is bitstamp really like $30 lower than btc-e?  seems its been like this all night |
|
|
|
About $450 000 market cap. Why worth almost about nothing? - There are 216,000,000 new Devcoins every months and the amount will stay the same (there is no block halving). -> Devs are sitting on are large amounts and are just waiting to be able to dump them. - Only a small community. - I maybe wrong about this, but I don't see any actual developing going on. What is the latest version? i believe an update to be in line with bitcoin's most recent updates is currently in progress, to be finished in december. also, i think the number is 180,000,000 and it is per round, not month, which is generally longer than a month. more like 1.5 months or so i think. |
|
|
|
can't seem to make a new thread you're still a newbie. after your first post, you are still restricted to this board for four hours before you can post in the rest of the forum. after that, you should be able to post a new topic in the marketplace. best of luck! |
|
|
|
|
well, Mastercoin piggbacks on bitcoin, and uses the blockchain, right? i don't see why you would want to change the bitcoin protocol unless entirely necessary -- when we can add protocols like Mastercoin into the mix.
|
|
|
|
|
i think people that know nothing about hit hear "coin" and think of that as the single unit. i've seen several people in the newbie forum that thought you could only buy in 1 BTC increments. i imagine BTC is fairly confusing to the new user....
|
|
|
|
|
i don't think it will, but bitcoin is crazy, and for all i know we could be at $5k next week. having said that, i think we may break $500 or so, maybe push a bit higher than that, but after that, i think there will be a real pullback. true support levels are hard to predict at this stage in the game, too.
|
|
|
|
|
i think it will definitely reach $1000. it's tough to say if we'll do it on this current rally. i'm not sure how much fuel there is left to it! $500 will be a big hurdle, $1000 still seems like a very long ways away.
|
|
|
|
I have never heard about BitCC. Do bit research before paying for something next time, to minimize likelihood to be scammed
Yeah, the test purchase was my research of sorts, since I couldn’t find anybody who had ever tried the service to know whether it worked. i've never heard of this company. btc is truly the wild west still.... i really only deal with companies that have been around a couple years and have built a solid reputation. there are too many horror stories out there. |
|
|
|
|
i originally got into bitcoin when i was an agorist. it sort of went hand in hand with it. i have always considered myself a libertarian, although i now consider myself an anarchist and thus much further left now than when an agorist. so.... i suppose bitcoin has not changed my positions.....
|
|
|
|
|
8 year max on this poll? only on bitcointalk, haha. i thought it was "any day now" many years ago. i, unfortunately, am fairly confident this business can and likely will be dragged out much longer than we'd like.
|
|
|
|
|
so, i couldn't get through even a small portion of OP's ramblings. there's nothing to this, right? i use cryptsy all the time, and have never had any problems. if there is nothing to this accusation, perhaps the thread should be closed...
|
|
|
|
if the price gets high enough, it becomes normal to see it as mBits or mBTC. i don't really think that changes things much. if BTC is worth $1 million, then i suppose it makes sense to start seeing the unit as satoshi.  |
|
|
|
what is this talk about changing passwords on bitstamp accounts? looking up info on the people who run it? what's going on over there?  i haven't had any funds on there in little while. |
|
|
|
i'm nervous about this. are there any sources that talk about what US government officials, in any capacity i guess, think about bitcoin? i haven't seen much talk about this. i guess i will hold regardles.  |
|
|
|
what can i say? those are the rules. if you plan to stick around for more than a day or two, it won't even matter. these rules drastically reduce pretty quickly. i can remember exactly how it works, though. happy posting!  Thanks! I'm already out of the n00b prison, so that's cool. You're saying the 360 second rule will evaporate for me at some point? yeah, i don't know what the rule is for me now, but i can't tell that it's even there. i remember at one point it was like 62 seconds. but now i don't notice it. oops, i guess i said "can" instead of "can't" in that quote..... |
|
|
|
Something about hacked email addresses, blah, blah, blah......
If he genuinely believes that, then he doesn't understand anything about security (well the Security part of the FAQ gave it away a bit). First, you don't need to hack anything to send an e-mail as another user and thus should at least do a verification that the user can receive the mail. But really, it could be much simpler to reuse the data already provided to inputs.io... didn't he say that passwords were not compromised? isn't that something that could be used to verify the original owner of the accounts? this ID stuff is total nonsense. |
|
|
|
I said it's a failsafe way of DISCOURAGING, not of completely overcoming the creditors.
fixed. exactly. so that was a roundabout way of saying that TF's bunk ID policy accomplishes nothing, right? except, of course, to discourage his own creditors from collecting from him. so shady..... |
|
|
|
what can i say? those are the rules. if you plan to stick around for more than a day or two, it won't even matter. these rules drastically reduce pretty quickly. i can remember exactly how it works, though. happy posting! |
|
|
|
|
i am from the u.s. and i see no reason why coinbase is the best. i use bitstamp and btc-e. the fact is, no exchange is safe, and coinbase is certainly not immune to its share of horror stories. never risk too much with a 3rd party in bitcoin. that is unfortunately just the landscape right now.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
