show 0 BTC and be useless.
+1 So now you're admitting they're not a scam? |
|
|
|
So when is the address coming? 24 hours or 2 hours or...?
Some time within the next Timer removed. End time: 2013-09-18+19:46:44UTC |
|
|
|
Dividend day was previously miscalculated, i apologize, expect the first payment on Tue 24/9 and mining address proof in less than 24 hours as promised.
Timer removed. End time: 2013-09-18+19:46:44UTC |
|
|
|
Mining address will be posted before the timer ends.
Timer removed. End time: 2013-09-18+19:46:44UTC
What galaxy timezone is that ? Timezone is irrelevant. The timer is set to end 24 hours after labcoin's post where he claimed the address would be posted within 24 hours. |
|
|
|
Why? Because you're too stupid to understand how usernames work on the Internet?
I don't know much about Skype but I would guess usernames are unique? And I don't think they expire. And what does that forum username have to do with Skype? Both screenshots refer to the same skype username. No they don't. One screenshot shows a forum user called "labcoin" with a Skype username of "delaria". The other screenshot shows a forum user called "Delaria". It does not show the Skype username. The name it displays in the popup is the forum username, not the Skype username. |
|
|
|
|
Mining address will be posted before the timer ends.
Timer removed. End time: 2013-09-18+19:46:44UTC
|
|
|
|
Why? Because you're too stupid to understand how usernames work on the Internet?
I don't know much about Skype but I would guess usernames are unique? And I don't think they expire. And what does that forum username have to do with Skype? |
|
|
|
This is looking more and more like a scam. If it is then it's even more epic than pirateat40 with millions of dollars on the line. At least BTCGarden gave the coins back. Why? Because you're too stupid to understand how usernames work on the Internet? |
|
|
|
You do maybe realize that one can use several BTC addresses? Either way. Troll away if it makes you happy.
But no one can share one same BTC address, u understand that? Of course they can. They'd have to be stupid to do so but there's no reason that they can't. |
|
|
|
Dregs all around for the followers. |
|
|
|
There IS a difference between a date and a time, no?
My understanding is that: let X be any date, The assertion "BEFORE <X>" means any time and date before the first second of day X How unreasonable is that? Is it Wednesday yet? |
|
|
|
LOL, there's a sell-off, yet the price is going up. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
