please anyone lend me 0.35 btc to mine the bitcoin, the coins are pay back as soon as i got profit, i am not gonna scam, but i just want it for.
this post will be deleted while i am lended.
Do you have any collateral? |
|
|
|
It would probably not be wise to buy from that website when you can get them much cheaper from bitmantech |
|
|
|
What rate are you offering? edit: are you flexible on your rate? Did you guys bother reading the OP? She had it there for several days with no changes: rate is bitstamp.
Thanks |
|
|
|
If he posted a signed message from an address previous used by the anonymous account, wouldn't that compromise the account's anonymity?
He doesn't need to post it now. If escrow is used then he can provide it to escrow prior to him receiving funds for the transaction. The escrow will not release funds until a signed message can be verified. By agreeing that he can sign a message now he can give more legitimacy to the account he is trying to sell. |
|
|
|
|
Your prices are significantly overpriced. That alone is a scam. Do you agree to use any kind of on forum escrow service if someone wanted to buy your miners?
|
|
|
|
I figured I should post there here. Per the message I received from Spekulatius the hacker used the below email and IP address -snip- The attacker used the email screams@live.com and the IP 73.166.140.216. -snip- I received the same PM , however welcome back @Spekulatius. ( I hope you're not coming to use again GMX or web.de). I simple gmail address with the 2FA it's the better solution and obviously secure . Ok, changed it to a yahoo.de account. Hope thats secure enough  Feels good to be back That may work, however the most secure email would be one that cannot possibly exist (IDK why the forum does not allow the option of simply not having an email at all). What I recommend using is [username]@bitcointalk.org, since the forum does not offer email services it would not be possible to hack/create that email address (although you would be somewhat out of luck if you forgot your password) |
|
|
|
I don't think he's lying. Didn't moreia get hacked by the email trick? May not control as much accounts as he says he does, but still probably has a considerable amount
Check the security log and look at the recent accounts that have had their password reset via email recently. Have enough had their passwords changed via email in the last 30 days to give him enough accounts as he is claiming to have? |
|
|
|
The problem here is the according to the security log is that a lot of accounts have had their password reset via email recently, however the vast majority of them are brand new accounts and/or junior member or lower Whoever is willing to use escrow is more than welcome to purchase. No scams will take place since escrow. The only way I win is if I have the accounts right? You need to research more on vulnerabilities as you are really uneducated and quite slow in the field... Still a buster... According to your OP you control 10 heros, 5 legendary, (at least) one VIP, and two donator accounts. I don't think you control any of them. Why don't we wager a bet that you do not control all of them. If you can prove to a neutral third party (that we both trust) that you control all of them then you win, if you are unable to prove to a neutral third party that you control all of them then I win. You lose and will find out soon enough. Sit tight geezer. How much are you willing to wager? You need the money to pay back HBOgo so you might as well wager something if you really control all those accounts |
|
|
|
The problem here is the according to the security log is that a lot of accounts have had their password reset via email recently, however the vast majority of them are brand new accounts and/or junior member or lower Whoever is willing to use escrow is more than welcome to purchase. No scams will take place since escrow. The only way I win is if I have the accounts right? You need to research more on vulnerabilities as you are really uneducated and quite slow in the field... Still a buster... According to your OP you control 10 heros, 5 legendary, (at least) one VIP, and two donator accounts. I don't think you control any of them. Why don't we wager a bet that you do not control all of them. If you can prove to a neutral third party (that we both trust) that you control all of them then you win, if you are unable to prove to a neutral third party that you control all of them then I win. |
|
|
|
The problem here is the according to the security log is that a lot of accounts have had their password reset via email recently, however the vast majority of them are brand new accounts and/or junior member or lower |
|
|
|
|
Can you prove ownership of the account?
|
|
|
|
I will be happy to continue with your campaign. I understand a lot of my posts don't count due to them being "bumps" of my own threads, etc. but I do try to make at least 30 constructive posts. Fairly happy with your campaign so far so I see no reason to leave  Current Post Count: 1265 Payment Address: 17Lizqx12cdV3vWkJh7GR9Tz3YrFkq4ao2 Confirmed. thanks. |
|
|
|
|
You could really even do this with something like google docs/microsoft excel
|
|
|
|
Just the people who are promoting this scam
We just aren't FUDing everything in sight... It's not like I tell people to throw their money at it, I still advise caution. I just said that I got paid out. Holy crap, this is a steal... 110% in only 24 hours? That's more than 12 times the 103%... definitely gonna dig into my wallet for this... |
|
|
|
I would probably gamble if I weren't already suspicious that Plutonium isn't your alt account. If you could show me proof you have no affiliation whatsoever to Plutonium, I would make a wager.
How do you show someone you have no affiliation with another person? That's kinda a ridiculous request + Why the hell would he care if you wager with Plutonium, there's no ref program. No. Grendel wants wager with me to see if he/she gets back that 425% gain after 60 days. . . That is not going to be a fair bet. If he is an alt of the OP (as michaeladair is most likely) then the OP will most likely only repay Grendel which would cause you to lose your bet and would give confidence to other suckers who would be willing to invest when they should not Is everyone here an alt of the OP? As you are claiming... it seems that way. Just the people who are promoting this scam |
|
|
|
I would probably gamble if I weren't already suspicious that Plutonium isn't your alt account. If you could show me proof you have no affiliation whatsoever to Plutonium, I would make a wager.
How do you show someone you have no affiliation with another person? That's kinda a ridiculous request + Why the hell would he care if you wager with Plutonium, there's no ref program. No. Grendel wants wager with me to see if he/she gets back that 425% gain after 60 days. . . That is not going to be a fair bet. If he is an alt of the OP (as michaeladair is most likely) then the OP will most likely only repay Grendel which would cause you to lose your bet and would give confidence to other suckers who would be willing to invest when they should not |
|
|
|
|
The problem with this is that if the funds get reversed then the lender is screwed
|
|
|
|
Even the most reputable members of the forum always offer escrow (even if they are on the top 8 escrow list). JonnyQuid was offering to use escrow that he thought to be safe (LBC) while you demanded that he send first. You may have a difference in opinion on what kind of escrow service can be relied upon however he was offering to use some kind of escrow. I am not endorsing LBC nor saying that you cannot scam via LBC however a lot of successful trades are done via LBC Fair enough. I've never interacted with LBC escrow, and I just assumed it was less than legit (Or at least not as secure as a normal forum escrow). If it was a little huge to open a scam accusation thread then so be it, but there's two things here that aren't right: 1: JonnyQuid left false feedback stating that I have multiple accounts and try to scam sellers. There's no evidence of that. 2: I got a slice of negative feedback for asking that a new user "send first". That doesn't make sense. Shipitbuddy is another user who does business fairly often - Tomato left him a neutral Trust stating "Use escrow", etc. That would be more appropriate here than getting "neg repped". I got the message - it seems just as shady (less, actually) when I ask -anyone- to send a non-refundable currency to me without escrow, but I hardly think that deserves negative trust from a big name around here. I dunno. This is just a bit irksome that when I open a thread on someone else, I get neg repped. Obviously I won't be doing that any more, but if you check my post history, I've made scam accusations before that were spot on. You should never ask a trading partner to send first. If you are not comfortable sending first then you should say something along the lines of the fact that you will accept escrow if they are not comfortable sending first. When I am trading with someone I will say something like this: -snip-
Please confirm that you are comfortable sending first and i will send you a payment address, or if not then please contact an escrow service of your choice via a group PM to get escrow setup |
|
|
|
I'm not taking sides or accusing anyone of anything but how is it fair that JonnyQuid gets negative feedback from both redsn0w and Tomatocage but WorldWideBTC doesn't. JonnyQuid was willing to use escrow through localbitcoins. This is not a surprise. There are quite a few people here who prefer localbitcoins over trusted forum members. I myself dealt with trusted members here who wouldn't use escrow through forum members but had no problems with localbitcoins. Tomato and redsn0w, did you miss this message from WorldWideBTC: My Trust is flawless. If you're serious about selling your coins, send the 1.25 BTC to: 1DVNbLRM8q65D7moYJWcNTLHpPLmVUGsR7
He wanted JonnyQuid to send first, no escrow. Right? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=205881 - Last trust was left in March 2014. WorldWideBTC was away for awhile, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=550247.msg6016121#msg6016121 posted on April 1, 2014 and his next post was on December 12, 2014, unless I'm missing something like deleted posts. We ALL know bitcointalk is full of scammers, long term and short term. This could very much be a hacked or sold account with the scammer being smart and waiting instead of trying to scam right away. Like I said at the beginning, I'm not accusing anyone but if this was a scam, it could have gone either way. Hmm yeah I'll update it later when I get home Tomato, really? I stated many times that it was my personal opinion. I haven't had any problems with my transactions, and I got the same list of excuses that most new account scammers give. Remove your negative trust, please. I haven't done anything untrustworthy. I was just pointing out that some random person shows up, doesn't even talk about escrow, and wants a user to send BTC to them. That's pretty typical behavior. Even the most reputable members of the forum always offer escrow (even if they are on the top 8 escrow list). JonnyQuid was offering to use escrow that he thought to be safe (LBC) while you demanded that he send first. You may have a difference in opinion on what kind of escrow service can be relied upon however he was offering to use some kind of escrow. I am not endorsing LBC nor saying that you cannot scam via LBC however a lot of successful trades are done via LBC |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
