However we cannot discriminate the idea of having huge expectations when you start a business. It is simply the reason why you started something and it is somewhat a gamble; no one gambles without expecting to win. Patience and all but such thing would really have a place in every investor's life. Whether settling for the 'minimum' return, is different from being contented. Also, such thing would depend on the individual and take note for individual differences. But most of the time, those investors who are contented with what their business is generating, simply has another source of income. The idea is not to rely on a single source of profit in order to not be weighted by consequences of starting a business.

Trends are good indicators because demand simply controls the market price. What's wrong is to sit on a trend wherein it is a changing factor in the first place. Trend is a good indicator but for a short period of time unlike with price actions which determines the trend. Both are valid I guess, it is just the application of these two which results to wrong doings of investors and traders.
Price correction occurs in every ATH. Maybe if you cannot see it, you are in the wrong time frame. Daily and weekly time frames would show a more detailed price actions. But that is indeed true; good price actions lead to good price trends.

But it still has something to do with accessibility to transact in this technology which I think, limiting its usage, so technically OP is correct. Another limitation is government adoption of this industry as a mode of payment on different transactions which is still a problem up until this point. Given these circumstances, should we be hopeless? If we would be optimistic, things still has aid in the future. There are still countries who allows cryptocurrency usage, and that is something already to consider for a bright future in this industry. Not chaos but problem. However, it won't be a solution indeed given how dependent technology at the present is, on internet connection. We could see this on the advancement of  appliances perhaps wherein most of the new release have the "smart" function which requires internet connectivity, so what more of other technologies existing.

Depends on the project for sure. Staking has its risk of being squeezed between market price volatility. There are staking wherein an investor won't br ablr to pull out his stakes for a period of time so imagine if a market crash occur during that period; the only thing you could do is to wait for things to recover. But staking on the other hand is a good thing to do especially if the project has a good platform such as with Binance launchpads, to give you an example. Most of the release of their launchpads are successful creating profit from staking into it. Ofcourse not all projects would be resulting to something positive, that is the risk already. It'll now depend on what type of an investor you are; short term or long term.

This is the unfortunate reality. I have seen small businesses in my country before, who accepted cryptocurrencies as a mode of payment but eventually decided to stop doing so. There are many reasons; convincing them to do so by giving discount, the fear of losing due to market volatility and such. For now, I think it is better to accept that this industry is not ready yet for such change. It is okay on the other hand to use Bitcoin and other crypto as an investment because it is a profitable one especially if you could manage the risk and make use of the market price volatility.

Let us wait for further improvements and developments in general. Regulation in the first place is struggling to be implied so what more of merchants encouraging people to use crypto as a mode of payment. We'll get into it maybe not today but someday.

On facebook streaming page, problem only is a bit of a delay with the match but that's fine with me as long as the fight is continuous and there are no interruptions with the vid. I am one with those who cannot afford spending money for pay-per-view also, not really that of an avid van to spend more than what I use to bet. Result will come out in the first place and it is enough for me to just watch the game or fight with some delays. If it is just ethical concerns, live streams of a fight or match on facebook are stolen from the main service provider. So if such thing matters that much on your end, go with PPV to atleast give support to the operators of that much or the management itself. Also, on other platforms, such thing is prohibited which pushed me to settle with what I can access.

In most cryptogambling sites, there are options a gambler may choose with regards to the currency as a mode of payment to both withdrawal and deposit. Likewise with fiat based gambling sites wherein different currencies are being used. In my country, our main currency is the mode of payment but I still choose betting using cryptocurrencies; one reason is to avoid taxes especially to my winnings. Tax in my area in particular with gambling is I guess one of the biggest. But for sure it is more convenient given the number of platforms offering gambling games. In cryptogambling sites, I avoid using big tokens because of large gas fees. Alternatives are better in order to lessen the fees.

Sweet words won't mean a thing unless proven. Ofcourse brokers would say things to convince you because it will be profit in an instant. With regards to the idea such that if you've lost much in stock market, then try taking a pause and realize what have you done wrong. Problem for years is that people engage with investments they don't know nothing about, trusting "professionals". Regardless if you are dealing with experienced individuals, you should still know what you are dealing yourself with in order for you to have your own opinion whether to continue or not. Stock market has its own risk. Relying or depending all of your investment to ither people won't do you good in any case. It would be much better to study things before continuing into it.

The price would either go up or down. I think it is more likely to increase this year even if it won't reach its ATH. The market have shown progress already from the market crash since its ATH and that is something already to consider. But as usual, the market price won't continuously increase in a consistent manner; corrections would always take place no matter how we wish the price to not fall. The bullrun is more likely to happen next year due to the anticipated halving but as we manage our expectation, things won't instantly happen. Indeed, patience will be required no matter what behavior the market is showing. Find the right entry points and you will be good to go.

Question is; how would a gambler see if he/she is betting too fr than they suppose to? Problem is lack of awareness. In most of the times, playersold set an amount to bet for the whole day but due to the involvemen of emotions, things are not being followed as planned. Ofcourse it would be easy to say that you are fine losing a certain amount but deep inside there will be that urge to get your losses. And once you got your losses back, there will again that urge to come up with a win. Obviously, self-discipline is the bottomline but unfortunately not all people can impose such thing unto themselves. There will always be underlying factors which will interfere to your plans in gambling.

Advice? I guess it is to not be dependent with gambling money in the first place. Avoid being dragged into the idea that gambling could make you rich someday. I believe this is where all emotions in this industry comes from.

The advice could have been invest only an amount you can afford losing, in that way it would be clear to him what he is engaging himself into. But based on your story, he just invested a little more than his monthly salary, and if that is out of his savings, then that will just be a fine amount and if it won't leave him tight. Also to add, clear your intentions that you have warned him about the risk 'coz if not, we cannot tell by now but once a collapee occur, for sure you'd be one who will suffer from burden and blame. Actually, same thing happened to me before wherein a friend of mine became interested with what I am doing. A crash occured and even if I have mentioned volatility on his end, he still chose to blame me for his losses which is why I never encourage people in this industry other than myself.

AIs won't give accurate prediction. The information they can provide is limited with what is existing and not with information which is not in the 'book'. There could be a textual analysis provided by AI but such thing is not explicit with regards to prediction. In the first place, prediction is a guess based on existing stats of a team perhaps, but anything can happen in the game. This is the downside of AI wherein the information is limited. Also, would you be okay as a gambler to rely with what a computer would be recommending when it comes on betting? 'coz personally I won't. It would be better to lose with my analysis than to lose with other's choice. In such way I would still be able to enjoy what I have speculated.

Bank statement won't expose your private keys but keep in mind filtering the information you will be sending. Also, it is for me fishy in a way that I haven't experienced gambling sites asking for my bank statement rather than transaction history
 But if you think that the site is reputable enough, then it could be worthy of compliance. Bank statement only includes previous transactions as well as balance but if there is other way to get your refund then that would be better ofcourse.
Problem is if such information is required by the gambling site. If that's the case then the player has no other choice but to comply in order to process the refund. However, following transactions would be somehow worrisome so I guess moving to other platform would be a better idea.

That's how money works in any field. It is no longer passion and enjoyment to all players, to some, money matters more. Would it be worthy betting on these games still? I'd say yes. I agree that not all players are into bribery and some are still passionate. But the bottomline is, not a single player would dictate the match outcome so hopes are still there. Even with other sports, I agree that such thing is also evident. But what is our option? To not bet? I disagree. Atleast, I do still enjoy my gambling experience inspite of the idea that results might be rigged. I somehow accepted that fixed matches are existent in sports industry just like with other sport tournaments.

There were some before but were not proven afterwards, which counts as allegations alone. This is how reputation and credentials matter in every platform; no matter how many issues are created, players of a gambling site would still stick to a particular platform. This I think is a factor being not considered by the new ones in this industry; they tend to focus more on bonuses and promotions without appreciating the long term effect of reputation. We have many gambling platforms up until this date and not all sites are reputable enough to be recognized by new players in this industry. What keep players on a platform is the way they trust the service provider.

Would only work if the market price of Bitcoin will consistently and continuously increase. As we may observe market prices are volatile and any news related into it would surely make an impact. So I'd say a regular job is still required or better if you are seeking for stable income without the need of depending on your family. The idea is good for sure, but things just don't work that way and that easily knowing that your source of income chosen has volatile rewards.We are not even aware of until how high the market price be 23 only have to assume its value and wait for things to occur.

Bitcoin and this technology in general are indeed profitable but have you ever wonder why there are still people or investors who are woriknhg still in order to provide sustainance of that.

NFTs would exist as long as the investor keeps it on his wallet address. As far as I remember, once an NFT is sold, the owner will no longer have the possession over it. However, if it is its value which is being discussed to last forever, it is more likely not to happen. First thing is that, the market price of an NFT is determined by demand and supply as well. These factors are highly being affected which could trigger sudden changes withthe market prices. But if it is just total appearance to one's wallet, as long as the platform is there, the artwork would be able there.

If it is investing to NFTs, that would depend on your preference . If you are after easy money then think of all the possibilities. Not all NFTs are working fine as it supposed to. So think of whether it is something worthy of risking your money with?

If you are enjoying where you are spendong or using your money, then that's just fine. What is not is to stress out because you used all of your money into something which will generate profit but will not give you satisfaction or happiness. Things should be balanced; allot money for investment purposes and also, allot for personal entertainment. You'll see; not all people are the same. Some would be fine just enjoying things that much 'coz money is their motivation. While others are prioritizing enjoyment over investments. Eitherway is valid as long as you are meeting your personal goal which is to either earn profit, enjoy, or both.

You can think of many ways to earn profit from investment but sometimes you will have difficulties with finding the source of your happiness. Alike with the counterpart with struggling to dinf that investment and ssacrificing happiness and contentment.

Will such thing occur in this technology? 'coz personally, I'd say never even if regulation occur as long as demand and market supply is there, things will remain the same and it is just transactions which will cost higher in terms of charges. The market price of cryptoa are more likely to still be volatile? Even the market value of currencies from one another declines as a result of economic recession.

So I think, as far as this industry is concerned, some characteristics would remain even in the future; people who spreads both good and bad news in this technology, governments of many country, investors trying to avoid taxes. These contributors would play a role determining whether price of cryptos would be stagnant or not.

I'd say not to avoid a certain player to keep on winning but rather to maintain the gambling site's economy. Think of this instance; a player used huge amount of money and happened to hit the jackpot. We have this thing called prize pool and if in case the multiplier would consime ll of the prize, not to mention there are other gambling games, for sure the platform itself would collapse which would also cause inconvenience to both player and house's side. Other than this reason, I cannot think of other possible reason.Gambling platforms won't limit a player from winning continuously, but atleast with moderation such that not in a single bet 'coz in every round, there are players who are losing which compensates those who loses.