We sold shares of the company+tokens, since we are a legal equity we did this via sale shares.
The burden of proof still lies on the project now. So many unpleasant experiences have gone to prove just how cheap words are in crypto and the need to have proofs that are just as immutable as the product being developed |
|
|
|
Man, still holding some of these from the presale days. Glad to see they're still around and will be demoing their product, but they really need to step up community engagement and communication. Their TG group is barely getting any attention it seems with a pinned message that goes as far back as November last year
I am right there with you. Been holding these tokens ever since they were done with the ICO which is months now and yet they still couldn't find a good decent exchange that is willing to list them. Wonder why they seem unable to get on Idex. It's just another ERC20 token and IDEX still remains of one the better dexs out there. Could also try switchneo. However, at their current rate of engagement, getting answers to that is going to take another decade |
|
|
|
Under this new management will the roadmap differ or Persona is still going to continue on its existing one? Also, could you shed any light into the possible runway the project now has under the new management? |
|
|
|
|
That FUD got out of hand fast. It also shows how much startup need PR department or personnel that can anticipate and get in front of the narrative before the brand is damaged or exploited by both internal and external actors
|
|
|
|
|
Does cardstack have an adoption roadmap? Really starting to feel the project isn't gaining enough traction or even use cases. Maybe the team should also look at making it blockchain agnostic or interoperability features. There's just too many "Web 3.0" projects out there that seem to be 3.0ing better
|
|
|
|
|
Man, still holding some of these from the presale days. Glad to see they're still around and will be demoing their product, but they really need to step up community engagement and communication. Their TG group is barely getting any attention it seems with a pinned message that goes as far back as November last year
|
|
|
|
The first webinar will be held on September 18 to explain how Blockchain affects Telemedicine. What benefits can medical workers get
I'm sure people too can't wait to see the explanation from the Webinar It`s simple they scammed the investors by selling them a worthless token, I quote there CEO miss 419 Chrissa McFarlane " Patientory doesn’t rely on users owning tokens" Source: https://www.coindesk.com/this-crypto-is-worth-less-than-1-cent-vcs-are-betting-millions-on-its-futureIn the normal world that would been called a scam! Chrissa McFarlane sould be arrested and pun in prison. This useless token has already been sold to investors. And about the punishment, I agree. When the ICO took place - specific promises were made for investors - at the moment they are not fulfilled. The PTOY token costs less than a cent, although the price during the sale is $ 1. Im feeling doubt if the team that has already posted used the real identities, it looks like they are fake https://icobench.com/ico/patientory/teamYou can try to check them all through their linkedin accounts and it looks very strange while one of these guys have so many companies. Scam coin. Pretty sure the coindesk article would have looked up their identities - especially the founder's - before going to the press with that writeup. Not unusually also to see folks with fingers in numerous crypto pies though it does little to assuage concerns can't trust it too fast because we must find out more information, not a few who consider fake but can't be blamed they also want to be careful. maybe clarification is best solution for participants Completely understand the concern, after all, if one project is successful enough, there wouldn't be any need to pursue others and even if they are all successful, there's just as much hours in the day and not enough hands (and brainpower) to multitask. Clarifications and most importantly, a new and specific roadmap for the token, will certainly go a long way in addressing concerns |
|
|
|
The first webinar will be held on September 18 to explain how Blockchain affects Telemedicine. What benefits can medical workers get
I'm sure people too can't wait to see the explanation from the Webinar It`s simple they scammed the investors by selling them a worthless token, I quote there CEO miss 419 Chrissa McFarlane " Patientory doesn’t rely on users owning tokens" Source: https://www.coindesk.com/this-crypto-is-worth-less-than-1-cent-vcs-are-betting-millions-on-its-futureIn the normal world that would been called a scam! Chrissa McFarlane sould be arrested and pun in prison. This useless token has already been sold to investors. And about the punishment, I agree. When the ICO took place - specific promises were made for investors - at the moment they are not fulfilled. The PTOY token costs less than a cent, although the price during the sale is $ 1. Im feeling doubt if the team that has already posted used the real identities, it looks like they are fake https://icobench.com/ico/patientory/teamYou can try to check them all through their linkedin accounts and it looks very strange while one of these guys have so many companies. Scam coin. Pretty sure the coindesk article would have looked up their identities - especially the founder's - before going to the press with that writeup. Not unusually also to see folks with fingers in numerous crypto pies though it does little to assuage concerns |
|
|
|
|
Seems like the project's finally getting off the ground after sputtering so much. Sort of forgotten about the asset after the realities of the bear market set in and the exuberance died. Glad to see they're still hanging in there
|
|
|
|
|
I have one caveat for selling all my shitcoins and contributing to this amazing ICO. When you get to 2009, you have to promise you will find me and tell my younger self crypto is no magic internet money. He'll understand the rest
|
|
|
|
We are happy to announce our first client of specialized crypto legal services...
Could you introduce us to who you really are first? I get that the focus here is on your client rather than you, but it's just as well that the exact nature of the relationship/partnership be clarified for us |
|
|
|
|
The narrative on telegram is wholly different from what is being perpetrated here. If there's any such bankruptcy or scam going on, the folks on telegram seems to be extremely chill about going under and even ranking Nimiq as one of the top projects that will survive the ongoing shakeout in the industry. Such a headscratcher
|
|
|
|
What a riot. Caught for plagiarism and their argument is "they copied the existing"? Not an original bone in them or could not be bothered to acknowledged and adapt the existing for their own purpose. What else could possibly go wrong? |
|
|
|
|
Still trying to wrap my head around this. Distribution of the total supply is 100% via airdrop? If it is, then where are the sells coming from and what's this whole thing about IEO and buying to hold all about?
|
|
|
|
The design is insanely cool, why do you mark it as SCAM?
The OP was the one that got outted as a scam rather than the project. He was promoting another project that had all the attribute of a ponzi as you can see here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=165790It's always easier to check the trust reputation for reasons why |
|
|
|
What's the rationale behind basing your messenger on Mattermost?
What made it the preferred choice compared to others and how is your messenger going to step out of mattermost's shadow to establish its own identity?
Is there likely to be brand conflict between your messenger and its inspiration?
As far as I understand from reading the wp, they use a controlled messaging application (in this case mattermost) not to depend on a third party, when the amfeed businesses start. All related businesses will be in that place, being able to control spam and have everything organized. But the team can explain it to us better  I see. However, discord could achieve just as much without the need to commandeer an entire app development. I'm more worried if Mattermost licensing allows people to fork their product for public use. Feels like a legal case down the line |
|
|
|
|
Without a WP at the moment, there's no much to go on with other than a snazzy looking site. A roadmap on the site too could have helped form some vague conception. Ant ETA on when proper documentations will be coming out?
|
|
|
|
|
What's the rationale behind basing your messenger on Mattermost?
What made it the preferred choice compared to others and how is your messenger going to step out of mattermost's shadow to establish its own identity?
Is there likely to be brand conflict between your messenger and its inspiration?
|
|
|
|
|
Surprised to see this product still around. Even more surprised to see they are actually trying to onboard more stakeholders into their ecosystem. I'm more interested on what their progress on this claim is "BABB will enable central banks to issue their own digital currencies to stimulate the local microeconomy"
|
|
|
|
|
Time to return to this project I guess. The whole cryptopia snafu threw me off. It's no fun knowing you have xxx worth but unable to access it because shit exchange. Purely my fault for dragging my rear end over moving the asset off the exchange of course.
Time to start accumulating again
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
