6 - thierry4wd thanks  |
|
|
|
6 - thierry4wd ------- Please |
|
|
|
|
I understand better now actually, you should invest in a circuit breaker suitable for your output cables, because in this configuration you only have to protect absolute short circuits: s which is not really good for safety. Or add a DIN type circuit breaker, much less expensive and just as efficient, preferably of curve C;)
I usually touch cables from time to time to watch that it does not heat up precisely ... you should also invest (if it is not already the case) in a current clamp, it is not worth much thing, and you can very easily check your load balance, check cable by cable, and normally, if you take the 3 phases with the clamp, it will only indicate the unbalance value, ideally if good balance, close to ZERO;)
|
|
|
|
Hi, I confirm, in France, we also have this kind of cable, because in industrial installations, 99% of the equipment is simply 3p + T, so have never used the neutral, except for some application like computer and lights, for example, on my site we use about 250KW per hour, but only 20kw max in 220v ... Regarding the circuit breaker which burned, I wouldn't say a load imbalance, (although it could be present), but I would rather say a badly tightened terminal block! normally, this kind of circuit breaker is equipped with 3 independent thermal, therefore, say a 3p 20A for example, if only one phase exceeds 20A then it falls ... the quality of the contacts is essential!  |
|
|
|
Hi, the method of setting the fan louder to run cooler is great !!! but, lower your efficiency ... I explain: the miner this launches with a parameter: 2020-10-08 08:36:47 power_api.c: 262: set_working_voltage_raw: working_voltage_raw = 1820
2020-10-08 08:36:47 driver-btm-api.c: 594: init_working_voltage: set fixed voltage raw to 1820
But after 10min, as you have set the fan strong, he sees a temperature which seems too low to him and therefore, it increases the voltage, and therefore your efficiency drops, it does its only in order to heat it up: 2020-10-08 08:38:19 frequency.c: 306: get_sale_hash_rate_GH: g_sale_hash_rate = 55000
2020-10-08 08:38:23 driver-btm-api.c: 1500: dhash_chip_send_job: Version number 4.
2020-10-08 08:38:23 driver-btm-api.c: 1647: dhash_chip_send_job: stime.tv_sec 1602146303, block_ntime 1602146293
2020-10-08 08:48:22 frequency.c: 882: check_PCB_temp_inc_vol: need update voltage from 1820 to 1870 when PCB temp = 26
2020-10-08 08:48:22 power_api.c: 268: set_higher_voltage_raw: higher_voltage_raw = 1870
2020-10-08 08:48:22 power_api.c: 374: set_to_higher_voltage_by_steps: Set to voltage raw 1870, step by step. Notice, it goes from 1820mv to 1870mv! everything to waste energy and heat it up ... Ps : i look same "problem" on T17 / T17+ / S9K / S9SE / and probabli all 17 series.... need confirm... |
|
|
|
Kano, I always see him writing that it violates the csgminer license, but in other better known frimwares that also do it, I don't see him writing it?
And I want to emphasize that I don't trust this firmware and that I would never install it.
But if I would like you to answer me this, since you are a well-known member in this forum and I do not understand this change of magic wands when it comes to defending one and others because you have not seen it.
I do not want to offend you much less, if you do not answer me I will take it well.
A greeting.
I confirm , Kano, say on ALL firmware the Cgminer problem of GPL, on my firmware to no exeption !!! |
|
|
|
Hi, to my knowledge, only firmware before 2020 can be unlocked by a remote utility, so asicTO utility (works very well) or Awesome miner (also works very well via the command "Send custom:" unlock "to unlock ssh) ... We have also experimented with a bitmain firmware from 2020/04, and the unlocking worked very well with the SD card despite the recommendations, but to be taken with a grain of salt, we only tried the T17e ... You can try it. SD card in this case, you do not risk anything. at worst nothing will happen and you will keep the firmware currently installed. PS: "my" SD card file is compatible with all 17 series without exception, and also for all minors with the C43 control card (for exemple : s9k, s9se, Z9/11 and more). Regarding my firmware, try to unlock it with a utility, and try to install my firmware, if that doesn't work you must use the SD card files that I placed at your disposal in the first post, once the firmware is installed, if it does not suit you, no problem to go back (Philipma1957, Favebook, and me will confirm you) it is to say install bitmain, or vnish, or other! Bruru : If you want help, i need screen of your ("System / Overview") for i understand what firmware you use actualy I remind you that I am available for any request about my firmware, and I am as transparent as possible, do not hesitate to send me a PM if you want a quick response;) Ps : HS , today was the big day for me! very stressed, a great first for me, this morning I had an operation for the removal of the gallbladder. Everything is fine, everything went well, I hope this will continue! I have 30 days of rest to respect, no physical effort. |
|
|
|
Hi all, i edited first post, for add S17 / S17pro firmwares, this firmware is compatible with S17 and S17pro models. Is now available, with only 1% devfee ! Please let your comments !!!  |
|
|
|
Absolutely no problem! I must be as transparent as possible about my firmware, and that seems normal to me;) for temperature protection yes, I just reactivated the option of the original firmware ... even if I think that it does not really make sense to use it ... |
|
|
|
Thank you for your interest, let it be clear, in my firwmare, I only modify the configuration page to display all the hidden options, and, concerning bmminer, I ONLY change the boot, it starts in fixed mode and not automatically. EVERYTHING else remains the same, Regarding pool security, in fact, the miner ping my pool, so if it is killed, or if the miner loses all internet connection, then it starts again. but contain litle bug, i resolve this problem soon and i release update |
|
|
|
|
From memory, the T9 + this launches at 575mhz and 890mv, 890mv is HUGE !!!
from my experience, it works very well at 575mhz (original speed) and 800mv or 790mv, thanks to that it saves about 300w ...
for your speed of 300mhz, you will have to set it to 790mv, or try 780 or 770mv, but it may not launch, or crash after a few minutes ...
It is necessary to understand, for comparison, the frequency is the speed which one asks of it, and the voltage and the energy which one gives it, if it does not have enough energy it will fail, but if it has too much , it will simply consume too much current!
ps: if you are looking to reduce noise, then set the fan fixed, the T9 + can go up to 105c chips absolutely without any problems, without any problem (i run 3 T9 + at 105-110c all time on arround 2 years !!! without any problems ...) ...
with pleasure;)
|
|
|
|
Hi, no this works fine on both fans, in reality on almost all minors the 2 fans are different, in fact for the same% one fan will run faster than the other, just try to reverse the connectors of the fan and you will see;) or, for example, apply 30%, and you will also see;) Thanks for testing my tiny mod  |
|
|
|
Hi, yes is good méthode, working for the voltage to ! If you have set 300mhz, replace 0706 by 790mv, on all m'y test 790mw IS lower value stable... Make 790mv and you see you low power and lower temp ! If you interessed, i have make specialy patch for S9 and T9+, juste make --fix-freq and New miner configuration page , full free PS : Kano, i have Big respect for you, but now you see again, don't need modify bmminer or cgminer for make this tweak |
|
|
|
ok, in fact this is normal i have built in a security, if the client kill the develop pool, the miner stop hashing, but normally should restart ... i see where the problem is coming from i will correct this and update, I would be interested to have your feedback if possible |
|
|
|
Hi, thank you for worrying, it touches me , actually I spent a night in the hospital for a "gallbladder?" bilary. I'm going a lot better, but I have to have an operation for an ablation in early October, I lost all confidence: s and a can in panic but I must do it ... Regarding my firmware, thank you for all these details! and time to test all this! have you been able to raise power? efficiency? I would also like to have the opinion of the community concerning the costs, their opinion interests me, I should perhaps lower them to convince more people? Thanks again;) |
|
|
|
|
Hi, indeed, some firmware can solve some problem, concerning mine, it ignores some functionality and this content to make the miner work as simple as possible with only useful things. did you use mine?
|
|
|
|
Hi, first of all thank you for the very helpful review! at the moment i'm very ill, staying in the hospital, i don't have too much time or strength at the moment: but i'm trying to follow a little ... Concerning the T17 +, I am very surprised, because the mod is the same as on the T17, and I did not see any problem with it, can you tell me more about this strange behavior? I am very curious about this because very surprised! |
|
|
|
Hi, regarding the testing of my firmware, I appreciate your commitment to do a review, however, for the T17 and T17 + models I would prefer that you use the public link, so that the review is as close as possible to reality Of course, the T17E is another topic for the moment, and as promised to those who reached out to me to develop the tests, thereafter, you will have access to my firmware without dev fee, if at all are suitable, and that you want to keep them of course;) |
|
|
|
Hi everyone, and thank you for your interest! I will try to answer your expectations as clearly as possible, I am here for it;) and I am as transparent as possible! Here are 2 screens, which should already answer most of your questions;)   1: Regarding the single payment, for a license without devfee, I realize that it does not interest anyone in reality, or at least a very small minority ... that's why I decided to integrate 2% cost, but in return the download is free, which allows you to test it for free, absolutely nothing prevents to revert to another firmware thereafter (original included). 2: the fees are extracted every 2 hours as you can see, my priority is to make your miner more efficient, not to fill my pockets as quickly as possible as some do (be careful, I do not quote anyone, some custom firmwares are very good too), and by design, the minor switch on the dev fees one can more than every 2 hours, for about 2min30. 3: The beginning of the fees, in fact, when you install my firmware, you will need to play with it a bit (like any other custom firmwares), try new parameters, new freqs, votlages .... and by design, each time you press "apply" news settings, the count of these 2 hours is reset to zero, by design, for as long as it takes you to polish it, you will still be on your main pool. 4: Confirmation of fees, look at the 2 screens, I will round off the figures, the miner works at 49.5th, if you do (49.5 / 100) x2 = 1 ... now look at the pool report, over 24H, you have 1th extract, which confirms that you have 2%, and no more. Now look at the minor side, understand that it is necessary to make the report with the "DiffA" (and not the "Accepted"), because the difficulty of the pools comes into play in the calculation, a pool with 52.5K will have more shares than 'one at 65.5K (to use our example). Please calculate ... we have "1763283525" on the main pool, and "35061760" on the dev pool side, if you do this calculation: (1763283525/100) x2 = 35265670. See that we are very close to "35061760", in this case, in reality the miner has extracted very slightly less than 2%, that is explained, the miner extracts the dev pool, and whatever happens, he Switch back to the pool, even if he hasn't finished his share, and therefore, by design, if a share takes 10s to do so, it will be lost. I hope I have been the most transparent with you, and if you have new questions, I will answer them without problems! Thank you. PS: I will modify the first post to add the other firmware. I am also awaiting the test from Philipma1957, who I know, that this self good or bad will give as much detail as possible , I will add a link for the T17 by tonight, with a charge of only 1%. |
|
|
|
Hi all, i have updated my first post, is now available for all, free download . |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
