How can such a picture be inserted next to the useename or in the social media fields of the profile? The "picture" is a character, it's part of TradeFortress 🏕's username. Back in the days, users had much more freedom to use weird characters in their usernames (and it's always a paid to deal with for data processing). At some time in the past Admin restricted the use of weird characters in new usernames, but the old ones are used to login to they can't be changed. Try search MEMBERS for a weird character, you'll get many hits. Update: I never looked close enough to see what the "picture" is. It turns out it's a Camping Emoji: 🏕 |
|
|
|
Hacker's phone number also is present here: You shouldn't post that here, DOXing should be moved to Investigations:
1. Personal information must be confined to the new "investigations" board (under Scam Accusations), which is only visible to Members and above. Personal information is defined as anything which links a user's online identity (username, email, etc.) to their meatspace identity, excluding links that the person himself has posted. It is not allowed to post somebody's personal information in any other public place, including in signatures. |
|
|
|
Ever since I started this topic, there's been a bug in my code that caused some users to show their userID twice, but I never looked into the reason. While searching for the bug, I found another bug: I didn't have the userIDs for recently added usernames on DT2. If I'd update today, that would be: Username: rxalts (userID 2514450)
Username: DWM14trustbot (userID 2644432) This bug is fixed, and it's also what caused the bug I was looking for. The first username (a Newbie) is included by bavicrypto, and it looks like Trust selfscratching after rxalts left 3 users positive feedback on the same day. Interesting enough this user also received positive feedback from 4 DT-members after buying a collectible coin through escrow. The Collectibles board keeps surprising me in the way they throw Trust and feedback around. The second (a Brand New user) looks like a future project made by DireWolfM14. At the bottom of my DT2-list (see previous post) are the newest accounts. There are more very new accounts (Newbies and Jr. Members) on DT2. I think the users on DT1 who included them use their Trust list in the wrong way. |
|
|
|
Even after changing my e-mail address, my account got hacked again today at 8:15 AM GMT.
I got it locked within 5 minutes. If this keeps happening, you should really improve your computer security. Maybe even consider changing OS? This time hacker has bombarded my e-mail account with spam mails. In last 1.5 hour I have received 3K+ mails. Please suggest a way to stop this bombardment. Other than using a spam filter or changing your email address, there's not much you can do. If your current spamfilter can't handle it, you can consider forwarding all email to another email provider with a better spam filter (Gmail for instance often marks my legit emails as spam, so they just filter a lot). Someone with e-mail id oliverfichtner@icloud.com has hacked my account this time. Their IP address is 179.43.157.33 (somewhere in Zurich). If someone lives nearby then please visit this person. You can email abuse at icloud to report this. |
|
|
|
And what happens if the prediction fails due to a mempool clog? Then it can take weeks, you can drop the transaction, use CPFP, or use RBF. This will probably happen at some point again during the next bull run, and that's all the more reason to consolidate your small inputs before that happens. Which reminds me: I haven't done that in a while. |
|
|
|
We should red-trust the new applicants before this gets out of hand. Gotta protect the gang. Well, the Cycling Fox is red for a reason! |
|
|
|
Honestly, what goes on in this thread when I'm not around? I vaguely remember this indeed, I was having some alcohol and this topic went nuts  Thanks again! What about me? 😉 Somehow my topic turned into a "Apply for Foxpup's Merit Cycling Club" thread  |
|
|
|
To be very honest. What I have found is that most of the people here just merit users with higher rank and do not prefer users with lower ranks. That's not what I've seen. But if you stumble upon new users who make good posts and haven't received Merit yet, please post them in Report unmerited good posts to Merit Source. I'm still looking for a couple hundred good posts to finally empty my sMerit stash  |
|
|
|
Does the low fee 'like 1-5 satoshis per byte' remain during some specific timings? Your best odds for a low fee are on Sundays, but the point of this topic is to consolidate your inputs when you're not in a hurry and when you don't need your funds for a while. So if today's transaction confirms next Sunday, that shouldn't matter. That being said: My Bitcoin Core estimates a minimum fee transaction to confirm in 4 to 8 hours. |
|
|
|
Are you able to include the flag comments? I just did  Unfortunately, in BBCode the comments are on a new line, so I can't easily grep them all.. That works in HTML, but I can't post it.I did it manual, so please let me know if you find a mistake. |
|
|
|
You need to update your data and the claim. Many of the flags are withdrawn Here's an overview of all Flags you've created, 4 of those have been withdrawn: 2020-01-29 Wed 03.18hsource: loyce.club1260 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged andulolika (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, TMAN, TheUltraElite, nullius. Opposed by andulolika[/size]. 1242 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged malwarechain (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, nutildah, Rikafip. Opposed by nobody. 1128 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged Fire Rabbit (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, TheUltraElite. Opposed by nobody. 1119 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged gravitate (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, minifrij, minerjones, Lesbian Cow, Hhampuz, klaaas, hybridsole, ChiBitCTy, AlexSimion, bitenvy. Opposed by nobody. 1098 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged Isiaka208 (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, TheUltraElite, klaaas, roycilik, o_e_l_e_o, tvplus006, shasan, dkbit98, Rikafip, Blacknavy. Opposed by nobody. 1010 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged FruitsBasket (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, owlcatz, TMAN, TheUltraElite. Opposed by FruitsBasket[/size]. 959 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged heresamemo (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, examplens, mosprognoz, fratoshi. Opposed by kingcarsen, heresamemo, tbates76, c5yal8r, manosv[/size]. 958 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged kingcarsen (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, owlcatz, cryptodevil, examplens, nutildah, ibminer, Lafu, TMAN, TheUltraElite, xtraelv, pandukelana2712, IconFirm, charlie137, mosprognoz, notblox1, elmanchez. Opposed by kingcarsen, H055Y, tbates76, c5yal8r[/size]. 957 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged H055Y (type 1, see why). Supported by Foxpup, Lauda, examplens, TheUltraElite, IconFirm, smyslov, mosprognoz, blurryeyed, c5yal8r. Opposed by H055Y[/size]. 934 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged badjacks99 (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, LFC_Bitcoin, The Pharmacist, examplens, TheUltraElite, Hhampuz, CryptopreneurBrainboss, Coolcryptovator, Deathwing, Yatsan, ChuckBuck. Opposed by nobody. 930 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged CoinFoxs (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, LFC_Bitcoin, The Pharmacist, examplens, TheUltraElite, Hhampuz, webtricks, CryptopreneurBrainboss, Coolcryptovator, ChuckBuck. Opposed by CoinFoxs[/size]. 929 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged crex24 (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, Coolcryptovator, TalkStar, Rikafip, hacker1001101001. Opposed by nobody. 921 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged Blazr (type 1, see why). Supported by Foxpup, Lauda, The Pharmacist, actmyname, DiamondCardz, CryptopreneurBrainboss, Coolcryptovator, hacker1001101001, GSpgh. Opposed by nobody. 897 Insufficient support. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged MarquiseMuseum (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, TMAN. Opposed by suchmoon, Welsh, The Pharmacist, nutildah, teeGUMES, pandukelana2712, DireWolfM14, TECSHARE, Timelord2067, exstasie, MarquiseMuseum, xolxol. 886 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged kk80586 (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda. Opposed by dragonvslinux[/size]. *** dragonvslinux commented: Flag lacks proper reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5161689.msg52832048#msg52832048884 Insufficient support. ( Support | Oppose) (Withdrawn!) Lauda flagged dragonvslinux (type 1, see why). Supported by TheUltraElite. Opposed by nutildah, eddie13, Last of the V8s, Steamtyme, Timelord2067, dragonvslinux. *** dragonvslinux commented: Corrected reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2057229.msg52774268#msg52774268*** Steamtyme commented: Flag lacks proper reference. 745 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged DStrange (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, astraleureka. Opposed by nobody. 712 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged jamalaezaz (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, sabotag3x, JollyGood, robelneo, Enre, rhomelmabini, RBF, bobitza, ScamViruS. Opposed by jamalaezaz, rytos[/size]. 709 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged monocolor (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda. Opposed by dvy, SEELE^^01, dragonvslinux[/size]. *** dragonvslinux commented: Flag lacks proper reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5161689.msg52832048#msg52832048694 Insufficient support. ( Support | Oppose) (Withdrawn!) Lauda flagged Negotiation (type 1, see why). Supported by nobody. Opposed by Lauda[/size]. 689 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged hv_ (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, mindrust, nullius. Opposed by hv_, KNA84, Do_zzze, kna, CookyCook72, Yaka_MoZ, AyouthR, Bitcoin SV (BSV), Iamutut, nutlidah[/size]. 676 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged HardFireMiner (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, lighpulsar07. Opposed by HardFireMiner[/size]. 488 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged karatbank (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda. Opposed by nobody. 487 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged Karatcoin (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda. Opposed by nobody. 486 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged nikkybtc Banned! (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, mosprognoz. Opposed by nobody. 304 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged xolxol (type 1, see why). Supported by Foxpup, Lauda, nullius. Opposed by TECSHARE, Timelord2067, dragonvslinux, xolxol, lighpulsar07_alt[/size]. 294 Insufficient support. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged proudhon (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda. Opposed by mindrust, TECSHARE, Timelord2067. 288 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged Khaos77 (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda. Opposed by TECSHARE, Khaos77[/size]. 286 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged Thorecoin (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda. Opposed by TECSHARE, Timelord2067[/size]. 285 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged Pete550 (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, Hhampuz. Opposed by TECSHARE, Timelord2067[/size]. 284 Insufficient support. ( Support | Oppose) (Withdrawn!) Lauda flagged Dogedarkdev (type 1, see why). Supported by nobody. Opposed by TECSHARE, Timelord2067, sunerok, DesktopCommando, drummerjdb666, fuaimo3, ivanvanderkamp[/size]. 103 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged sgbett (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, owlcatz, LFC_Bitcoin, Hhampuz, El duderino_, nullius, sgbett, lighpulsar07, GeoRW, Blockchain0106. Opposed by jbreher, MirkoIta, shavenlunatic[/size]. 64 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged The-One-Above-All (type 1, see why). Supported by Vod, Lauda, xhomerx10, Hueristic, owlcatz, babo, LFC_Bitcoin, yogg, mindrust, P_Shep, BobLawblaw, o_solo_miner, Lafu, TMAN, AdolfinWolf, Arriemoller, Icygreen, d_eddie, El duderino_, cabalism13, ChiBitCTy, dkbit98, 1miau, Timelord2067, legendster, IconFirm, psycodad, ChuckBuck, bitcoinPsycho, mosprognoz, bitmover, blurryeyed, xLays, rhomelmabini, lighpulsar07, GazetaBitcoin, hackerplace, decodx. Opposed by teeGUMES, TECSHARE, Quickseller, FruitsBasket, The-One-Above-All, xolxol, actisstupidname, sock-puppet. 52 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged MemoryDealers (type 3, see why). Supported by Foxpup, Lauda, Hueristic, LFC_Bitcoin, infofront, mindrust, Avirunes, Hhampuz, HairyMaclairy, El duderino_, ChiBitCTy, legendster, mosprognoz, heslo, GeoRW, N0sferatu, ScamViruS. Opposed by theymos, Stunna, malevolent, redsn0w, Slow death, OgNasty, TECSHARE, jbreher, Quickseller, MirkoIta, Murat, lighpulsar07, Khaos77, actisstupidname, above the one above all. 51 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged PHI1618 (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, mindrust, El duderino_. Opposed by TECSHARE, Quickseller, mhanbostanci, 2run, Blacknavy, PHI1618, gospodin, Dogan86, huseyin15, zfrey, vipganyan[/size]. 50 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged crypto-rainbow (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, LFC_Bitcoin, Avirunes, TheUltraElite, Hhampuz, El duderino_, DireWolfM14, mosprognoz, rhomelmabini, N0sferatu. Opposed by nobody. 49 Active. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged deeperx (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, LFC_Bitcoin, Avirunes, TheUltraElite, Hhampuz, El duderino_, mosprognoz, rhomelmabini, N0sferatu. Opposed by Real-Duke, bykardinal, USBitcoinServices.Com, escapefrom3dom, youngwebs, dreamhouse, dvy, ja23, longlivecapitalism, SEELE^^01, bizul, deeperx, dragonvslinux, Porfirii, shyreenjao27, bbvedf, Nico1994, bystander_sss, Sulfurath, nezero, biticoin, iDogLover, kk80586, kenji1286, Alter101, dontrundll32, Nomar[/size]. *** dragonvslinux commented: An opposition reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=516487947 Insufficient support. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged bill gator (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda, TheUltraElite. Opposed by malevolent, redsn0w, The Pharmacist, eddie13, teeGUMES, Steamtyme, OgNasty, TECSHARE, Quickseller, Rmcdermott927, bill gator, Thule, otrkid1970, actisstupidname, BharatDEX. *** Timelord2067 commented: Creator of Flag has locked thread therefore the disqualifying the Flag. 40 Insufficient support. ( Support | Oppose) Lauda flagged Bitcoin SV (type 3, see why). Supported by Foxpup, Lauda, LFC_Bitcoin, IconFirm, mosprognoz, Iamtutut, blurryeyed, GeoRW, korner. Opposed by theymos, malevolent, chimk, CryptopreneurBrainboss, jbreher, Timelord2067, Quickseller, peloso, MirkoIta, hv_, HardFireMiner, dragonvslinux, sirsplashalot, williamuk, actisstupidname, breign. 35 Insufficient support. ( Support | Oppose) (Withdrawn!) Lauda flagged Quickseller (type 3, see why). Supported by mosprognoz, The-Devil. Opposed by theymos, malevolent, qwk, redsn0w, BitcoinGirl.Club, crwth, chimk, DdmrDdmr, TECSHARE, Timelord2067, Quickseller, peloso, lighpulsar07, korner, lighpulsar07_alt, actisstupidname, IMadeYouReadThis, BharatDEX, rakasss. Update: I've manually added the comments to the BBCode. |
|
|
|
|
I've finished re-writing the code for the top-navigation-bar. It now "only" takes 6 hours to update instead of 2 days, and from now on the required processing power only increases at a linear instead of exponential rate.
Out of this 6 hours, 2 hours is for updating the newest version, the remaining 4 hours is for updating the older weeks. This should make it easier to quickly browse the latest Trust list viewer.
It's kind of a dirty code now, so please let me know if anything goes wrong with the navigation bar. So far, I haven't found any bugs.
|
|
|
|
I believe 50% users still didn't earned single merits. That means earning merit is very difficult for them. The percentage is much higher: in the last 3 months, 121,235 users have been active. Many of those accounts are no doubt owned by the same person. In the past 2 years, 32,570 have received at least 1 Merit. It's no surprise that many of those are users can be found in countless bounty threads. I think the straggle to get merit is same to all. For newbies it is considered more difficult To get Merit, you need 2 things: 1. Decent posts 2. Someone with sMerit to give needs to read your posts You're not a spammer, so I've merited some of your posts. The art contest was no airdrop. The merits awarded there were for effort, for hours of labour, therefore I really don't understand why it matters if someone earned 300 merits there or 10. They were not airdropped; they were given for real work. It's not a problem that you earned a lot of Merit from the art contest. The problem will be for you to reproduce this amount and turn it into a consistent flow of Merit earnings. |
|
|
|
No, you quoted PrimeNumber7 first. That was my point exactly It's not allowed to make several posts in a row, so in this case it would have been better to stick to the original thread title. |
|
|
|
I barely look at post titles, and I don't even mind someone "hijacking" later post titles by changing his post title, but it is annoying when I quote multiple posts and copy/paste them together. Like this post: I started by quoting PrimeNumber7, and now it has his post title. That would be fine if I wouldn't have added this, and it's even worse if I quote others too. You can change the topic of a thread using the following procedure:
~ I've never looked that far in that menu, but this is a great trick to know! Note that you can also lose the self-moderated status by moving your topic to a board that doesn't allow it, and you can circumvent the 24h delay on deleting posts by temporarily moving it to another board too. But if I am replying to a reply, I will probably use that post in mine. No sense changing the title to the OP. I'm quoting you, but this post has PrimeNumber7's title. I'm now paying attention to it, but normally I don't. |
|
|
|
I didn't research into YoBit at all because I have believed it's not my job to do so for reasons I outlined above. I had no idea YoBit campaign was ending. It now looks like you're willing to promote anything that pays you, without checking what it is and without keeping track of the campaign thread. That's disappointing for a green trusted Legendary member to say the least. |
|
|
|
The link is not working. Maybe the moderator has deleted all of Zabira's posts. I think user Zabira had posted something copy paste yesterday or the day before which is the reason. I've updated the link to my archived version. Zabira was Nuked indeed. The translation was not proper because most of the part was automated translation. I will translate and share the link with you. It's a risk I took when meriting a translated post from a Newbie in a language I can't read. |
|
|
|
But in bitcoin there is no such concept of "pulling" payment from your wallet as far as I know. The closest you get are zero-confirmation transactions which is obviously unacceptable. What exactly do you mean here? A zero-confirmation transaction still needs to be sent first, and it's not something the receiving party can "pull". I also definitely wouldn't want to manually make the payment every month. And no Bitpay or other bitcoin-on-a-card services. I can think of a way without using LN: you could sign locktime transactions up front. Say you want to subscribe for 12 months, and you want to pay a monthly amount. You could sign 12 different transactions that become valid at the start of each month, and give the receiving party the raw signed transactions. Each month, they can broadcast one transaction and get paid. This requires 12 inputs in your wallet that won't be used for anything else, so it's not really practical. In case you want to cancel your subscription, you can just move all funds to a different address and the locktime-transactions become worthless. If there would be a large demand for such a service, it could be included and automated in a wallet, but I doubt there's much demand. I have some recurring payments (loyce.club domain name for instance), but I just pay them manually. Another argument against automated Bitcoin payments would be the large fluctuations in value. |
|
|
|
Trade isn't an opinion.
You either scam someone, or you don't. If you check my sent feedback, you'll see I've tagged several Scammers without being scammed. If something is an obvious scam, I prefer not to get scammed first, and tag them as a warning to other users without trading with them first. Or are we just arguing whether knowingly promoting a proven scam is untrustworthy behavior? This is a more more interesting discussion. I'd say it says a lot about someone if they're willing to promote a known scam. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
