Muslims Say That Easter Egg Hunt ‘Violates the U.S. Constitution’Muslim parents in Dearborn, Michigan are upset after elementary school students received flyers promoting an Easter Egg hunt at a local Presbyterian church. The parents say the egg hunt “violates the U.S. Constitution”. The Muslims told the Detroit Free-Press that they were concerned about the religious implications of Cherry Hill Presbyterian Church’s “Eggstravaganza!” They were also “troubled” by images of a bunny rabbit. “It really bothered my two kids,” parent Majed Moughni, told the newspaper. “My son was like, ‘Dad, I really don’t feel comfortable getting these flyers, telling me to go to church. I thought churches are not supposed to mix with schools.’ ” The school district did not comment and the pastor of the church said there’s nothing remotely religious about the event. “Part of our efforts in Dearborn is to invite the community to let them know we’re here,” Pastor Neeta Nichols told the newspaper. “We’re offering various kinds of programming, fun opportunities, so what we can be engaged with the community.” http://toprightnews.com/muslims-say-that-easter-egg-hunt-violates-the-u-s-constitution/ |
|
|
|
it's a good news for women and children now they have own area in train and i think they will feel comfortable when to go use train.
Yes very good regressive news for women and children travelling away from their husbands and dads for hours and hours and hours. Thank you rapists. Thank you pedophiles. |
|
|
|
The American College of Pediatricians released a statement this week declaring that gender reclassification of children, also known as transgenderism, constitutes child abuse. “The American College of Pediatricians urges educators and legislators to reject all policies that condition children to accept as normal a life of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex,” the statement, entitled “Gender Ideology Harms Children,” began. “Facts – not ideology – determine reality.” The temporary statement, published Monday, March 21, with a full statement to follow in summer 2016, listed what the association ruled to be eight objective facts supporting their argument for why gender reclassification will now officially be classified as abuse: 1. Human sexuality is an objective biological binary trait: “XY” and “XX” are genetic markers of health – not genetic markers of a disorder. 2. No one is born with a gender. Everyone is born with a biological sex. Gender (an awareness and sense of oneself as male or female) is a sociological and psychological concept; not an objective biological one. 3. A person’s belief that he or she is something they are not is, at best, a sign of confused thinking. When an otherwise healthy biological boy believes he is a girl, or an otherwise healthy biological girl believes she is a boy, an objective psychological problem exists that lies in the mind not the body, and it should be treated as such. 4. Puberty is not a disease and puberty-blocking hormones can be dangerous. Reversible or not, puberty-blocking hormones induce a state of disease – the absence of puberty – and inhibit growth and fertility in a previously biologically healthy child. 5. According to the DSM-V, as many as 98% of gender confused boys and 88% of gender confused girls eventually accept their biological sex after naturally passing through puberty. 6. Children who use puberty blockers to impersonate the opposite sex will require cross-sex hormones in late adolescence. Cross-sex hormones (testosterone and estrogen) are associated with dangerous health risks including but not limited to high blood pressure, blood clots, stroke and cancer. 7. Rates of suicide are twenty times greater among adults who use cross-sex hormones and undergo sex reassignment surgery, even in Sweden which is among the most LGBQT – affirming countries. 8. Conditioning children into believing a lifetime of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex is normal and healthful as child abuse. The policy statement was authored by President of the American College of Pediatricians, Dr. Michelle A. Cretella, Vice President of the American College of Pediatricians, Dr. Quentin Van Meter and Johns Hopkins Medical School Psychology Professor Dr. Paul McHugh. http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/03/26/transgenderism-of-children-is-child-abuse-american-college-of-pediatrics-rules/?utm_source=TheBlaze.com&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=story&utm_content=transgenderism-of-children-is-child-abuse-american-college-of-pediatrics-rules&utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed------------------------------------- I thought that was obvious. i am completely agree with this idea.. childrens are growing up both mentally and physically day by day .. while growing up , they can be confused about their gender identity .. this incident is a normal process .. it isnt a sign that this child must change his or her gender.. so after becoming an adult, he or she can decide whether he or she wants to change their gender or not.. And yet parents doing this abuse on their children are celebrated everyday. |
|
|
|
To all the bitcointalk.org community.  |
|
|
|
Hmm.. 'Staying here for the train wreck. Moving back to europe. Canada is not so bad...'Funny how none of the replies visualized them running away from the US to mexico... That says a lot about how people really, truly feel about this country...   |
|
|
|
The list, so far...  |
|
|
|
|
If you are born homosexual, why can't you be a trans from birth: that's the rational for this to happen.
|
|
|
|
The American College of Pediatricians released a statement this week declaring that gender reclassification of children, also known as transgenderism, constitutes child abuse. “The American College of Pediatricians urges educators and legislators to reject all policies that condition children to accept as normal a life of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex,” the statement, entitled “Gender Ideology Harms Children,” began. “Facts – not ideology – determine reality.” The temporary statement, published Monday, March 21, with a full statement to follow in summer 2016, listed what the association ruled to be eight objective facts supporting their argument for why gender reclassification will now officially be classified as abuse: 1. Human sexuality is an objective biological binary trait: “XY” and “XX” are genetic markers of health – not genetic markers of a disorder. 2. No one is born with a gender. Everyone is born with a biological sex. Gender (an awareness and sense of oneself as male or female) is a sociological and psychological concept; not an objective biological one. 3. A person’s belief that he or she is something they are not is, at best, a sign of confused thinking. When an otherwise healthy biological boy believes he is a girl, or an otherwise healthy biological girl believes she is a boy, an objective psychological problem exists that lies in the mind not the body, and it should be treated as such. 4. Puberty is not a disease and puberty-blocking hormones can be dangerous. Reversible or not, puberty-blocking hormones induce a state of disease – the absence of puberty – and inhibit growth and fertility in a previously biologically healthy child. 5. According to the DSM-V, as many as 98% of gender confused boys and 88% of gender confused girls eventually accept their biological sex after naturally passing through puberty. 6. Children who use puberty blockers to impersonate the opposite sex will require cross-sex hormones in late adolescence. Cross-sex hormones (testosterone and estrogen) are associated with dangerous health risks including but not limited to high blood pressure, blood clots, stroke and cancer. 7. Rates of suicide are twenty times greater among adults who use cross-sex hormones and undergo sex reassignment surgery, even in Sweden which is among the most LGBQT – affirming countries. 8. Conditioning children into believing a lifetime of chemical and surgical impersonation of the opposite sex is normal and healthful as child abuse. The policy statement was authored by President of the American College of Pediatricians, Dr. Michelle A. Cretella, Vice President of the American College of Pediatricians, Dr. Quentin Van Meter and Johns Hopkins Medical School Psychology Professor Dr. Paul McHugh. http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2016/03/26/transgenderism-of-children-is-child-abuse-american-college-of-pediatrics-rules/?utm_source=TheBlaze.com&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=story&utm_content=transgenderism-of-children-is-child-abuse-american-college-of-pediatrics-rules&utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed------------------------------------- I thought that was obvious. |
|
|
|
German Railway Launches Gender Segregated Carriages In Wake Of Sex AttacksA central German regional railway is launching a special women and children only area for their trains, a move which has triggered controversy.The announcement from the central German Regiobahn line came earlier this week, with the network stating the new compartment on their Leipzig and Chemnitz would admit women and young children only. To ensure maximum peace for those choosing to travel in that compartment not only would it be sandwiched between the service’s two quiet coaches, but it would also be next to the on-board office of the “customer service representative. Traditionally known as a train guard or ticket inspector, the company said “the local proximity to the customer service representative is chosen deliberately”. Yet despite the recent mass sex-attacks in Germany, and the official advice to young women that the best thing to do is to keep groping migrant men “at arms length” to prevent rape, the railway denies the segregated trains has anything to do with sexual harassment. This denial has caused lively debate and controversy on German social media, reports Süddeutsche Zeitung. The launch of women’s only compartments puts Germany in a club of other nations who need to segregate the sexes on journeys including India, Mexico, Brazil, Egypt and Indonesia. The suggestion of women’s only rail carriages was recently floated by British Labour Party leader and avid train enthusiast Jeremy Corbyn, who in contrast to Germany’s railway admitted it was to help combat harassment, as reported on by Breitbart London at the time. Explaining the logic behind his idea, which was widely panned at the time, Mr. Corbyn said: “It is unacceptable that many women and girls adapt their daily lives in order to avoid being harassed on the street, public transport, and in other public places from the park to the supermarket. “This could include taking longer routes to work, having self-imposed curfews or avoiding certain means of transport”. Remarking he thought a solution to this could be women’s only carriages, Mr. Corbyn said: “piloting this at times and modes of transport where harassment is reported most frequently would be of interest”. http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/03/26/german-railway-launches-gender-segregated-carriages-in-wake-of-sex-attacks/ |
|
|
|
Today I say... As long as this gate is closed... As long as this scar of a wall is permitted to stand... It is not the American question alone which remains open... But the question of freedom for all mankind... ...Mr. Trump, Tear down this wall! -Ronald Reagan 1987 (mostly) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtYdjbpBk6AReal men don't build walls, they tear walls down That's not true. Real Capitalist Loving American men and women can do both, depending on the job in hand. |
|
|
|
Sitting alone minding my own business and some punk kid hacks in and kicks me in the junk and deports out.
You know its going to happen,I am gonna be trolled in real life now,screw this!
I wish I had LiteCoinguys bookmarks,you always bring the good stuff for us to learn from.
I hope one day bitcointalk.org will have that option built in. |
|
|
|
Trump would consider halting U.S. oil purchases from Saudis: NYTWASHINGTON Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump told the New York Times he would consider stopping U.S. oil purchases from Saudi Arabia unless the Saudi government provide troops to fight Islamic State. Trump's comment on Friday was included in a lengthy foreign policy interview published by the newspaper on Saturday and came in response to a question about whether, if elected president, he would halt oil purchases from U.S. allies unless they provided on-the-ground forces against Islamic State. "The answer is, probably yes," Trump said, according to a transcript. Trump has said the United States should be reimbursed by the countries it provides protection, even those with vast resources such as Saudi Arabia, a top oil exporter. "And yet, without us, Saudi Arabia wouldn't exist for very long," Trump told the Times. "... We’re not being reimbursed for the kind of tremendous service that we’re performing by protecting various countries. Now Saudi Arabia’s one of them." Trump also named in the interview retired Major General Gary Harrell, Major General Bert Mizusawa and retired Rear Admiral Charles Kubic as additional foreign policy advisors to the five named earlier this week who were criticized as obscure. Trump has faced questions about his reluctance to reveal who was advising his campaign. He told the Times he was willing to rethink traditional U.S. alliances should he become president. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-idUSKCN0WS0NG-----------------------------------  |
|
|
|
NJ Bill Would Ban Texting While Walking, Punishable By $50 Fine… Here is another reason to take a break from texting or talking on your smartphone while walking in New Jersey: a possible $50 fine. A bill proposed this week by Assemblywoman Pamela R. Lampitt (D., Camden) would impose a fine of up to $50 and possibly 15 days in jail for pedestrians caught using their cellphones without hands-free devices while walking on public sidewalks and along roadways. If the bill becomes law, “petextrians” – people who text while walking – would face the same penalties as jaywalkers in New Jersey. “I see it every single day,” Lampitt said Friday. “Maybe they will think twice about it.” A report released in 2015 by the Governors Highway Safety Association found an increase in pedestrian fatalities, and cited texting while walking as partly to blame. http://www.philly.com/philly/news/new_jersey/20160326_Will_cellphone_use_while_walking_be_banned_in_N_J__.html#CykyrBd0CBoR8BqZ.99
|
|
|
|
I was going to post this exact vid in my response to the discussion of Trump/Alinsky on the other thread. “A word about my personal philosophy. It is anchored in optimism. It must be, for optimism brings with it hope, a future with a purpose, and therefore, a will to fight for a better world. Without this optimism, there is no reason to carry on. ..."
-- Alinsky - Rules for Radicals - pg 21
That makes me think back to the ' demoralization' that I feel at having to choose between 'Obama/Romney', 'Obama/McCain', 'Obama/Hillary', 'Bush/Kerry', etc, etc all the way back about as far as I can remember. When some possibly hopeful candidate is in the running, they are squashed like a bug by the media+establishment before it matters. This 'demoralization' has caused me not to even bother to vote at all over the last number of years. I see it as a theme in the alternate media, and it is one that resonates. I would guess that this is akin to what Bezmenov is alluding to. I've always considered myself fairly left-wing. To this day I've no love lost for the Republicans although in a practical sense they are more useful to me politically in my current situation insofar as they are less inclined to empower some of the scams that hit me the hardest. Specifically, the eco-fascism which I feel as a person who owns property and a person who would rather do shit than sit on my ass and wait for a welfare check. I've always been 'anti-American' to some extent as a hold-over to my youth when the memories of Vietnam were fresh in the public consciousness. That sentiment continues to be animated by things such as our regime-change campaigns which turn otherwise relatively function nations into failed states and our drone strikes which end up killing 90% innocent civilians. All of a sudden (e.g., 1/2 an hour before I write this) I wonder if that is not a huge part of the actual goal. That is, to create and maintain a sense of 'demoralization' within the United States itself! Lots of people don't care about TRUMP or threads about the US election. I believe the subject matter in the video was beyond TRUMP and more visibility was needed on its own. Smart is smart and there is no taboo in knowing yourself or your foe. Is optimism back with TRUMP? |
|
|
|
Holyfuckinshit! I'll bet that when 'the tapes' of Trump are released (probably after his death...which could be near at hand...) we'll find that his most treasured and productive books will in fact be Saul Alinsky's pamphlet ' Rules for Radicals.' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fyu2iaqrC_cConversely, when I get around to actually reading Machiavelli's work, I'm fully expecting to see a nearly exact match for 'the Left' of 2016. To my American brothers and sisters who have heard the term ' color revolution' but never really quite understood what it was, stick around because we'll likely see it employed right here in the good old USofA. Or at least as significant an attempt at doing so as the Globalist can muster. We probably won't have to wait much longer, and if one keeps their eyes open, one can see the little fingers of flame and some smoke already.  Most people on this planet agree with that statement, not just TRUMP I assume. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
