They cant fake Letter of Guarantee -----START SIGNING BITCOIN ADDRESS----- 1BitmixerEiyyp3eTLaCpgBbhYERs48qza -----END SIGNING BITCOIN ADDRESS-----
-----START LETTER OF GUARANTEE----- We hereby confirm that BITMIXER.IO has generated the address 19i3Gzpaa3SEuDgbUn6cxzPAW3MZ8nKw8B in order to transfer incoming amount (minus fee) to the following addresses:
100% to 1N6T1QQG6tGnAMTFHwgb84ASBKoroM22bN
This service will be only available for all bitcoins received from April 14, 2015, 14:25 to April 15, 2015, 2:25 GMT with minimum amount of 0.01 BTC. Our fee is 0.7132% + 0.0005 BTC for every forward address. This letter is digitally signed by our main account: 1BitmixerEiyyp3eTLaCpgBbhYERs48qza. Stay protected and thank you for your services. -----END LETTER OF GUARANTEE-----
-----START DIGITAL SIGNATURE----- GzrUf/JUe9IiNReoowZtk0g4whVZB/d1mQ7ULQsHP9RruSEwNH/A/kHQhXK458AhViGp3JVw+2WByS+RN5+MbQA= -----END DIGITAL SIGNATURE-----
Bitmixer.io should add warning to their site
|
|
|
Will take a look later. Wins during free spins are tripled? I mean option to gamble wins (red,black), most common feature on slot games
|
|
|
No KYC verification, provably fair slots and instant payouts
If I'm not wrong, these features already available. For example, if you consider For fortune jack site, they no need to KYC verification to withdraw or deposit and they also got many good probably games to choose. They payment system is also almost instant. It depends. CoinRoyale, Bitcoinrush , Bitcoinvideopoker are not provably fair (reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1494470.0) On FortuneJack only one slot game is provably fair. I'm talking about SoftSwiss,CoinGaming 'bitcoin' casinos, they usually request ID from anonymous users, most of the games are not provably fair (if any) and payout may take up to 3 days while they advertising instant.
|
|
|
This is such a nice site. It has everything you could want all in one place. Thanks! They are great, especially on automated comps and leaderboard promos.
|
|
|
Fancy and nice slots as expected, somehow missed Tropical slots launch. I have few questions regarding them, not explained in Rules. Any guide how to verify spins? What is House Edge of your new slot games and do they have free spins bonus? Do you plan to add gamble feature?
|
|
|
No KYC verification, provably fair slots and instant payouts
|
|
|
“Make like Jack and escape down the Beanstalk with a bag full of coins!” June 10th, 2016Just recently, one of our Euro currency players, ‘PierreS’, made his first and only deposit of €35.00 and successfully wagered his free deposit bonus. He then managed to net himself €40,119.60 on a single €24.00 bet playing Netent’s “Jack and the Beanstalk” at our casino. At the time of play that was the equivalent of winning BTC98.81 on a single BTC0.06 bet!Casino.bitcoin.com offers a 2 BTC + 100 free spins welcome bonus, as well as three great promotions every week, and features over 1,000 games from 7 different game providers. What makes our player’s recent large win even more amazing is the fact that ‘PierreS’ had only been playing at Casino.bitcoin.com for 3 days before winning this staggering amount. Huge wins like this don’t happen every day, and are practically unheard of so soon after a casino’s launch. The game which resulted in the massive windfall, Jack and the Beanstalk, is known to produce winners on a regular basis and we look forward to more players winning a very decent chunk of change at our Casino! Roger Ver, Bitcoin.com's CEO, had this to say about the fantastic news: “We certainly weren't expecting such a large win within the first two weeks of our Casino's operation, but a win this big just goes to show all of us that a little luck goes a long way! We're delighted that one of our players has been able to share in our success at such an early stage and we look forward to congratulating many more big winners in the future!” Casino.bitcoin.com would like to congratulate “PierreS” on his massive win and we invite all players, new and old, to try their luck at being the next big winner on Jack and the Beanstalk! Media contact: Name: Mate Tokay Email: mate@bitcoin.comLOL How he managed to bet exactly 24eur I have tried to set that bet but cant
|
|
|
Bitsler also has dice progressive Jackpot To win the jackpot you must hit the roll 77.77 and your two last digits of your ID bet must be 77 i.e : xx,xxx,x77 Odds to hit 77.77 1/10000 and tow last digits of bet id 77.77 1/100 = 1/1000000 A % of the jackpot will be won according to the bet amount % = (bet_amount*100)/0.005 (BTC) So Jackpot should be 50 BTC to be EV+
|
|
|
Thanks a lot MrVincenzo88! Very generous tip MrVincenzo88, good luck with your journey towards 500 btc profit. quick question does the bot distribute tip sent instantly to active users? No, 5 BTC is enough for year
|
|
|
When you log out it does not unregister you from sit and goes,so people will hit you and get a free ride with your chips. Some stupid player hit 4 different tables on me in a 5 minute period.
Think FJ should look into not allowing players to bleed funds in that way,its kid of scummy!
Unregister before you log out. No site auto-unregisters by default if you logoff. Some sites will give you a pop up warning to remind you. Pokerstars does.
|
|
|
Why? Whats the problem with 'minesweeper' apps? If there is security issue disable them manually
|
|
|
You just combined publicly available open source scripts. Dice - Untitled Dice Script Plinko - Plinkopot Classic Wheel - Modified untitled dice + wheel animation from Coinwheel script. Landing page looks good and rakeback but where do we check how much we get back?
|
|
|
Hey, I just got very lucky a moment ago and managed to win over 0.2 BTC from 0.04 playing slots at Betking.io while recording it Here's link to the video https://youtu.be/guZy7NAPh04This made my day. I have been quite unlucky for a pretty long time Gratz Box! How wold be full screen of Robots?
|
|
|
I'm glad all of the shill accounts for SatoshiDice came out. Do you think people can't tell that all of these newbie accounts coming out of nowhere to defend a shitty gambling site are genuine players? Honestly why do people play/invest here... Investors: They consistently are one of the lower volume casinos out there that accept public funds (stats according to https://dicesites.com/satoshidice), and they have a giant bankroll. What this means is you are getting a tiny return. I'll explain it this way: They average under 100 BTC per day in wagered volume, yet they have a whopping 4000+ BTC bankroll. Lets do some quick math: 100 BTC (daily wagered) * 1.9% (house edge) = 1.9 BTC expected return. Say you have 1 BTC invested, that means your expected return is 0.0475% daily... And that doesn't even include fees! They average well under 100,000 bets per day. This means they don't have many players. Most of their competitors are in the millions daily (# of bets). This signifies an over reliance on key larger players. Players: Terrible customer support, slow bets, and slow withdrawals. Yikes. And 1.9% House edge? That's nearly double the industry standard! I had those 100btc on their site and i had an average of 3.5-4.5% a month, everyday 0.1btc was added like clockwork with some spikes here and there... and the site had 5000+ btc thenYou are lying. 100/5000 = 2% (your share of the bankroll) You are claiming your 2% stake earned 3.5-4.5 BTC monthly. I will even give you the benefit of the doubt and say SatoshiDice did 5000 BTC volume (which: they didn't. I am being very generous saying 5k monthly wagered). 5000 * 0.019 = 95 BTC Profit (Before fees) 95 *0.02 = 1.9 BTC increase You are claiming you earned twice as much as you did (again... not even including fees). Cut the bullshit. And to all of those saying the # of bets don't matter... They do and they don't. What it signifies is that SatoshiDice has a very, very small userbase. 50k Bets is accomplished in under an hour on most sites. The only reason SatoshiDice is even in the middle of the pack as far as wagered volume goes is because the occasional whale drops by. The fact is SatoshiDice has a declining customer base. Not surprising considering their huge house edge. Investors make money on sites profit not wagered , their profit is above EV
|
|
|
REFUTING SCAM ACCUSATIONOur Casino is 100% legitimate, our reputation and domain means far more to us than any amount of funds, and we are backed by an entity which already holds a very significant amount of BTC so we have absolutely no incentive to steal any funds from anyone. As long as all Casino rules are followed, all winnings can be withdrawn. I will outline our proof below, and include screenshots. Screenshots can be falsified, of course, but the Bitcoin blockchain cannot so I encourage all users not to rely on screenshots as evidence. Take only immutable information as truth. If your address is 1C25NdiY9UbWQ2LdrVkMywbzUGAN8GDWaY and their address is 37poxtVQmj4fAMKBXJ8aiP2xf69QHdQqri you have a good scam report. The only problem is that with these transactions alone, for me it's pretty hard to see the proof that their deposit addres was indeed 37poxtVQmj4fAMKBXJ8aiP2xf69QHdQqri.
★★ What the user did not state in their OP is that they also have another account on our Casino using a different IP address. This account uses the email address "andre_ffer7@hotmail.com", which I will refer to as "andre_ffer7". This actually breaches the T&C's of our Casino and makes both accounts liable to disabling. Though there is no clear link in the Dashboard logs, the Bitcoin address and Bitcoin blockchain provides all the evidence we need.★★ Pertinent information:There are 3 different addresses we need to look at here: - 1C25NdiY9UbWQ2LdrVkMywbzUGAN8GDWaY (User's input address, as stated in OP)
- 37VqA6YtPUqWkubY3Z6ESJXkMpucGcThfD ("andre_ffer7" output address - one of our deposit addresses, NOT stated in OP)
- 37poxtVQmj4fAMKBXJ8aiP2xf69QHdQqri ("mark_11kaymen" output address - one of our deposit addresses, stated in OP)
There are 2 separate accounts (arranged here by time of use): andre_ffer7 (37VqA6YtPUqWkubY3Z6ESJXkMpucGcThfD):I can confirm that 37VqA6YtPUqWkubY3Z6ESJXkMpucGcThfD is this user's deposit address for Casino.bitcoin.com, using the account " andre_ffer7" (Player# 5127, which can be seen in the Dashboard URL) You will note that this transaction to the "andre_ffer7" account was sent with a insufficient fee to relay: https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/518cf0067c0356fe0d9b555111c30330e39cfc9935beb7b26aafd26f4907f72bPlease note the input address ( 1C25NdiY9UbWQ2LdrVkMywbzUGAN8GDWaY) in the above transaction. mark_11kaymen (37poxtVQmj4fAMKBXJ8aiP2xf69QHdQqri):I can confirm that 37poxtVQmj4fAMKBXJ8aiP2xf69QHdQqri is this user's deposit address for Casino.bitcoin.com, using the account " mark_11kaymen" (Player# 6203, which can be seen in the Dashboard URL) You will note that this transaction to the "mark_11kaymen" account was sent with an insufficient fee to relay: https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/e437a2c31a644bf0fd5e380aecb457df5b9250b189c50d81f6cbb385946774aePlease note the input address ( 1C25NdiY9UbWQ2LdrVkMywbzUGAN8GDWaY) in the above transaction. Player# 5127 andre_ffer7@hotmail.comPlayer# 6203 mark_11kaymen@yopmail.comI noticed the above accounts when checking the unconfirmed deposit for player 5127, and I happened to see another deposit for player 6203 in our Dashboard timeline. The amount was strikingly similar to the unconfirmed deposit for player 5127 so I looked into the Tx info on blocktrail.com and noticed the same address (1C25NdiY9UbWQ2LdrVkMywbzUGAN8GDWaY) being used to fund both accounts with 0.02xxxxxx BTC, despite that address only ever having received 0.03 BTC in total. This transaction (double-spend, unconfirmed) was to the account andre_ffer7@hotmail.comhttps://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/518cf0067c0356fe0d9b555111c30330e39cfc9935beb7b26aafd26f4907f72bhttps://blockchain.info/tx/518cf0067c0356fe0d9b555111c30330e39cfc9935beb7b26aafd26f4907f72b[Now pruned - please see at Blocktrail.com] This transaction (confirmed) was to the account mark_11kaymen@yopmail.comhttps://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/tx/e437a2c31a644bf0fd5e380aecb457df5b9250b189c50d81f6cbb385946774aehttps://blockchain.info/tx/e437a2c31a644bf0fd5e380aecb457df5b9250b189c50d81f6cbb385946774aeWe allow 0 confirmation play on our Casino, and you tried to take advantage of that to defraud us. As can very clearly be seen by the evidence presented above you sent 0.02999432 BTC to your "andre_ffer7" account with an inadequate fee, which you lost, so you double-spent that amount and sent 0.02899342 BTC to your "mark_11kaymen" account. The most common way that players attempt to double-spend at a 0 confirmation casino is by sending a transaction with insufficient fees; if they win at the casino, they simply wait and let the transaction confirm. If they lose, they quickly double-spend making the original transaction null and void. We do NOT allow double-spenders on our Casino, and as per our Casino rules if you attempt to defraud us you are liable to having all funds in your account confiscated. These are the terms by which you agree to play on our Casino. If you have any further questions please ask them here in public for all to see, or if you wish to refute any of the above presented evidence please feel free to do so and I will respond when time permits. Thank you. I see you care of your players privacy! Great!
|
|
|
x200,x1250 wins should be auto announced in chat
|
|
|
|