Don't expect to get something better from mercatox. They have got a shit reputation. Check their bitcointalk trust here- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=912990
Can also have a read to this- Crex24.com = 1xBet = 1xBit. Owners of fraudful exchange have been de-anonimyzed
They are a serial scammer and I read somewhere that mercatox has a connection with Crex24, I can't remember where I read it.
Anyway, ever since DOGE has a surge, many exchanges had committed fraud including the top exchanges. I don't think you will get anything anytime soon.

I agree with what you said. It's not possible at all that someone will run a site without any benefits, as we know google ads or any other ads would pay peanut if they enable while with an affiliate, it's very possible to earn a handsome amount, and sometimes, if lucky, a very good amount. Market leaders in this industry are having a huge amount of income from affiliates. Regardless, they are biased all the time, no matter what.

I think it is and it should be fixed. It says "Total time logged in:". Why should a logged-in user be counted more than one time at a time? Regardless of how many tabs they have opened at once, all of them should be counted as one single logged in and that's how the logged-in time should be counted too. Well, as theymos say most of the time, fixing this isn't the priority to him nor does this make a lot of difference but when someone outsider visit this tab, they will have a wrong data for sure and it will take time to discover the truth.

I don't want to say the name of anyone here but all the reviewers are also biased in many ways. For example, in any casino review site, if they rank casinos, they will list the one at the top which provides them the most referral commission. I have seen that almost in every casino review site. Isn't it a biased opinion? Well, I'm aware of both the sites you mentioned and I have to agree that they are quite good in terms of reviewing a casino and helping someone pick the best casino.

It's a problem of signature campaign participants, not a problem for the forum itself. I don't think theymos is going to change/add a rule just to make sure signature campaign participants don't get in trouble. This is not a solid reason, can't be.
It's a pain when you participate in a campaign where you are required to do X times of posts in a single board which was the reason I left OWL.games signature campaign. I was getting tired to force myself to post in the gambling section though I usually post there but having such a fixed rule is somewhat hard to follow.
I would recommend you
1. To stop posting on self-moderated threads though this won't be a solution.
2. Join a campaign where no specific board post isn't required.
3. Join a pay-per-post campaign.

I don't know why this is allowed. A few people post the exact texts and putting a source link makes them a legal post here which sounds too funny to me. If the OP of the post puts no effort at all and don't put some words from their own, I don't think it should be allowed. If I'm correct, there were few discussion on it but never got the attention from theymos or theynos never considered to review the rules.
The rules are back-dated. If I'm correct, it was allowed so that people can share news and continue the discussion while these days, people are abusing the rules most of the time.

You won't get an accurate answer here. Most of the posters will tell you about the casino they are promoting as some of them thinks they should lol. Most of the replies are biased. I haven't promoted stake ever, nor I'm affiliated with them. 90% of the times of my total gambling, I use stake and that's sportsbet most of the times. For other games, I don't have a go to casino. I check a few and try to pick a reputed one.

Can you please sign a message from this address to verify that you are the owner? Though I can see a signed message from 2020. But that has been old I think, your account had some issues back in the day. It would be good if you sign a message from that address.

Done but that doesn't prove the owner to be honest. If possible, please attach a signed message from the above quoted message.

Since 2014?
That's a huge time you spent here.
I have been here since 2018 and I have spent 105+ days here which I myself can't believe when I did lol. I didn't check it earlier but when I saw your topic, I looked how many days I have passed.

I had a look at the bitcointalk stats center, and guess what? I know none from the top 0. Though I haven't checked their profile, I'm sure all of them are bots.

It sounds funny to you. What would happen? Have you thought? I don't know what your perspective is but you know what, if there were no such shitty exchanges, I believe the price manipulation would reduce significantly. They manipulate the market heavily. Now, if they didn't exist, how we would be harmed? Exchanges are key, but that's decentralized exchanges, not centralized exchanges. And you don't know anything that's happening inside. This environment is something we don't see. We only see the things that they want to show us (can't remember the popular quote here).

Lol. I had picked 2-0 a few days back but I was thinking about whether I should change or not because France's front line is something unstoppable. Though later changed my mind and didn't change. Lucky me! There are still 2 matches left, 6 maximum points can be gained. Anything can happen here. There's still a chance that the top 10 will be changed if something different happens lol. Almost everyone has the chance to reach top.

I see, I wasn't sure as they made some confusion. They have been misleading their users? I have no little idea about these matters. I was reading another thread on the same issue. This is very possible that they may create a backdoor since claim it as a hack 
Well, I'm not a user of either of these multi-coin wallets anymore for a long time since I got my hardware wallet.

I didn't know it existed unless theymos mentioned it(not a vouch). He was also asking if someone has checked/used the wallet. It doesn't sound to be a vouch/recommendation Well, unstoppable wallet sounds to be a decent one so far for multi coin but personally, I haven't used that wallet as I don't feel it necessary so far.

1. Yes, it's open source.
2. Have a look here. They claimed it was verified by 3rd party.
Source

What this website has to do with the exchange FUD? And you think this is nothing but harmful for the crypto community? Lol. The FUD going around is people should take care of their funds instead of leaving them in exchange. In other words "Not your keys, not your coins". But you are asking people to stop that? Means you are asking them to leave the funds on exchange? NotATether doesn't promote that of course.
And how exchange FUD and Protecting Bitcoin is correlated? Can you explain further?

First of all, it's a wallet. What it has to have a downfall? It's a product/service we use without paying anything (I think some data is collected). If Binance goes bankrupt, people may stop using the Trust wallet but that doesn't change the fact that "Only you have control over the funds". The wallet can be closed source (afaik, it's open source), but since it's non-custodial, you have nothing to worry about unless a hacker gets control of your phone and steal your assets. However, it's always best to not use a hot wallet. A hardware wallet is the best, you have to spend little money to be your own bank.

Your account was once hacked if I'm correct. Maybe it has been hacked again lol. Hacker and you are accessing the account at the same time. Maybe that caused you the error. I can't see any other reason. Be aware mate, secure your account  

Would that happen if someone is logged in and other isn't. I think no though I'm not sure. In case of logged in users, it's very unlikely I think because only a very few person uses the forum through TOR (guess without stats).

You don't have to beg but have his attention lol. The comment from Lyn Alden is more than enough I think. Once it receives enough attention from the community, I'm sure it will get the attention from Elon Musk too.

However, I don't think Elon is going to be such harsh and delete all the inactive accounts which belong to famous people.

Who else think the penalty was a wrong call? I don't know if Modric has told it in real or not but few media is covering that he told after the match. I believe too that it was a wrong call. In no way, it should be a penalty call, same as the other two in favor of Argentina. First one against Saudi Arabia and second one against Poland if I'm correct.

ME ME 
Unlucky me! Got 37 win but most of them are CLOSE result.

I think so but it's not going to be the same as Argentina vs Croatia I think. Morocco will push hard, they have proven them already.

So far, in this world cup, betting based on higher odds had a great time (Saudi, Morocco, Japan, Korea), the same I had in the cricket world cup. I was able to win 7+ odds going with a underdog. Morocco has been playing good since their first match, they were pretty good so far. It will be hard to beat France but who knows, maybe they will make the final this time.

Good luck to you SeeBiscuit.

I don't have a lot of funds in any exchange. I frequently used Binance in the last bull run, have used ftx for lower withdrawal fee only lol. I can't exactly remember if I had any fund there. Even if I do, I'm sure it will be less than $10 lol.
But few of my familiar guys from my facebook group had some good amount of funds. I have alerted them not to store fund on any exchanges but who care. They never heard my word.