This is a feature i could evaluate.


you can open a position in the same direction if you think market trend will continue in that direction.
But if you don't have enought coins you must probably manually sell (directly on the exchange) some coin and then open your position.

Otherwise you could start with a sell, but if the ping is a sell, CAT will complete the ping-pong only after market returns to a lower value and then you could have your gain.
Ex :
Ping Sell 1080 -> Pong Buy 1050
or
Ping Buy 1080 -> Pong Sell 1110


Widest difference between best market prices means higher spread.
This is another point you can consider : higher spread mean higher change to complete ping-pong, BUT if spread is 5% And you wants a gain of 15% Probably the fact that spread is 5% or 0.1% won't change a lot, because to have 15% Gain you will need to wait a market movements and not only work "inside" the current spread.


Spread is the % difference between current values.
Current high/low in 24 hours could be an indicator, but is not always an important info : a market could stop moving after a lot of high/low.
But if you find a market where (usually) high/low values are constant, and the % difference is good, you can try to buy/sell or sell/buy inside that high/low range, using price limit and try to buy always under the median value (median = high+low/2) and sell alwayhs over the median value.


Your choise : you can open a market 5 times and create 5 algoritms (2 dynamic, 3 statics) and you can place 1 ping sell and 1 ping buy, or 2 ping sell (in different moments) and 5 ping buys (in different moments).
C.A.T. let's you choose, there's no unique best practise.


No, direction pool is related to the PONG type.

If you have a ping-pong of type Buy -> Sell then the BUY Pool will be updated after a PONG Completed
Ping Buy -> Trade -> Pong Sell -> Trade (Ping-Pong completed) -> Total (QtyxPrice) into Buy Pool -> New Ping Buy and so on.....


This is also your choise : if you know that a market never goes under a X Value, you could probably choose X as stop loss value.
Otherwise you could set a very high value or just accept the loss without set any stop loss.
On C.A.T. side, set a Stop loss only means to let the PONG be executed, then gains (negative) Are calculated and ping-pong continue with current market prices.

You mean generate multiple ping at the same time?
But then during recalculation routine CAT will recalculate all of these orders in the best market position.
This could probably works in an algorithm that is not a Ping-Pong.
Or maybe i haven't understand how this function must works....

No, every lookup C.A.T. will re-calculate all the values, so your "*TopOfCurrentOrderBook Price *MINUS *0.5%" will be updated with current values.



If you use 100% Of your balance yes. But i think that any person who use CAT decide to use a percentage (for example 0.1 BTC) on 1 Market and then another quantity on another market.
There are person who trade on over 100 market without problems.
C.A.T. use only the Amount you set in your PING Orders : if your total ping amount is 0.1 BTC, CAT won't use more than this. Only the rounding routines could use a little more of your portfolio to adequate the order calculation. But you can disable this option.

Ping/Pong limit are create against your last price, not market prices.
Your rules has not reason to exists :

Mode->Price Limit-> Never *PING *OVER *TopOfCurrentOrderBook Price *MINUS *0.5%

This will result in an order impossible to complete : your order will never be on top, so your pong will never be executed.
Your target it to stay in front of the top orders book, not constantly back (inside the order book)
with this rule you will be constantly back.



Data are returned from the API "MyBalance" that is needed in any exchange to let C.A.T. run.
I don't calculate anything. I only put the values Available/Held (if returned) in my internal structure.


Well it's not 0.0000 it's 0.0000XXXX (because Pool is not empty), but exchanges you're trading on doesn't wants more than 4 decimal places, so inside the log is printed 0.0000.
some people wants to adeguate the order to the minimal qty.
You have an option, so you can choose what to do.
If you think it's not a good practice, disable the Always adequate option.

Tutto giusto tranne che per il fatto che CAT non costa 1 BTC.
Costa un prezzo variabile dato dalla somma del CORE 0.5 BTC e delle API Che uno vuole acquistare.
Dato inoltre l'aumento dei prezzi, per la fine dell'anno ho applicato uno sconto del 50% sul totale.
Se offri sconto il ref può diminuire.

I prezzi li trovi nel topic ufficiale : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=507103.0

Ciao, nessun requisito, se una persona compra CAT facendomi il tuo nome (nickname) io ti do il ref.
Semplicissimo.

Probably you have the option ALWAYS ADEQUATE QTY TO MIN QTY (If Needed).


In the image you show me there are also gain at 0.444 that it's not > 0.5%
If you want you can send me your GAIN Log and i will check for you.


Actually i think you are able to create any rule with the Limit Editor.


CAT show the Available amount. But you can't be sure that it's the real available amount.
For example, during a recalculation routine :

- Recalculation start
- Order Is Deleted
- Coins return available.
- You check for available and you find available the order delete amount <- (EXTERNAL ACTION)
- Order is recreated
- You check for available once again -> Then you have less amount.

I'm going out.I'll come back tomottow night.

Happy new year to all the crypto community 

1 - Yes, i think 0.00000 is only a visualization problem, there are other number after the 5th zero : ex 0.00000XXX

2 - You need to check the % Gain from the Gain Tabs. As i said sometimes you could set 0.5 % Gain, but due to rounding routines have for example 0.45%

About this questions


CAT use the Min % Gain as spread for the PONG Orders. It use the REFERENCE PRICE (PING PRICE) vs the Calculate Price.
The other option works for the PING Creation and it works using the buy/sell market spread.

Si e poi firmare con lo stesso indirizzo un messaggio.
E questa sarebbe la dimostrazione necessaria per theymos.
Se non sei in grado di fare questo penso che dal forum non riceverai alcun supporto.

Ah si si ok, quello è vero, è che in quel topic ti quotano per evitare che lo scammer faccia sparire tutti i tuoi topic compreso quello in cui mettevi l'indirizzo.

che io sappia, se non hai tipo ficcato l'indirizzo qua dentro :

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.0

E dimostri a theymos che sei tu firmando qualcosa, non ottieni nessuna risposta.

Era una percentuale buttata li, tanto per dire che non si può considerare la Cina dentro il mercato BTC, ma solo alcune persone che rappresentano un infinitesimo del reale potenziale economico che verrebbe dato al BTC se invece entrasse tutta la nazione.
Dal calcolo che fai viene 1 milione e 400 mila
Personalmente direi che più di 1.4M conoscono BTC, ma non so quanti lo usino, ma sono fortemente convinto che in termini di speculazione siano MOLTO Meno i cinesi che ci sono dentro.

ALCUNI (pochi, probabilmente neanche lo 0,1%) Cinesi sono entrati.
SE La cina entra, intesa come nazione intera, 10K A Btc sarà una bazzecola

If C.A.T. try to create an order, probably the BUY pool is not 0.


You need to check your ping-pong.
If % GAIN is not > than BuyFee + SellFee you will have a loss.

During 2017 i will definitely change the CAT PRice list, but actually the 50% Discount is still active. Don't miss this opportunity 

these are the last 2 days to get 0.1 REF 

Puoi tentare un replace by fee, ma è pratica avanzata.....

Non mi intendo di electrum ma non vorrei che fosse proprio lui a tentare di continuare a trasmettere questa transazione, quindi potresti anche provare a reimportare le tue chiavi su una nuova installazione di electrum (anche qua la pratica può essere avanzata).

Sum 0.5 BTC (Core Lifetime License) and all the API you wants to get.
Then divide by 2 (-50% Discount)

and you will have the total price

Sometimes there are rouding routines that could change a little the % Gain.
Rounding sometimes is needed.
There's also a rounding on fees (also on exchange side) and when we are talking about micro orders it is possible that fees are higher than the gain.
But this happens on very little orders.