Where's your frinckin servicenodes ? Go and read the roadmap. You'll be waiting for a little while yet. In the meantime, here's some light reading: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/221034643_A_Pattern_Language_for_Overlay_Networks_in_Peer-to-Peer_Systems“The contributions of this paper are twofold. First, it presents a complete pattern language for overlay networks, consisting of simple new patterns as well as adaptations of existing patterns. Second, it suggests several proto-patterns, which have not yet been documented, but belong to the fundamental building blocks of overlay networks.” Cheers Graham
|
|
|
Nice quotable quote on HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9945139Ask HN: Are there any startups disrupting business banking?
”Ally and Simple are doing a great job in the consumer space, but is there anyone working on business banking?
We have used both national and local banks and it's nothing but a struggle. Fees to receive money, fees to move money, fees to send money. There's a fee for just about everything, and almost nothing works as it should.”
Cheers Graham
|
|
|
Wallet update 0.9.2.2
It is recommended you run the masternode on port 11994.
Thanks! Upgraded, recompiled, reconfigured, restarted. Just for confirmation masternodeaddr=5.9.56.229:11994 ... port=11994 rpcport=11995
Are these port assignments correct? And should I expect masternodelist to update eventually? { "192.99.37.133:9999" : "ENABLED", "45.63.15.168:9999" : "ENABLED", "62.210.253.159:9999" : "ENABLED", "5.9.56.229:9999" : "ENABLED", "24.10.106.218:9999" : "POS_ERROR", "188.226.198.109:9999" : "ENABLED", "80.236.18.96:9999" : "ENABLED", "104.207.159.110:9999" : "POS_ERROR", "104.207.159.189:9999" : "POS_ERROR", "84.200.4.67:9999" : "ENABLED", "104.207.131.242:9999" : "ENABLED", "127.0.0.1:9999" : "ENABLED", "75.130.163.51:9999" : "ENABLED", "127.0.0.1:9999" : "ENABLED", "127.0.0.1:9999" : "ENABLED", "159.118.11.101:9999" : "ENABLED", "84.110.80.85:9999" : "ENABLED", "109.87.255.75:9999" : "ENABLED", "45.63.70.191:11994" : "ENABLED" }
Cheers Graham
|
|
|
What are the initial warning signs that shows a coin or project is nothing but a pump and dump?
Anything newly-launched using the Bitcoin 0.8.x codebase. It's a dead giveaway. Cheers Graham
|
|
|
please can someone tell me what i did wrong while compiling -QT ? ...
#include <QApplication>
Either: Add “+widgets” to the relevant line in the .pro file and continue to compile with Qt5 http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qapplication.htmlor Use Qt4 ... if you have qmake-qt4 available on the command line Cheers Graham
|
|
|
There are company registration details for Coingateway: https://opencorporates.com/companies/gb/09224948It's a UK-registered outfit so OP should try contacting them direct, keeping a copy of all communications and allow them an opportunity to resolve the issue. If no answer or resolution, follow the recommended procedure for complaining to the authorities. Cheers Graham
|
|
|
Obviously Dash use them for mixing/InstantX, but are there any projects using or with plans to use masternodes in other ways?
Bitcredits has bank nodes, heading towards insurance and loans, etc: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=896133.0Cheers Graham
|
|
|
wow thank you very much. my wallet sync again np, you're welcome. Just a suggestion: the difficulty is minimal atm and Fuguecoin offers convenient in-wallet mining from the debug console: setgenerate true 1 will start mining using 1 core, setgenerate true 2, ditto but with 2 cores and setgenerate true -1 will start mining with all cores. (Right now, you only need setgenerate true 1 to ensure a steady stream of FC) setgenerate false will stop mining * gjhiggins makes mental note to investigate restoring the “mining” tab. Cheers Graham
|
|
|
I'm getting a untrusted error when I visit minkiz.co. Just got curious - figured you might wanna know.
Thanks for the heads up. We are very aware I love irony. We've had a self-signed x509 server cert and associated CA cert since forever (alright 2001), but of late, browser “vendors” (is that still the right term?) are now actively preventing users from accessing the site because our CA is not their approved list. How do we get a "trusted" server cert? We are invited to demonstrate our trustworthiness by ... handing over $$ to some obscure corporate entity that's greased Google's palm. I know a shakedown when I see it and so we make the brave assumption that visitors to a cryptocurrency satellite web site will largely be clued up about self-signed server certs or prepared to see things from a different standpoint. I've started to use a standard note whenever I include a link to Minkiz; * in a posting. For the terminally curious, Minkiz is a blend of art and tech: two types of block explorer, altcoin metadata in SPARQL-able RDF, charts generated from DOACC metadata (the world's most complete open source list of altcoin metadata: https://github.com/DOACC), a spoof coin generator and a wild stab at zany with the “HodlerScope U2AT” a spurious remapping of numerology to cryptocurrency, currently awaiting me upgrading Semantic UI to the latest release (sigh). Still in Ninja launch atm while I finish off the upgrade but there's a few new goodies in the pipeline. * self-signed SSL cert, CA cert, DYR: archive.orgCheers Graham
|
|
|
If you think you are better than Peter Todd at telling good crypto from bad, your understanding of the issues is not adequate and you actually do need help in this matter.
What a vivid imagination you have. Peter has made a patently indefensible statement in a tweet: “orders of magnitude worse”. I don't know what possessed him to display such immaturity but if he continues, it will be at the risk of his reputation as a mature commentator on technical matters of cryptography and cryptocurrency. Cheers Graham
|
|
|
You should be grateful he's helping you learn to avoid Dash's snake oil, bad crypto, and bamboo runway.
Your wholehearted commitment apparently prevents you from even entertaining the notion that I already have an adequate understanding of the issues and that I don't actually need any help in this matter. But thanks for the thought anyway. Cheers Graham
|
|
|
“The Cryptonote/Bytecoin codebase #XMR is based on is atrociously bad, orders of magnitude worse than #Bitcoin. WTF: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/amjuarez/bytecoin/master/src/crypto/tree-hash.c” Unfortunately a rapid descent into hyperbole is a characteristic tactical error made by people suddenly finding themselves out of their depth. The assessment of “orders of magnitude worse” is patently indefensible and testifies to the fact that Peter is now emitting random hysterical shrieks. C'mon Peter, let's see your defence of your public pronouncement of “orders of magnitude worse”. How many orders of magnitude? And I'm on the edge of my seat waiting for your definition of “worse”. Chapter and verse please, not just finger-waving at source code. If you've got something specific to say about coding style or substance then either spell it out or STFU. No? Then perhaps you might more usefully apply your intellect to the task of developing a constructive and mature approach appropriate to your job title, then you might have a snowball's chance in Hell of ever being taken seriously again. Cheers Graham
|
|
|
Because first page of thread is almost expired, i made a small site dedicated to fuguecoin. There are info, files, network hashrate & profit calculator. www.fuguecoin.euwow this coin still active?. node please. any exchange? 1. Yes. 2. 5.9.56.229 or 95.24.44.228:50001 3. Not at present. Lightweight block explorer at https://minkiz.co/acme * Cheers Graham * self-signed SSL cert, CA cert, DYR: archive.org
|
|
|
The more I look at it I think getwork should be last on the priority list. Strange that you should say that, great minds think alike ... Cheers Graham Edit: dispelled ambiguity
|
|
|
Block explorer has been unreliable of late due to an unrelated issue with the server (gnutls cache database problem, apparently). I've revived the server, the VCoin Abe block explorer is available again and I'm keeping an eye on it. I'm looking with keen interest at: http://test.webbtc.com/about. TTW script debugging? That’s far too useful not to have one pointed at the VCoin 0.11 blockchain. Cheers Graham
|
|
|
I have never heard of most of those coins, are any of them a really serious anon competitor?
I have no opinion on the matter that I consider worth sharing, sorry. The context was “completeness”, is all. Cheers Graham
|
|
|
That's more like it. You have excellent github search-fu, it turned up nothing plausible when I checked before posting. Now I don't need to badger the dev for an answer to my ignored question about the number of coins (61,800,000), thanks. Cheers Graham
|
|
|
|