Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 05:43:23 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 [72] 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 ... 258 »
1421  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Why is transaction not broadcast? on: December 07, 2013, 06:39:40 PM
I made a few withrawals from online wallet/exchange.  The ones that are for 1.0 btc are immediately shown on blockchain.info.... but the ones for .78xxxxx are not shown and it has been awhile now.  Why is that?  And the status has been processed...

How long could the .72xxxxxx amts take to arrive?
please wait a few more days for the transaction to confirm, or contact the exchange.
1422  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Is it possible to crack a private key missing 1 number or letter? on: December 07, 2013, 04:51:53 AM
In your case, there's no need. The private key import format contains a checksum. All you need to do to verify whether your key was copied correctly is import it into bitcoin-qt. it will prompt you if the checksum mismatches.
1423  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I have over 33,000 bitcoins. on: December 06, 2013, 06:32:35 PM
give us the address holding the alleged 33000 bitcoins + signature or gtfo
1424  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Be careful folks. Just got hacked, lost some BTC today. on: December 06, 2013, 05:40:10 PM
Today, approximately 3 hours ago, it was withdrawn to a Bitcoin wallet "in Moscow" according to blockchain.info's block explorer.

Here's the transaction in question: https://blockchain.info/tx/6fe852a0c72f3195a84a0cbf46984a50d905923a4b9d1390af3d0bf14d3a7232
that means the transaction originated from moscow, most likely by the exchange that held the funds. it's not the ip address of the address the funds were withdrawn to.
1425  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bitcoin memory usage on: December 06, 2013, 04:18:16 PM
How is it running at the moment for you?

My bitcoind is also consuming more and more memory over the time... 590 mb usually.. and then growing growing up to more than 1 gb after some days..

Anybody knows how to prevent this?
I set maxconnections to 20, but it didnt change anything..
connections do not increase memory usage that much. the biggest factor in usage increase is the growing memory pool for transactions. there is no way to clear the memory pool, or set a limit for it. the only remedy is increasing ram capacity, increasing swap, or restarting the daemon regularly.
1426  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: ATTENTION: Top 10 Most Trusted...Websites To Buy & Sell Bitcoins on: December 05, 2013, 11:44:14 PM
Can a mod delete this thread?  It's obviously trying to bait people into visiting scam sites...
Sorry, but my hands are tied. Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor.
1427  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Flaw in Bitcoin? (video) on: December 05, 2013, 09:40:38 PM
duplicate topic, see: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=359051.0
1428  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Can I pay a miner to confirm an unconfirmed transaction? on: December 05, 2013, 05:03:20 PM
Yes https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=232979.0
1429  Economy / Goods / Re: *IN HAND* PS4 for sale! New in box (still sealed) Free Shipping! $620 on: December 03, 2013, 11:33:57 PM
Bitcoiners hate PS4?
bitcoiners hate paying 50% markup on a console.
1430  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What is the minimum IQ needed to understand Bitcoin on a basic level? on: December 03, 2013, 11:04:05 PM
ITT: people thinking IQ is a comprehensive measure of intelligence.
1431  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: How bitcoin-qt generate address and how do I know they are really random? on: December 03, 2013, 10:30:46 PM
but computer can not generate reall random numbers.. Is there a way to create a bitcoin address that is connected to something I add .. like a string that I can add..?

go to http://bitaddress.org/, use the "brainwallet" option.

inb4 inevitable "MY BRAIN WALLET WAS HACKED!"
1432  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Recover wallet.dat on win 8.1 on: December 03, 2013, 06:55:43 PM
OK I did what you said but I didn't see any difference. I had 1 transaction in 2013 but didn't appear. Also I had some coins in that didn't appear also.

What did I do wrong?  Huh


check here is it in the correct directory???

http://img854.imageshack.us/img854/9907/qafj.png

it appears you have a wallet.dat renamed as "btwall.dat". have you tried using that as your wallet file?
1433  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Mailbit.io allows you to easily verify your ownership of a bitcoin wallet on: December 03, 2013, 05:43:33 PM
2. Apply a 'catch all' on the mailserver allowing you to basically email any user on @mailbit.io even if it wasn't created yet. So you can basically send an email to 13bdG3V2yrpnxkugVQ3Xzipmrbu5pmrDbg@mailbit.io with some content and when/if someone will ever register and validate that account he will be able to see the email you sent.
I can see this being exploited into using the site as a mailinator clone.
1434  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: If you could create an exchange... on: December 03, 2013, 01:55:39 AM
1. go to services discussion
2. see what all the complaints about exchanges are. hint: it's AML and withdraw times
3. Huh
4. make your superior exchange
1435  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Someone made an unauthorized transcation from my wallet? on: December 03, 2013, 01:53:57 AM
I did indeed use an online waller - blockchain.
Can't be the last two, possibly the first or second.

What can I do?


EDIT: I will be giving out a bounty equal to about a hundred dollars in bitcoin to whoever helps me recover my lost funds.
you can't recover it. the money has been sent to the thief's address and it can't be reversed.
1436  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: "Virgin" coins at a premium? on: December 03, 2013, 01:25:48 AM
no one would buy them except for high profile scammers like pirateat40 because a simple deposit-withdraw cycle at a exchange will sufficiently remove taint. no one would sell to high profile scammers because they're going to take all the heat when they try to spend their coins. with coinjoin already possible (at the protocol level), there's no need to buy virign coins anymore.
1437  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: .1 BTC to anyone who can fix my wallet on: December 03, 2013, 12:03:50 AM
see: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=232979.0 under "How do I resend a transaction with extra fee?"

or if trust me, you can send your wallet file and I'll do it for you.
1438  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: 7 gpus on a single motherboard is posible? on: December 02, 2013, 10:28:17 PM
Im planing to use all cards with risers but ... all risers must be with molex or just the 1x?
if you leave out the molex, there's a chance that the riser will burn due to too high current..
1439  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Idea on the "Blocks are [not] full problem" on: December 02, 2013, 09:01:36 PM
Exactly.  Are the core devs treating this issue seriously?  In my opinion it's the biggest threat to Bitcoin's future.  The blockchain transactions-per-second needs to get MUCH higher in order to support the future that we all want.

If bitcoin becomes a low-TPS system with high fees that is only viable for moving millions of dollars, and all other transactions move off blockchain, then I think Bitcoin will collapse since it loses its main feature that is appealing (ie. peer-to-peer payments).
that said, it's important to note that bitcoin is not for micropayments.

250 is the default in the reference software. A simpler hypothesis than miners performing some complex orphaning cost benefit analysis is that they don't care to change the defaults.
An easy way to test that hypothesis would be to change the default to 1 MB and see how many miners suddenly start creating larger blocks.
for a pool admin, it's trivial to change the "soft" block size in bitcoin-qt
1440  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Idea on the "Blocks are [not] full problem" on: December 02, 2013, 07:51:12 PM
this solves the block propagation problem, but it still doesn't solve the problem of TXs eating up a full node's hard drive space.
Pages: « 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 [72] 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 ... 258 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!