@silvermetal Silvermetal, sorry, I think youīre getting lost in conspiracy theories here. Point is, there are dozens of forums that called themself fancycoinametalk.org, because btctalk. Same with the silly cryptobullion stuff. If you want to criticise, you should better focus on facts that you can prove. What you present here are anything but correlations - and they are very very loose. @maok The points in low hashrate has been the subject from as long as I found out about Quark, back in June last year people were worried, now again you are worried(why I wonder as you're not involved in anything anymore) I answered that question several times. I put some money and a lot of time into Quark, I helped building up the community, thatīs why I am still related to it in a way. When I look back at what happened in this time, it is obvious that issues were silenced by a cheering fanboys and people were listening to charlatans like DigitalIndustry. This way newcomers like me had the impression that everything was fine when actually anything happened in terms of development and community building. With recreating the Foundation we tried to work against that. We used time, brain and money to bring stuff forward and to be honest with the weaknesses that Quark has due to is centralization and low hashrate. Unfortunately this endeavor failed for several reasons, including tricking the community with B9/Mimiccoin by DigitalIndustry, McPhervi but also the active and trustful developers MaxGuevara and Shakezula. This alone should be enough to be sceptical when it comes to Quark. I prefer to talk about those weaknesses, so newcomers will now what they are buying than not talking about any of this stuff at all. Anyway, same as you, I am a free human being and I am not spreading false information, so I should ask you in reverse, why are you bothering? if you bother to read I said I am concerned but thing is that, the coin pool or anyone who gathers sufficient mining power can only do as much harm as delay transactions. If the network is down e.g. because the pool went offline it is really easy to find the checkpointing node. Once you know which one it is, you can DDOS it and there you go automatic checkpointing. So, no, delaying is NOT the only thing that can be done - and there are many people outside who like to do this stuff just for fun. Just look at the Auroracoin fork. It doesnīt make sense at all, but yeah, someone did it. an army of thousands of botnets (...) that pool has a solid majority, more than 50% which is enough (not 99% like you exagerate ) Thousands of botnets? You donīt need thousands of botnets. Please check out the numbers, I also linked some on Reddit. The Top10 miners at coinmine.pl own more than 50% of the global hashrate. You can compare the daily Hashrate with the pool hashrate and will find that most of the time it is at 98-99%. Why do you think Max is asking Quarkers to spread their Hashrate to other pools? Once quark or any crypto currency gathers more adopters you will see or have seen in other crypto currencies that the hashrate will also raise because the value will raise and so on. That really doesnīt matter as long as it is centralised at one pool. Thing is once Quark is a worthy currency for real use, if ever, will be strongly protected by the decentralization in mining power.
Yeah, sure...why? Even Bitcoin was centralized at GHash.io with over 50%. There is no incentive not to mine at GHash - there is only a high incentive in telling others not to mine there. Your mining results will always be better at the largest pool and thatīs particularly why there is no reason to believe that real decentralization will ever take place, because solo-miners are always in large-slight disadvantage. Quark is not the only currency who deals with this issue. Most PoW coins do and there have been LOTs of discussion how this problem can be solved, but none as far as I can see with Quark but your mining contest (a fancy thing for the moment, but doesnīt solve the issue longterm). |
|
|
|
|
Yay there you go, the FUD accuse. Look maok, I know you think you are the (only) one who looks rationally on things, but you obviously don't know what FUD is. I am pointing out facts that YOU and other Quark reminiscence prefer not to talk about.
"The pool controls a solid majority of hashing power but of course you fail to see that once more users join in with hashing power on other pools or solo mining, the numbers will even out among many other miners, but that will only happen in time. "
Give me a break....the pool has a "solid majority"? Dude it's 99% if you like it or not and that's not a solid majority but "basically everything".
And what's that strange theory? People with more hashing power will come and solo mine? Why would they? I asked you this question before: what makes you think that people will start solo mining long term? The only incentive is a tiny jackpot that is not permanent but based on donations. The reason why people gather at coinmine is the same why Bitcoin minera are gathering at Ghash. You can of course assume that people will act irrationally, but to me that's a strange (or rather pathetic) way to deal with facts.
I am not bashing, I am delivering facts that you prefer not to talk about (or have you? I couldn't fibe one thread about it). You probably know that, but I have dozens of mails that proof that even Max and Adam were aware of the issues with the centralization at coinmine.pl and the decreasing hashrate. That was one of the reason why we seeked to find more incentives. If you prefer to argue against the developer that invented the whole thing then you must have a surprisingly negative image of Quarks development. You can go claiming that there is no problem whatsoever. I'll come back to remwmver you of your posts when things fall to an all new low.
|
|
|
|
quarkfx, you had me at 14 yo killing people  .. say again the quarktalk jackpot in which more than 40 individual SOLO miners participated the first time round, say again what ? say "noone participates" please repeat that. Quark isn't secure great thanks for your opinion, you can move to another coin now which is more secure ;-) Sorry for you to not get the reference. You were the one arguing that noone would attack Quark because it wonīt make sense - I simply argued that damage is done no matter if it makes sense. Wow, 40 (in letters: fourty - CRAZY!) entries in one round (how long was that again). And now what? Do you think thatīs many? Thatīs nothing. Beside that, how would you possibly know they are individuals? Technically it could be even one person. I am coming back every now and then to see the "progress" that the few lasting Quarkers evangelize. I am glad to see that there are less and less people falling for the "keep smiling and forget about every criticism" attitude. In my first post I addressed the factual centralization of Quark and you come up with a pathetic "Hey, but we are protected against everything", which is either a lie or plain lack of understanding crypto. btw. And donīt worry, I am not talking to you, since I know there is no way to keep you from believing that everything is fine - I am writing so people who think about getting into Quark think again. |
|
|
|
thats the miners fault. most miners are braindead and just follow guides/copy-paste.
tough a pool that cares about such situations, would not allow itself to grow that big. obviously, this isnt such a pool.
It doesnīt matter whose fault it is, what matters is that Quark is 99% centralized at coinmine.pl which means that if coinmine.pl has any sort of issue, the network will collapse and remain unstable for enough time to perform any sort of attacks. As I said, I donīt expect any attacks, but there is no way to call Quark secure anymore. # Also, you should be aware of the fact that it is not the responsibility of the pool to stay under 51% hashrate: There is a strong incentive with all PoW coins to join a pool. The only incentive not to do so is a "jackpot" that people donīt bother to play, because its peanuts (even though I agree that the reward is an even smaller peanut). @maok they are braindead Cheesy because if they'd solo mine they could also participate in the jackpot and win lots more quarks, the winners from Christmas are: http://quarktalk.org/threads/mining-jackpot-winner-s.1006/ the next draw will be on 21 July 2015 so anyone wishing to get out of the pool you could be lucky and win much more Wink Should I tell you again why noone participates in your "jackpot". They are not braindead, they probably simply forgot to switch off their machines from mining Quark or they are a small number of servers where someone sometime pointed a miner to coinmine.pl. As for the attacks and destruction lol, there's nothing much any majority can do without harming itself, How long have you been in crypto? Are you aware of the attacks that have been performed, even though that would somehow hurt your logic that they are harming themselves? Do you know that there are 14 years old, writing worms that can effectively kill people when entering sensible systems like hospitals just for the sake of it? The only reason that Quark runs is that there are very few who would care to kill one out of hundred unimportant cryptocurrencies. plus Quark has double spending protection unlike most other crypto currencies so we are protected form any form of fraud as long as you keep your private keys safe. Sorry, but thatīs horseshit. "any form of fraud"? Really? Are you even aware of the different types of attacks that can be performed? Double-spending is just one out of many. Also, checkpointing can be ddosed and no, the few hundred nodes Quark still has are not many. What makes you think that? Even Auroracoin has still 200 nodes even if itīs dead. You know Maok, we donīt need to agree on the security of Quark but your way of arguing is pathetic. If you donīt think itīs a problem that a decentralized currency is effectively centralized at one pool then I donīt get what you are doing here. And with regard to the argument you made on Reddit, a cryptocurrency canīt be destroyed, you absolutely miss the point. No, a cryptocurrency canīt be destroyed this way. In the end itīs only a protocol. However, value can be destroyed if a network forks due itīs weekness. You really sound like Digitalindustry: rejecting any sort of rational criticism and evangelizing the great advantages of a currency that noone else is interested in. Please repeat: Quark is coinmine.pl |
|
|
|
At the current hashrate of the coin , how many i7 processors it will take to do a 51%?
Few days ago you would have needed only 80M to perform a 51% attack, if someone had really been interested to knock down the network he could do that by temporarily ordering a few number of virtual machines. It would probably have costed less than 1000$. Even that was too much to perform an attack, noone cares. The Hashrate hasnīt been that low since December 2013, still in December the situation was better because it wasnīt that centralized - even though it was really bad: As you can read from this post the Hashrate of Coinmine in December 2013 was about 90%. Today it has 98.96% with 406M Hashrate (donīt believe it? click here). There is basically noone solo mining. Quark IS coinmine.pl.
Waiting for Digitalindustry or Hillux to come and claim that Quark is the best and most decentralized currency. Iīd be interested in an explanation how Quark could ever get away from being centralized at coinmine.pl |
|
|
|
To keep you updated on shedding light into the scammy behaviour of "Kolin Evans" I sent this email to Bill Still. Bill Still received my mail as he immediately answered, asking for my origin. I keep you updated. Dear Bill when I went into cryptocurrencies the end of 2013 I read some articles on Quark and also saw several videos of yours where you talked to an individual that referred to himself as "Kolin Evans". From what you tell in your videos, he convinced you with some arguments about the cryptography of the currency and you eventually "bought in". Over more than half a year I have been associated member of the Quark Foundation and created several artworks and videos for them. I eventually left due to misbehaviour of some other core members, including the head developer and the named individual (who btw. wasnīt even part of the Quark Foundation). Now after more than a year, I am looking for answers to some questions. First off, I would like to know if you are still supporting and holding Quark since I noticed you are no longer posting a Quark address for donations and I know that you have been selling at least substantial parts of your Quarks even though you confirmed to be a long term holder. I know there were good reasons to do so, but still I would like to know your standpoint. Also I would like to go on record whether you bought all your Quark or were provided with free Quark and by whom. In your recent AMA you didnīt answer this question and we have plenty of indicators that Quarks were given to you for free. In your first video on Quark with the person who calls himself "Kolin Evans" you refer to him as part of the development team, which he has never been part of. He commited to be a trader without any technical knowledge. Most people in Quark believed that "Kolin" had a strong relation to "Max Guevara" the main developer of Quark. Max himself rejected this in a public chat. I would like to point you out to more scammy behaviour of this individual and ask you to shed more light on this issue since you were in close contact with him. One of your last videos on Quark I remember you refer to it as "solid as the rock of Gibraltar". It wasnīt. In fact Quark ahad a much stronger decrease in value than Bitcoin and many other cryptocurrencies over the last year. Mining power destabilized so the Foundation eventually looked for ways to provide incentives. "Kolin" was one of the forces who actively tried to scam money out of the whole endeavor. There is a lot of email proof for that. You wonīt find all proof there, but https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=781954 is a good summary of what he plotted. Doing some backchecks on "Kolin Evans" we found that he is a highly instable person who acts as if he was an economic expert, however he is mostly delusional in his analyses of which he is religiously convinced. One of his main methods is buying cheap crypto and then cheer them hard to make people buy them. He provably created a large ammount of sock puppets to bump and cheer his own threads. Now that he is no longer very active in Quark related threads because most of them are dead, he switched over to other coins like Mooncoin and Caps where he sings the same gospel. I and many others wonder in which way you have been involved in this misbehaviour. You explicitely stated that you are not giving any investment advises but your "information" on Quark turned out to be based solely on the informations giving by the referred individual. If you were not involved in a scam, than I would be very grateful if you could describe how the contact with the individual was initiated and how you have been cheated into cheering for Quark. Iīd be grateful to hear your comments on this issue. All the best, |
|
|
|
Oh noes Julie, ratio, you just triggered Hilux namecalling mode |
|
|
|
Lol
Best rebuttal ever. Whoops, Lol, you're really a wordsmith. Wow best quoting ever you are really good at hitting the quote button...how do you even fuck that up??? What a fool. Oh your mother must be so embarrassed.  classic, you must be really running out of arguments. Best escape. |
|
|
|
Best rebuttal ever. Whoops, Lol, you're really a wordsmith.
|
|
|
|
QuarkFX you are even more a phony than silvermetal. You all but admitted in the Bottlecaps thread that while part of the Quark Foundation you participated willingly with Digital Industry in part of a scam involving pumping CAPs and that the profits would be used to pump Quark. As I said in that thread it is interesting that you turn on DigitalIndustry only after the plan failed. You have no morals, your attack on Digital Industry is out of scorn and bitterness. You think DigitalIndustry is a bad guy...well I would say you are worse to leech on to him and follow him until it didn't serve you anymore.
You were not even around for the first 6 months of Quark. You are just a bandwagon tagalong that came to Quark during the Dec2013 hype, likely buying at the peak of a 10000% 3day rise in price like a fool and are desperate to blame anyone but yourself. Such a tagalong and so desperate to be part of the group you even felt the need to have quark in your name.
Time for the two of you to move on.
Uhm wut? I was on the CAPs thread? Then why don't you quote me? And I participated in a scam? Tell me more. This is going to be entertaining. Yeah wrong person...got you mixed up with Coinmama. Whoops... Oh well now you know what its like to get accused of things that make no sense which is pretty much all that silvermetal does to people. Awwwww such a nice excuse. So let me wrap up: when silvermetal questions the liability of some newly created accounts that are mostly doing anything but cheering for Digitalindustry you show up and complain about such behaviour. However when you falsly accuse other members then this receives anything but "whoops" and - even better - "there you have it". I acknowledged I mixed you up with Coinmama. I didn't falsely accuse you I got you mixed up with another user...that is called a mistake. Not too complicated even for you. And btw. I am still interested in proof for the scam Coinmama carried out. Let me guess: Someone told ya? Yes someone did...Coinmama. She posted PMs between herself and DigitalIndustry (and the rest of the Quark Foundation) that illustrated an attempt to pump CAPs and use the profit to pump QRK. So I asked her why she didn't share that info immediately...instead of months later when it didn't work out showing her morality is false. Alas she went silent. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=241445.msg9586936#msg9586936https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=241445.msg9587410#msg9587410Of course you accused me lol. The reason for that (mixing me up) doesn't change that. Not too difficult to understand, right, "even for you".  With regard to Coinmama you accused her to have participated in a scam while now you turn it into "she remained silent" because she didn't go on the record immediately. I know the correspondence very well and I know how she reacted to it. There was never any acknowledgement, quite the contrary, she was the one who fired against that type of "plans". She simply didn't tell you and it's clear why: because this type of info would severely harm the reputation of Quark. Digitalindustry was at that time still considered to be an important person by both: the community and the core team. He was one out of 5 members who was invited to a private chat with Max Guevara who till then wasn't responding to more or less anyone. Coinmama went on the record when things became really nasty aka Digitalindustry and Vic attempting to carry out the proposed scam with Mimiccoin. If I wanted I could post the long correspondence in which she, Orm, Hai and me observed the coin and speculated over being what looked exactly like the scam being plan in forehand. But heck, you can see that even without the correspondence. Even for someone with poor background knowledge it should be understandable that there are good reasons not to easily post this kind of stuff on btctalk - maybe you don't understand the impact or you don't get that this kind of crazytalk is rather the norm with Digitalindustry. Vic had one (even though - as it turned out - bad) reason to collaborate with Digitalindustry: he thought he was the link to Max Guevara who till then didn't speak to anyone. However, Digitalindustry claimed to be in close contact with Max, even pretended to beclose friends (this type of stuff is still online on forum.qrk.cc). After moderating the chat with Max, it was clear to be a false impression, Max commented on that in the chat. Again, you are accusing Coinmama, based on the simple fact that you have no understanding of the timeline. That's also why you have no proof. Like every good conspiracy theorist you are "just asking questions". That's laughable and hypocritic. There is plenty of proof that DI and Vic carried out an insider knowledge scam, yet you remained silent on that while now you try to accuse the person who was probably most actively against this endeavor. Let me comment on this using your words: "Whooops" |
|
|
|
QuarkFX you are even more a phony than silvermetal. You all but admitted in the Bottlecaps thread that while part of the Quark Foundation you participated willingly with Digital Industry in part of a scam involving pumping CAPs and that the profits would be used to pump Quark. As I said in that thread it is interesting that you turn on DigitalIndustry only after the plan failed. You have no morals, your attack on Digital Industry is out of scorn and bitterness. You think DigitalIndustry is a bad guy...well I would say you are worse to leech on to him and follow him until it didn't serve you anymore.
You were not even around for the first 6 months of Quark. You are just a bandwagon tagalong that came to Quark during the Dec2013 hype, likely buying at the peak of a 10000% 3day rise in price like a fool and are desperate to blame anyone but yourself. Such a tagalong and so desperate to be part of the group you even felt the need to have quark in your name.
Time for the two of you to move on.
Uhm wut? I was on the CAPs thread? Then why don't you quote me? And I participated in a scam? Tell me more. This is going to be entertaining. Yeah wrong person...got you mixed up with Coinmama. Whoops... Oh well now you know what its like to get accused of things that make no sense which is pretty much all that silvermetal does to people. Awwwww such a nice excuse. So let me wrap up: when silvermetal questions the liability of some newly created accounts that are mostly doing anything but cheering for Digitalindustry you show up and complain about such behaviour. However when you falsly accuse other members then this receives anything but "whoops" and - even better - "there you have it". You know, for me it doesn't really matter who a sockpuppet is - it matters what and how users do things. What I see is a person that only shows up to rant about accusation he believes to be false (which is your good right) but seems to have any problems with the well documented misbehavior of DigitalIndustry (which is hypocrisy). And btw. I am still interested in proof for the scam Coinmama carried out. Let me guess: Someone told ya? Who could have thought that this thread could ever get this amusing again. |
|
|
|
QuarkFX you are even more a phony than silvermetal. You all but admitted in the Bottlecaps thread that while part of the Quark Foundation you participated willingly with Digital Industry in part of a scam involving pumping CAPs and that the profits would be used to pump Quark. As I said in that thread it is interesting that you turn on DigitalIndustry only after the plan failed. You have no morals, your attack on Digital Industry is out of scorn and bitterness. You think DigitalIndustry is a bad guy...well I would say you are worse to leech on to him and follow him until it didn't serve you anymore.
You were not even around for the first 6 months of Quark. You are just a bandwagon tagalong that came to Quark during the Dec2013 hype, likely buying at the peak of a 10000% 3day rise in price like a fool and are desperate to blame anyone but yourself. Such a tagalong and so desperate to be part of the group you even felt the need to have quark in your name.
Time for the two of you to move on.
Uhm wut? I was on the CAPs thread? Then why don't you quote me? And I participated in a scam? Tell me more. This is going to be entertaining. |
|
|
|
Maok, it's your business if you think what silvermetal does is irrelevant. It's not your task to comment on his posts. But Quarkfx, I am tired of posts in which random new people that enter in Quark topics be it here or there to get accused of a myth which was never proven, namely sockpuppets. I guess it wasn't my task to comment on that just like it wasn't silvermetal's task to investigate so many people history and place judgements on those that write either in here or reddit. I think is anyone's task to defend those that are immediately labeled and attacked based on something with no proof. I think it's obvious here that Vanuatu will never use Quark - not becaus the account ia a DI sockpuppet but because there were like 100s of cases that were misleading people into believibg something big ia hoing to happen. This is just one of them. To prevent people to buy in on this basis is a reasonable thing to do. There ia no reason to flame here.
who's going to buy into those pump messages like something big is going to come? No one. The poster just expressed an biased opinion on things that may or may not happen.. Yeah, who would buy in on announcement? Are you serious? That's how 90% of cryptoeconomics work: Buy on announcement. It doesn't matter how ridiculous those announcements are. e.g. the "something big in the works for quark" announcement was ridiculous but many bought in anf kept asking for months. Obviously not too many will fall for this kind of ANN today, but it is still bullshit. Contrary to what Hilux suggests this isn't a Cheer-Thread but a thread on Quark and if someone likes to talk about the ugly sides then he or she has every right to do so. What Orm does has anything to do with "Quarks going down, sell all your coins". I don't believe that every person he called a sockpuppet was in fact a sockpuppet, but I can see where the judgement comes from and he's got a point that in many cases it smells like sockpuppet. Also as far as I see Orms main point isn't that Quark is a scam by itself but that it has been used to make a lot of money and there are some actors who have proven to carry out those scams (e.g. by making announcements to keep people in Quark), Digitalindustry is just one of them. A lot of bad stuff happened, qex.la or before the paying platform....maybe you missed those parts because you were not there maybe you prefer to not look at them but for fact there are good reason to be very critical eith no matter what happens with Quark, partiparticularly as long as Digitalindustry remains involved. |
|
|
|
|
Maok, it's your business if you think what silvermetal does is irrelevant. It's not your task to comment on his posts. If you don't like them simply don't answer. I don't think you have a strong point here. We all know it's hard to prove sockpuppets in most cases - that's the reason why there are so many. I think it's obvious here that Vanuatu will never use Quark - not becaus the account ia a DI sockpuppet but because there were like 100s of cases that were misleading people into believibg something big ia hoing to happen. This is just one of them. To prevent people to buy in on this basis is a reasonable thing to do. There ia no reason to flame here.
|
|
|
|
When I joined bitcointalk.org I was quite aware of the use of sockpuppets, particularly because money is involved and both FUD and cheering paid out. However, the excessive and really pathetic use of sockpuppets by digitalindustry (see also here: digitalindustry aka kolin evans busted on planning a scam) made me wonder whether it is much more than what I formerly believed. Obviously, we will never know, but I am interested what you think how many there are. |
|
|
|
Interesting, I didnīt know about the forum but itīs obviously Kolin based on the crappy images. The funny thing here is, that different to kopimi.com, another of his pages, this page is not anonymised, so it is possible to look up the owner and credentials: Registered through: GoDaddy.com, LLC ( http://www.godaddy.com) Domain Name: DIGITALCURRENCYTALK.COM Created on: 30-May-13 Expires on: 30-May-14 Last Updated on: 30-May-13 Registrant: Jeremy Wentz 3305 Eastern Blvd York, Pennsylvania 17402 United States Administrative Contact: Wentz, Jeremy cyberkiller6@comcast.net 3305 Eastern Blvd York, Pennsylvania 17402 United States 7175782644 Technical Contact: Wentz, Jeremy cyberkiller6@comcast.net 3305 Eastern Blvd York, Pennsylvania 17402 United States 7175782644 Domain servers in listed order: NS1.DREAMHOST.COM NS2.DREAMHOST.COM NS3.DREAMHOST.COM Jeremy Wentz has other pages registered there, however shows no relation to crypto. Look it up yourself. |
|
|
|
I'm on the fence, I'm 50/50 going to buy the some/all of the QRK sell wall if it appears again.
I heard thousands of those sentences, none of them were true. If you would think this is a good catch, you wouldnīt be here talking about it. Fact is you didnīt buy, and you didnīt buy for a good reason: because it is not undervalued at all - there is nothing such as "undervalued". There is only value and people who like to see the value under- or overvalued. In fact Quark has faced a lot more sustained negative attacks than many of the ALts that are down even lower or have faded into oblivion, which is a positive thing. A lot more negative attacks...grow up. Since I watch this thread you were mostly complaining about people who were raising doubts. Didnīt hear any critical voices when "Kolin Evans" got his bullshit machine on full throttle - yeah, there was lot of opportunity. My best guess is that you are blind on one eye. For this person everything that raises critic is a troll, a person that has so many sockpuppets account that you can hardly count them...(or do you actuallly believe the developer of Mimiccoin actually existed?) There will always be some who lost 99% and prefer to hope for people to realize that Quark is the big thing and there will always be trader to speculate on the coin. If you think the masses will catch fire just like this, stop dreaming, this is not going to happen. If we are heading for another ALT boom to follow a BTC boom people should be buying up the solid coins that are undervalued like Quark, YAC, HBN, DGC etc etc in my opinion.
Yeah, of course they should buy them, since you own them and want them to be less "undervalued"... Stick with Quark and stop pretending - buy that wall, every Quark of it is yours. |
|
|
|
frozenbit < yes Bitcoin goons maybe it's a problem?
Caps a HBN are two good core crypto that can grow and will be included in the PoW+ i'd recommend buying into a basket of Quality
there is not much out there, but just look for the ones the trolls attack : D
C-bloc not really needed although it would be fun to implement, considering you retards gave up so quickly on ever thinking you could fork Quark or get a consensus.
it would be like walking into a mental disability hospital and yelling "chocolate icecream !"
where's the burn project? ha ha you seem to be the master of your own hand and lube, you are just a little angry at burning all this Quark and you can't even keep it under 1 million for more than a few days ha ha.
: D : D : D
Ok, let me summarize: 1. Floor: You are not able to name one and you acknowledge that all your previous predictions were wrong. 2. Frozenbit: Obviously still the best project ever but destroyed by Bitcoin goons. 3. Caps & Hobonickles: good core crypto, "basket of quality" (why: because you own them) 4. C-Bloc: When you said it would be implemented and that you talked to a dev you were actually talking shit. 5. Trolls: Everyone who provides arguments against your mental meltdown is obviously a troll, what else. Itīs funny that you keep referring to my burning proposal, since you usually forget about everything. Must have really bugged you out  Oh yes, and I am indeed little angry, because I sold my Quark at 8000, 7000 and 4000 Satoshi whereas now I could receive the incredible amount of 1400. Damn, so angry about missing this bargain Itīs also funny that you keep referring to a quote of Mako that you want to see as proof that "a group" wanted to fork Quark, whereas Mako simply stated that EVERYONE could fork Quark if he or she wished. Yep, pathetic, and it getīs even worse the more often you quote it. |
|
|
|
12 btc sell wall again at cryptsy
only 900k it must be frustration not being able to push it down? Hey Kolin, what about the floor predictions you promised for Quark? How much was it? Wonīt fall below 5ct/Quark, right? And hey, next step was Frozenbit? I just checked http://frozenb.it/ and it seems that the Bitcoin Mafia killed the project because it was too dangerous for them....or it was simply another shady project that you tried to sell as the great game changer. Also desperately waiting for the Communist-Bloc to become reality, and hardware wallets, and and and. You know...all the big project that you promised for Quark but never happened, oh great master of shady announcements and false floor calling. Itīs also good to see that your main attention passes from Quark to classic pumpīn dump currencies like Hobonickles and Caps. Well done! P.S.: Seriously, what is Quarks floor? There is no buy support at all, but a massive sell wall of 12,27 BTC. So if it is that "tasty", how come that noone eats it? I guess you expect cheaper prices to come? Enlight us, oracle. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
