Be careful the Munokami.com gambling site, no rain, no lightning, today I saw that my account on the Munokami.com game site has been blocked. Proof: Don't know what mistake i made let alone make a mistake deposit and bet i haven't i did it. Be careful just a warning never make a deposit on the Munokami.com site, most likely after you play and win all your Bitcoin assets will be frozen and lost, sites like this are vulnerable to fraud, be careful to avoid before being made a victim. Did you change computer or internet connection? Is the really the issue with your IP or account? Maybe tra to connect using other provider (mobile, vpn) and see if you are still blocked. |
|
|
|
All Messi haters should only pray that Lewa is awarded for his 2020 performance.
"Haters" is too strong word... On the other hand, if Nobel prize for literature was awarded with a delay (in 2019 they gave prize for 2019&2018), then why not do the same with Ballon d'Or. |
|
|
|
|
Or people are tired of having "one hero", situation similar to F1. Hamilton's domination became boring and predictable, Verstappen maybe is not the kind of person you instantly like, but he is a great opponent and warrior. And many people support him because he guarantees fight and good racing against Mercedes.
Situation in 2020 was really strange, because the whole season was as much impacted by covid as some people stated and Lewandowski was obvious number 1 for the prize - but then it would break Messi's domination...
|
|
|
|
|
What is your budget?
I would recommend my provider, maybe they are not as cheap as Hetzner but contact with support is fantastic. The price for dedicated server would be around 200 euro (gross/month) for Intel Xeon E-2236 6x 3.4 GHz, RAM: 64 GB, 2x2 TB SSD.
185 euro for Intel Xeon E-2236 6x 3.4 GHz, RAM: 32 GB, 2x 1 TB SSD
170 euro for Intel Xeon E-2234 4x 3.6 GHz, RAM: 16 GB, 2x 500 GB SSD (so you would not have raid on that)
DirectAdmin included.
There would be probably also the option for VPS, but max they have is 150GB and you would have to pay extra for HDD, but I do not know if you may buy 800GB.
|
|
|
|
Apart of languages like Turbo Pascal (  ) I think you may start with doing simple things in PHP. And later you will go into Java or C. Or C#. If you know one, you almost know others... I don't think this is a good approach. I find it best to start with a language from the start and focus on that completely. For example choose C# and stick to it from the beginning. You can learn the basics (doing simple things to understand how programming works) to advanced projects such as writing a full node for a cryptocurrency. This way your focus isn't divided among multiple languages where you know like 5 languages but all at a beginners level. Besides, some languages may never be useful like PHP and if you needed to (after mastering that one language) you can quickly learn that secondary language with your background. It makes you a technician, not an IT specialist or programmer. Usually one language is not enough, the more you know the better you are. And I don’t even talk about things like learning algorithms and other stuff you learn during computer science studies, but just the knowledge of differences between languages. That’s true c# is a good choice in general, but it does not solve all problems. Maybe he will switch to building webpages? Or bash scripts? I would say again- there is no one language for all, your problem decides what would be the best tool. But wide scope of education covers many subjects and - what is the most important- teach you how to think as a programmer, not just a dump copy-paste guy. |
|
|
|
I looked in the bitcoin folder and I did not see a debug log.
Could you explain the -reindex or link to a topic that covers it?
When you launch program as a 'bitcoin-qt.exe', add parameter '-reindex', so at the end you launch -reindex throws away the block chain index and chain state (the database of all unspent transaction outputs), and rebuilds those from scratch. It is exactly like downloading the block chain again from peers, except the blocks already on disk are used. I don't have space on the hard drive to run a full node.
You may launch it with prune option specified in program (I even think it is enabled by default), so blocks will be downloaded and processed but only a given space on disk will be taken (for example 1GB). The problem is that if you load wallet which state is before the date of your 'database', wallet will not be opened/functional and redownload of blocks will be needed. If you do not plan to open old wallets but work with only one or create a new one - this is the option for you. |
|
|
|
When I try to sign a transaction with Electrum (and then sign + broadcast with Trezor One), it won't work because of the error "DataError: Expected input with amount".
There is a presentation of that operation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40mdFIAEh4E&t=8376s(jump to 2:48:27) At which stage you have the problem? |
|
|
|
Also if you're not far with the syncing process, you can try to run the program with -reindex and see if that fixes your problems.
Reindex usually works. What you may also do is to delete the whole database and try to download from the beginning (if you have time...). Do you still use Bitcoin Core version from 2015 or the latest one? |
|
|
|
|
I do not remember how it works, but maybe Bitcoin Core is not synced, therefore newly created transactions were not transmitted. The question is at which stage of synchronisation it is. And will it publish transactions when become synchronised?
|
|
|
|
|
Is your bitcoin core fully synced?
What shows block explorer? Any other output address?
Is your input addres emptied? Maybe there was a transfer to change address which is (no idea why) not visible/counted by BCore.
|
|
|
|
When I try to sign a transaction with Electrum (and then sign + broadcast with Trezor One), it won't work because of the error "DataError: Expected input with amount". Hmm... Interesting. It appears that this is what it returns during an improper signing. Checking on github ( #L134), there's a condition that isn't met ( coin.force_bip143 or tx.overwintered). There is also part ( https://github.com/trezor/trezor-firmware/blob/master/legacy/firmware/signing.c): if (!tx->inputs[0].has_amount) {
fsm_sendFailure(FailureType_Failure_DataError,
_("Expected input with amount"));
signing_abort();
return;
}Is it possible that you selected several inputs and at least one of them is empty? Also, as mentioned, I'm willing to pay $1k of BTC to whoever can help me fix this issue We'll need more context to help you. I believe that it's easier to make Electrum detect your Ledger Nano S than the former, so let's focus on that. I think so. First at all - did you update firmware on both hardware wallets? |
|
|
|
Thank you.
Where do I find my "from" address in my Bitcoin Core wallet. I have tried to look for it but been unable to find it.
Do not you see it on recent transactions list? If you know transaction id, you may always get all the information using console: https://bitcoincore.org/en/doc/0.16.0/rpc/wallet/gettransaction/or just use blockchain.com explorer to see details in more 'user-friendly' way. |
|
|
|
When I try to sign a transaction with Electrum (and then sign + broadcast with Ledger Nano S), it won't work because Electrum won't detect the Ledger Nano S.
Which OS version do you have? Newer than 10.14? Does Nano S works correctly with Ledger Live? |
|
|
|
So I make another small sending this time of 0.003.
It get sent, but does not get received.
You should check (using for example blockchain.com) the progress of transaction - is the transaction visible? pending? confirmed? If transaction is waiting in mempool for a long time, it usually means that fee is too low. Do you remember which fee you selected? You may use page https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#BTC,24h,fee to see what is the current fee needed to have transaction accepted (at this moment around 30sat, during weekends it could be 1-2 sat, all depends on number of transactions and number of blocks processed). Do you have one address loaded or many? Check if you have only one output in transaction or many. Maybe amount which you do not see was transmitted into "change" address (but then should be visible in the wallet) - if this is the case look here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5373169.0 |
|
|
|
I would say start with C as your first language then move up to Java. This is how they learn it at every University in my country in courses that have something to do with computer science (or pure computer science). The basics they start you off with is using a Virtual Machine with Ubuntu to start off understanding the basics on a deeper level. I am currently using Oracle VM Virtualbox with an installed Ubuntu VM and basically just using the vim, debugger, compiler and makefiles.
But then again I am just telling you how they do it for first semesters at university. I am no expert. Just starting out.
You can't do anything in blockchain with Java as there are almost no libraries for it (BitcoinJ being an exception). So start with one of C++ (not C because too many libs now require C++ compilers), Python3 or Javascript/NodeJS. I think it should be a bit different approach. In fact there are 2 ways: 1) problem 2) education Ad 1) If you have particular problem, find the best tool to solve it. Are you interested in machine learning, blockchain, computer graphic, music? Each problem has different tools and programs - so you may start to learn how to use them later how to enhance them and at the end how to build your own. If you know the scope or what you want to accomplish, it will be easier to understand the way program works. And reading good program you learn a lot. Ad 2) "Educative" paths are usually similar - you start with writing/designing algorithms, to understand what you may expect from such a stupid machine as computer. Then you start with structural programming and move to object oriented programming. Or typed language. Apart of languages like Turbo Pascal ( ) I think you may start with doing simple things in PHP. And later you will go into Java or C. Or C#. If you know one, you almost know others... Anyway, I recommend that book to read "Clean Code" by Robert C. Martin: https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/clean-code-a/9780136083238/ |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
