Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 05:26:12 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 ... 109 »
161  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Wallet is Obsolete help on: June 12, 2015, 03:09:54 PM
My Bitcoin Core wallet is giving a new error message. It still works but it say the version I am using is obsolete

So, can I disregard the message and carry on or do I need to re - download


Please help community!

To do with BIP66. It is now activated according to http://bitcoin.sipa.be/ver-50k.png

More info: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0066.mediawiki
162  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: I used to Receive on BTC-E, then decided to download Bitcoin Core on: June 11, 2015, 04:31:37 PM
To what extent is that statement true? I don't think that deleting files through software is considered permanent deletion.

Huh

I think he's referring to the way most OSs "delete" files. It's marked as "deleted", but "still there". At least as long as the OS doesn't overwrite that sector. File recovery software might help with that.
163  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: An alternative to spamming the Blockchain on: June 11, 2015, 02:24:36 AM
[...] and then need two months to deploy an emergency hard fork if something bad happens.

Where do you get two months from? The last time there was an "emergency hard fork" situation the matter was resolved in ~ two days, IIRC.
164  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Unconfirmed after many hours........ on: June 09, 2015, 03:45:24 AM
I never even knew it was possible for something like this to happen. I sent it right after blockchain came back from being down for maintenance yesterday.  Do I have to worry?  How long will I have to wait?  Thanks for any replies.  

https://blockchain.info/tx/b8839083ebfce193f7e3d7fc0afcf0c45adf497738650b2e0dec03a186d602a1

Somehow bc.i didn't push your tx to the network. It didn't show on blockr, blocktrail and insight. I have now pushed it manually for you. Shouldn't be long now.
165  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: "cannot open wallet dump file" on: June 09, 2015, 03:27:18 AM
It would be nice for a future version of bitcoincore to include a text versions of the error codes so that users can interpret things like -8 means "missing path argument" or something like that without having to post here or grep through source code for the interpretations.  Don't get me wrong, error codes are useful and awesome, but eventually it's nice to provide a text based version of the error code along with the numerical one.  Really, the numerical one is more useful for API usage.

Open an issue on github.
166  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: How do you prefer to log in? on: June 09, 2015, 03:24:44 AM

Mycelium and, I believe, Trezor now support BitID.
https://github.com/bitid/bitid
167  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: USD volume traded in bitcoin - is the chainblock reliable? on: June 08, 2015, 12:12:34 AM
Whats with the spike in transactions? You'd think this would correlate to a possible price spike? Can anyone determine where it's coming from?

https://www.coinbase.com/charts

Some sort of spam experiment: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1075590.0
168  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Backing up Bitcoin Core on: June 08, 2015, 12:04:46 AM

Is there a Windows version of rsync? Software that does a full backup once and on subsequent backups only copies over the files that have changed (incremental backup)?
169  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Core or XT? POLL on: June 07, 2015, 11:59:44 PM
[...] the miners [...]

Some miners comment here:
http://cointelegraph.com/news/114481/chinese-exchanges-reject-gavin-andresens-20-mb-block-size-increase
170  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Spike in Bitcoin Transactions on: June 07, 2015, 11:53:37 PM

Some sort of spam experiment: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1075590.0
171  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: June 07, 2015, 10:53:59 AM


It's also officially summer.
172  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Welcome to Bitcoin's Boring Era on: June 07, 2015, 10:11:50 AM
Boring in the way that it just simply works?
173  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Core or XT? POLL on: June 07, 2015, 02:15:28 AM
[..]
That's less than 1% of the network. So what's the fuss about ?
[...]

You have been had.
174  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: [ANN] CoinMap - Map showing places where Bitcoin is accepted on: June 07, 2015, 02:07:50 AM

It's down for me. Just the Trezor ad shows in the lower left corner.
175  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Core 0.10.1 has been released on: June 04, 2015, 03:29:40 AM
Could someone explain a bit more about it please, and if you can from the  oldest release, thank you very much.

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Bitcoin_Core
https://bitcoin.org/en/version-history
176  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: FORK POLL - A transactions per second comparison of the top 10 cryptocurrencies on: June 04, 2015, 03:20:16 AM
Historically, the bitcoin community loves to eat whatever Gavin is serving up,  [...]

Huh? Stopped reading after that.
177  Other / Meta / Re: This has to stop on: June 04, 2015, 03:15:44 AM
Just report to mod and be done with it.
178  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bitcoin Node on: June 04, 2015, 02:56:40 AM
What coin would you actually recommend to mine then?

If you're talking about software, you can use cgminer: https://github.com/ckolivas/cgminer

I think it's the most profitable one and it's the one I've used without an issue.

He's talking about making a quick buck.

cgminer is a miner software and has little to do with profitability. Much more depends on the equipment.
179  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: If I am running a node can I make it two? on: June 04, 2015, 02:53:36 AM
Unless you have a complete potato internet i.e you have trouble refreshing this page, you are more than fine on bandwidth.

Some beg to differ:

nullc / gmaxwell:
Quote
On bandwidth, it really is a problem for many users. For buffer bloat affected routers it Bitcoin Core currently makes your internet connection completely unusable periodically, multiple second ping times that kill web loads and knock out VoIP-- even when you are outbound only. After moving to silicon valley and finding myself inflicted with DSL instead of the nice FiOS I had back east, I've intentionally not fixed the problem (by sticking a FQ-CoDeL linux router in front of the DSL modem) for myself at home (because only ultra geeks will use that fix and I want to experience what other people experience), but it's gruesome and I have to turn off Bitcoin during conference calls. (This is also actually a problem on my offices newly installed 160/30mbit comcast service).
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/37vsh4/interview_with_gavin_andresen_and_peter_todd_on/crqlxfc
180  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: If I am running a node can I make it two? on: June 03, 2015, 03:25:12 PM
IIRC, the recommendation is to have just one node to the outside world and all nodes on the inside network connect to that one. Different port won't help, as other clients will look for port 8333. You could consider having your one node available on TOR as well though. That way you'd have "two" nodes, one on "clearnet" and one on TOR, but of course on just one PC with a single instance of Bitcoin Core.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 ... 109 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!