Really text proof? Did you just not go on a long winded explanation of how all that can be faked yet you claim it as proof.
ah no but this is some clear proof here https://gist.github.com/atcsecure/cf6a478ef3169cefdc6dabout why this all started, and yeah I have the skype screenshots to back it up too! I'm very disappointed with what I am reading there. At what point were you planning to tell that to all the XC investors? Just spring it on us with an announcement?  Absolute not, it would have been done by a consensus vote of XC holders and only then if it was "approved" would it have happened |
|
|
|
The truth is that Mr Boh has an axe to grind, because he didn't want to merge SDC with XC as discussed with its lead developer. https://gist.github.com/atcsecure/cf6a478ef3169cefdc6d2nd - This conspiracy has blown way out of control, I never was behind cloak, in fact I called it a scam from day#! [ http://pastebin.com/TvJkKiCJ] 3rd - I was never the dev of any other coin than XC and blocknet, - I was never the hal dev, I did NOT WRITE ANY of its code 4th - I barely have enough time to manage my full-time business and XC and my family - how could I Have possibly had the time to do any thing else? 5th - Any involvement with PROM was stated publicly when it happened, check twitter and the forum for the record - and thats it 6th - Blocknet funds are going to be escrowed - there IS NO SCAM INVOLVED NOR HAVE I EVER BEEN INVOLVED IN ANY TYPE OF SCAM EVER!! It is sickening that a few people with false pretense have taken something that was already public knowledge and twisted it. I've spent over 1000 hours on XC, in order to bring some real value to this marketplace and bridge the gap into the business world with this technology, and the fact that a few paid troll's can cause this much havoc is complete insanity Get your FACTS straight before making an assumption by a paid troll Sincerely, Dan Metcalf +1 I think everybody needs to go back and read my statement again So who's paying who for this FUD campaign.. https://www.dropbox.com/s/s6zbpubnmxw2j4x/dumb%20%282%29.tiff?dl=0 |
|
|
|
I wanted to make a clear and concise statement about all of this mud slinging going around.... As everybody involved with XC's knows I did numerous freelance projects, some of which Prometheus was involved in, like KeyOS and Halc. Yesterday I was so frustrated with everything that was ALREADY PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE [stated on twitter and in the XC OP/ANN] being portrayed as some type of scam.. Accusing me of being Prometheus, accusing me of being the dev. of numerous coins and half the coins in blocknet...that I simply answered no to any and all questions. None of these allegations are true, I am DAN METCALF and I have never used any other account than ATCSECURE on this forum. Nor did I ever participate into any scam's, nor would I ever... the comments about XC's POW being stopped because I was paid off is a complete fabrication. What I find most interesting about this amount of FUD is that all the information was already public, and to think that I have all these alias's on this forum is complete insanity. My full statement on the matter can be viewed at http://www.atcsecure.com/blog/Official_Statement.pdfAlso blocknet's assets and funds will be held in escrow and released as development progress's. Blocknet is not a scam, but a legitimate project and proof of concept code will be available shortly. Sincerely, Dan Metcalf Dan you have only yourself to blame for destroying your reputation, sorry. You were well known and at some point respected... why use a seudonym? By definition, you know what that means: posting stuff that Dan Metcalf wouldn't. No two-ways about it. Not to mention the fact that having already one handle instead of your well known name makes quite difficult to believr you dont have others, whether true or not. The accusations are very specific. There's no avoiding it and it doesnt matter if they can be proven or not. Yhere's no burden of proof in crypto. Anf for ehst I have read, it's game, set and match for you. How can you even pretend any credibiliyy after reviewing your own code in HAL? Not to mention the actions that followed thrre... Bye bye Dan Metcalf. Think of another handle because as Dan Metcalf and "actsecure", you are done. What actions exactly? I am not the hal dev, I"ve stated that numerous times. I'm also not the cloak dev, i'm not the aero dev, I'm not involved in any type of coin-cartel.. |
|
|
|
Nice reply Dan, don't let them get to you.. It is disgusting what some of these morons are saying.. What is most amusing is face to face I would suggest none of them would have the bottle to even remotely question you, but where they can hide behind a keyboard they think its fair game....
Really really sad some people reduce themselves to this sort of behaviour.
I agree as well, all of my info is public and I'm not hiding behide anything.. bunch of cowards! |
|
|
|
So they exposed the truth about Dan.
Nope. The truth about Dan's code reviews and collaborations was made public at every point on the XC thread. There was nothing to expose. What they did is make it look like it was a dirty secret, when it wasn't. How does the fact that this information leak was premeditated take away from the fact that it's all now confirmed to be genuine? What's happened is that Prometheus has been subject to smear campaigns in the past that make him out to be a P&D scammer. Linking Dan to Prometheus therefore appears to wreck Dan's reputation. But the truth is that Prometheus is no paragon of virtue, but he is not a pump-and-dump scammer either. And Dan's link to coins Prometheus funds has not been a secret at any point. So what's all the fuss about? Hearsay about Prom; true records of conversations that have nonetheless been cut to put Prom in as negative a light as they can; another coin doing its best to destroy the competition. We have nothing to hide. Bring it all out. There is nothing to fear from the truth. How was Dan being involved in Halcyon public information? Why would someone involved with the coin do a supposedly unbiased code review? It was made public in the XC thread. There was even a press release about it. Why did everyone(especially you) vehemently deny that the chat logs were genuine? 1) I denied the validity of the entire smear campaign. 2) More specifically, I denied the validity of numerous pastebins and whatnot due to their being modified. 3) I denied the truthfulness of 00Smurf's screenshots because of (a) their having been cut in such a way as to present Prometheus in a negative light (b) their having been presented in the context of a smear campaign that guaranteed they would be misinterpreted. 3b is the subtlest point yet. Texts have two layers: the physical marks on a screen and the meaning they convey. In 00Smurf's case, the physical marks were probably only altered by cutting out sections. However the interpretive layer - the meaning - of the text was heavily and deceitfully modified by the smear campaign that it is a part of. Aero, Key and Halcyon are three of the most infamous pump and dumps. Prometheus' MO is already well known. - Is it? How so? Though a smear campaign? - There are many, many pumpers in crypto. I'm personally aware that several groups were pumping Hal, and that they were not in communication. - Just because something that Prometheus funds is dumped, it does not imply that Prometheus dumped it. None of this being related to him is an issue really. But the fact that Dan is involved with this scene goes directly against the image of unbiased and "one of crypto's best" that XC has been trying to portray him as. Well, this is the whole point that I'm contesting. Dan does work with Prometheus. But that does not imply that he's involved in a pump and dump operation. The truth is that he is not involved in a pump and dump operation. In the XC thread before it was closed not one person was saying "yeah, we all knew Dan was involved in Halcyon!". It was quite the opposite actually. If fact you deleted posts saying that. - I don't moderate the XC thread. - See the above press release about Dan being involved in Hal. - See the above posts about the two interpretive layers. Claims about Dan's involvement in Hal turn into FUD if uttered in an interpretive context that implies that such an association is illicit. Doing a code review under the pretense of being an unbiased third party was made public. Dan being having a major level of involvement in the development of Halcyon was never made public. From him developing their anon tech, to it being "Dan's coin", it's not clear exactly what level of involvement Dan had in it other than the fact that it was clearly a major part. Whether it was you or Teka who deleted the post(s?) about Dan's involvement in HAL doesn't really matter. I think at that time you were in control of Teka's account at the time as Teka was busy and couldn't moderate that thread. But whether it was you or him who deleted the post is irrelevant really. You tried to cover up the HAL connection from the start. Obviously unbiased code review is not equal to Dan being involved in HAL. Not at all. In fact it specifically implies that he as NO involvement in the project. This is an untrue statement I was not a developer for hal, did I make recommendations based on what I found on the review YES, but outside of that, there was no involvement in the project.. |
|
|
|
Reading is the key to success I wanted to make a clear and concise statement about all of this mud slinging going around.... As everybody involved with XC's knows I did numerous freelance projects, some of which Prometheus was involved in, like KeyOS and Halc. Yesterday I was so frustrated with everything that was ALREADY PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE [stated on twitter and in the XC OP/ANN] being portrayed as some type of scam.. Accusing me of being Prometheus, accusing me of being the dev. of numerous coins and half the coins in blocknet...that I simply answered no to any and all questions. None of these allegations are true, I am DAN METCALF and I have never used any other account than ATCSECURE on this forum. Nor did I ever participate into any scam's, nor would I ever... the comments about XC's POW being stopped because I was paid off is a complete fabrication. What I find most interesting about this amount of FUD is that all the information was already public, and to think that I have all these alias's on this forum is complete insanity. My full statement on the matter can be viewed at http://www.atcsecure.com/blog/Official_Statement.pdfAlso blocknet's assets and funds will be held in escrow and released as development progress's. Blocknet is not a scam, but a legitimate project and proof of concept code will be available shortly. Sincerely, Dan Metcalf It wasn't public knowledge though. At all. It was only known by a select few in some inner circle of altcoin manipulation. He did a code review for Halcyon under the pretense that he was an unbiased third party. You don't see the problem with that? I was an unbiased 3rd party, I didn't write HAL, didn't write cloak [called it a scam] http://pastebin.com/TvJkKiCJ, I'm not some mastermind behind all of these coins as alluded to by several people, instead I'm XC's developer and this all started with SDC [ https://gist.github.com/atcsecure/cf6a478ef3169cefdc6d] - Mr Boh is just an upset SDC investor with an axe to grind and now has created this giant conspriancy theory that I am some evil mastermind behind this cartel of coins... nothing could be further from the truth |
|
|
|
Really text proof? Did you just not go on a long winded explanation of how all that can be faked yet you claim it as proof.
ah no but this is some clear proof here https://gist.github.com/atcsecure/cf6a478ef3169cefdc6dabout why this all started, and yeah I have the skype screenshots to back it up too! |
|
|
|
The truth is that Mr Boh has an axe to grind, because he didn't want to merge SDC with XC as discussed with its lead developer. https://gist.github.com/atcsecure/cf6a478ef3169cefdc6d2nd - This conspiracy has blown way out of control, I never was behind cloak, in fact I called it a scam from day#! [ http://pastebin.com/TvJkKiCJ] 3rd - I was never the dev of any other coin than XC and blocknet, - I was never the hal dev, I did NOT WRITE ANY of its code 4th - I barely have enough time to manage my full-time business and XC and my family - how could I Have possibly had the time to do any thing else? 5th - Any involvement with PROM was stated publicly when it happened, check twitter and the forum for the record - and thats it 6th - Blocknet funds are going to be escrowed - there IS NO SCAM INVOLVED NOR HAVE I EVER BEEN INVOLVED IN ANY TYPE OF SCAM EVER!! It is sickening that a few people with false pretense have taken something that was already public knowledge and twisted it. I've spent over 1000 hours on XC, in order to bring some real value to this marketplace and bridge the gap into the business world with this technology, and the fact that a few paid troll's can cause this much havoc is complete insanity Get your FACTS straight before making an assumption by a paid troll Sincerely, Dan Metcalf |
|
|
|
Can you clarify how did you get this and if you got more? https://i.imgur.com/EEc9xf2.pngThe same things that you said at the beggining regarding the Skype jpgs can be applied for this one also. Just doing the advocate of the devil here. If they are legit and you got more publish all of them. No I can NOT confirm it is legit. << anything can be photoshopped >> I'm not going to waste any more time or energy on any this crap, I've got work to do. |
|
|
|
Has the ITO coins from BTER been returned to Devs or are they still on the site?
Also, how many tokens were sold on BTER before it got taken down?
It was not taken down, it is still listed for trading.. they were doing a server upgrade https://bter.com/trade/BLOCK_BTC |
|
|
|
I wanted to make a clear and concise statement about all of this mud slinging going around.... As everybody involved with XC's knows I did numerous freelance projects, some of which Prometheus was involved in, like KeyOS and Halc. Yesterday I was so frustrated with everything that was ALREADY PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE [stated on twitter and in the XC OP/ANN] being portrayed as some type of scam.. Accusing me of being Prometheus, accusing me of being the dev. of numerous coins and half the coins in blocknet...that I simply answered no to any and all questions. None of these allegations are true, I am DAN METCALF and I have never used any other account than ATCSECURE on this forum. Nor did I ever participate into any scam's, nor would I ever... the comments about XC's POW being stopped because I was paid off is a complete fabrication. What I find most interesting about this amount of FUD is that all the information was already public, and to think that I have all these alias's on this forum is complete insanity. My full statement on the matter can be viewed at http://www.atcsecure.com/blog/Official_Statement.pdfAlso blocknet's assets and funds will be held in escrow and released as development progress's. Blocknet is not a scam, but a legitimate project and proof of concept code will be available shortly. Sincerely, Dan Metcalf |
|
|
|
Why not post both of Dans replies (That answer all questions) under the first post in this thread and be done?
Thats what im frustrated with, it can be so easy but all made so bloody difficult. Most of these clowns should be ashamed of themselves. Dan has some serious accusations on him and has treated it like a bit of a joke really.. How do you expect me to treat it when I see things like Dan Metcalf = Prom , and everything else that is being posted by a bunch of newbie accounts? |
|
|
|
I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted
Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all
1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!)
2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did)
3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent)
4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this?
5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent)
6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with)
7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one?
8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all)
9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to?
If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on.
as I stated before I answered all these questions, no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was my idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way, the code reviews are not outsource as I've been programming for 35 years Dan Metcalf Thanks for answering some of the questions im still interested if Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one? NOHave you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with) Code reviews are public informationHave you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent) NO |
|
|
|
I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted
Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all
1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!)
2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did)
3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent)
4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this?
5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent)
6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with)
7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one?
8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all)
9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to?
If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on.
as I stated before I answered all these questions, no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way, the code reviews are not outsource as I've been programming for 35 years Dan Metcalf No, no, i'm asking you to answer them here in a cohesive manner. Avoiding it is again highly suspicious. Its alarming how you just wont answer them but plan on commenting anyways! Are you that stupid? can't you fucking read? "no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way" You can't even FUD properly? Common!!!!! WTF? he didn't answer them how i asked so being a clown and buzz of How you asked? WTF.... GTFO, I answered the questions |
|
|
|
I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted
Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all
1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!)
2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did)
3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent)
4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this?
5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent)
6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with)
7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one?
8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all)
9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to?
If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on.
as I stated before I answered all these questions, no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was my idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way, the code reviews are not outsource as I've been programming for 35 years Dan Metcalf No, no, i'm asking you to answer them here in a cohesive manner. Avoiding it is again highly suspicious. Its alarming how you just wont answer them but plan on commenting anyways! Dude I did answer them, in order just separate out the comma's and each one is the answer to the question in the listed order... |
|
|
|
I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted
Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all
1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!)
2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did)
3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent)
4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this?
5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent)
6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with)
7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one?
8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all)
9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to?
If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on.
as I stated before I answered all these questions, no i did not develop hal, no i did not develop for uitl, blocknet was my idea/formulation alone thus no p&d groups involved in it setup, the coins were chosen based specific tech they bring to the table, and other coins requested access, no prom was not involved in coin selection, all the information about the code reviews was public at the time they happened, no prom has never funded me in any way, the code reviews are not outsource as I've been programming for 35 years Dan Metcalf |
|
|
|
Possible Iconic Expert is behind it as well, just like he was in Cloakcoin.
i have been told Prom is Bobsurplus and that is IconicExpert too http://pastebin.com/QLYy2uLjcheck out that IRC log of Cloak and Dan etc.. did you invest in their Cloak Movie or Cloak Retirement fund ? Or Cloak Apparel ? Dan in that log said Cloak should be worth $400 a coin LOL they lured noobs into the web of IRC lies and pumping hype bullshit then preyed on them.. where is that coin now ? movie complete ? I'm not in the log, cloak asked me for a review, which I never DID.. so GTFO with your bullshit it clearly says in the LOG that they wanted to ask me to do a review.... seriously |
|
|
|
I've answered all of these questions already, go back and research the information for yourself |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
