guys i need some help if possible... work has began and i have reached the stage where im looking for someone who knows how to create a youtube style video hosting site with a few extra's, please pm if you have the creativity and coding skills, ill pay in drk ;-) thanks
Any off the shelf stuff work for you? There's plenty out there to build on and a lot of it is free: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_video_hosting_services
|
|
|
Another noob question: Do we update remote MN wallet to the latest version as well or just the local wallet? Cheesy Now show me that patience that you guys were talking earlier Wink
Always update both you stoopid n00b and RTFM grrrrrr ![Angry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/angry.gif) and welcome aboard. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) indeed update both, but it's not necessary to use the local wallet to restart masternode. that part you can fully do on the mn server Unless there is a protocol version bump or it takes you half an hour or something to update your MillionnaireNode! ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
Another noob question: Do we update remote MN wallet to the latest version as well or just the local wallet? Cheesy Now show me that patience that you guys were talking earlier Wink
Always update both you stoopid n00b and RTFM grrrrrr ![Angry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/angry.gif) and welcome aboard. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
looks like you can grab it from github already .. but lets wait till Evan gives an official announcement.
Feel free to start updating. I'm just compiling it and writing the announcement. edit: v0.10.15.19 is out. Added a bit of debugging and another sanity check www.darkcoin.io still has v17 binaries Compiles fine from https://github.com/darkcoin/darkcoin![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs27.postimg.org%2Fhjvhwfg03%2Fimage.png&t=665&c=b9bTlBnX0XkAFQ) oops, binaries now up on darkcoin.io!
|
|
|
This would cause an immediate hard fork. All new clients would only talk amongst themselves and the old ones would still be mining. Mining pools for example, would need to update the moment it came out to avoid 100% of their blocks getting orphaned.
You say that like it's a bad thing... ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
LOL, ebolajax wetting his panties again at the mere thought of annoying any Men In Uniform. They might take the truncheon out of his arse and go beat someone with it, he likes it just where it is thank you very much Sir!
|
|
|
Why is it that every time there is positive news about DRK the Cryptsy DRk wallet is under maintenance?
Answers not really needed.
Not to anyone with a clue, but for those without... crooked adj. evil, corrupt crafty criminal deceitful devious dishonest dishonorable double-dealing dubious fraudulent illegal indirect iniquitous lying nefarious questionable ruthless shady shifty suborned treacherous underhand unlawful unprincipled unscrupulous untruthful ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
what today it disappeared ?! might just reboot or something !
but sure we could totally boycott Exchanges into switching off Bots ! that could be an interesting experiment !!!
why not to use only the exchanges which are bot free? bitfinex is one of them am I right? ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Sadly not: https://www.bitfinex.com/pages/api - you can bot away on Bitfinex all day long, although they might 'restrict' you to 60 hits/minute per bot IP.
|
|
|
is it possible to burn drk for drk 2.0 to get rid of old clients and start fresh?
its not a real proposal, just wondering if its technically possible.
Each protocol bump should kick everything else off the network, and thus be a fresh start. This enforcement thing has been holding back development since May. The current mining architecture just isn't a good fit for what Darkcoin is trying to achieve. I have proposed making mining via Masternodes mandatory many times, and just get called a 'Nazi' and a 'retarded fucking Jew' (by the same people... ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) ) - the nearest I've had to a sensible argument against it is that pools need beefier hardware than Masternodes, but why not require pools to obtain compliance tokens from Masternodes first that are required for a block to be accepted? There are lots of ways it could be done but nobody seems interested. I am more and more coming to believe that PoW is a dead end. Centralised pools do not secure the network, they are a security liability. Nobody wants to talk about it. Mining costs do not translate into coin value. Nobody wants to admit it. For the last six months PoW has just held back development, it has done nothing whatsoever to add value. Shifting block reward in favour of Proof of Service is a good move, but the timeframe is too long and it's meaningless if PoW can still fuck things up. PoW has been a spanner in the works for half a year now, my fear is that it is also going to make InstanTX unworkable as well Here you go again. Get over it, PoW is here to stay, better get used to it. Oh, I'm getting used to it, we're all getting very used to it. Round peg + square hole = does not work. As has been shown. Repeatedly. For the last 6 months. ![Kiss](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/kiss.gif)
|
|
|
is it possible to burn drk for drk 2.0 to get rid of old clients and start fresh?
its not a real proposal, just wondering if its technically possible.
Each protocol bump should kick everything else off the network, and thus be a fresh start. This enforcement thing has been holding back development since May. The current mining architecture just isn't a good fit for what Darkcoin is trying to achieve. I have proposed making mining via Masternodes mandatory many times, and just get called a 'Nazi' and a 'retarded fucking Jew' (by the same people... ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) ) - the nearest I've had to a sensible argument against it is that pools need beefier hardware than Masternodes, but why not require pools to obtain compliance tokens from Masternodes first that are required for a block to be accepted? There are lots of ways it could be done but nobody seems interested. I am more and more coming to believe that PoW is a dead end. Centralised pools do not secure the network, they are a security liability. Nobody wants to talk about it. Mining costs do not translate into coin value. Nobody wants to admit it. For the last six months PoW has just held back development, it has done nothing whatsoever to add value. Shifting block reward in favour of Proof of Service is a good move, but the timeframe is too long and it's meaningless if PoW can still fuck things up. PoW has been a spanner in the works for half a year now, my fear is that it is also going to make InstanTX unworkable as well.
|
|
|
Yeah, as far as I know that's just if your MN got forked, it shouldn't be there, or should be changed.
|
|
|
The LTC volume numbers are a bit baffling. Who the hell is buying LTC, let alone that much? ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
|
|
|
10% drop in the last 24 hours alone and just $30,000 trading volume.
What a fucking joke.
You not wrong even Urocoin (the shit coin literally) is hashing higher i think What are you two dunderheads gibbering about? BTC down 4.5% so far on the day, DRK down 2.59%.
|
|
|
I want to transfer 90 DRK from a very old wallet on 9.13.15 It errors with is that normal? It would let me do 10, but for a fee? Fees are incurred by transactions according to size in bytes, not size in currency amount. Use coin control to select your inputs to keep the size in bytes below the fee threshold. Ah thanks, the wallet has thousands of transactions from p2p mining, so thats the reason? Yep. You're just going to have to spend ten minutes shuffling all those tiny inputs into a larger lump or lumps.
|
|
|
I want to transfer 90 DRK from a very old wallet on 9.13.15 It errors with is that normal? It would let me do 10, but for a fee? Fees are incurred by transactions according to size in bytes, not size in currency amount. Use coin control to select your inputs to keep the size in bytes below the fee threshold.
|
|
|
but i find it alarming that one pool can have so much control over our network
"Unknown" on chainz means just that, it doesn't mean that the 52% is all one pool, it isn't. Rest assured that there are three pools that between them own >50% of the network, not just one. Centralised hashpower secures the network, it is absolutely not a giant fucking liability in any way!
|
|
|
Over 1080 Masternodes and rising. ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif)
|
|
|
The network has updated to v0.10.15.17 and enforcement will be activated on Monday, October 3rd. Be aware if you haven't updated, you will risk getting lost on a fork after Monday. You can ignore this message if you've already updated. Thanks. I assume that is a typo should be Monday November 3 nope Evan is going full retard and retroactively activating it in the past... The time continuum is about to be seriously discombobulated. I have no doubt that Evan will succeed at this. I've volunteered to be a guinea pig and go back to my childhood (with a list of winning horses, lotto number, etc.... of course) I believe he's sending me tomorrow at noon. By tomorrow evening, I will have been the guy who was buying hundreds of thousands of coins, it'll be me, me me me me me!!! YES! I would pay to see this movie. TanteStefana send back through the timelock by The Duffinator to save the world from BlockNet. ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
The network has updated to v0.10.15.17 and enforcement will be activated on Monday, October 3rd. Be aware if you haven't updated, you will risk getting lost on a fork after Monday. You can ignore this message if you've already updated. That's right, Darksend is now time invariant and Enforcement will be retroactive with extreme prejudice, bitches. ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|