Are you really making a statement about this? A 5 year old boy is not suitable for gambling, but is 6 years old suitable? Really?

I think there must be an age restriction and this should not be less than 15. Take a look at the children around you. Evaluate how old (approximate) individuals who can make really healthy decisions. Not every 15-year-old child may be of the same maturity, but we have to find an average age. And this age should not be 5!

Really? Have you ever visit your website? It looks created in 1990!
The interface of the website looks very inexpensive and outdated. It sounds like you could really do better. Don't be angry with me, I just think you really need to do better.

I think the most striking data here is that the Bitcoin price saw ATH 2 years after the 2nd halving took place. I don't know if we can see an ATH after the third halving in 2020. However, it may be necessary to consider this as an average of 2 years. During this period, it is useful to be prepared for some price fluctuations.

PLUS: After 2 halving events to date, the price never came below that date. If this will be valid in 3rd halving, the price during halving may be our new bottom point.

Scammers are everywhere. And at every opportunity, they reappear to get people's money. Therefore, each of us should be very careful and always have to think twice before making a move. It is always necessary to be more careful about money issues.

The faucet things closed a long time ago. I think the last example of the freebitco.in genre is now. I think it might be a bit dependent on his gambling activities. But I am glad that they are online, frankly.

It is not important thing right now if you are promoting their products. It is important because they are helping for all human being right now.
And we all need these helps a lot. Actually I've stopped visiting for a while but I will play in there again. I appreciate their help. Hope it will go on for a while.

I'm sorry but I partially agree with you on this. I agree it would be nice to be able to pay with Bitcoin now and it would be a healthier form of payment. But Bitcoin is not yet able to handle the burden that will occur when the whole world wants to implement it. So if the whole world started to pay with BTC at the same time, how long would it take to confirm the transactions?
I'm not sure even Ethereum, which has a relatively better approval period, can handle this load. Even if other cryptocurrencies can do it in speed, I do not include it in the subject as its competencies can be questioned.

There is no data anywhere in the world that can provide reliable data on this subject yet. Therefore, it is not possible to find a clear answer to both the question you asked before and this question.

No country has yet officially accepted the existence of Bitcoin. Yes, there are some applications, tax payments and court orders. However, none of them are subject to a legal regulation. So we need this first to get data. However, even if this is happening, you may not get clear data. Because Bitcoin payments are anonymous. For this reason, it may not be possible to get information about why the payments are made and to whom.

I'm sure the vast majority in the forum know what Valhalla is. And yes, we are smart enough to understand the irony here. But of course this was not what I wanted to say. I'm not sure it's a good project or company name. I think a name used in this way cannot be a big and prestigious brand name. I think you should first review the name issue. Also, the most important element of wallets is security. I think you need to be informed about this issue.

Physical casinos may not be practical. You may not be able to reach all the time. I think this is the most important difference here. Online casinos are always with you with an internet connection 24/7.
Online casinos are always practical. If you want, you can reach online casinos even while walking on the road.

Of course, there is also the issue of security. Generally, physical casinos are reliable because they are legally regulated. But there are a lot of scam platforms about online casino. For this reason, we should definitely investigate before getting involved.

If you ask this topic here, I am sure that there will be more detailed responders: Wallet Software

Still, we can say that most secure way of keepin cryptocurrencies is using hardware wallets. Ledger and Trezor good choices.

Just the name is enough for me to choose not to use this wallet. Moreover, this promotion title is another disaster.

Many gambling platforms also offer options in this area. Many topics have been created in the forum about such websites. I think you can give more specific information about what kind of game you are looking for.

I don't think we have enough data about halving. I don't think those for other coins are valid for BTC. For Bitcoin, we have seen only 2 halving so far. And in both of them there was a positive divergence between halving and price.

Therefore, it may be necessary to re-analyze the others before guessing what will happen for the 3rd time. It is not easy to predict what miners will do, but I think Bitcoin mining will always continue. Because even if the number of miners decreases, the difficulty level will decrease every 14 days and the income of the remaining miners will increase.
Nevertheless, the previous halvings showed that as Bitcoin's release rate decreased, this had a positive effect on the BTC price. What will happen this time? I think we will see its effects within a year.

Come on guys, we have already fastest connections with some non blockchain platforms. There is no relation with connection or communication with corona virus recovery.
Corona virus has not recovery solutions yet. Scientist is looking for a way but there is not!
And I am sure if anyone find any solution, we all will be reach all information quickly.

So there is no blockchain need here now. Just need a cure.

Sorry, but we've seen a lot of blockchain projects trying to be developed about food chains. But even in a normal period, we saw that they were not successful and could not progress.

In fact, it's not just about food chains. Blockchain is a great technological development, everyone agrees. But I am not sure how accurate it is to apply to Blockchain to solve all the problems in the world. In other words, Blockchain can not cure all of our problems. Instead, it may be time to use blockchain in the right place and look for more rational solutions in other areas.

Do you think Satoshi looks like someone who will think of what everyone thinks? The general opinion might have been the way you said it. But he has already chosen the best way for Bitcoin to reach its true potential. He has also made the right choice, as far as we have seen so far.

That would be much appropriate. Because in this way there was no real accusations about them. And it wouldn't be good for anyone. Because not everyone has to be of the same opinion. There may be people who use some of the platforms written here and have not had any problems to date.

When I think of Waltonchain, I don't think of anything other than the scandal that happened 2 years ago. I have never followed and bought it ever since. I'm not sure if it makes sense to do Mainnet.

Every day a new and different token is on the market. I don't think it's useful to open a topic this way. There is no information. There is no benefit. It makes no sense.

Instead, a topic can be created that summarizes the topic and gives an idea of its content. Or you can wait for the right time and create a nice topic later as ANN. In the right place. (Announcements (Altcoins))