servicenode count

{
    "total" : 5,
    "obfcompat" : 5,
    "enabled" : 5,
    "inqueue" : 2
}

From the console. And those are the winners that are already working:


servicenode list


[
    {
        "rank" : 1,
        "txhash" : "21cfe749931b19f3e2fef9eda35b510ec74bb696e3e9b26f57a4c5e653006f62",
        "outidx" : 0,
        "status" : "ENABLED",
        "addr" : "BbHefUXsgc3Tt4zjBaVrXh23h2iCmHo65Y",
        "version" : 70710,
        "lastseen" : 1504317800,
        "activetime" : 29139,
        "lastpaid" : 1504318302
    },
    {
        "rank" : 2,
        "txhash" : "9b997a6d29711907f87fffa75e4170cc9c7de9dbe73e39c56ec16a251a4e0ea1",
        "outidx" : 0,
        "status" : "ENABLED",
        "addr" : "BdrbyPEQTNVwZc8XUqEL4wZYtCKANhJPzu",
        "version" : 70710,
        "lastseen" : 1504317831,
        "activetime" : 14159,
        "lastpaid" : 1504318282
    },
    {
        "rank" : 3,
        "txhash" : "b1c3e146b2834a00bcb40aace8936e9a1f078cb456a600837fab0fe80d061090",
        "outidx" : 0,
        "status" : "ENABLED",
        "addr" : "BfE9VzGRs4park8YcokkkXZ7Hzh3EPEhyz",
        "version" : 70710,
        "lastseen" : 1504318257,
        "activetime" : 1944241,
        "lastpaid" : 0
    },
    {
        "rank" : 4,
        "txhash" : "6670de4ba3cd07d35dd92cb6f3264452aa1536658008dc66852d352da157f7d7",
        "outidx" : 1,
        "status" : "ENABLED",
        "addr" : "BV9DSGMbhdAWAb8mbGGgEwFEkpCRSqDGFn",
        "version" : 70710,
        "lastseen" : 1504318235,
        "activetime" : 476827,
        "lastpaid" : 0
    },
    {
        "rank" : 5,
        "txhash" : "7055ce8f6bbece5aaad6ebe66e5d56343b5ee3fc8ac1fabe838b82034799196d",
        "outidx" : 0,
        "status" : "ENABLED",
        "addr" : "BWT6GLPsiHSNnoVVo85zJqa8qUJkfmWXiJ",
        "version" : 70710,
        "lastseen" : 1504318119,
        "activetime" : 1944103,
        "lastpaid" : 1504318131
    }
]

Salute

Maybe yes, but there is also the option of private insurance companies wanting to protect data only of their insured clients and only share it with its net of hospital. Also you can have different EMR's using protocols that allow their interconectability. I think that this is not a game of first one gets all, various blockchain healthcare startups are going to have their option.

Just my thoughts.

Not totally sure, but taking into account that this is only an open code app, what are going to be the charges? Programming?? As with emule link pages and users could be prosecuted, but I see very difficult in the case of the programmers. It's only code with legit uses.

Oh, please, guys, if I remember correctly the creapool is yours. I have bought 4GH/s to finish this fucking scrypt phase and now the pool is down. Sorry, but this is not serious.
I'm starting to lose too much money in this project. No, no, not comfortable with this.

Let's move this to 46368. Buying hash here and there to put the chain at work faster Let's see if the algo change goes smooth...

Oppps, I have entered here to make a question  It's already possible to make the swap or we have to wait at 15:00 UTC to make it??

Salute, fantastic project and thanks, lot of thanks.

Don't send anything to Bittrex. Wallet is waiting for update since this night at 1:00 UTC. You can read more in:


A little secret, taking into account the fantastic work of Blocknet team and Bittrex in this one for the moment, I have the impression we are going to see a new listing in Bittrex soon (just saying).

Kind advice, made a new bootstrap that at least surpasses that point.
I have about 30 wallets and follow about 50 threads in BCT. When I found a problem that I never saw before,  I directly ask, don't have time to search fuzzy and strange wallet behaviors.
And sorry but this is the first wallet I know capable of being stuck in the same point for more than a day. And I have synced tens of them.
Think about a coin swap to a new chain or something similar, because from an investor point of view, this is not a very good sign for the project.
Anyway, thank you for your help and good luck with the project.

Is there any bantime option or similar to avoid this???


After 36946 network is sending my wallet only orphan blocks. Lots of them... Is there any bantime or similar option to ban nodes which send orphan blocks???

The privacy characteristics of the coin make it very interesting, but it's the coin in which I have found more problems to sync in 4 years in crypto. Not a good signal...

Salute

Salute

No idea why does it need so much time to make the first payment. Usually, they start in two or three days. The ammount is the usual one with current difficulty.

Can someone share a copy of an updated blockchain (database + block0001.dat). After days I continue stucked in the same block.

Salute

It's stacking fine now. Probably some strange behaviour with code. OTOH, I haven't take a look into the code, but if blocktime its 720 sec, I have the impression min stake age is 2 days, 1440 blocks, and not 1, 720 blocks.

Salute

It's funny, I have the same message but when I enter in the minting tab I found two mature entries. I will let a bit more the wallet opened for stacking to check if it's a bug in the icon behaviour, in the stacking itself or it simply need a lot of time to change the icon state.

Salute

From experience from the past, let at least 24-48 hours from fork to ask for wallet deposit and withdrawal reopening. You will be lot more sure about chain stability and so on. Also ask to as much pool owners as you can to open a pool. Offer bounty if necessary. Try to avoid 50% attacks and double spending  from GPU farms (I have the impression someone is going to try it) this way.
Salute and good luck.
Salute

Another option, open eternitynode.conf and put a # at the beginning of every EN you want to quit. This way you can eliminate only part of the nodes while maintaining  the rest active.
Salute

New algo explorer and X11 pools list in the Ann would be really appreciated. O know you have a lot to do, but just in case you found some free time.

Salute

Trying to sync the wallet in version 1.3.0.0 on win10 but always get stuck in block 37257. Using the recommended conf file with 21 connections, so the problem seems not to come from there. Any thoughts??

Thanks and salute

This is the version in blocknet.co, I think it's not the last one as told in the other post. Thank you anyway.

Devs, try to solve this as soon as possible and kindly ask ocminer for a pool update. Have a pool with the new algo in sprnova is important IMHO.

Ah, and congrats for the quite successful swap.

Salute

Where can I found the last interim version of the wallet?? I'm unable to find it in the Ann or the web (v1.2.1.6 I think it's not the last version) and want to have the wallet updated before the production wallet is launched.

Thanks