Searching for a game, and guess what !? I literally found two versions of it, maybe could think that is just a displaying bug, but:   After looking on games infos of each version it is been confirmed   |
|
|
|
Users can withdraw faucet balance without any problems.
Then why those rules at T&C about confiscating funds? I have read the whole Terms & Conditions and still do not understand what you consider to be a faucet abuse. We can claim faucet, we can play with that balance, but if we win and then deposit you can take away everything? I understand that depositing to just can withdraw the some coins won from faucet can be considered as faucet sniffing ! Some sites will not be very happy if you find a way or strategy to lead to reaching the withdraw limit while they claim they have a "faucet". Then is in reality just fake propaganda by using the word "faucet" erroneously. |
|
|
|
|
13. Chan Sung Jung
12. Petr Yan
11. Gilbert Burns
10. Tecia Torres
9. Jared Vanderaa
8. Raquel Pennington
7. Jairzinho Rozenstruik
6. Ian Garry
5. Mickey Gall
4. Josh Fremd
3. Julio Arce
2. Vinc Pichel
1. Piera Rodriguez vs. Kay Hansen
|
|
|
|
|
1. Sheffield Utd - 2:1
2. Blackburn - 3:1
3. Peterborough - 1:2
4. draw - 2:2
5. draw - 1:1
6. Nottingham - 3:1
7. draw - 1:1
8. Cardiff - 1:2
9. Swansea - 3:0
10. Stoke - 0:2
11. Fulham - 1:0
12. Luton - 0:2
Sportsbet username: 00016
|
|
|
|
|
Game 1: 50' 4-2 Arsenal
Game 2: 50' 1-2 Chelsea
Game 3: 50' 3-2 São Paulo FC
|
|
|
|
How was everyone's day, any big wins? I managed to scoop a nice little 6-multi @28.59, was also PSV win away from cashing a 700 total odds ticket, funnily the draw (the more obvious pick) was giving me even better odds (800).  Not surprised by Barca and Roma results, expected Marseille to get a more comfortable lead before the reverse fixtures, as it won't be an easy trip in Greece knowing their fanatic fans.  Jesus that is a very good bet, .. truly expecting nothing less from morvillz7z  |
|
|
|
Actually, gambling is not a profitable entity that we are sure we can make a profit if we gamble, unlike investing that somehow gives some assurance. But to choose which one I'd prefer the most, I consider sports games where I can see that it was not just all about luck, unlike in casinos.
Yes sure, beside the fact investing can be in way of just placing money or can be followed by work.., so. The difference is in that betting in sports or in events in general follow (generally (or in the great outlines)) the scheme of if 7 players or peoples from 10 think that the team A will defeat team B then the odds will be of "7 vs 3". What mean that a real advantage for player can be created, in contrast to casino or luck games. |
|
|
|
Nevertheless, I find the rule to be a little vague and the punishment too harsh. Someone can simply make a honest mistake if they don't understand the rules well, but you still get to confiscate all funds. I understand you want to prevent faucet abuse, but I think a better measure would be a wagering requirement for all deposits.
This needs to be addressed immediately as there are players that will really try to use their faucet. Because some won't deposit first because of trust issues. Better be clear if they need deposit first before withdrawal of winnings from the faucets, and if the deposit needs at least 1x wagering requirement. If they are not clear about this, this may possibly give them a headache later on. When talking about "faucet" there is no "abuse", nevertheless not in that interpretation, or understanding. Abuses on faucets can be regarding multiple accounting or contournements to claim multiple times the allocation destined to each individual ! Some sites claim that they are providing faucet, and however if you manage to do money from it they restrict it to you telling that is made just as a recreative way to occupating for (regular players), to use just in example when waiting for a tx confirmation or when the fund are already in a bet ... So it is just a move to trick people they really providing a "faucet", as a free way to give their site a good image. PS: Despite that that will surely not coast very much if allowed, as it needs to made something like ×1000 .. in addition to the fact that it gives to the site activities that bumps the stats ! |
|
|
|
|
Je voulais demander, je me demandais plutôt combien de ceux qui ont sélectionnés Zizi le Zemmour, combien d'entre eux vont effectivement voter pour lui !
Ils voteront Macron, il propose de se racheter avec un peu de bakchich ! c'est comme à la pègre !!
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I remember how SegWit dropped the transaction prices and I guess something similar will have to be created so that more transactions fits into one block. Then maybe the block reward payed only by a transaction fee will be enough. There is yet the very first solution of increasing the blocks size ! The block size was limited at first time because of technical and networking difficulties (largely surpassed now), and the increasing was always part of the Bitcoin conception. It is what was implemented for Bitcoin-Cash, then majority of miners refused the migration so it is what have land to the fork from which BCH resulted. Miners then just won't abandon the income constituted from the tx fees !! |
|
|
|
You shouldn't be claiming that you have a "faucet" if it is just for purpose of testing the game! Some fun coins would be enough for this. What is Faucet?
The Faucet feature allows you get some amount of cryptocurrency to play with for FREE. The purpose of the Faucet is to test the game with zero risk prior to depositing. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is dead Yeah, like the other would say: Bitcoin is dead, long live Bitcoin !
Wow, 19M already ! Do the reward shouldn't be smaller ? !!!! |
|
|
|
|
Pour les entreprises, type échanges etc. qui doivent gérer beaucoup de volume crypto, il existe / on crée des solutions (machines) où on garde les clés privées indépendantes ou déconnectés du réseau, d'où le délai d'approbation, alors la transaction est signée et juste la signature ou hash de la transaction est transmise
|
|
|
|
I am very new to gambling, I am facing many issues for this but I don't understand such as: RTP, house edge I don't understand these things. What should I need to keep in mind to choose a good gambling website?
https://www.gamblingsites.com/online-casino/introduction/glossary/ https://casino.guru/learn-about-games-of-chance-rtp-variance I think so the most important to look for in a casino is the transparency, after that generally all will follow.. Online casinos nowadays can more be considered as service providers, as almost all casinos just provides games created and provided by games providers companies so you can find and play the same game at number of casinos.. So quality of service and transparency are the most important criterias !! |
|
|
|
Les miennes, elles sont dans la blockchain.
Et la blockchain se trouve dans des ordinateurs J'en profiterais pour relever la question posée sur mon dernier Topic: " Bitcoin, preuve de survie !"  Là on pourrait songer à la blockchain sur Blueray peut-être, que mettrais à jour après tes derniers transactions, pour toi je veux dire! |
|
|
|
Bien sûr, j'étendrai ma zone de chalandise et achèterai hors UE mais cela me coutera plus cher, hélas Pas impérativement, la Grande Bretagne par exemple n'est pas si éloignée ! Tu penses à des taxes douanières ?? |
|
|
|
qui serait alors tradable et donc permettrait un retour/paiement aux joueurs, quelle différence avec ce qui se fait déjà, ça me semble pas déconnant. Là j'imagine que l'intérêt / attrait pour les joueurs serait dans la décentralisation, la possibilité de disposer librement de ses possessions sans contrôle ou obligatoirement devoir passer par un tier central, c'est vrai que cela donnerait plus de pouvoir aux joueurs, autant sur leurs avoirs que une éventuelle influence sur l'évolution du jeu.. mais encore beaucoup dépendra aussi du montage/configuration de la blockchain ou coin, en termes des règles de creation, distribution, rémunération, (pouvoirs), règles de législation etc.. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
