Truth727 the spammer is here again. Has to work harder though.

I am saying it here for everyone to see:

Truth727 is payed by

Martin Armstrong

who wants to see my messages go away.

Does anybody think that this clown has anything else to do? NOBODY would ever ask him for advice.

If in fact anybody being affiliated with an agency having the capacity to be relevant in a market situation like this would post here in such a situation, this person would be fired immediately.

In other words, you are doing exactly what you say you shouldn't be doing. Only idiots do that!

But no, I can engage you here wasting time and providing proof of what I say - which is exactly what I want, and you are falling into the same trap again and again -

This scenario just reinforces what has been said by many people in this thread for months - that Martin Armstrong sits in a house of cards.

Again, I am not finished without providing proof:

Which Government has asked Martin Armstrong for Advice?

The Institutional Services Confidence Trick

You are giving me all these opportunities and ideas how to defeat you, it is amazing -

You are being ridiculed. You are shooting yourself in the foot, literally. Does it not hurt?

You just don't know what logic is. But the readers know and nobody except some shill / troll defends you.

The astute reader will notice that over45 is currently having a fake dialog with his Aussie spammer trying to derail this thread - this is how desperate he is. At this time of the day - March 20, 2020, 11:15:19 PM - it is now 8:15:19 pm ET on a Friday night, if that is not desperate, I don't know what is.



Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Why and how can Martin Armstrong and affiliates claim (make it appear to the untrained eye) that the Socrates system of Technical Analysis always creates the correct trading signals, makes the correct prediction and is never wrong?

The answer is very simple. The system produces multiple conflicting signals to choose from. In hindsight, one of the correct ones is chosen as the winner and the incorrect ones are ignored. That's it! We always win.

To explore how we get there, let us first look at the problem of forecasting from the rear vision mirror perspective - in hindsight.

Let's assume for the moment a scenario where we use a smart trading system that produces three possible signals from a single output: Buy, do nothing or sell.

We use that system and look in hindsight at a market situation, say a stock rally. We wanted to profit from it, but our system failed and advised to sell, so we sold and traded with a loss. Naturally, we review the situation and ask ourselves: What was the signal that we missed that would have told us to trade in the right direction, the opposite direction? Our system is a system that has only a single output, so there is no way we could have traded differently.

Martin Armstrong would have had this problem when designing Socrates at the very beginning.

To solve this problem, Martin Armstrong would have extended his system to have multiple outputs to choose from. These outputs typically produce different results in any given market situation. Let us see how this is implemented in practice by inspecting the signals from a Socrates report in a single time frame, say daily, on the same day:

• Our Daily level momentum is bullish
• The trend indicator is neutral
• Our long-term trend is bearish
• The cyclical strength indicator is bullish
• The market is trading above one indicating pivot implying that this market is in a positive position
• With respect to time, there is a prospect of a decline moving into (the following day)
• The overall tone on the Daily level is negative since the last Daily Bearish Reversal being elected ...
• The broader tone of the market is still positive on this trading level.
• The Oscillators are in a mixed position.
• Immediately, our (Energy) model continues to rally suggesting that a strong rally is likely.
• We have elected a Bearish / Bullish reversal

Additionally, we may get:

• Fake elected Reversals count
• Superposition event canceling a recently elected reversal (Refer to Revision Signals)

These can all appear on the same day.

Then there are signals that must be considered but they are not in the reports:

• The NON-election of a nearby Reversal (the most mysterious "signal" one could imagine)
• Reversal One Percent Rule
• Reversal gap

We are counting 16 signals in a single time frame. When we multiply this by 3 for daily, weekly and monthly time frames to be conservative, we get 48 signals to choose from, each of them may have different directions.

The Socrates system does not provide a computerized solution for consolidating these signals into a meaningful response, so it is a matter of human interpretation to find the correct conclusion.

Now let us look how this expansion is exploited to always produce the correct result in hindsight, by means of an example:

Wheat Futures Example

On Friday, 2019-04-30 /ZW Wheat Futures definitely elected a Monthly Bearish Reversal, that, if had it been traded for the month, would have produced a loss of 17.4%. The response of an Armstrong affiliate to this dilemma is to blame the user as follows:

Martin Armstrong Affiliate Response


In clear text, this means that in hindsight, the correct conclusion would have been to ignore the ELECTED Monthly Bearish Reversal, and instead to pay attention to the NON-elected next reversal, plus consider the turning point, the timing information. These are not signals that the system puts out. The user has to carry out this research.

The answer to the question we asked in the beginning is fairly obvious from this example. The conclusion for the correct trading decision can only be made in hindsight by cherry-picking some signals that best fit the situation in the past. That is because there are no rules for how to pick the best mix of these signals for a trade. These rules are made up by Martin Armstrong and his staff in hindsight on the fly to match any situation as required.

Therefore, the Socrates system cannot be used to get accurate and verifiable trading decisions in real time.

See also:

The Reversal System - Engineering Background


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.

See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Look at this:

Armstrong Economics


His Global Correlation Model (click for more details) is a lie, has been debunked. Utter bullshit. No such thing as his "Capital Flow Analysis".

Where is the proof?

Where is the definition of HIS "Capital Flow Analysis"? (Spoiler: Snake Oil)

It is an illusion!

And boy, you just don't get away with saying "pitfalls that plague most computer modelling systems". You get the punishment you deserve, you incompetent crackpot!





Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Proof:

Check out this link:

FACTS DO MATTER! Marty says DO NOT BUY THE LOW 4 days after the 2018 LOW

knock, knock

Hmm. Gumbi has fallen flat on his face now. That was too much truth for him.



Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.

See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Martin Armstrong you are a clown!


Scientific Proof:


Go to your mickey-mouse web site (largest forecaster in the world) and click on the button "Learn more About Us".

Then perhaps it will occur to you!

 

(Spoiler: Link to Nowhere)


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Hard to keep up with the number of lies and insults he produces every day. As some may have noticed, I am building a repository - but honestly - he is the biggest liar on earth - he keeps me busy.

He is running a ponzi scheme. He uses part of subscriber and report sales money to buy more publishing space. He spams the entire internet with his fraudulent content on multiple sites. He even re-publishes his content on his facebook page. Then he spams amazon.com with a book that nobody has been able to buy and writes fake six star reviews about it even before the publish date. He does not care.

One of his strategy components is:

"There is no such thing as bad publicity".

Let's see whether this holds. We have the bullets to win this information war. It's not like the people suddenly have a lot of money to buy his useless reports and conferences.


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Fred another newbie joins the charlatan hahaha


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Marty, unfortunately MANY people who bought your reports are very unhappy.

Please refer to the following recent sample case:

Fraudulent Blog Post Revisions

If you want to contact Marty directly, just send a private message here: Contact Martin Armstrong and daughter.

Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.

See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Everything you need to know about Martin Armstrong and GOLD is

here

Quarterly Superposition Event in Gold 2015

and here

The Martin Armstrong Gold / Silver Ratio Fallacy.


Meanwhile, our latest theme is still:

"Which Government has asked Martin Armstrong for Advice?"



Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.

See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Now Martin Armstrong's trolls are calling each other "troll" and get confused.


Even trolls / spammers get senile.

Now Martin Armstrong's trolls are calling each other "troll" and get confused.


Even ?trolls / spammers get senile.

Ever heard about different time zones? We are ahead of you.

On your pocket calculator, search for the button with the "-" (minus) sign on it if you know what I mean.

Subtraction.

Or buy a Socrates report for that. Or take your medication. In any case, change your ID from over45 to over95. over45 has expired.

 



Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.

See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Good to see you engaged here over45 getting older just keep posting. Need a new ID over65?

Good traffic rate here.

2020-03-19 05:08:16 (Read 629679 times)
2020-03-19 12:49:30 (Read 629762 times)


People are watching you talking to yourself and the other shill. They are laughing their heads off. Keep spamming the thread.

It will not help Armstrong selling his reports for toilet paper value.


Meanwhile, our theme of the day is still:

 "Which Government has asked Martin Armstrong for Advice?"




Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.


See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Have you ever heard of the Fair use doctrine? Case closed, your idea is flushed down the toilet.

I would encourage any critics to keep posting selected Socrates reports with their fraudulent revisions because critics are covered by the law, the fair use doctrine.

Please refer to the following sample case:

Fraudulent Blog Post Revisions


Once again Martin Armstrong is denied the option to use this forum for fraudulent advertising and intimidation. Yes, fraudulent advertising, false advertising. And we are here to take corrective action with information, just the facts.

Meanwhile, our theme of the day is still "Which Government has asked Martin Armstrong for Advice?"


And YOU over45 get your standard reminder as promised (even if you consider it meaningless).


I think that over45, m96, Gumbi, Alex-11 need a reminder what fraud is which they keep posting on this site in plain sight for everyone to view..

As previously said, Gumbi's and cohorts' posts get replied to in a way that will remind them of the context in which we showed them that Martin Armstrong is a charlatan.

Let him be reminded again that we have a model case where this behavior is documented in much detail. Here we show how Martin Armstrong's fraud manifests itself. Beyond any doubt. A self-documenting case. It actually saves time and effort to repeat this as opposed to wasting the time trying to argue this same type of thing without end.

Whatever smokescreen over45, Gumbi, m96, Alex-11 and cohorts are coming up with now, they get this reply. I know they just want this message to go away but I am not going to do Martin Armstrong the favor. I am just not taking his baits for more nonsense any more.

The pattern is the same again and again: Pick one of the ambiguous conflicting Socrates signals in hindsight to argue the case. For us, there is no need to formulate a custom response to that. We use this standard response that documents the following model case. To show everyone what these charlatans are doing.

I have an obligation to spread the message for the honest people, and as painful as it is for me, I am going to persevere until the Armstrong promoters shut up. So they are warned. The honest people have all the facts on their side.



Here we go. You are providing the proof of my assertion yourself!

Hindsight, Fraud. This hindsight message is fraudulent misrepresentation of performance, pure fraud!
Now here you are saying, and I know you are speaking for Martin Armstrong, that


Martin Armstrong had this information, this bullish signal, the fact that his model went long - at the end of the year - but at the same time failed to tell his clients?

In fact he sent the opposite signal to his clients at the time!

If he knew this at the time when he claimed the system went long, and let's assume for the sake of argument that what you say is true then he could have been trading against his clients because he published this signal only three months later.

You are not worth the respect of a single honest being on earth! You are a fraud!


And yes, I have all the reports. How could I otherwise quote them? I have everything!

More importantly, all other people who lost, they have everything as well.



Here is a detailed time line of the events:


Quarterly Superposition Event in Gold 2015


Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.

See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

That's informative. Fine. But where is the punch line? We need new case studies, evidence, proof, exposure of the inconsistencies case by case.

If you could wrap this up to expose the Forecaster movie as a lie and paid-for misinformation / infomercial name clearing device as suggested by critics already, then that would be something.

You would be able to use this old material, recycle it and put it into context with new claims that Martin Armstrong made. That is how to do it, and this is what armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com is about and should be about.

Why does it work? Because that is the trick that Martin Armstrong uses - you use his own trick and turn it against him.

Again, in other words, you unwrap his story, reconstruct the reality from facts and show exactly what the difference is between the two versions which shows the stuff he lies about. Simple.

Take This one as an example. At a first glance, it looks ridiculous. Who would have thought about it? It is the first time anybody ever wrote about it. You pick a theme, research the facts, and in no time, you nail him against the wall because he lies about everything.

It always works because he MUST contradict himself. In this case, it is impossible that he is a government advisor while every child knows that he writes that government "is too stupid to manage a bubblegum machine" (search google if you don't believe me). Again, piece of cake. Took me three hours.

And it is easy because for a nobody without a college degree such as Martin Armstrong to be government advisor, this is an extraordinary claim.

If no proof of that is provided as in this case, too bad for him, you win, because as you said, extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence. And you win TWICE and ridicule him if you find facts that contradict this claim such as him calling his clients idiots.

Since about a year ago, after the mood in this blog turned around, and even more so after early 2016, a massive amount of additional evidence has been collected here and at armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com. I did some of the latter, working on this non-stop literally, with the option in mind that someone might finally see the value of this additional material and take this fraudulent outfit to court. The idea is not new, and a few people are already talking about it. I think it is about time now. I have done my part - who is the next guy who will finish him off from the legal perspective?

We need someone with the the ability to focus on the core issues without getting confused and distracted. There are many aspects of this scheme that stink to high heaven but when approaching the case from the legal perspective, one needs to have a clean structured strategy, and some of these issues might not matter too much while others are core and critical.

Nice to see you back here Gumbi. I always like to see you engaged, serving the public with your gifts to humanity. Keep up the good work! I know it is tiring to persuade these non-believers, but you might have to invest another full day of hard work. Today's theme is here.



Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.

See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

Should be a piece of cake. See Martin Armstrong Financial Advice: Do not buy the Low!.

He sells financial advice which is in conflict with what he is allowed to do, in conflict with his fine print.
Now over45, one of his happy clients as he likes to present himself, wants to sue us for publishing the evidence

Give me a break!

Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.

See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.

As long as you are here showing Martin Armstrong 's character, helping me to show it, giving me the opportunities, that is good. Keep up the good work. Keep posting here all day!

Now you have endless opportunities to provide the proofs, to prove me wrong. But don't forget, you will get the warning, the reminder any time.




Martin Armstrong is a charlatan, and he spent 11 years in jail for that reason but he has not changed.

Read this blog starting here to find out more about computerized fraud.

See armstrongecmscam.blogspot.com for a more compact view of major findings posted in this blog.