Why not Craptsy?
Craptsy sucks they have long withdraws of btc and not only.... I don`t like it now ... btw. have a problem. wanted to make the debit_AP the tx went out on c-cex but on block explorer is still unsent and the other address is sent in the same tx just look....wtf? http://scr.hu/1ame/0jebqwow man awesome screenshoter you got there! Thanks for the link  |
|
|
|
|
the last logo is pretty cool but doesn't look like minerals or something starcraft related
But overall logo looks really great
|
|
|
|
Ok, so here are logos that we currently have I suggest a vote Or are there more logos coming soon? |
|
|
|
 a new mineralscoin logo. very cool logo! I think we gotta vote for the best logo. Quite a few logos were posted here, I'll try to gether em all up in one post so it'll be easier to see what's the best one |
|
|
|
Hold for 5% POS and come back in a month. I thought it is 5% per year.. yeah, doesn't look like its 5% per month.. |
|
|
|
Dudes what do you think I should do?
A) Mine multipool with rented cloud hash
B) Mine Minerals with 50MHS of rented hash
C) Buy minerals of that bloody piece of crap called C-Cex (providing I can log in, which I probably cant)
"B" but ~45MH/s on every of 6 pools  Would that work DEV? I guess that would work but thats dodgy. Dev said that he's watching at how fair distribution is going and will take action if someone would cheat the system. |
|
|
|
I don't see no jump  http://scv.minerals.pro/index.php?page=statistics&action=blocksdiff is increasing coz price is increasing, no surprises there Again if you feel like some1 else apart from 6 pools mining Minerals the accurate thing to do is to check if all the blocks are found by these pools or some blocks are missing |
|
|
|
we will see price drop if multipool stops.
Multipool is completely useless ... If you want more investor interesting to MIN..the MIN dev team have to do something others never do!! Yes agreed I feel like "multipool" is better then nothing. It does no harm, but may help, just change its name But I completely agree that we should think of something new. Come on guys, lay out your wildest dreams of what features a cryptocoin should have. Minerals dev will consider implementing it  We're all in the same boat here holding minerals, gotta make it worth much more to get rich! Zach, why are you not content simply mining on one of the NON-MP pools now? I'm mining just for fun, it doesn't matter what or where to mine with my 2 GPUs I'm mainly an investor and I see great future in Minerals. "Multipool" couldn't hurt, but may help so I'm supporting it |
|
|
|
I mined more Lion on the very first blocks @ pool.mn with reward=1 then the rest of the day at Dedicated   Holy shit! 13,496.49 Mh/s out of 19,102.74 Mh/s on Dedicated !! please spread that hash!Off topic again. Again there is a reason why Dedicated usually controls coins. Ease of use. 1. Copy coin address/port 2. Paste in bat 3. Save bat 4. Run bat One user name for all coins. No more setting up miners for other coins. They make it simple for miners. I understand the security risk but I don't leave coins on pools and I use different passwords for every pool so I can live with the consequences of using Dedicated. Just my point of view for other pool owners here why Dedicated is so big. IMHO. Non sense, he got single registration recently, he's been using the old default theme for ages. We got it for 6 months, also only create workers once with us. That is not the reason, its all PR, most of the pools provide the same service as dedicated. your interface is too confusing. Only now people starting to get a clue how to use it. I personally prefer default mpos theme or close to that |
|
|
|
we will see price drop if multipool stops.
Multipool is completely useless ... If you want more investor interesting to MIN..the MIN dev team have to do something others never do!! Yes agreed I feel like "multipool" is better then nothing. It does no harm, but may help, just change its name But I completely agree that we should think of something new. Come on guys, lay out your wildest dreams of what features a cryptocoin should have. Minerals dev will consider implementing it We're all in the same boat here holding minerals, gotta make it worth much more to get rich! |
|
|
|
Your saying, min.multipool will mine other coins to purchase MIN and payout will be in MIN. (in the name of protecting the coins value by purchasing large amounts of MIN) Is this not exactly what blackcoinpool.com has been doing with blackcoin after it went POS? look at their stats now... very low miner count, blackcoin is in the toilet in price again.... that concept is basically failing for the most part. Plus the pool operators there, I think got a little greedy with how they used others hash power to mine and then buy and distribute blackcoin as payment. Any miner with any sense saw it was a bit of a rip-off. For me I still say stay out of the multipool business in everyway shape and form for MIN. Let it be NON-MULTIPOOL if its going to be used as BCPOOL has done. it is failing. Why not just let the average miners and investors set there own course and nature will do its thing with this coin. NO-MULTIPOOL Thanks for pointing out joe  Agree with MinermanNC.. If the idea of the coin is against multypools, whales and so on.. isn't it double dealing to start one yourself? (I see the reasoning behind its short term advantages, but still.. isn't it more important to stick to initial values?) I.e. I would vote against it.. I keep my MINs (mined a bit lately and stopped) and would benefit from it, but would prefer to miss that opportunity than play unfair.. Hm, I see your point. Just to make sure that we are on the same page - Minerals multipool is not mining Minerals but other coins and then buying Minerals on the market. I think that this buying process is what MinermanNC referred to as manipulation. Maybe you guys are right and Multipool is in a sense doing disservice to Minerals' goals. I would be happy not to have multipool ever, lets just agree on this! 1.close multipool.minerals.pro 2.change the domain name to pospool.minerals.pro, leave the same everything else 3.launch pospool.minerals.pro 4.People will cheer |
|
|
|
Your saying, min.multipool will mine other coins to purchase MIN and payout will be in MIN. (in the name of protecting the coins value by purchasing large amounts of MIN) Is this not exactly what blackcoinpool.com has been doing with blackcoin after it went POS? look at their stats now... very low miner count, blackcoin is in the toilet in price again.... that concept is basically failing for the most part. Plus the pool operators there, I think got a little greedy with how they used others hash power to mine and then buy and distribute blackcoin as payment. Any miner with any sense saw it was a bit of a rip-off. For me I still say stay out of the multipool business in everyway shape and form for MIN. Let it be NON-MULTIPOOL if its going to be used as BCPOOL has done. it is failing. Why not just let the average miners and investors set there own course and nature will do its thing with this coin. NO-MULTIPOOL Thanks for pointing out joe Agree with MinermanNC.. If the idea of the coin is against multypools, whales and so on.. isn't it double dealing to start one yourself? (I see the reasoning behind its short term advantages, but still.. isn't it more important to stick to initial values?) I.e. I would vote against it.. I keep my MINs (mined a bit lately and stopped) and would benefit from it, but would prefer to miss that opportunity than play unfair.. I am sure you don't quite understand the concept behind this multipool.minerals.pro as well As I just said "multipool" is incorrect word and confuses people Its not regular multipool as we used to know, it mines other coins, trades it on exchanges for minerals and pays you minerals for mining. |
|
|
|
proof is in the pudding, see what your min payouts are for 24 hours compared to mining in a normal pool and with your own hash.... this sucks, I really thought this coin was going to be a normal open and fair market coin with no manipulations,,, I guess not  yes a multipool buying min for payouts is a manipulation. If you don't like the idea of multipool you don't have to mine there, there are 6 regular pools to mine until POW ends. People were asking for multipool so dev delivered it. Fine by me, the more options I've got the better. I think the issue is that it is bad for the image of Minerals. its just the wrong word for it. People see word multipool and instantly think of something bad. Should be called POSPool or smth |
|
|
|
proof is in the pudding, see what your min payouts are for 24 hours compared to mining in a normal pool and with your own hash.... this sucks, I really thought this coin was going to be a normal open and fair market coin with no manipulations,,, I guess not yes a multipool buying min for payouts is a manipulation. If you don't like the idea of multipool you don't have to mine there, there are 6 regular pools to mine until POW ends. People were asking for multipool so dev delivered it. Fine by me, the more options I've got the better. |
|
|
|
No multipools! maybe I missed something but this fly's in the face of the whole concept. If people want to mine MIN let them join one of the pools already in place through pow phase? Tell me why a multipool should be allowed ...I'm not seeing it.
I'm not sure you understand, the multipool mines other coins and sells them to BUY MIN from the exchange. It does not mine MIN directly. Your saying, min.multipool will mine other coins to purchase MIN and payout will be in MIN. (in the name of protecting the coins value by purchasing large amounts of MIN) Is this not exactly what blackcoinpool.com has been doing with blackcoin after it went POS? look at their stats now... very low miner count, blackcoin is in the toilet in price again.... that concept is basically failing for the most part. Plus the pool operators there, I think got a little greedy with how they used others hash power to mine and then buy and distribute blackcoin as payment. Any miner with any sense saw it was a bit of a rip-off. For me I still say stay out of the multipool business in everyway shape and form for MIN. Let it be NON-MULTIPOOL if its going to be used as BCPOOL has done. it is failing. Why not just let the average miners and investors set there own course and nature will do its thing with this coin. NO-MULTIPOOL Thanks for pointing out joe I still don't see how multipool.minerals.pro may harm Minerals. It may bring 0 effect or increase coin price. You may see price is increasing already after multipool ann so its not 0 effect but minor benefit as of now. |
|
|
|
|
seems like multipool got fixed, can see stats, everything working fine
|
|
|
|
No multipools! maybe I missed something but this fly's in the face of the whole concept. If people want to mine MIN let them join one of the pools already in place through pow phase? Tell me why a multipool should be allowed ...I'm not seeing it.
its not regular multipool as you might know it its a multipool for POS coins. It mines darkcoin, trades it for bitcoins, then buys minerals and pays these minerals to miners. The purpose of this multipool is to allow big wales come end mine minerals is they want. But this time their hashrate can only increase the price of minerals Regular pools are up and running as well but these pools limit you down to 50 Mh/s |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
