The words he used were "concrete red flags" ie something solid and observable beyond mere suspicion. You are free to have your own opinions,you are not free to have your own facts and rules. No matter how abhorrent you think I am, I am still not part of a collectivist hive mind that punishes anyone of a different mind. I am just one individual that upholds principles no matter who they apply to. Its easy to feel right with a dozen of your friends ready to dogpile on anyone who challenges you. This is all that is wrong with the current default trust as it stands. Feel free to find some more friends to reassure you of your correctitude in your arbitrary witch hunts.
It is very observable that CryptoSparks asked for a 5 BTC loan and said it's risk-free. You don't uphold any "principles", you're just making shit up when you're unable to get someone to agree with you. You can't be possibly dumb enough to believe that your incessant yapping about your virtuous character means anything to anybody except yourself. If the partnership request to lenders is the real problem, why didn't you all attacked that at first? Why do i have all kind of illogical feedback? Why can't you understand that the "risk free" is referred to us taking the market risk while giving fixed interest to the lender that would have still access the funds? I guess the answer is... you got roasted on every other aspect, and in your case little shiba, because of huge lack of technical knowledge. much wow! I also find very funny how most of you guys, and ladies, start your accusation with something like: I don't know anything about trading bots, but this looks pretty fishy to me and it does indeed look as though he's a scammer. I'll support the flag in lieu of giving this guy a neg, which he already has a bunch of.
Just an advice, if you don't know anything about a subject, don't pretend to know better than who works in that field. You can have your opinion that "is impossible to make money with bots and markets", but that is just.. your personal opinion. Your pointless flag states:Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that anyone dealing with CryptoSparks is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so. This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions.Is clear that the bold part is totally untrue, since you have 0 concrete evidence against us and all your accusations are based on personal opinions and lack of knowledge. Also stop with the " is hard to find evidence" theory. Is very easy to spot a scam and prove it. The fact you have nothing against us even though you have access to the live demo account via api key ( special link for suchdumbmoon and smallbrainers )should make you think.
Objective proof of fraud isn't needed for a type 1 flag.
Where is the "concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user's opinions. " ? Why there are knowledgeable & reasonable forum users that don't agree with it? Funny how you pop out only now that a few of your pathetic internet police buddies came out of their dirty holes, don't you have casinos to spam? did you get your weekly payout based on the rekts that you bring to sportsbet? |
|
|
|
1. Lender as service provider:
Lend us UP to 5BTC with 10% monthly payback + 5% monthly interest.
We can give API access + EMAIL +PASSWORD of the trading account managing the funds as collateral so you can always keep an eye on the funds.
This results in almost 30% risk free profit for the lender. 2 year of data shows the bot can easily handle the interest rate, please download and check for yourself.[/s]
This looks like a promise to repay a loan principle 10% per month + 5% monthly interest no matter if the bot works or not, no? This is not a loan per-se , it's more like an investment, simply because the only way CryptoSparks is going to repay the loan back to the lender is IF the bot works , if the bot does not work there will be no money left to repay the loan, CryptoSparks then will have one of two options 1-Run away and disappear 2-Borrow more money from other investors/lenders in order to repay the the previous interest, and then if the bot fails again , he will need to borrow more money again and again until he gets to the point of no going back and then he simply run away with whatever money left. I have been day trading Forex and Crypto for long enough and I can tell you for sure that , anyone who has a working bot , especially a bot that has a similar success rate to the alleged results presented by CryptoSparks would not be looking to promote it on this forum, if he is so certain that the bot works he would sell his wife and kids and trade with 100x leverage for 2-4 weeks and become instantly rich. CryptoSparks might not be attempting to scam, but he sure is willing to risk people's money without showing them the complete risks and consequences of using a trading bot especially on Bitmex, so this can also be considered unethical and probably illegal in many places. In the best case scenario CryptoSparks is simply asking for 5 BTC loan that has 50/50 chance of repaying, which is risky enough to be flagged for, some of those feedback are not appropriate , but the flag is more right than wrong. This is the problem of your point of view: would sell his wife and kids and trade with 100x leverage for 2-4 weeks and become instantly rich. If you have a winning strategy, doesn't mean that if you go 100x (people still do that btw?  ) you will still be able to apply that exact strategy. I honestly think there's no long term winning strategy that can survive the risk of 100x leverage. Going back to our bot, leverage is dynamically set based on many factors, there's no way to set a higher static leverage to maximize the ROI. I get your points about the lending request, but i repeat that it was more of a partnership proposal to the liquidity providers of this forum(the lenders). Who would take a loan leaving the funds in control of the lender? The proposal should have also marked how using us as service providers instead was a way better option. The loan would have been repaid monthly from the same money sitting in the trade account. The mathematical and technical impossibility to liquidate the full account, the 2 year of data showing how the avg risk involved per position is only 5% while the avg monthly ROI is 25% , and ultimately considering the scheduled income coming from set commissions, would have EASILY allowed us to pay the 5% monthly interest and the 10% payback, giving the lender a fixed ROI while dumping the market risk on us. As you correctly pointed out, the lending request became a issue only after the trolls realized how their attacks of "SCAM", "PONZI", "DON'T SEND BTC TO THIS USER' ecc were miserably failing because they didn't even take the time to understand our bulletproof business model. Lastly i would like to point out that the 100% win rate we are keeping since launch is not alleged, but printed in stone and easily verifiable via api key provided in our thread. |
|
|
|
People can understand who is the liar don't worry.
I think that's the truest thing you've ever said. Congratulations on your new start. Thanks, now go spamming casinos for the good of the people, you KING! |
|
|
|
So now some ones innocence or guilt is determined by how many people defend them? This is the popularity contest I was speaking of previously in addition to the burden of being judged guilty until proven innocent. Not only do people have to prove themselves innocent to the mob, but if they don't grovel sufficiently it doesn't matter how much they prove their innocence. Plenty of people have no one defend them even when they did nothing wrong simply based on the fact that they don't want to be the next target of the mob for daring to contradict them, exactly like is being done to FruitBasket.
How many times do you I have to tell you that this isn't a court of law? Stop using terms like "innocent" and "guilty." Nobody here is thinking along those lines except for you. blah blah blah
Way to rearrange the debate to cut out replies I already made that addressed every single issue you now want to pretend is left hanging. Again, you are concentrating too heavily on deceit, ego and manipulation in order to promote your "service." I've already invested far too much time in countering your lies. Try being truthful for a change. People can understand who is the liar don't worry. Everytime i reply, i use knowledge, facts and reputable sources. While when you talk... is such a low level fud that is clear you can't even be that stupid, but you are driven by second interest. Go hide under a rock instead of spamming casinos all day and faking interest in protecting people from losing btc. |
|
|
|
As always, first they yell scam/ponzi, give red trust, open flags.. all without having the necessary knowledge to understand the technical workflow of our business model or even 1 piece of evidence against us. Then when they receive the answers, pooof. disappeared. That's why "spineless". Never bend the knees if you are running a legit business. Let the facts and your clients talk for your business and exploit the visibility that trolls give you.
Hopefully our story will teach something. As has been pointed out to you several times already, you are a habitual liar incapable of honestly representing yourself and your services. Despite your massive arrogance and litany of unsubstantiated, over-the-top claims, you've only managed to actually demonstrate that you've made winning trades equaling to $11 across the span of 20 days. Had you made these trades for you clients they would currently be sitting on a loss, thanks to owing you 30% of their profits + a $10 a month "VPN fee". Why are you charging every client this fee anyway? The more clients you have, the less the fee should be for each one. Every time you speak you raise more questions than you can provide answers for. Your one defender in this thread didn't even bother to oppose the flag against you. Shows you how much support you actually have here.  I don't see cryptohunter err tecshare's name on here, do you? Can anyone believe how ignorant a person can be ? What he's assuming is that 3 3 wins in a row and +15% would have been a losing investment which is totally false because we require at least 100$ as starting bankroll. That would have been 5$ profit considering the 10$ of monthly vps fee. But is not that the point. The point is that trading is all about %. And we wouldn't have even taken 5$ as commissions since is basically equal to a btc transaction fee. Our pay in a similar situation would be a new happy client that after a positive month of testing is ready to deposit a bigger bankroll. I will just post the replies he already received. Wow, you made $11.33 in 20 days, that's terrific!  Watch out everybody, a market maker star is born!  It would appear that the majority ALL of your trades were positive, so that is commendable. However, if you charge your clients 30% of the profits + a $10 VPN fee, while conducting the same trades for them via API, that means they are sitting on a net loss of $2.40. Maybe you can squeak out a few more trades before the end of the month to put them back at a net zero.
The profits are in term of ROI %. With 100$ in the account you will never get rich with 20% per month on avg.
The 100$ mark exists so the entry barrier is low, the people can test it and if they like it they deposit a real bankroll
The higher the bankroll, the higher the profit. Is simple math.
MarketMaking with 100$ is a joke even though still profitable thanks to compound, people with very low bankrolls should try our upcoming swing trading bot Wow, you made $11.33 in 20 days, that's terrific! Watch out everybody, a market maker star is born! It would appear that the majority of your trades were positive, so that is commendable. However, if you charge your clients 30% of the profits + a $10 VPN fee, while conducting the same trades for them via API, that means they are sitting on a net loss of $2.40. Maybe you can squeak out a few more trades before the end of the month to put them back at a net zero.
We earn ONLY on people's profits. You earn on people's rekts. We don't even take the commissions if the amount is insignificant Yet you have the ass-face to fake interest in protecting the naive users. disgusting. |
|
|
|
As always, first they yell scam/ponzi, give red trust, open flags.. all without having the necessary knowledge to understand the technical workflow of our business model or even 1 piece of evidence against us. Then when they receive the answers, pooof. disappeared. That's why "spineless". Never bend the knees if you are running a legit business. Let the facts and your clients talk for your business and exploit the visibility that trolls give you.
Hopefully our story will teach something. |
|
|
|
Can you show me the trading records of yesterday and today? Those trading account records that have been added to your robot hosting plan.
Arakne's last trades were on 22th september and you can find them all here Keep in mind Arakne is a Market Maker severely limited to trade during breakouts and manipulations thanks to side algos that constantly track different patterns. If you are looking for a bot that actively trades the breakouts, (like the one of yesterday) , you should wait our swing trading bot release during october, because Arakne is for safe and slow passive income only. I am very interested in this project,but My telegram can't get in touch with anyone, can you contact me?@awniubi666
Please join https://t.me/ArakneCurrently is the best way to stay in touch if you are not already in the army. |
|
|
|
Do you hold custody of funds? Or you use API Keys for linking? IF you never hold custody of funds we would be interested in a partnership. Check Arakne Market MakerTelegram: Blob_Crypto |
|
|
|
While people get rekt both ways, we earn passive income. +72% in 24 Hours.8 SPOTS LEFT What happend here bro. You went from 10k+ $ trades with your bot to... 10$ + trades ? Get woke go broke? That is the swing trading bot, Phoenix. Totally different approach, money management and account. If you thought 500% in 20 month was impossible, imagine the roi of a bot that can make 70% in a day Of course Higher the reward, higher the risk. Like i said, that bot is currently being implemented with the backtestengine before the final release in october. Stick around Adolf, and don't compare different bots and different accounts. You and your 3 buddies haven't learned the lesson in META? Thanks for the up though but is no necessary anymore, wait Phoenix's thread if you want to help
Successful traders don't use bots. The best way to become a successful trader is, doing less trades.
The less you trade, the more successful you become.
That's why, the best traders are who do zero trades, hodlers.
 Hope you hodlers are enjoying the day! https://medium.com/@super.crypto1/4th-dimension-bitcoin-manipulation-cartel-can-it-be-burnt-no-way-c53de65c166a |
|
|
|
CryptoSparks i joined only for this, i sent u a msg via telegram, plz check it out.
I loved how u didn't bend the knees to who attacked u, but replied with wins.
There's nothing suspicious about that vouch. It couldn't be an alt of the OP. He's not so stupid to think that anyone would fall for such blatant shilling. [/sarcasm] Actually, he really is that stupid. Just go through his post history for proof. You are very smart[/sarcasm] LOL. I see you are jealous, probably a rekt hodler. Edit: I hope that you are not seriously so ignorant. I even offered to share read only api key, yet no one bothered to ask. So I sent screenshot with proofs and still u ignorant. Wow, you made $11.33 in 20 days, that's terrific! Watch out everybody, a market maker star is born! It would appear that the majority of your trades were positive, so that is commendable. However, if you charge your clients 30% of the profits + a $10 VPN fee, while conducting the same trades for them via API, that means they are sitting on a net loss of $2.40. Maybe you can squeak out a few more trades before the end of the month to put them back at a net zero. U have to think percentage wise lol. Anyway you are probably jealous and don' t know how his bot works and how Bitmex works. When I first accused you of being the OP's alt it was tongue-in-cheek, a sort of half-assed joke. Now I'm starting to think my initial intuition was correct. Otherwise, I have no clue why anyone in their right mind would align themselves with, and continue to shill for this toxic troll and his shady service. And shill you have, becoming toxic yourself in the same way. Here you are, just the two of you, promoting this service that quacks like a scam, fighting an unwinnable fight for acceptance against the whole forum. If you're not the OP's alt, what could you possibly gain from continuing to shill his service? You can still benefit from his service without promoting it, correct? It's quite baffling. Because he's a dev like me and he knows all i have been saying is true. Furthermore he is testing the service . While you and and your buddies, have 0 knowledge in markets and coding, and haven't tested the service. Who do you think has bigger chances of being on the right side? I bet even fire was shady for the neanderthals ! Get used to it, he's the first of many around here. Told you many times, we are here to stay. Your FUD didn't stop Arakne , and will not stop the new swing trading bot coming in October. You have 0 power, even in your imaginary kingdom built upon a rank on a forum  |
|
|
|
Can we please stop these Quantum Computer spams going around recently all over the forum? There are numerous topics regarding "Can bitcoin be destroyed using QC?" and people making the same posts over and over again. As of now, the Quantum computers would prove a threat when people tend to reuse the same addresses over and over again for receiving the coins. On such instances, public key of the bitcoin address might be figured out which with the help of QC can be helpful in displaying the private keys. Currently there are no real ways or ideas where a QC can break through the SHA256 function and find out a public key but OTOH a future QC can break a public key cryptography and reveal the private key. The QC pose a threat for PKC type of algorithms but they cannot break the hash functions and if they come nearer to them, we can certainly double up the bit sizes. QC require around 1500 qubits to crack the ECDSA algorithm and the current working IBM Q System One has only 20 quantum bit. So it might take around 10-20 years for a quantum computer to reach at least 1000 quantum bits.But at least our bitcoin developers would find a way to adopt Bitcoin with Post-Quantum Cryptography techniques. The recent Google's Quantum Supremacy is said to have an array of only 54 qbits which is only 2.7 times the qbits developed by IBM Q. When we find out a possible way to break ECDSA, we would be adopting for the post-quantum cryptography. Security Engineers and Hackers are always same and neither of them can win the game of security always. For instance, if a hacker exploits a system the security expert finds out a way to minimize the vulnerability at the earliest. Everyone need to have a deep read on this topic : I don't believe Quantum Computing will ever threaten Bitcoin before starting any topics further on quantum computers and their threat to Bitcoin or cryptography. Thanks for the very informative post. My apologies for the thread, i only took a quick look at the first page of this section before opening it. |
|
|
|
people who don't already know what something as simple as an API key is, should stay away from it because there is pretty good chance that touching it will lead to their loss specially these days that the internet is filled with lots of malicious websites and even malicious trading bots that fool people into giving them their keys (which is basically access to their funds) which they will abuse.
I personally disagree with this point of view. Especially considering how easy is, people should learn it, because ignorance can never be a better option. I've made this guide after endless battles trying to explain what API KEYS are to HIGH RANK USERS in this forum. Even if the user intentionally selects withdraw privileges, there are 2 more very safe barriers that any malicious scumbag needs to overcome in order to steal funds: - 2FA - Email confirmation |
|
|
|
You are incorrect on so many counts I don't have time to dissect each and every point. So lets just stick with the major ones: Nevertheless, its still a loss. Is not a loss caused by the algo and is so small that has absolutely no value or impact on the overall ROI. Nice try This is a prime example of your big-headedness getting in the way of reality and what makes you untrustworthy. ANY loss incurred has an impact on the overall ROI. This is mathematically unavoidable. If you would have said the losses have a "statistically insignificant" impact on ROI, I might have been inclined to agree with you. But no, you said "absolutely no impact," which is unequivocally false. Learn what backtests are. 33 wins in a row in 3 weeks is no handfull and is not luck. Is backtest accuracy. There's no way to prove the backtest accuracy without giving access to the source code to competent people. This will never happen because:
a. source code will never ever ever be shared
b. most of users in here, including yourself, are just... users. you know how to use SOME things works, you have no idea how and why they work that way. But is ok. Is not your job. But at least avoid starting a which hunt while you have very little knowledge in the sphere of interest. Accept to be wrong sometimes.
You are just confirming what I said earlier: you are relying on people to trust you to be truthful, which you apparently have a pretty hard time doing. Your reply is a long, weird way to go about saying I am right. Everything market related, has risks.
You are adding risk on top of risk by assuming the trust of your clients. I have no other interest than bringing profits to my clients, simply because i earn only from their profits.
Again you're being untruthful by leaving out your $10 a month VPN fee. As I pointed out earlier, if you had made the same trades for one of your clients through API they would be sitting on a loss after your fees. Other users know you very well, you think you can damage my business with your flags and red trust? Your pathetic attempts only brought attention on Arakne, and all the points i debunked with knowledge,data and reputable sources only cleared more doubts that people could have had.
Yeah you really showed us. Cleared up all the doubts. Everything is pretty crystal clear now.  How will we ever survive those 0.001$ losses imposed by bitmex bugs with only 33 wins in a row in 3 weeks ?? Do you think i own the VPS service? how retarded can you be to think i eat the 10$ ? I pity you. Your only job is to fud and spam casinos making people go rekt. I bring value to the forum, i write guides and offer legit and well thought business. Learn before exposing yourself. |
|
|
|
I already explained what those negative PNL of 0.0001 mBTC ( 0.001$ loss) several times in the other Threads.
There's a bug in the bitmex websocket's position endpoint. After several days without trades, the position value restores and the endpoint returns error when trying to access it. This causes the bots to crash. What's the solution until bitmex fixes the problem? Make instant 1 contract trades to unlock the endpoint. That 0.001$ loss is the fee paid as taker(necessary to close the "unlock trade" in less than 1 second) and the mathematical loss that come from the 0.5$ of spread between the ask and the bid.
Nevertheless, its still a loss. I have all kind of verifiable data, if you are unable to access a bitmex account via terminal is
not my problem, but i will make an easy step by step guide when i will have some free time.
No, you don't. You have 1 data set of a handful of trades made this month. Anything else you are referring to is non-applicable to the service you are offering in this thread. You still don't understand what a Market Maker is , and why they REQUIRE HUGE AMOUNT OF CAPITALS. Please DYOR before making a fool of yourself over and over again.
As defined by BitMEX a "market maker" is ANYBODY who places a limit order. You could place a limit order of 0.001 BTC and boom, voila, you are now a market maker. So the "requiring huge amount of capitals" idea is completely bogus. Perhaps don't be such an over-assuming ass if you don't want to make an ass of yourself over and over again. The 495% roi in 20 months is backtest, the exact same code that is running right now with 100% win rate. Before attacking the validity of backtest, please learn what they are and why they are mandatory for every legit bot.
You are just expecting people to take your word that you have not altered either the bot or the data set. Why can't you see the problem here? Again, all you actually have data on is your 7.615 mBTC deposit, which is less money than the minimum you are asking to participate. I see this as incredibly risky and would never touch what you are offering. Some people are lazy at heart and too enamored by the idea of "passive income" to dig deeper into what they are getting themselves involved in, so you will inevitably find new suckers to draw into your scheme. If you make them all broke, I can't help but think they deserved it. Nevertheless, its still a loss. Is not a loss caused by the algo and is so small that has absolutely no value or impact on the overall ROI. Nice try Anything else you are referring to is non-applicable to the service you are offering in this thread. Learn what backtests are an why 600 trades over 20 months are valuable evidence. Furthermore the real 33 wins in a row in 3 weeks since launch is no handfull and is not luck. Is backtest accuracy. There's no way to prove the backtest accuracy without giving access to the source code to competent people. This will never happen because: a. source code will never ever ever be shared b. most of users in here, including yourself, are just... users. you know how to use SOME things, you have no idea how and why they work that way. But is ok. Is not your job. But at least avoid starting a witch hunt while you have very little knowledge in the sphere of interest. Accept to be wrong sometimes. I see this as incredibly risky and would never touch what you are offering. Some people are lazy at heart and too enamored by the idea of "passive income" to dig deeper into what they are getting themselves involved in, so you will inevitably find new suckers to draw into your scheme. If you make them all broke, I can't help but think they deserved it. Everything market related, has risks. You might find that risking on average 5% of all bankroll per position is too risky, but that's just your opinion. I have no other interest than bringing profits to my clients, simply because i earn only from their profits. I wonder why you never attack casinos and betting games that earn on users' loss and are CODED to make the player lose on long term. I wonder why you can't accept that there are systems and people able to make money from trading. 2 BLN daily volume on bitmex, and everybody is loosing money? You know right that those 2bln are the amount of money that winners take to losers? Also, do you think i would put my real funds on a public access account? That deposit is coming straight from a commission from another bot. Furthermore backtest shows that going bellow 7 mbtc as bankroll, would cause arakne to try marketmaking with less than 1 contract(which of course is impossible). this because the bot is so safe that the first entry put you at only 1% risk. Market Makers BOT are designed to provide liquidity and collecting the rebates. What kind of liquidity do you think you can provide with 100$ ? I like how the others are stupid and lazy, while you prove yourself to know absolutely nothing about market behaviors or our business model. Other users know you very well, you think you can damage my business with your flags and red trust? Your pathetic attempts only brought attention on Arakne, and all the points i debunked with knowledge,data and reputable sources only cleared more doubts that people could have had. Congratulations, you managed to type 4 paragraphs while saying nothing.
Just oppose the flag and be on with your day.
I don't have time to deal with another cryptohunter.
I see. So it is ok for you to run around making unsupported allegations, but supported allegations against your own behaviors are not acceptable. I think you need to prove to me you aren't involved in a protection racket because you seem to have a large ego and air of superiority. Perhaps I'd consider withdrawing my support after more evidence of his legitimacy has come to light.
Isn't this the exact opposite of the intended purpose of flags? I thought the evidence was supposed to be presented before supporting it, not create a conclusion and then build a narrative around it. You know, innocent until proven guilty, not your rep is toast until you can prove yourself/appease the mob. Guys, I know its way satisfying to hunt down dirt bags, but in the process you are degrading this community to a standard of mob justice and might makes right. This atmosphere not only drives out honest users, it creates constant chaos and conflict which is a great way for scam artists to hide in by not only easily diverting attention, but making it a simple task to target honest users who are resisting corruption. I know casting suspicion and hoping to be right is way easier than doing the research to prove it first, but this precedent of guilty until proven innocent needs to stop. This community highly values privacy, anonymity, autonomy, and decentralization, all things that are regularly stripped from users under this precedent. There are so few platforms left where there is even a chance of preserving these things. Don't let this forum be consumed by this malignant obsession with finding and punishing scammers at all costs, because they will ALWAYS be there, no matter how many you stop. Can you go hide under a rock now? Thanks PEOPLE, LISTEN TO THIS USER THAT IS VERY WORRIED ABOUT YOUR MONEYWhy should you enter the markets with a proved system, better go BETTING on the service he spams everywhere. We all know how safe and profitable is bettingIf you are bettor, learn also how you can make money with that... but is WAY HARDER and WAY riskier than trading.  |
|
|
|
It would appear that the majority ALL of your trades were positive, so that is commendable.
Buddy why you can't accept we are legit? Because you keep lying. You had 4 losing trades, and even if the losses were so small they aren't reflected in your balance, they are still losses. How could you generate a negative Realised PNL without a losing trade? You don't have any verifiable data that demonstrates your bot is capable of profiting with larger amounts of bitcoin. All you have data on is your 7.615 mBTC deposit, which is less money than the minimum you are asking to participate. By the way, what is your advertised 495% ROI based on? 2 years of testing data? Testing of what? The exact same bot you have now with no modifications whatsoever? You should probably clarify this when advertising your service because that's part of what makes the whole thing look like a con. You had 4 losing trades Wrong once again. I already explained what those negative PNL of 0.0001 mBTC ( 0.001$ loss) several times in the other Threads. There's a bug in the bitmex websocket's position endpoint. After several days without trades, the position value restores and the endpoint returns error when trying to access it. This causes the bots to crash. What's the solution until bitmex fixes the problem? Make instant 1 contract trades to unlock the endpoint. That 0.001$ loss is the fee paid as taker(necessary to close the "unlock trade" in less than 1 second) and the mathematical loss that come from the 0.5$ of spread between the ask and the bid. I have all kind of verifiable data, if you are unable to access a bitmex account via terminal is not my problem, but i will make an easy step by step guide when i will have some free time. You still don't understand what a Market Maker is , and why they REQUIRE HUGE AMOUNT OF CAPITALS. Please DYOR before making a fool of yourself over and over again. The 495% roi in 20 months is backtest, the exact same code that is running right now with 100% win rate. Before attacking the validity of backtest, please learn what they are and why they are mandatory for every legit bot. Thanks |
|
|
|
Google’s quantum computer is allegedly more powerful than the world’s top supercomputers and the performance proves just that. The quantum computer completed a calculation in 3 minutes that would have taken IBM's Summit, the world's most powerful commercial computer, 10,000 years to complete. https://interestingengineering.com/google-says-that-they-have-just-reached-quantum-supremacyQuantum computers are a threat for many blockchains, including BITCOIN. Are you guys scared? Is this the gov's hidden ace against bitcoin since they can't force people to stop using it? |
|
|
|
Wow, you made $11.33 in 20 days, that's terrific! Watch out everybody, a market maker star is born! It would appear that the majority ALL of your trades were positive, so that is commendable. However, if you charge your clients 30% of the profits + a $10 VPN fee, while conducting the same trades for them via API, that means they are sitting on a net loss of $2.40. Maybe you can squeak out a few more trades before the end of the month to put them back at a net zero. Buddy why you can't accept we are legit? The profits are in term of ROI %. With 100$ in the account you will never get rich with 20% per month on avg. The 100$ mark exists so the entry barrier is low, the people can test it and if they like it they deposit a real bankroll The higher the bankroll, the higher the profit. Is simple math. MarketMaking with 100$ is a joke even though still profitable thanks to compound, people with very low bankrolls should try our upcoming swing trading bot |
|
|
|
For the unbelievers, I have to share my status of using his Arakne bot. Back to back winning trades by CryptoSparks his bot. I want to thank you for running this bot on my bitmex account. My advise is to ignore the haters from now on. You know what they do: FUD and tell everyone it is a scam and than they develop their own bot as showed in the images. Funny that jealousy makes people do this kind of stuff. Trading is always risk vs reward. Until now I am still very glad I had opportunity to use his bot. Everyone here reading this. Decide for yourself if you want to use his service or not, I really don't care. Only thing that bothers me is the always constant negative bullshit he gets for his efforts.  Happy trading everyone  Thanks for the support mate, luckily you are a Legendary Member so they can't accuse you of being an ALT ARAKNE REACHED THE 5 BTC CAP WE WERE LOOKING TO MANAGE ON BITCOINTALK.
Subscriptions are OFFICIALLY CLOSED
Thanks to who took the risk and did his own research.
You guys are the reason why i haven't left this forum yet. I want to personally thank all the trolls that helped Arakne gain the needed visibility! Your ignorance and arrogance played out exactly as expected, funny enough... the warning was right there: Hello,
as always i keep roasting ignorant people accusing me of scamming
I leave you and this thread with the WHOLE trading history since Arakne's launch, 33 wins in a row printed in the face of trolls, ignorant and rekt people that think is impossible to make money with the biggest industry of the world. Ps. don't worry, Arakne's trades updates will still be posted in her Thread... while Phoenix, the Swing Trading Bot, will hit bitcointalk pages in October THANKS LOSERS!
|
|
|
|
SUBSCRIPTIONS OFFICIALLY CLOSED
Join the waiting list to be notified in case new spots are available
https://t.me/Arakne  |
|
|
|
CryptoSparks i joined only for this, i sent u a msg via telegram, plz check it out.
I loved how u didn't bend the knees to who attacked u, but replied with wins.
Thanks mate, i replied to you, welcome in the army! CryptoSparks i joined only for this, i sent u a msg via telegram, plz check it out.
I loved how u didn't bend the knees to who attacked u, but replied with wins.
There's nothing suspicious about that vouch. It couldn't be an alt of the OP. He's not so stupid to think that anyone would fall for such blatant shilling. [/sarcasm] Actually, he really is that stupid. Just go through his post history for proof. Still here loser? What about this Legendary? For the unbelievers, I have to share my status of using his Arakne bot. Back to back winning trades by CryptoSparks his bot. I want to thank you for running this bot on my bitmex account. My advise is to ignore the haters from now on. You know what they do: FUD and tell everyone it is a scam and than they develop their own bot as showed in the images. Funny that jealousy makes people do this kind of stuff. Trading is always risk vs reward. Until now I am still very glad I had opportunity to use his bot. Everyone here reading this. Decide for yourself if you want to use his service or not, I really don't care. Only thing that bothers me is the always constant negative bullshit he gets for his efforts. Happy trading everyone ARAKNE REACHED THE 5 BTC CAP WE WERE LOOKING TO MANAGE ON BITCOINTALK.
Subscription will be CLOSED AT MIDNIGHT, when the free vps deal expires.
Thanks to who took the risk and did his own research.
You guys are the reason why i haven't left this forum yet. TRADES UPDATE 22th September 20195 WIN - 0 LOSS ROI: +3.9%  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
