Actually I think AT might actually be the best one to vot for. If we can get more devs working on expanding the usefulness of qora, the more exposure we will get.
Agreed. We didn't find a single dev interested in doing something. It doesn't mean tens of devs will start developing something if they have this opportunity. We need to make Qora famous first, then devs will be interested in building something on top of Qora. I have been trying to devs interested in developing a payment gateway for popular web carts for a shop I want to run. Funny how I work with a lot of devs but non interested in cryptos nor money it seems -_- |
|
|
|
Actually I think AT might actually be the best one to vot for. If we can get more devs working on expanding the usefulness of qora, the more exposure we will get.
Yeah I thought same thing that's why I voted for it. I find it sad price speculation poll had 6 times more votes than feature development  I think it is more that people have voted in that to test the system and have not changed their votes yet. I know that was the case for me. |
|
|
|
|
Actually I think AT might actually be the best one to vot for. If we can get more devs working on expanding the usefulness of qora, the more exposure we will get.
|
|
|
|
Here's some of the things that's been running through my mind as I was reading the voting list:
Which feature costs the least amount of time to implement? Which new feature will attract more users to Qora, and encourage more transactions? Which feature would offer the most bang for the buck (in other words, which feature is the most practical and useful at this stage)?
Having asked myself those questions, I'd like to share my thoughts with the community:
1. As qora has already mentioned, true anonymity is not really feasible at this moment due to lack of volume and amount of transactions at the moment. That's why I'm against implementing anonymity as the first feature. In addition, the only option for anonymity we have now is CryptoNote, which is not my favorite solution for anonymity at the moment. I think we should wait until we have more options (ie. release of darksend implementation) before we go for this route.
2. Do you see practical value for having an Asset Exchange at this stage? It is my opinion that without a way to solve the trust issue and easy cashout/asset conversion option, having an asset exchange is not worth much at this moment. I used to lean toward colored coin/assets, but after some serious thought, I am not sure I'd vote for Colored Coin/Asset anymore.
3. According to qora's document, Arbitrary Transaction and Wallet Upgrades seem to cost the least amount of time to implement. Arbitrary Transaction will attract a lot of developers who will like to build applications on top of qora, and Wallet Upgrades, well as its name suggests, will have the most exposure to the end users. So I'm starting to think that they're the best options at this moment.
So after some careful and serious thought, I think I will either vote for arbitrary transaction or wallet upgrade as the first feature to be implemented.
+1000 like hearing my thoughts  EDIT: @qora: How about inserting a deadline for the voting polls (the duration could depend on the number of blocks) in a future update? This way the number of polls wont get incredibly huge over time. I agree with both points :-) I will be voting for at or wallet upgrades. I will be pulling my qora for polo to help in this effort. |
|
|
|
|
Gen 2 coins will be t he future.
Nxt qora simcoin + whole host of nxt clones maybe...
|
|
|
|
|
Did Bret introduce points recently?
I did maybe 5btc worth of trades but have 0 points?
|
|
|
|
Strange working now. Maybe I have the wrong link saved. Will check it out later. I think we need to send a twit out about voting on bter |
|
|
|
|
Woot i guess sending the twits? worked lol.
QORA ADDED TO THE VOTING LIST
Vote my friends!
|
|
|
|
|
Chat logs are down I think?
|
|
|
|
Woot  |
|
|
|
Hi,
Where can I find the source code??
Thanks
qora will open source within three months Source for that? qora promised No he said he wont release it without investor approval. |
|
|
|
Is it the same DEV with Qora?
No, why would he clone his own coin  |
|
|
|
|
My path was for 64 bit make sure you put your local path.
|
|
|
|
|
"C:\Program Files (x86)\Java\jre7\bin\java.exe" -Xmx256m -Djava.library.path=libs/native -jar Qora.jar
Edit the run.bat and put in the full path to the java.
See if that helps.
|
|
|
|
|
I think it might be worth us having a moderated /locked ann thread when the voting system is live. We will have a OP that has all the details and have a community member that starts it so we can edit it on the fly?
|
|
|
|
Just out of interest did the dev have qora.org domain? Looks good if he is actively helping the community with marketing too  |
|
|
|
Anyone got any transcripts of the chat?
I would also really like to read the transcripts of the chat. Now all the chat logs are stored. Later, I will do that all could read the chat history for all time. http://coinia.net/qora/chat/Im guessing the chat with qora was not recorded? How can we verify it was him and not someone registering as qora? |
|
|
|
Dont bother GFW... This is the weirdest thread ever. Who cares about sockpuppets when they are just FUD makers. half of Silkcoin is sockpuppets, half of the forum is sockpuppets. I'm a sockpuppet!
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
