What the**? thats ridiculous for me that was unacceptable and too much it's better to leave that shitty exchange It's not worthy to stay there, instead of wasting any of our resources with Latoken exchange It's better to use those popular crypto exchange with a good volume and not charging any unnecessary hidden fees I'm using Binance since 2017 but I was never charged any fees because I'm not active.

I'm using an Atomic wallet before and it was a multi-coin and noncustodial wallet. It means you are the one who controls your keys and seeds. But It was too buggy before that force me to choose another wallet to used and this time it was Imtoken wallet 2.0. Actually I'm also using an old Imtoken wallet before but due to my increasing requirements for storing other coins, I replaced it until Imtoken launch its 2.0 multi-coin wallet with built-in exchange and other functions. so far I'm very contented with Imtoken wallet 2.0. with user-friendly UI and for me, it was a flawless wallet.

In this current market situation, I think it's not possible to happen after idle and no development in two years the project eventually die without any liquidity and it's very hard to survive without any adequate source of funds thats why after 2 years of waiting for the bounty payment to arrive is just hopeless I never encountered that long before getting paid in the bounty campaigns that I promote.

The Ethereum 2.0 upgrade has produced mix reaction in the Ethereum community there were some positive while others were against the 32 Eth staking minimum and IMO, it's too big for us the ordinary Eth users It should be downgraded to a minimal and affordable amount, not 32 Eth it was a costly thing to many and I'm afraid it will not do well to many Eth users.

In the early days of the IEO crazed, I have already participated in some of the popular crypto exchange IEO campaigns namely from Kucoin, Coinbene, Binance, etc and it gives me a decent profit. But after they change the system to the lottery and ticket method, it was very hard to participate because it was a pure luck-based system so if you are not lucky enough to be chosen you cannot buy some IEO coins/tokens so it's useless.

I believe it was highly possible, but when? I really don't know. especially this time that the world is experiencing a big health problem brought by COVID-19 pandemic. But the cryptocurrency industry is resilient and a lot of potentials and it works in different ways than we expected so in cryptocurrency everything is possible so IMO, 1000X Or even 2000X growth was still possible.

The digital Yuan can compete with the existing cryptocurrencies in China, but it cannot dominate all cryptocurrencies in the global arena. the important thing why cryptocurrencies are thriving till today because it was decentralized while the digital Yuan is not it's obvious it was controlled by a centralized entity like the Chinese Central Bank (CCB) so I think the investors are still considering Bitcoin, Eth and other cryptocurrencies over the digital yuan.

I think Olportal is not a crap project its a legitimate project with real and already working product, The announcement regarding CoinAll listing was postponed due to CoinAll temporarily suspension of all new listing due to the COVID-19 effect while regarding Okex listing I think it needs time just be patient mate, give them enough time. If Coinsbit listing is not good for Olportal token price will thats another side of the story and let the project team handle that problem.

Actually, the ICO's are not totally dead or disappearing it was just slowing the process in the last 2 years because of many different reasons like fraud's and scams also the longest bearish market situation that forcing many investors to hold temporarily all of its crypto investing sorties, ICO's and IEO's can co-exist but it needs to be more transparent especially in terms of audit and security of funds.   

The social media channels are very important for all projects because it was like an active medium or information portal for the project's progress and development, achievements, listing, and promotion, etc. without social media, all of those crypto projects are boring and in a hard time to disseminate all the information they want to share for all of its investors, users and supporters. Thats why for me social media serves as an important part of all crypto projects today.  

I think there was a particular project that has trying to resurrect those dead coins/token. But it was not successful and also abandon by its developer for whatever reason I don't know! But why are those good and prospective projects are failed? I think there was a logical explanation behind these unsuccessful projects I don't believe that it was just a simple funding project. or maybe the creator is not aiming for the long term or maybe the creator is just planning for something quick money who knows? The crypto industry has a lot of this modus.

I think the crackdown was already initiated most of the privacy equipped cryptocurrency is in big trouble because many governments particularly the United States wants to regulate the crypto industry and they are worried about those privacy coins because it is very hard to track and identify those transactions due to its privacy features thats why if we recall in the previous months those privacy coins are already threatened to delist on many regulated cryptocurrency exchanges globally because of that privacy features issue.

Some bounty managers are limiting its participants already in their respective bounty campaigns and also implementing the first come first serve basis, In some instances, they are not allowing newbie participants to join in their bounty campaign and also those forum members that have negative trust are also prohibited to join in the most of bounty campaigns. one of the many problems in the most bounty campaign nowadays is the small budget allocation, and a too-long period before getting paid, 6 months to 1 year. to be exact.  for me it's better to limit the participants if the budget allocation was small.

One of the few old coins that quietly working at the background, I remember when Nano was hit the all-time high price at $36 sometime in Jan 2018 if I'm not mistaken, I feel regret because was sold my Nano early in 2017 until now I remember it as one of my stupid moves, other than Ethereum, By the way, Nano can surely compete the race to mainstream adoption because of its many useful features and functions to offer like feeless transactions due to the block-lattice its a kind of data structure in which all of each account have their own blockchain rather than competing with others on a central chain thats quite amazing and it is also fast like those DAG-based chains.

I'm also traded XRP in Binance I don't see any abnormality going on, the XRP price trends remain stable as we speak $0.20+ per XRP is not bad for a 100 billion coin total supply. if the Ripple team sells some of its coins. I think there is enough reason why they do that so why we feel aggravated about it we should move on guys. But if we bought XRP on its peak for me thats a different story. I'm judging only base on the situation because those people who buy XRP during its peak has a valid reason to shout it out.

I think EOS has a good reputation and a top-ranking cryptocurrency on CMC, but honestly speaking it's a complicated coin to use but just limited of sending transaction because of the CPU, RAM, and NET requirements its difficult to use for those newcomers But overall its a potential coin for investment and its worthy to pour some investment, actually I'm holding some EOS on Binance. 

I think thats not true $400 Million for a website what a costly acquisition, I think Binance won't pay that much. By the way, let us point the main issue here before Binance acquired CMC it's already stained with an accusation of listing unverified projects that later on become an exit scam. not just that some technical people are questioning the method of CMC's calculation on the market cap of any coin that listed on the CMC platform. so what trust would be broke if it was already broken just my opinion.!

You have a piece of technical knowledge and expertise to develop a system from scratch but you have no funds to support it. I think you need an investor or at least you can conduct an ICO to raise some funds, just present your project to the community, and if it is an original or a unique idea and not a copy from existing projects I think many investors will support it. In terms of promotion its hard to promote a project nowadays without money involves only the bounty hunters who are eager to promote an ICO project without any guarantee to be paid. thats the reality today. 

I think your OP title "Which is safer, USDT or Binance USD?" is confusing regarding your point which is the interest rate. But let me answer this way if the interest rates of BUSD deposits are much higher compare to USDT deposit it is better to go for BUSD because it was offering much higher interest rates and of course BUSD is a stable coin guaranteed by Binance exchange as a Binance user since 2017 I can say that it was a trusted exchange platform and much safer compare to others.  

This is the sad reality nowadays more and more bounty campaigns works that got wasted and not paying bounty hunters and accusing anything beyond just to avoid paying its obligation. this is a lesson to learn now especially those bounty managers that before posting any campaigns the payment should settle first in escrow or any other safekeeping method for the bounty tokens. for this concern, those projects are just wanted a free promotion without payment thats the new normal these days. for me, its a wake-up call to avoid those bounty campaigns without any payment guarantee.