Meanwhile at NASA...  |
|
|
|
There are many ways to prove spherical earth. Let me say an example: Take a look at a ship going out. If the earth is flat, you will notice that the small ship gradually disappears and disappears. Listen to it seems reasonable, but take a closer look. When watching a ship sailing, the ship will disappear from view, but first, you will see the hull of the ship disappear first, then gradually to the sad column, and finally the turn. lost completely. From this it can be said that the Earth must be "curved" a little, this phenomenon can happen. Right?
No not at all, not even a little bit. The surface of a large body of water is flat and level over any distance. Objects on the surface of the ocean are obscured by perspective (bottom up), mirages (bottom up for narrow band), atmospheric magnification (bottom up), atmospheric opacity (entire object) and angular size convergence (entire object). Other atmospheric effects such as diffraction, diffusion and compression that also cause image distortion are also present. In the case of a boat the bottom part is obscured by a reflection of the area just above it. As the boat gets farther away it gets smaller and a complex form of superior mirage that's seen in a narrow band along the horizon called a Fata Morgana which remains the same size, covers more and more of it. Eventually the angular size of the boat is so small the entire vessel is engulfed by the mirage and disappears. Other effects such as perspective, magnification and compression can also be present depending on the situation. The fact objects are never seen to lean backwards shows they're not traveling down hill. The idea that ships go up, over and behind a giant hump of water three miles out is plainly ridiculous. There's no argument for curved water and all experiments ever conducted show that water forms a level surface. Even more obvious is the horizon rising to eye level at any altitude, you'd be looking down at it if the ocean were curved. |
|
|
|
The Sun illuminates locally and can only light up half the surface at a time as it's a small projected light, 32 miles wide at an altitude of about 3,000 miles.
  Absolutely hilarious isn't it? |
|
|
|
 In the following short video (2:51) an infrared camera peers through the hazy atmosphere to see entire mountains at impossible distances and the Sun not setting but fading away. -- https://youtu.be/jS-akcip240Credits: JTolan & DIRTH Video clip:  Sun "set" |
|
|
|
Can anybody give me evidences of a planet that we live on is flat. Like, how is traveling from both sides of the world to the same distance needs the same time? is it even possible for flat Earth? I've always been taught that the Earth is a sphere. Can't imagine it being flat so how is it possible. I'm listening  You're going to need to clairify your question. Dude, the earth 🌍 is spherical not flat!
Look at how the sun circles the earth 🌍 e.g morning in London and Midnight in Hong kong.
Yes, the Sun does in fact circle above the Earth. The Sun illuminates locally and can only light up half the surface at a time as it's a small projected light, 32 miles wide at an altitude of about 3,000 miles. Perspective, convergence and atmospheric effects limit the distance sunlight can travel creating day and night as it orbits. |
|
|
|
I just learned the hard way how much Google hates Trump.  So I was watching flat earth YouTube videos as I always do and a flat earth parody video from YouTube's most prominent flat earther Jerenism popped up. According to Trump himself the universe is actually trumpcentric LOL! Now here's the fun part, after watching this video YouTube turned on restricted mode and grayed out the button so I couldn't turn it off. The result of restricted mode is that it hides all comments and prevents the posting of comments. YouTube then throttled all video streams making them completely unwatchable. I'm back watching videos and reading comments but I can only do this via a VPN and web browser, the app is fucked now. Possibly all just coincidence but really, locking my app in restricted mode so comments are disabled seems like censorship. |
|
|
|
In Conventional Science at least 10 dimensions exist otherwise at least 7 dimension. At the same time a 4 dimensional endless looping flat plane is just outrages. One observable fact is Suns path over the course of the year.  Using analogy of Möbius strip https://i.imgur.com/t06MtEm.gifor https://i.imgur.com/8nWbofO.gifA lot of things start to fall in place. 12h day, 12h night check large claw. Sydney to Chile, Santiago flight distance, yep, tick that one too. Makes perfectly sense that there is a different (landless) MGRS grid for the north polar region and no skipping or adjustment for south polar region Edit: Ancient Roman mosaic depicting a structure similar to Möbius strip. Moebius, is a surface with only one side and one boundary when embedded in three-dimensional Euclidean space.  Honestly I find most of your posts a bit cringe worthy, but there's a whole lot about the dome and the projection of the celestial objects I don't understand. That Roman/Atlantian mosaic is very interesting. For one it's got giants, a subject the Jews lie about as much as the Earth. Second as you point out the constellations are on a mobius strip, very interesting indeed. |
|
|
|
In the past, people believed that the Earth was flat until someone proved that it was wrong. Now people believe that this earth is flat, despite all the evidence that it is completely wrong... Over the past 50 years, there have been numerous photographs of Earth from satellites, proving that the earth is shaped like a BRIDGE. Yet people still do not believe, even some people try to fly in the air with homemade rockets to prove the opposite. This is a daunting trend, the Internet users lack knowledge may be. Easily fooled, kids will probably have a misconception about the planet they are living in. If the Earth is a plane, the two stakes will have the same or nearly identical shadows, as they will all have a vertical angle. with the ground. Because the two balls of the two different piles, inferred two piles towards the sun in two different angles, we can conclude that the Earth is spherical. Or you can pick up the phone, call the person on the other side of the Earth to see if they are day or night. Unlike you, this Earth can't be flat. There are many ways to prove that the Earth can't be flat, but sadly until now we still have to prove that the Earth is spherical.
Satellites are a hoax, nothing but weather balloons and radio signals from the ground. The images NASA claims are from space are taken from a high altitude with a wide angle fisheye lens, a composite of high altitude images or just CGI and photorealistic paintings. The Earth is flat and the light casting the shadows is divergent i.e. it spreads out as it travels like all light from a point source does and, the source of the light, the Sun in this case (the distance to the Sun can be measured with a sextant and it's about 3,000 miles) is close then, the shadows from two sticks will cast the same shadows as if the Sun's rays were all parallel and the Earth's surface were curved. The Sun is close (3,000 miles) and small (32 miles wide), anybody with a sextant can measure and prove this. The light from a close small Sun can't travel all the way across the Earth, perspective, convergence and various atmospheric effects limit the distance the light travels. This results in day & night as the Sun circles above. The only sad thing here is the gullible fool who can't speak English and thinks the Earth is a spinning globe. |
|
|
|
 Green screen and CGI with an actor hanging from wires, go fucking kill yourself! Prove it Forget the gas oven, you need to go hang yourself with a length of piano wire.  |
|
|
|
Green screen and CGI with an actor hanging from wires, go fucking kill yourself! |
|
|
|
 Fuck you. |
|
|
|
Objects on the surface of the ocean are obscured by perspective (bottom up), mirages (bottom up for narrow band), atmospheric magnification (bottom up), atmospheric opacity (entire object) and angular size convergence (entire object). Now if you want to bullshit the goyim you've got three different effects that cause bottom up obfuscation of objects that you can mix and match or use alone to trick these stupid animals into thinking objects are going behind a curve.  BADecker wants you to go have a drink. |
|
|
|
We've got a plane projected onto a sphere that is then re-projected onto a plane, this is how modern map making works; two projections for the Jew and one for the goyim. edit: Here's an analogy for the modern map making process using Google Translate and some text provided by BADecker: source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1009045.msg46350567#msg46350567English --> Scots Gaelic --> English In terms of the festival ...
If you are 6 feet high,
and you are standing on the beach looking out at sea by boat,
if the top of the tree is centimeters above sea level,
you still see the peak roof at a far away distance.
The reason is for the great distress of the earth. If the land was not so hard, the competition would not be long. It is the distance that gives insolvent ideas ... because of air, etc.
If he was the only 6-foot high person,
at the same place on the beach,
look out at the same ship,
but you were buried in the sand up to your chin,
(how people bury themselves in sand at the beach),
the ship needed to be much closer,
so you could see the same part of the crop crops,
how did you do when you were standing on the beach.
When the vessel is closer, you will get a better view of the loss of the atmosphere, and less the effects of the effects and conditions of other atmosphere. Now you do not have the effects of your atmosphere, you can clearly see that the earth is a globe, as the ship goes beyond the horizon.
When you are on land just and level,
and put your eyes near the ground,
by a straight road and level
(maybe to enter the ditch),
the competition is so close and the atmosphere clearances are so limited,
so that you can easily see the globe of the globe of the world,
on the way a mobile car goes away quickly over the horizon.
You do not have to make something foolish at a seafront. Everyone can do this right where they are. You can use your digital camera. The distance is so close, even if you use a fish lens, the lens will not have a great impact on how the car goes beyond the distance. Summer will have a slight impact and it will not make any difference to the car clearly beyond the horizon. Now, you can tell the ground that there is a layout, with a look or a camera, whichever is it.
In fact, the above modification needs to be made in some ways. My guides may not be right for you and your place. You must consider your own information for your own place. But almost no one can prove how this will do enough to prove that the earth is globally.
 |
|
|
|
...
Gleason's or other Azimuthal Equidistant (Equal distant) maps are distorted images as each square is of equal distance. You cant make that type of map without distortion. It is used by sailors with various scales.
...
Army's however navigate using proper world map without distortion like this:
...
Scaling for soldier is easier and cheaper as no need to buy expensive navigation charts.
...
I find your statements suspect...  Meanwhile, over at NASA:  |
|
|
|
Q: How many hours are there in 1 day?  A: 12 hours. |
|
|
|
Notice the red lines, the routs connecting major star ports; they're lines not arcs. The only logical conclusion based on the logistical fallacy of taking a longer path than is required is that the globe is a projection and the map is true.
That's not what the description text says. It clearly says its a projection of a globe with poles. "This map is made on the North Polar Azimuthal Equidistant Projection. This means that the world has been projected on a plane tangent to the North Pole, with the parallels of latitude as concentric circles equally spaced from the pole outward." How about the only logical conclusion is the map is what it says it is? You lose. I'm not entertaining you any further.  There's times in life when you need to read between the lines. |
|
|
|
^^^ So you're going to go down the "war doesn't involve conspiracy" path are we?
Stop changing the subject. Who the fuck said anything about war not involving conspiracy? Oh that's right, it was you when you were trying to avoid explaining why you believe in a map that clearly states it is a projection of a globe. So, why do you believe in a map that clearly states it is a projection of a globe? Notice the red lines, the routs connecting major star ports; they're lines not arcs. The only logical conclusion based on the logistical fallacy of taking a longer path than is required is that the globe is a projection and the map is true. In war a projectile is fired at the enemy and in this case, it's a large heavy ball. It's a global war map and you're ((no you specifically due to being a shill)) the enemy, welcome the New World Order. |
|
|
|
|
^^^ So you're going to go down the "war doesn't involve conspiracy" path are we?
|
|
|
|
|
^^^ My hint was that's it's a Azimuthal Equidistant map.
I know they use this type because during an elementary school class tour of a large ship, I commented on the AE map in a map book on the bridge and was immediately scolded by the Jewish teacher who snapped the book shut and made sure to explain what a stupid comment I made.
The heading "GLOBAL WAR" on a Flat Earth map says it all, think about that in the context of a massive conspiracy. Unless you want to argue war doesn't involve conspiracy?
|
|
|
|
|
^^^ see edited reply.
There's always a narrow band mirage at the horizon, its magnitude however is dependent on atmospheric conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
