Hi Wapinter! Thanks for updating the final sheets. Can you confirm is signatures can be removed?
Also I remember there was a post regarding remaining funds being reserved for a bounty that could happen later or increase allocation of existing bounties if many people participated (since only 65% were allocated). Could you please let us know if the remaining 35% will be re-allocated?
Thanks for everything.
I also asked the same question, when can I remove my signature and my avatar? Whether the signature will be deleted after the coins are distributed. The same for me, When can we remove the signature? & Could you please let us know if the remaining 35% of tokens will be re-allocated? |
|
|
|
sounds great, an open platform for medical professionals, that allows specialists to access medical research data in order to build other platforms specializing in a wide array of medical conditions and diagnoses.
I think this is a one of a kind project that is not meant to be taken for granted or ignored considering its significance in human lives. But I also think the DEVS must do their part for this project to be successful.  What do you think that DEVS should do exactly? Ive seen the team and it looks like there are more people from healthcare than DEVS |
|
|
|
I think Mark Space should start looking for partnerships in virtual reality hardware as these tech things start with a successful VR equipment. If not at least the makers of gaming consoles.
Do you think makers of gaming consoles will be interested in a blockchain start up? The same can be said about virtual reality hardware. I believe blockchain still needs time to develop |
|
|
|
I think it’s a nice way to reward investors to offer an early access to the closed beta. I’m really curious to see how the platform will work and how the REPU team will developp the project in the future.
Sure thing.. however if there would be a demo already available I think they would get funding a lot easier. I agree with you. Nowadays a lot of cheating and projects must now not only to promise but also to show the results to convince investors! I think we are sort of seeing that reflected in the market as well. Those that joined crypto in the past months looking for quick gains are now learning that prices can actually go down and that they should DYOR It's hard to imagine how the platform will be integrated and how it will work from the top to the end. As they say we should wait until 2-3 Quarter to test public beta version of the platform. With many blockchain projects/ICOs I really have my doubts because they seem too ambitious. I think many of them (for example healthcare) will be facing legal issues. But for a reputation/rating platform, I think it is easy to implement. |
|
|
|
big team, big project. ok we will see What worries me a bit is that the ICO will take very long. Maybe it would be better for them if they would speed things a little bit up. I think a fast ICO will be enough. When there is a start up with big ideas, it will either be a fail or a huge success. I am hoping for the second one |
|
|
|
What is the main difference between you and other similar health care programs?
I would say the main advantage is the team. When you read their descriptions and google them a little, you will be really impressed by the references all of them posses. Its a perfect mixture of doctors, medical professionals and blockchain experts. Definitely the Ehealth team makes a big difference compared to other healthcare ICOs |
|
|
|
Is it just me or is the orderbook and everything empty so far?  Yes, orderbook is empty. But it shouldn't be tradeable yet, should it? ICO isn't over resp. has just begun. Its is very amazing that MRK token has already been listed on Etherdelta, and that is good for the project. But one thing I've noticed is that its ticker in ED is not MRK but rather it is MARK... Any info about this? So If the ticker is different, could it be that it is not the right contract address? I would be very careful with ED if I where you |
|
|
|
i guess, we are in need of a repu platfform, not only for people, for businesses also. like mentioned before the thing about tripadvisor. that way people can really give out a trusted reputation vote for a company and less fake ones, generated by bot armies.
You are right. In today's IT age, we are in dire need for a platform like Repu as it is a very essential tool that will enable us to make our lives and businesses have a significant advantage over other competitors. It actually already exists, rating is everywhere. There is just not a platform like Repu, so that makes me curious how it will be implemented |
|
|
|
Not so in Russia, there are models, which dont uderstand english, but the can learn the 20 dirty words quickly.  Sure, they'll be probably more busy doing something than speaking english. To chan in written form, they need like 100 most used words. I am sure the ones willing to earn money would manage to learn those words I think when platfrom will be working in full resume and become more popular, than more professional models come to this platform  Professional models will attract more visitors to the website, so in the end it will always be worth investing |
|
|
|
I looked up the profile of every single team member and I have to say, very very impressive! That's certainly a very strong point with regards to credibility.
My question however is, why would i trust the "second opinion" of an online professional over that of a doctor WHO ACTUALLY EXAMINED ME in person?
Because sometimes due to experience or other circumstances some doctor may overlook some simptoms and give an erroneous diagnosis. Thi project prevent these problems as well. Usually machines are more likely to make less mistakes. Who knows maybe in healthcare it will develop the same way |
|
|
|
Wow, really interesting thanks for sharing ! Let's hope that eHealth First in the coming days will provide WP. As for the article: that's cool that other people not involved into this project also noticed its potential. This is a very good sign of successful implementation this is a pres release guys, not an article. it's good for getting exposure but that's it. Even as a press release, it is a good read. It explains in an easy language how the blockchain technology will be implemented by Ehealth |
|
|
|
In this project is as simple as getting on board good models -> get lot of users -> make profit
The platform looking good, so the team is delivering results at this stage for what i can see
Yes, that is true More people watch -> more tokens needed to pay -> the more 1 token cost I see only one competitor for Livestars, it is SpankChain. But I see Livestars name popped up more often than spankchain. To be honest I never heard of spankchain and I think its a very silly name. Who takes an ICO with a name like that serious |
|
|
|
Any new update with regards to upcoming alpha or beta release.? I hope it will come out too soon.
You can see their roadmap in website, where is written: 2018 year (2-nd Quarter) - Closed beta testing of the platform among ICO participants
2018 year (2-3 Quarter) - Public testing of the beta version of the platform
2018 year (3-4 Quarter) - Platform releasewo thats not a long time until then - im super curious Eventually Platform release is not gonna happen for q3/4, not because they can't deliver but because beta testing usually lasts for more then 5-6 months. It's a better safe the sorry situation, I bet that we'll see platform release on q1/2 2019 Building a platform is probably not something you can do overnight, people complaining about the roadmap really dont have patience |
|
|
|
This partners (Jaguar, LendRover etc) invested some money in private sale already? Or what is this partnership?
they will be showing of there products within the mark space Like in a shopping mall as far as i understood it. Hm. really? They will be show every model of their car on MarcSpace platform? Or they will have just their concept and will show on their own websites? They will probably show the newest/best models they have for promotion and marketing. Being in VR is hot nowadays |
|
|
|
It really is a complex project since we are talking about health and how to integrate it into the blockchain and have it access by millions of people wrong diagnoses or posted information can cost someone health.
it is, but if they get it right, they're gonna have first mover advantage and the project could really blow up and go mainstream. I think any ICO or platform that actually nails a big health project would instantly shoot up to top 10 in market cap. The top 10 in market cap should only have projects that exist longer than a year imo, I believe ICO's should first prove themselves |
|
|
|
WhitePaper will be a watershed in this ICO, it will show us what is left to understand, and understand the complexity of the project and the need to extend its roadmap. I believe that after the WPP we will really understand the greatness of Ehealt, even for those who are still skeptical of this
Yes, all will clear up next week - this project can be grand, I hope that it will be so. Medicine is large segment - in combination with blockchain technology this can give revolutionary results. I'm gonna be one of the firsts to try the EHealth brand-new services. I waited for too long for such a company to ever come up online that's what's great about this new wave of ICO's . new companies can try different approaches. But they do need a lot of people / network to be succesfull, and with lots of competition it means ICO's are trying to pull in the same people With so many people eager to try new different things in blockchain, it is not going to be a problem imo |
|
|
|
I think music streaming will be integral to this platform
The developers should be perfecting this now, rather than later. Quality control and scaling issues are best controlled before popularity.
Why is music streaming relevant? Do you know what kind of platform/industry live stars is? |
|
|
|
how market.space will sell its virtual spaces of 8x8 m2.
If I buy a virtual space next to jaguar or any of its great brand my shop will have a lot of value read only if it's in the middle of unknown brand.
I think thats the idea, it is already proposed by many others and I think I also seen other ICOs implementing this idea |
|
|
|
REPU needs not Artificial Intelligence. The Artificial Intelligence are the people who gives reputations and not the maschines  Well in fact they want to work with AI to find fake comments etc. So AI is also needed here. The AI is crucial in order to detect the false comments and i think this is the only way that they can assure at least over 90% accuracy. But devs said some time ago that they are indeed planning to use an AI in order to avoid dishonest and fraudulent behavior and enhance review verification. Check back to the 4th page of the thread. That would be great. The question is how much time will it take for them to implement it  I think the technology already exists. You can analyze rating patterns and scan for keywords among other things. It will take time to learn the patterns though but REPU already said that they will manually check rating in the beginning. You are probably right: one review from a person to person, strict rules for all, order of changing your review etc. Thus they need alive people as well as AI to successfully run the project as designed. Technically speaking, I think it is now already possible Reputation management and rating already exists for many years. Imo this is not a new idea/technology and I think it can be improved by REPU |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
