Signature advertisements have gotten more and more "creative" and annoying over the past few years. Unlike forum banner ads, they can't be hidden and can show up multiple times per page so they can significantly clutter up each topic. Blocking them with ABP is futile because the filters are limited to blocking a particular user's signature. To address this problem, I have developed a script that detects "annoying" signatures and blocks them. It doesn't use a blacklist, but rather a scoring system for each signature. If the score exceeds a certain threshold, the signature is hidden. Preliminarily testing shows that most signature advertisements are blocked (exceptions are ads with little formatting). Screenshot: (note how only the annoying ads in the first 3 signatures are blocked, but the tame signature at the bottom is untouched)  Download (updated 2018-03-13; reason: changed host to github.com): UserscriptSignatureAdblock.user.js (0.5.1) Installation: Firefox extensionhttps://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/bitcointalk-signature-adblock/Works for mobile and desktop versions, but only recommended for mobile. Dekstop users should use the userscript. |
|
|
|
|
This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
Reason: referral link
|
|
|
|
|
This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
Reason: advertisement
|
|
|
|
|
This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
Reason: not bitcoin related
|
|
|
|
|
This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
Reason: duplicate topic
|
|
|
|
Luke-Jr tried to install malware on gentoo users
Misleading much? His distribution of bitcoind ignored satoshidice transactions. That's very far from malware. You'd expect that a global moderator in the biggest bitcoin forum would be familiar with the definition of malware...  I'll take the bait. Is refusing to relay certain transactions hostile? intrusive? no. It's certainly not a virus, worm, trojan horse. Nor does it spy on you or hold your computer for ransom. I'm saying what luke-jr did was right, but there's no need to overblow everything. |
|
|
|
I trashcanned the topic because it was a begging thread. It has since been restored to archival.
Thanks. Can OP make changes to his posts in an archived topic ? No, because the topic is locked. However, I suspect that OP was the person who locked the topic so he could very well unlock it. So I unlocked then relocked the topic to prevent that. |
|
|
|
|
I trashcanned the topic because it was a begging thread. It has since been restored to archival.
|
|
|
|
Luke-Jr tried to install malware on gentoo users
Misleading much? His distribution of bitcoind ignored satoshidice transactions. That's very far from malware. |
|
|
|
Hello I need a loan of 0.1-0.25
I will be repaying In 1week
Th reason I need it is to buy college clothes since I'm going to college to become a successful mathematician
so you'll totally be able to produce a timestamped acceptance letter, right? |
|
|
|
I don't think he can chargeback EA games if he has bought a legal key cause all these digital good deals are final.
risk is still there if it's carded. |
|
|
|
|
This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
Reason: fraud
|
|
|
|
Creating a bootstrap.dat file not an optimal solution because bitcoind will need to verify the data upon import, which takes a significant amount of time. The best solution would be to stop bitcoind, and copy the entire ~/.bitcoin folder. but if you insist on using bootstrap.dat, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/tree/master/contrib/linearize |
|
|
|
I'm still not sure what you're saying.
All these features can be achieved via command line and all these commands can be accessed via RPC so the functionalities are available that way.
Are you asking for command shortcuts so things are as easy to code as using the UI? That's a lot to ask. That's not normally how command-line apps work.
RPC is intended to be used by programs/scripts so it needs to be flexible and have low-level methods. The script itself can implement the required logic.
Consider this, an application that uses xinput to drive the QT-client so as to gain access to the extra features it offers.... Ridiculous right! If there is a good function or subroutine, then it should be exposed as an API extension... Not buried away as part of a user interface. Why do I have a feeling that you're just too incompetent/lazy to use the raw transactions API? |
|
|
|
Not sure how they would be able to profit from this though.  for the aliexpress link: cookie stuffing |
|
|
|
|
This topic has been moved to Trashcan.
Reason: begging
|
|
|
|
Besides that, every 25 points you have, gives you a chance to win another 0.05. In order to win that, you need to guess one letter and 2 numbers right (e.g. D29, Z97 and T05).
This is the sha 256 hash of the 1 letter and 2 numbers: 8f5faaf481f49ae360bceaa840c7be6e9f1c60d8ad034bda8a7705f7bf2f9a0d
I was bored and wrote a program to bruteforce every possible combination of 1 letter and 2 numbers and none of them has the hash that you provided. Care to explain? |
|
|
|
|
I did some quick tests and it seems like they pull the pages on demand and then cache it afterwards.
|
|
|
|
if you click the link, you'll see that the $19/year offer is no longer available. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
