Has anyone checked the project website lately? am afraid the project might pose a good surprise, its great upgrade from last year and a regular update with blog on developments. Just maybe the team is really busy with development, my hope is it kicking off this year.

The promise Q3/Q4 is here and expect possibility a second bounty, maybe with a smaller budget like the contemporary campaign to raise aware, wherebye build a large active community except the team is no more interested. I hope the team has learnt a lot from the time off the scene to put a success ICO/IEO.

It was not added that private sales was completed yesterday with decent and moderated medium on investors selection to protect the token on a long term. I think this is a good development on the part of the project's team . I questioned the transparency of the private sale with respect to fund raised and amount of token sold,yet not seen any response. We all still expecting the tokenomics by the end of this week as promised.

I will never recommend buying an exchange token forever, cause most exchnages dont last for long. BNB is good but a risk for long time. try other altcoin that a in privacy coin like komodo, zcash etc. They have enjoyed consistence over the years and kept their place on the top 100 in marketcap. They stay on high volume exchange, so one can buy in any quantity and wont be worried on getting buy orders. Ethereum will still be a good option with the size of token on its platform, which drives the demand.

I also got this decent lady as bounty manager, @hisdearqueen, Can check her group on telegram and mostly starts her bounty thread with new account. She has done 3 campaign this year, 2 listed on exchanges and the other not completed ICO. She made success campaign even for project in the bear market. She is quite professional and listens to hunters. I just hope she got more campaigns and negotiate higher pay.

So why start announcement group since it wont be interactive? however, the trend has changed but most discussion is still within the  forum members and no team member.

I prefer the first with a little adjustment, probably combining the 2 process. The spreadsheet should be submitted, vetted by the team before sending the token to the bounty managers for distribution. There are cases bounty managers have a lot of spam accounts that they reward, in the process diverting the money to themselves and reducing hunters reward. The vetting process can correct such cases

Sometimes I think some managers approach this project for campaign, their negotiation level could bring them on board. I noticed the scam project go after the bounty managers than managers go after them, thats why we have more scam bounty campaign. The trend will change sometimes with the IEO, it is getting obvious that it is pump and dump process, exchanges make more money with it than the project.

There is a level of distraction with most IEOs, they have already had a private sale at different level before getting of IEO. It is distracting to think there are no more ICOs that they just went to IEO. big Investors are still the one eating the large portion of this cake and dont let us be deceived. Get rich in this space and make friends with those that move the space, then u eat on their table with them.

These are legends in bounty management, they wont go for any project and be ready to work for your money with them. You can be assured of good share of percentage among all campaigns and signature campaign enjoys. I dont think they can go for low reward for any campaign and they go fight for the hunters.
I wont want to mention my worst bounty managers on the list, I have reservation for one especially, he need to improve with his relationship with hunters, he is losing leadership position, just tossed up and down, weak and very bad rewards. Have worked with sylon, lauda and irfan_pak10, i want to do that again. Hamphaz,sapta and bubbalex are good and have worked with them, I dont know of others.

I quite support this, we need to let the projects and bounty managers understand that we need a good pay for campaign. They get a good pay for their management and fraud even the bounty hunters. I am more disappointed in bounty hunters glorify and even fight on telegram group at any hunter that show the dissatisfaction at the low reward from bounties. Harmony show a high level of disrespect to bounty hunter paying 15k for over 3 month for hunter and now locking for another 3 months. quite unfair but one will be disappointed when bounty hunters come against you if u say anything, they make hunters sound hungry and desperate. I bet we will start having good reward bounties soon, the confidence is high and every new project will want to exploit it.

Nicholas just announced the demise of this project, so Tonton can shut/lock this thread for life. 

It is disappointing that even with the twitter campaign we couldn't raise the hydra followers beyond 500, the present followers which could include bounty hunters. I seem not to understand how to improve the community with altcoin interest and crowdfunding, this may not affect the progress of the crowdsale but could affect the token trade.

its a very long time you have been away. a lot of off-crypto progresses had been made, like they are following the roadmap but no significant change in the token price. over -100% dump in price after exchange list but we hope as the product approaches trading it could affect the token. The team also promise a buy back at a point, which date confidential.

Just you never read bitcoin whitepaper like I didnt, so will be a large number of people. IMO, there are more important information on bitcoin, which cant be found in the whitepaper but relevant to the space economics. whitepaper should be about the technology and roadmap, and I think a large percentage or whole could have been covered by now.

this cases of locked ERC20 tokens are fewer than raising eye browse. I also dont think not only bounty hunters are victims of the lock. It is disheartening to see team raise fund and decide to lock people's fund compulsorily because they want to make profit without the hunter. There is no reason that justifies that. Bounty hunters and managers need to work together than ever

The big name companies moving into cryptocurrency are using their good names to acrue that big funds, they have enough money in the bank to back it up but if you observed most recent startup in cryptocurrency, they now raised fund below $10m. IMO its a level of correction in the space recently and it doesnt mean that the company wont succeed. It is though important to have capacity to make big volume trade daily in big exchange, we will also need to consider the percentage of the hardcap traded.

If you understand the space u will know that some figure can make significant impact for any type of project because of the experience on how to drive the the token market. It is so unfortunate how Roger var had been criticised but had outperform even ethereum this year but it is important to know the level of involvement of Roger var in the project, sometime they might use his image for crowdfund alone.

It worries me how bounty hunters act around here, they see themselves as getting free token. Project teams and the ICO or IEO are raising fund free fund all in the name of a promising project that will fend them profits. Giving out a share of the project token for advert should be normal thing, they need advert somehow except if the crowdsale is in form of IEO.

When I saw the price movement of bitcoin this year, one can conclude that last year dump was mere manipulation. It is just done to drive away weak hands for cryptocurrency. I expect the price to reach 10k by July but I dont think the news of facebook and other coin could influence the pump. By the time institution had driven the price beyond 15k there is possibilities the whales could take over from there. Bakkt launch will be a very interesting improvement in the confidence of new traders in the next few weeks.