I am not sure , never tried it.
Not caring for the negative deal , won't use it anyway. Either someone elses problem or noones problem , both ways ; not my problem.
Try to change your title and see what happens. |
|
|
|
quickseller please have a look.
I had a look. It is nothing more then a parked domain. I doubt you could sell it for .02 BTC. Not interested. |
|
|
|
I get 5-10 PMs a week from newbies / literally just signed up accounts asking legitimate questions or asking for help. These are accounts that more often then not become useful members of the community. You can't paint everyone with the same brush.
if you force users to make at least one post before sending a PM then this problem would be solved. |
|
|
|
Ok i updated the thread with specifications
Are you sure your stats on the OP are correct? I am showing 5 posts and 5 activity on your profile. |
|
|
|
|
+1
It is also very common to get a PM from one of these imposters after inquiring about a good or publicly making an offer for something. It is very obvious to me that they are fake however the amount of money involved is usually large so they would only need to scam one person to make it worth their while.
I think a good balance would be a one post requirement before you can send a PM in order to make these imposter accounts more visible (and hopefully visable enough to get tagged with negative trust)
|
|
|
|
|
In other words your opinion needs to be valued enough by someone on level one default trust (someone who is on DefaultTrust's trust list) so that they add you to their trust list.
|
|
|
|
|
Being trusted by someone and being on someone's trust list are two independent things. Being trusted by someone generally means that you have done business with the person before or you have witnessed them do something that makes them trustworthy.
Being on someone's trust list means that the person whose list you are on values your opinion enough to agree with your trust ratings.
For example I gave you positive trust because you repaid a loan I gave you with collateral securing the loan. However I really do not know you therefore I am unable to gage your opinion enough to value it.
|
|
|
|
it takes almost two months for an account to go from member to full member  |
|
|
|
|
I am pretty sure you are wrong about being able to earn 1 BTC per month with a member account.
Even if there were a campaign open they allows unlimited posts for member accounts, you would need to make somewhere between 1000 and 2000 posts to make that much.
Also your title conflicts with your description. The account either has positive trust or neutral trust.
|
|
|
|
If anyone has a serious problem with Nubbins' judgement then they should exclude Nubbins in their own trust list. There's no need to wait for other members to take action.
Someone give this man a medal. If you don't like me, why in the fuck am I on your trust list? You are by default. That is the point of this thread to change you being on everyone's trust list by default. Well maybe the point of the thread should be to change Default Trust so it doesn't suck in precisely the way that pisses everyone off. Why not chime in here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=914641.0;allIt would be much easier to abuse trust in the proposed system (I did voice my concerns in that thread). His concern is not that he sees your trust ratings, it is that other people see your trust ratings by default and as a result may be negatively (or possibly positively) affected to be able to conduct business as a result of your ratings. |
|
|
|
If anyone has a serious problem with Nubbins' judgement then they should exclude Nubbins in their own trust list. There's no need to wait for other members to take action.
Someone give this man a medal. If you don't like me, why in the fuck am I on your trust list? You are by default. That is the point of this thread to change you being on everyone's trust list by default. |
|
|
|
I'm not interested in the origin of money
no, the title of your thread says you are looking for dirty money. |
|
|
|
|
The purpose of it is to discourage spam. Since you as a rule cannot be traced via IP address on tor it would be very easy to contiously spam (and get banned) via tor. The amount you pay is nominal however it would be prohibitively expensive for spammers
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think you will be able to get that much without collateral
|
|
|
|
|
Very interesting. If the site is legit then burtw may not be the same as the person arrested.
Does anyone know for a fact that burtw in fact lives in Colorado?
|
|
|
|
|
It is probably not a good idea to deal with someone openly admitting to be willing to accept "dirty" money
|
|
|
|
|
Can you offer your account as collateral?
|
|
|
|
No buyers?
Considering the fact that BadBear just tagged all your accounts, I would be willing to guess that it is Pierre11, which happens to have negative trust so I doubt it will fetch very much |
|
|
|
|
I was just curious to see if he could vouch for your explanation. But it doesn't really matter since you got the loan using your DOGE as collateral.
|
|
|
|
Clearly this all revolves around the initial accusation that he was using a laser engraver, and no actual solid evidence of this has been presented, just speculation after speculation endlessly. Convenient how this is set up so the burden of proof is set upon WoodCollector and not Nubbins to provide sufficient evidence of his accusation.
I think this is speculation. I also think he has gotten much more lazy with his alts and they are acting much more like alts/socks IMO (almost to the point where he is now trolling). This is not at all speculation. Who would have even started to try to play "scambuster" mall cop sifting around looking for any reason to speculate on endless topics regarding WoodCollector if it weren't for Nubbins's original accusation? Again, it is a simple task to accuse anyone of using alts to discredit them, and conveniently there is no way to prove this either way. THAT is what speculation is. Just a bunch of wannabe detectives overly confident in their "scambusting" skills. WHAT IS THE PROOF? I SEE NO PROOF ONLY TONS OF SPECULATION! I agree that the majority (maybe even all) of the evidence against WC is speculation, with the exception of him using alts to further his cause. I do trust BadBear enough to take his word for it that he personally saw proof that the alts of WC are in fact alts of WC. If you didn't trust BadBear then maybe you could ask theymos to look into it and see if he comes to the same conclusion. BadBear is unwilling to provide this "proof" and I guarantee you Theymos doesn't care. That leaves the accusations standing only as that, accusations with no evidence. If there was a big enough of a dispute about the alts then he may intervene to give his opinion on them being alts. BadBear might be wiling to share the evidence with other Admins who he trusts who can weigh in |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
