Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 06:11:35 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 [81] 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 ... 164 »
1601  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: GBMiners.com is Expanding, Inviting miners to come join us . on: October 20, 2016, 03:40:59 PM

"GB" is short for GainBitcoin, a company which has difficulty with maths when selling cloud mining contracts, as I point out here.

Their use of MLM to sell contracts is reminiscent of BitClub Network, from whom they steal layout, text and approach and now further copy with their own pool.
They may or may not mine themselves in China with some S9's.
The are owned by "Mark Lee" from Singapore who has had various Bitcoin enterprises in India and a long term relationship (if they are not the same person) with Amit Bhardwaj/Kumar, of late unlamented HighKart fame.
 
1602  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: i want start cloudmining !!! on: October 20, 2016, 03:24:40 PM

Wait What? cloud mining is not profitable at all it's your lucky when you got your money back guaranteed but some of cloud mining are really scammed and they run your bitcoin and you will not really make profit on there sysmtem if you are going to invite those people to register under you then it is much more better to earn money i think.

I think that means you think that cloudmining is not profitable and probably a scam, but it's ok to sell it to other people to collect referral commission?
Nice.
1603  Other / Bitcoin Wiki / Re: Request edit privileges here on: October 20, 2016, 08:47:39 AM
dmor93

As this newbie appears to only have joined BCT to push GBminers, I trust you have mechanisms in place to prevent promotional spam?
1604  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: i want start cloudmining !!! on: October 20, 2016, 08:05:44 AM

 hashocean ..... very good cloud bitcoin mining site you can go for, they seem legit because they have been operating for long time and are still existing till today.

WTF are you talking about?
Hashocean is a collapsed ponzi.
1605  Economy / Investor-based games / Re: There is a HYIP that bothers me ... on: October 19, 2016, 09:45:04 PM
what i want is the expert review and handful of people who got paid ... preferably with proof ...

That won't be of any use really.
A slow burning Ponzi (it has no form of income apart from new investors money) like this, paying <1% daily, can last up to a couple of years.
From now onwards it's downhill, then bye bye if they get lucky with a big deposit.
1606  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: BitClub Network: MLM promises, false testimonials and PoS coin - AVOID on: October 18, 2016, 07:45:20 PM

yeah well, ponzi pumpers are like grass hoppers. they move on, looks one scamcoin is still going strong. forget about this shit, it's the past.

Very true, but there's still 1000's of punters locked into contracts, the only escape being if BCN decide to bin them.
Then there's the going nowhere Clubcoin PoS and, of course, the Coinpay platform that's going to take over the world. Sometime soontm .
1607  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: BitClub Network: MLM promises, false testimonials and PoS coin - AVOID on: October 17, 2016, 10:49:59 PM

As time goes by and BitClub Network becomes yesterday's news for the MLM pumpers, my suspicion that the operation was only ever a Genesis Mining reseller becomes almost a certainty.

Building on this

Quote
Genesis Mining publicly claim to have an Icelandic mining farm, amongst others. Both Genesis and BCN reference the Verne Global setup.
Genesis Mining give no details of their mining pools.
Genesis Mining, since Spondoolies bit the dust, give no details of what mining equipment they use.
Genesis Mining are getting heavy criticism for reducing cloudmining payments to dust

Genesis get lots of stick on here about declining payments and Bitclub's ROI also just stretches further and further, as evidenced by users

Quote from: Chris 99Bitcoins article
I have invested 540 Euro in BTC. That’s about 90 Euro for the one time fee and another 450 Euro for the small pool. The first few weeks I repurchased 100 % and changed this setting to 50 % in May or so.

Today I have withdraw 25 Euro for the second time. So within 200 days I made 50 Euro, a bit more than 10%. Lets do the math: 50 Euro in 200 days makes 250 Euro in 1000 days. That was simple Smiley
In total I have earned 0.28428 BTC and withdraw 0.04748 and 0.045. And of course I lost 0.004 BTC due to the “lower than 2.0 BTC” fee.

Quote from: Max same article
After 200 days I increased my shares similar like Chris. I agree, it should be possible to reach 2 shares at the end of the 1000 days. According to my simulation I have to keep the reinvest on 100% until they reach 1.2. That is because of the compound interest effect. However there will be no profit after 1000 days. The break even is around 1500 days. Assuming same average earnings and similar BTC price.

2 things I learned in the 200 days and through simulation.
1st the mining earnings are constantly declining. They go only up when the market share of Bitclub on the Blockchain increases. But that has been very stable. It only went up significantly when they canceled the 1st share of September 14th 2014 through June 30th pools as mentioned in a comment above.
Since then the earnings have come down to an average level again to about 0.00089 BTC per day for a 500 Dollar pool. The reason why it declines is the market share has stayed stable at about 5 found blocks per day on the Blockchain. At the same time the number of total shares in Bitclub pools increases through constant reinvest of existing members and through selling pools to new members. So the same amount of BTC is divided through more number of shares.

To add further

Genesis has a contract cancellation clause allowing termination if maintenance charge exceeds mining income.
BitClub Network are more basic, they just cancel oversold contracts.
 
Then of course, there's Ethereum mining, started by Genesis at the end of 2015 and, three months later, BitClub offering ETH packages with MLM attached.

And further then, there's the Curious Case of the Super Arbitrage Bot. This of course was openly sold (not sold in the end) as an official BitClub Network/Genesis Mining joint venture, as explained above. Something happened. All of a sudden bullshit excuses from BCN about them being TOO big to operate it properly or smth. Whether or not Genesis are still using this bot on their own account, supposedly have been for three years, is something only they can answer. GLWT.

And the latest coincidence/evidence that BCN are just a Genesis reseller is ZCash mining, Genesis' latest baby. Right up behind them come Bitclub, Zcash mining




"What does it matter," you ask?
"Obviously makes your view that Bitclub are unsustainable look unlikely. If they're "backed" by Genesis, the biggest cloudminer in the world according to themselves, my money should be safe amirite?"

Well no, not really.
Firstly there's no guarantee that Genesis are bomb or market proof. In a mining arms race like we have now, only the biggest will survive and it's unlikely Genesis qualify there. Although if they are using Bitfury gear, their belated announcement that they're finally gearing up with 16nm will at least make Weeks' claims come true, albeit over six months too late.
If Genesis are paying dust to direct contract holders, what chance do investors in a reseller have of making any money, especially when the sales force of that reseller are hiving off probably a third of all new money for themselves, as "commission"?

And what a temptation it must be to keep selling and selling, irrespective if there's nothing profitable left to sell?
That what they do, welcome to MLM.






1608  Bitcoin / Press / [2016-10-15] Business centre 'held to ransom' for bitcoins on: October 15, 2016, 04:06:08 AM
An excellent example of

Poor reporting
Scaremongering
Ignorance

Quote
Locked screens displayed a sinister message demanding three 'bitcoins' in return for the safety of some files.
But the centre's CEO, Maragret McMahon, said they had a "lucky escape".
"We refused to pay the money, which we have been told would equal about £13,000 and reported the hack to the police," Ms McMahon said.
 




http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-37660657
1609  Economy / Investor-based games / Re: Can Anyone Tell Me (and others) What is an Investor- based game ?? on: October 14, 2016, 11:59:09 AM

It's a made up name for the stuff that gets dumped in this trashcan sub forum after the gambling lobby got pissed with these scams turning up on the main Gambling board.
1610  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: CredaCash - completely private transactions in 5 seconds on: October 13, 2016, 12:50:33 PM
So you don't think that verification of your own claims as to the provenance of the sole named member of your dev team are relevant to the credibility of the currency?

The technology speaks for itself, end of story.

You think?
 Cheesy
1611  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: CredaCash - completely private transactions in 5 seconds on: October 13, 2016, 12:29:11 PM
How about answering the simple questions I have now asked twice, based on your website

We're not answering personal questions here on bitcointalk, just questions about the currency.

So you don't think that verification of your own claims as to the provenance of the sole named member of your dev team are relevant to the credibility of the currency?
1612  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: CredaCash - completely private transactions in 5 seconds on: October 13, 2016, 12:19:07 PM
  I'm not sure what other information you're waiting for that we could provide at this time.


How about answering the simple questions I have now asked twice, based on your website

Quote from: Our Team

Project Lead – Allen Pulsifer, BA Dartmouth College; MS Columbia University; many years experience developing complex backend and embedded software systems.
1613  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: CredaCash - completely private transactions in 5 seconds on: October 13, 2016, 09:28:48 AM

I agree that it all sounds very marvelous, but being a practical sort of guy I wonder if you would mind answering these couple of boring questions I asked earlier on the thread. It has been known (shock horror) for alt coin devs to not be entirely what they say they are.
It seems to me that Allen Pulsifer is in his 70's, according to the never wrong Interwebs.
It's great that a septuagenarian would be involved in cutting edge crypto stuff and I take my hat off.
If it is him.

You appear to have lots of Trademarks registered thru Creda Software Inc. Where would they be Incorporated?

How old is Allen Pulsifer?

Quote
Co-Founder and former CEO of $4M/year hardware and software developer.

What would they be called?
1614  Local / India / Re: Amit Bhardwaj/Kumar and a HashOcean clone called Gainbitcoin. on: October 12, 2016, 10:25:48 AM
The Bitex?...

One of Mark Lee's many VariableTech sites, run in India by RADOX, directors Bhardwaj/Kumar (please someone explain this dual identity deal).

All came about mid 2015, Bitex doesn't appear to be active, no turnover listed on Coinmarketcap. The only sign of activity is the BTC/INR ticker appears to update periodically and a chart with some meaningless wide spread "orders".
It naturally links to Gain.
 
It's difficult to estimate the ins and outs of Bhardwaj/Lee's various schemes financially, all I think is that the various facts and figures in this thread show quite clearly that he/they are definitely not to be trusted in any way.
1615  Local / India / Re: Amit Bhardwaj/Kumar and a HashOcean clone called Gainbitcoin. on: October 11, 2016, 08:13:19 PM
That is true BAKA and hello Dhyaan Rakhje I am MBA ( Mane Badhu Aavde) so i know how handle this situation. Mind it or you'll have to pay for that CoolBTC

Are you under the delusion that you're some sort of fucking gangster?

I point out that your employer friend Bhardwaj produces websites where the Universal Laws of Mathematics do not apply, as anyone can see, and what do I get threatened by?

First a lawyer who doesn't know law, then some chode with a Big Man complex.....  Roll Eyes


And take those silly fucking sunglasses off indoors

They make you look like a bhadhava.......A Bhardwaj bhadhava, got a certain ring to it.

1616  Economy / Service Announcements / Re: MINEX.IO (beta) - BLOCKCHAIN PROJECTS AGGREGATOR (THE GAME) on: October 11, 2016, 05:02:05 PM

You guys crack me up.

Along with your continual ninja editing (how many times are you going to change the name of this thread?) you say that first of all you are a
"cloud mining aggregator"
Then, oh, but it's only a
"game, a simulation"

but that you have
"Bitfury mining power in sic rent"

but you still claim a 110% ROI, impossible with your "portfolio", or is that not really a portfolio
then you claim ROI is much higher, but you are
"a kind of bitcoin faucet".

I'm sure you're all reeeeally clever guys, having great fun with your little in-jokes, but all you are doing in real life is what all scammers do: deliberately misleading people and obfuscating the source of income, to take money while attempting to avoid any responsibility.

1617  Economy / Investor-based games / Re: Join zarfund today and make millions with bitcoin. on: October 11, 2016, 10:41:10 AM

Of course there's an admin, where do you think all those upline payments end up? With the admin who created the scheme and are the top of the pyramid i.e. Mr. Jordaan, ex MMM pimp.

Quote from: BehindMLM
As with all cash gifting schemes, once recruitment of new ZarFund affiliates dies down so too will payments within the system.

ZarFund affiliates at the bottom of the company-wide matrix (typically the largest group of affiliates), will stop paying their upline unless they can find affiliates to recruit and receive payments from.

This means the upline stops getting paid. They too then stop paying their upline if they can’t replace affiliates who quit.

Non-payment slowly trickles up the ZarFund affiliate-base until an irreversible collapse is triggered.

At that point any ZarFund affiliate who hasn’t received more than they’ve gifted to the affiliate who recruited them each month loses out.

Pure pyramid scam.
1618  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: HashCоins - Blockchain technologies that work on: October 11, 2016, 08:11:56 AM
Did someone actually recieved physical hardware ?!

Of Course! and I never had any problems in communication!


And who the fuck are you, Mr. 18-months-gap-in-posting-probably-bought-account?
1619  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: Building miner on: October 10, 2016, 01:27:46 PM
say several word about these bitfury chips?    

How about "$1m minimum investment"?
1620  Economy / Investor-based games / Re: Lara with me - Grow your Bitcoin capital with 3% daily profit. on: October 09, 2016, 03:48:32 PM
Quote
Telegram News, [09.10.16 12:59]
LARA COLLAPSED!

Telegram added scam warnings to all the messages from that bot and many people requested withdrawals during the last hours, so the creators took the invested money and run.
They don't really admit it, their argument is that they can not do payouts because their bot is limited, so let's just discuss that:

WHAT IS A TELEGRAM BOT?
A Telegram bot is not some magical smart programm. It is a pretty simple user interface for a programm. Like for example a website.

DOES DELETING THE BOT LIMIT THEM FROM FULFILLING WITHDRAWALS?
NO! If they wanted to, they could also run their programm without that bot (the user interface) and pay all the "investors" their money back. Or programm a new user interface within a few hours (for example a website).
If you still have doubts whether Lara is a scam, them not paying the users their money is the FINAL PROOF!
Without their bot, the withdrawals are now higher than the new investments and the creators took the money and run. Read this picture (https://telegram.me/newschannel/320) to understand.

IS THERE ANY CHANCE TO GET INVESTMENTS BACK?
We fear: No. We are sorry you lost your "investments", but Lara did not create any value. They were a scam, a ponzi scheme, you need to understand that a huge majority of the victims would have lost their money anyway.
Them collapsing early just saved many new people from losing money.
It's pretty simple: Don't give money to somebody you don't know on the internet.

This channel is usually not for news about Lara.
We post the latest Telegram-related news, analyses, comments and more.
We also have weekly competitions to determine a #BotOfTheWeek and #ChannelOfTheWeek (on sundays) and have a #PollOfTheWeek (on wednesdays).
Pages: « 1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 [81] 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 ... 164 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!