One less vote for harpy clinton.

 

Something is wrong with harpy clinton...

No. We do not want to hurt his feelings.

Saudi Prince Begs America to Reject Trump











    A Saudi prince has urged Americans not to vote for Donald Trump in the upcoming general election.

    Turki al-Faisal, who served as Saudia Arabia’s ambassador to the US from 2005 to 2007, spoke against the presumptive Republican nominee during a foreign policy dinner in Washington, DC on Thursday.

    He blasted Trump’s proposal to ban Muslims from entering the US, which the billionaire first formulated in December last year before renewing his vow on Wednesday.

    ‘For the life of me, I cannot believe that a country like the United States can afford to have someone as president who simply says, “These people are not going to be allowed to come to the United States,”’ Turki said according to the Huffington Post.

    ‘It’s up to you, it’s not up to me,’ Turki added. ‘I just hope you, as American citizens, will make the right choice in November.’

    Turki, who went to Georgetown University in Washington, DC, isn’t currently part of Saudia Arabia’s government but serves as the chairman of the King Faisal Center for Research and Islamic Studies, a cultural organization that conducts research in politics, sociology and heritage.



http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/05/07/saudi-prince-begs-america-reject-trump/

Back you say? They never left...

 


Video: Sanders Supporter Makes Video Showing Bernie Sanders Killing Hillary Clinton…

 

Don't worry. Berniebots are not going away any time soon...

 




able assemble and protest. But here's the thing: today, report after report from witnesses on the scene of Thursday's Clinton rally are saying that the Sanders supporters who showed up there were anything but peaceful. No, no one actually engaged in physical violence like at a Trump rally, but there are now numerous stories circulating on social media about Sanders fanatics shouting obscenities at Clinton supporters as they left the rally, grabbing campaign posters out of the hands of Clinton supporters, and hurling insults even at small children who happened to be there with their parents.

Through various accounts and actual photos and video of the scene, a picture is painted of enraged Sanders fans forming a kind of gauntlet around the rally attendees and forcing them to endure genuinely shocking verbal abuse, all for no other reason than the fact that they support Clinton and not Sanders. Read these tweets and watch these images and you'd honestly think the men, women and children being shouted down -- people from all walks of life, a couple of whom were even handicapped -- were common criminals and the Sanders supporters were angry townspeople who had gathered to shame them. But then, that's where we apparently are now with the Sanders zealots: they not only viciously attack anyone who dares to speak a kind word about Clinton online, they also arrogantly shut down her speeches and publicly, shamelessly thrash anyone who happens to be there. As one person who was at the rally wrote Friday at Medium, "They were cussing at people, calling women whores, and telling people to kill themselves. They were shouting in children's faces, blowing sirens in their ears, and making them cry."

Take a look for yourself. 


[...]

Make no mistake: this situation is only going to get worse the closer we get to the Democratic National Convention. Bernie Sanders is not only vowing to turn his quixotic quest for the Democratic nomination -- which he simply cannot and will not win -- into a fight on the convention floor. What's more, while he reiterated during the Maddow interview that he would do everything in his power to ensure that Donald Trump isn't elected president, in an earlier interview with NPR's Steve Inskeep, Sanders refused to say whether a Democratic presidency was more important than a Sanders presidency. He was pressed on it, but wouldn't answer. That speaks volumes about where his head seems to be. 

The thing is, if Sanders doesn't either immediately at least try to call off his dogs and change the tone of his campaign with respect to attacking Clinton or just drop out altogether, Democratic unity may be impossible. If that's the case -- and considering the relentless obsessiveness with which his fanatical following approaches this crusade of his -- you can look for the convention to potentially be drowned out by chaos. Never mind that the Democrats were supposed to be the adults in this room this election cycle. Never mind that the alternative to the Democrats is Donald Trump. Sanders's acolytes will risk all of that and so much more to make their entirely moot point. And if their anger won't sway the nomination -- and it won't -- they could very well spend months exacting their revenge on Hillary Clinton, potentially even if Sanders endorses Clinton and campaigns for her.

Because that's the problem. These lunatics are very likely well beyond Bernie Sanders's control at this point. 

Germany Offers Taxpayer Funded “Flirt Workshops” for Migrant Men


Published on May 4, 2016

Recently, "workshops" offer asylum seekers courses on how to flirt with German women. The courses are financed by the German government with, of course, taxpayers money.

It is one thing to help each other in need. OK, That part I understand. You ran away with what you could hold on your back. You have no passport, no form of ID. OK, That I understand.

Now once you are lucky enough to get to europe alive, you demand, not ask, demand not to be fingerprinted, not to have your pictures taken, nothing that could link anything in the future back to you. A European citizen, with these demands would be without a job, a place to live, etc... You reject the destinations the system gives you, you reject the food the system gives you (because there is a red cross on the boxes)

Basically you believe you have more rights that the people who believed in helping you, while you are a guest of honor in their home... And Merkel agrees they have more rights than Germans.


Insanity.

It’s Official: Social Security Admin Introduces Gun Ban For Some Beneficiaries



The Social Security Administration (SSA)has released details on the looming gun ban which was first discovered at it was being fashioned behind closed doors in July 2015.

Details of the ban seeped out over the next few months then it formerly introduced by President Obama on January 5, 2016.

On July 18 the Los Angeles Times reported that the ban would apply to SSA beneficiaries who are ruled mentally deficient or labeled with a “mental illness” moniker. Once categorized as having mental health problems the beneficiaries would be reported to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) and added to the prohibited persons list, thereafter barred from purchasing guns.

According to the Times, one of the measures of mental health stability would be whether beneficiaries could handle their own finances or not. Based on this measure alone up to “4.2 million” SSA beneficiaries were believed to be susceptible to losing their Second Amendment rights because they have other people handle their finances for them.

On January 4 Breitbart News reported that Obama would be incorporating the SSA gun ban into his executive gun controls. The White House executive order preview said:

    Current law prohibits individuals from buying a gun if, because of a mental health issue, they are either a danger to themselves or others or are unable to manage their own affairs. The Social Security Administration (SSA) has indicated that it will begin the rulemaking process to ensure that appropriate information in its records is reported to NICS. The reporting that SSA, in consultation with the Department of Justice, is expected to require will cover appropriate records of the approximately 75,000 people each year who have a documented mental health issue, receive disability benefits, and are unable to manage those benefits because of their mental impairment, or who have been found by a state or federal court to be legally incompetent. The rule-making will also provide a mechanism for people to seek relief from the federal prohibition on possessing a firearm for reasons related to mental health.

And now the SSA has released details making it clear that beneficiaries who do not receive benefits themselves–but have them sent to someone who manages finances for them–take the risk of afoul of the SSA and being prohibited from purchasing guns.

On pages 19 of the SSA’s 41-page overview of the gun ban, we read:

    Under our representative payee policy, unless direct payment is prohibited, we presume that an adult beneficiary is capable of managing or directing the management of benefits. However, if we have information that the beneficiary has a mental or physical impairment that prevents him or her from managing or directing the management of benefits, we will develop the issue of capability. If a beneficiary has a mental impairment, we will develop the capability issue if there is an indication that the beneficiary may lack the ability to reason properly, is disoriented, has seriously impaired judgment, or is unable to communicate with others.

Once the beneficiary has the SSA’s attention–by having someone help with finances–the process of determining mental health status begins, becoming incrementally intrusive. And if a ruling of mental illness sufficient to meet the reporting threshold is handed down, then the beneficiary will be reported to NICS and prohibited from purchasing firearms.



http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/05/05/official-social-security-admin-introduces-gun-ban-benefeciaries/

Rand Paul On Trump: “I’ve Always Said I’ll Endorse The Nominee”









Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, asked on Thursday if he would endorse Donald Trump now that he’s the party’s presumptive nominee, answered that he has always said he would back the winner of the Republican primary.
“You know, I’ve always said I’ll endorse the nominee,” Paul said in an interview with interviewed by radio host Leland Conway. “I said that even when I ran [for Senate] in 2010.”
Paul then turned to criticizing Hillary Clinton.
“To me it’s most important that people know that, for Kentucky, the Clinton’s will be terrible. I mean, she said she’s gonna put coal miners out of business.We’ve lost 10,000 jobs. So I think it’s almost the patriotic duty of anybody in Kentucky to oppose the Clintons because I think they’re rotten at the core, I think they’re dishonest people.”


http://archive.is/Mdflk


 

Thank you for participating in this thread again. How's bernie doing?